Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

BCB Interview: Cubs Chairman Tom Ricketts (Part III)

Tom Ricketts, Chariman of the Chicago Cubs, greets fans before the Opening Day game against the Milwaukee Brewers at Wrigley Field in Chicago, Illinois. (Photo by Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images)

The third and final part of my interview with Cubs Chairman Tom Ricketts touches on TV territorial rights -- something I know is a key issue for many BCBers -- as well as what he hopes to accomplish in "Year Two" of the Ricketts family ownership of the Cubs.

Many thanks to Tom for his time and his candid answers to my questions. I hope to be able to do this again later in the season. And now, it's almost time for real baseball to start as pitchers and catchers report to Mesa on Sunday and will have their first workout on Monday.

Follow me past the jump for Part III.

Star-divide

BCB: Is there anything that surprised you about your first year?

TR: Well, there’s a pretty steep learning curve on a lot of different things. A lot of the more subtle parts of the operation, but in terms of surprises, I don’t think there’s anything that really sticks out as a surprise. But obviously we’re still learning and we have a lot to learn to get better.

BCB: Getting to something specific, were you pretty sure Lou was not coming back?

TR: It was left open to start the season. It was one of those things if they had gone well and Lou had felt like that he wanted to continue managing and he had a pretty good season and things had fallen into place, it was possible. But we did anticipate the mid-season shifts, and I think we did our best to get through that.

BCB: Let me beat the drum for television broadcast rights again. You know that certain places are blacked out and certain people who read BCB in Iowa can’t watch certain Cubs games. Is there anything you can tell them about whether broadcast rights will be opened up so that anybody who pays to watch a game can watch a game, no matter where they are?

TR: I know we talked about this last year. I know that Crane knows more about it than I do. I don’t’ know what kind of flexibility the league has on it. I guess it’s a territorial…

BCB: It’s a territorial rights that dates back to the 1970s that .. I don’t have the specifics, but these areas were all carved about by the different teams and so certain teams can prevent other teams from carrying their games in those markets even though those broadcast channels don’t carry the games anymore. You know, pretty much everybody’s on cable these days or satellite.

TR: It’s worth revisiting. Obviously there’s some pretty good reasons on the front end for these territories and the idea of just defending your space for your team. But as people have stopped going over the air maybe those reasons don’t exist anymore, but let me check that.

BCB: How does it feel being the new kid on the block?

TR: First of all, Chuck Greenberg (Texas Rangers) is the new owner on the block, right? But the owners have been universally supportive. It’s a good group of people. I think the Commissioner’s been great to work with. He’s actually been very, very helpful on a handful of different issues. So, so far, so good. It was relatively smooth. I’ve got a pretty steep learning curve on that too. The fact is that I can always call the Commissioner. I can call Jerry. Everyone is pretty open.

BCB: Despite the North Side - South Side rivalry, you and Jerry Reisndorf get along well enough?

TR: Absolutely.

BCB: What would you say your goals are now for the next year?

TR: First and foremost, we want to start wrestling this Wrigley issue to the ground. I think we owe it to everyone to take these issue head on and try to get through them. Obviously, always improving as a team on the field. Looking at ways that we can get better; I think that’s something that just never ends. With respect to the in-game experience that’s sort of a thing that never ends. We started a lot of initiatives last year. Obviously, the Ambassadors, we tried a lot of stuff. We did a lot of surveys for the first time. We’re really trying to understand what we can do better in the park on an ongoing basis. I think that’s another thing that’s good for next year. Just a lot of work.

BCB: In those surveys, was it 37 percent are from out of town or first timers?

TR: In the two weeks that they were in the park, the people they surveyed, 37 percent were from out of state. But it was a week in August and a week in September so it was probably kind of skewed a bit. I don’t think we have that kind of numbers in April or May but I think we use it as just how indicative of how powerful an attraction Wrigley is from a tourism standpoint. And you know as well as anyone, you can be sitting next to someone from Ohio or Iowa.

BCB: I always find people from out of town.

TR: And the other thing that was interesting about those people from out of town, most of them came because they wanted to come to a baseball game at Wrigley. Most of them aren’t convention goers, or happened to be around or visiting a brother-in-law who’s graduating from college…

BCB: They came specifically to go to Wrigley?

TR: I think most of them were Cubs fans, but I think people come because Wrigley’s unique and it is baseball the way it’s always been. It’s definitely got a special charm to it.

BCB: You’ve got the longtime cable exposure from the ‘80s and ‘90s. There are Cub fans at BCB that have never lived in Chicago. They became Cubs fans because they could see them on television all the time.

TR: And we understand and we get that part.

BCB: This is where the territorial rights come in. you’ve got people who at one time could see 140 games on WGN and now they can’t. Okay, so some of them could pay extra, buy an Extra Innings package and see it, but there are some who pay for that and still can’t because of the territorial problem.

TR: Right. I’ll look into that territorial thing again.

BCB: One of the things that I have noticed, watching you from spring training on. That first day when you came out to the berm in Mesa and you were swarmed by people -- it seemed you weren’t quite ready for that. But as the season went and you settled into the role of the face of the franchise and you got out and talked to people and listened to people, what did you hear? Did you hear complaints? I heard "Can I have a picture with you?" but what did you hear?

TR: There’s a couple of things. I think really early, like in the spring training games and in the first few weeks of the season it was a little overwhelming because I think that people didn’t really realize I’d be there a lot. So by the time that we got to the middle of the season you’d see me come out to the bleachers, and I’d walk around every game. People got used to seeing me there so it got a lot more comfortable where I could just sit down next to someone and just talk. That’s when it got easier at the park, no question to get around and talk to people. And a lot of photos. That happens. But as I go around and talk to people, it’s all over the map in terms of what they want to talk about. There are some people who have specific issues or suggestions and we acted on some of them. Sometimes I’ve walked into an usher who had a suggestion and we’ve used that. I think one thing that we’ve learned in our first year is that communication can get better around here. I don’t think that a lot of the suggestions get up to the level that they can be acted upon and our people don’t know what the process is for a suggestion is to get to the right level. Some people had suggestions on general manager or manager, and I don’t mind that. That’s great. That’s a really healthy thing to talk about. That’s a fun thing to talk about. Even for me, even though I can’t say anything, it’s fun. I would say that literally of the thousands of people that I met in the park or at the airport or anywhere last year, I could name two that I thought were inappropriate. And one was just a young guy who was over served who misunderstood, he thought we were putting in some kind of PSLs or something and he was afraid of PSLs. And one was just an odd cat out at the All-Star Game who didn’t like our pitching coach. But those were very isolated instances, and I think people were opinionated but respectful.

BCB: Speaking of PSLs. No plans for PSLs?

TR: No.

BCB: Do you feel any particular pressure personally when you hear people say: "Why doesn’t Tom Ricketts do this" or "Tom Ricketts needs to do this" or "Tom Ricketts is the one who we’re blaming for this".

TR: I guess ultimately someone has to take the blame for everything. I guess you have to accept that as part of the job. I mean, I really don’t worry about that too much, to be honest. I think that my goal is that everyone that does spend a few minutes actually watching the team knows that the family and I are doing everything we can to hit those three goals, and we’re looking at very long days looking at very creative solutions and pushing really hard. And when you read something or you see something unflattering about me, maybe in respect to the bond issue or you hear somebody say something that’s not true… hopefully most people discount that stuff appropriately. And ultimately what we have to be known for, or what I have to be known for is being a guy that went to war for the team on the topics that were important and got us to a level of success that we hadn’t been to before. So the only way to really gauge what we’re doing now is to fast forward 10 years and look backward because we’re not managing toward how people feel today, we’re managing toward how people feel in the future and you just have to keep the big picture in mind whenever you hear people concerned about any type of individual decision or something that did or didn’t happen that may or may not have upset them.

BCB: Is there anything else you want to say in conclusion?

TR: I’m excited about Mike Quade. I really am. I am excited about Quade but I think here's another case where maybe the media created a problem that didn’t exist -- the Sandberg issue. I mean, Ryne and I talked throughout the process. He’s a complete gentleman. We have a good dialogue, we have a good relationship. I think it just seemed the media was try to make a lot more out of it than just the fact that Jim, and we support him 100 percent, made the call on the guy he thought could win the most baseball games. And to read any more into it than that is not productive.

BCB: So the door is always open for Ryne Sandberg to come back?

TR: From our standpoint, Ryne is always a Cub. He’s always been part of this organization. To the extent that if there’s a role for him in the future that’s more specific than that, we’ll always be open minded. And frankly, with all sincerity, everyone here wishes him the best and success in the future. It’s nothing but an incredible amount of mutual respect that I think all the parties have in this case and I just wish him all the best.

Comment 160 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Some thoughts:

1) Congrats on scoring the interview, Al. Been here since 2005 and I don’t think I ever thought the owner of the Cubs would be sitting down here for an interview. That’s awesome. But that leads me to 2…

2) It’s obvious you got this interview because the Cubs knew you wouldn’t really grill TR. Most, if not all of the questions were slow pitch softballs lobbed right to him.

3) What is TR POSSIBLY going to do about the territorial broadcast rights? As far as I understand it, that issue lies with Selig, not the owners. And as long as Selig is the commish, be honest with yourself: Do you really see him making a change? It’s nothing short of idiotic that these archaic ‘territorial rights’ still exist. If they haven’t figured that out in the last 5 years, I have little faith they’ll figure it out in the next 5.

4)

BCB: In those surveys, was it 37 percent are from out of town or first timers?

TR: In the two weeks that they were in the park, the people they surveyed, 37 percent were from out of state.

This part almost seemed scripted… you already had the answer to your question before he even spoke. It actually makes me wonder if your questions were given to him ahead of time. I’m not accusing, I’m just saying stuff like this makes it seem like there was prior knowledge.

5) The Ryno question… in what galaxy would TR have thrown him under the bus there? I know people got emotionally invested in that decision, but there’s no WAY TR comes out and says that Ryno isn’t welcome back.

Overall, this three part interview was definitely an interesting read, but what did we really learn? Was there anything critical about the Cubs brought up?

PS – I can’t believe you didn’t mention your bleacher security concerns when TR was talking about the in-game experience. And the ushers. Why are they so difficult about the simplest things?

by Schwa on Feb 11, 2011 8:20 AM CST reply actions  

No, that question was something that was known before hand...

… just wanted some clarification.

I didn’t feel the questions were “softballs” at all. Yes, maybe I could have asked other things. But I know I’ll be able to sit down with him again. Sometimes you have to lay the groundwork.

Regarding the territorial rights, this isn’t Selig’s call — it’s the owners. Some of the small market owners balk at letting this go. I’m hoping the Cubs can be in the forefront of getting this anachronism eliminated.

Regarding bleacher security and ushers, I have mentioned this to several members of Cubs management in occasions separate from this interview. Trust me, they know how I feel. If things don’t change in 2011, I’ll let them know again.

I don’t know exactly when I’ll be able to do this again, but I know I’ll be able to do another one sometime in the future.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 11, 2011 8:26 AM CST up reply actions  

...
Regarding the territorial rights, this isn’t Selig’s call — it’s the owners.

Good to know. I guess my confusion came from the fact that Selig almost ALWAYS is the recipient of the hatred over this issue, especially here at BCB. In fact, I feel like you’ve criticized him before when discussing that issue. I could be wrong about that, and I don’t really feel like searching back.

I know it’s not baseball, but I would have been interested to hear his thoughts on the pending NFL holdout. Mainly because the owners play such an (obviously) pivotal role in that. But like I said, this was an interview about baseball for a Cubs blog. Just something I think would be fun to hear his thoughts on.

by Schwa on Feb 11, 2011 8:39 AM CST up reply actions  

I believe Selig...

… is the master of non-action re: territorial issues (and a lot of other stuff, too, like replay review). If the majority of owners wanted to dump the territorial restrictions, I think Selig would go along with it.

MLB’s labor deal is up at the end of this season — so maybe in a future interview, that could be a topic.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 11, 2011 8:40 AM CST up reply actions  

Completely agree with this!

When Selig finally leaves, I believe baseball will quickly move to catch up with the other major sports in areas such as replay.

by TJ11 on Feb 11, 2011 8:42 AM CST up reply actions  

Agreed.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 11, 2011 8:49 AM CST up reply actions  

I am not a big believer in age discrimination...

I am very much about the best person for the job no matter race, gender, or age…BUT I do wonder if the game has passed Selig by.Holding a manager on to long only messes with that team. Selig is screwing up an entire league and i can’t believe the other owners do not see this….

Again not a big believer in forced retirement, but somehow his exit needs to be moved up….

by TJ11 on Feb 11, 2011 8:55 AM CST up reply actions  

You may be on to something here.

While someone his age (76) can still do his job, I do think the game has passed him by. I like tradition and history, too, but sometimes things do need to be changed (like replay review).

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 11, 2011 8:58 AM CST up reply actions  

Well...

I’m not a big Selig fan, but he’s shown a willingness to change. He wanted to expand the playoffs this year.

by Shanghai Badger on Feb 11, 2011 11:05 AM CST up reply actions  

True.

But that’s about the only innovative idea I’ve heard from him.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 11, 2011 11:10 AM CST up reply actions  

Innovative = money making

Hence the reason for Selig being behind it. More playoff games = more revenue = more profit.

"Manny Trillo is coming in to pinch run. You know, for a lot of teams, you would pinch run for Manny Trillo." - Harry Caray

by Archie on Feb 11, 2011 3:13 PM CST up reply actions  

He wanted to...

expand the playoffs post season TV revenue this year

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Feb 11, 2011 12:18 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

That seems to be about

more money. I’d guess the owners pushed that issue to Bud rather than hime initiating the idea.

If a quality pitching start is 3 runs and 6 innings, then a quality hitting day is 1 for 4.

by tharr on Feb 11, 2011 2:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Well I think the other owners are doing just fine.

It’s a business. As long as they keep raking in money, they won’t push for anything to change. Even the Pirates make plenty of money due to revenue sharing.

by Schwa on Feb 11, 2011 8:58 AM CST up reply actions  

The Pirates are what is wrong with baseball....

Getting other people’s money and not using on team building…..

That said, I worry the Cubs will become more like them than the elite teams as the big contracts come off the books. I hope I am wrong!

by TJ11 on Feb 11, 2011 10:28 AM CST up reply actions  

Selig is against territorial restrictions

since the day he cluelessly found out about then when he tried to watch a game somewhere and was told he couldn’t because of blackouts. Al’s right though, Selig has no power on this, it’s all the owners.

I wished that RIcketts would have shown more awareness of this issue, but unfortunately, its the small market teams that keep this thing alive.

by Josh Timmers on Feb 11, 2011 11:53 AM CST up reply actions  

Territorial rights

I live in the Memphis area and I get blacked out by 3 teams and 2 of which I can understand somewhat but the 3rd is just crazy. St. Louis, Atlanta, & Cincinnati. I suscribe to the extra innings package but am really considering not suscribing this year which would be the 1st time in 5 years. I can’t believe in 2011 this still has not been addressed.

by Cubsfan Waveland on Feb 11, 2011 8:44 AM CST up reply actions  

Kick the Reds Out

They can keep their territorial rights to middle and east Tennessee, but the Reds don’t need to have a claim on west Tennessee.

2011 - The 103rd time is the charm.

by memphiscub on Feb 11, 2011 12:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Amen

I live in Bloomington, IN (1 hr drive south of Indy for those of you who aren’t familiar) and I’m blacked out of the Cubs. Like I’m going to drive 4 hours to the ballpark every day. One Way.

"Manny Trillo is coming in to pinch run. You know, for a lot of teams, you would pinch run for Manny Trillo." - Harry Caray

by Archie on Feb 11, 2011 3:15 PM CST up reply actions  

Again though

MLB doesn’t have blackouts to force you to purchase tickets to the game. That’s the NFL and it’s the source of the biggest confusion around. (Although I’d argue the NFL is keeping the policy in place for other reasons than selling game tickets these days.) If that was MLB’s policy, they’d lift the blackout for games sold out 72 hours ahead of time like they do in the NFL.

MLB doesn’t expect you to drive to Chicago to see the game. They expect you to call up your local cable company and demand that they carry CSN Chicago. That’s the point of MLB Blackouts, although technically they were designed to protect the syndicated TV packages of the 1960s and 1970s that mostly don’t exist anymore.

by Josh Timmers on Feb 11, 2011 10:29 PM CST up reply actions  

they were designed to protect the syndicated TV packages of the 1960s and 1970s that mostly don’t exist anymore.

These regional TV networks don’t exist at all any more. For example, the Royals keep blocking the Cubs from parts of Iowa that they no longer telecast games to. It’s pigheaded. It needs to stop.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 12, 2011 7:39 AM CST up reply actions  

I think its pretty obvious TR

has not thought once about terretorial rights. He really had nothing to say about it and didn’t even really know what the question was about.

I’m feeling that somewhere around 100% of owners in baseball probably have this same outlook regarding territorial rights. The only time they care about them is when it effects them (i.e., like when the Expos moved in to the Orioles territory in D.C.).

Life is tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid.

- John Wayne

by Tackle Box on Feb 11, 2011 9:22 AM CST up reply actions  

Re: softballs

I’ve thought about this a lot reading this over the past few days. I think Al said it correctly — he COULD have asked other things, but the questions he asked weren’t really softballs.

Without opening the debate up again, Al clearly feels that the Joe Ricketts/politics issue isn’t as big a deal as I and others do. As a result, he didn’t press that issue as much as I would have.

But I’d say that falls under “interviewer’s discretion.”

by elgato on Feb 11, 2011 9:55 AM CST up reply actions  

I think getting answers to questions about players...

… would be more up Jim Hendry’s alley than Tom Ricketts’.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 11, 2011 10:32 AM CST up reply actions  

I'd like to do one.

Maybe I can get that arranged, too.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 11, 2011 10:51 AM CST up reply actions  

That would be cool....

Please let us get a few questions in….

by TJ11 on Feb 11, 2011 11:45 AM CST up reply actions  

Al

Al I think this is an example of how professional you are that you can use in help in getting Hendry for a sitdown.

I know if I were Ricketts after the way you did the interview I’d put in a good word too.

Nothing happens unless it's first a dream

by puckishcubsfan on Feb 14, 2011 7:19 AM CST up reply actions  

Thanks for the interview Al!

These were great.

Chicago fan stuck in Florida.
RIP Ron Santo

by alkappy on Feb 11, 2011 8:21 AM CST reply actions  

I thought the interviews were able to reach some areas that normally would be broached...

So nice job Al.

He did seem to spin the usual company line many times and came off sounding like a politician.

He did not talk about players very much. I would have liked a few questions asked about decisions hendry has made. But I guess if you want to be able to interview him again in such detail, you would have to leave out some of the more difficult questions.

All in all it was well done. Especially if you are wanting to know more about the business side.

by TJ11 on Feb 11, 2011 8:30 AM CST reply actions  

He did not talk about players very much. I would have liked a few questions asked about decisions hendry has made.

While that’s interesting, a few problems:

  • TR isn’t a baseball guy. There are more knowledgeable baseball minds on this site.
  • No way he criticizes Hendry. Just no way. That question would have been spun off so quickly your head would spin.
But I guess if you want to be able to interview him again in such detail, you would have to leave out some of the more difficult questions.

Bingo.

by Schwa on Feb 11, 2011 8:34 AM CST up reply actions  

TR may not be a baseball guy, but he is supposedly a big Cub fan.....

He would have an opinion….

But you are correct, the Earth would probably spin on his answers alone.

I would like to see Hendry answer questions from fans live. Not like the convention where there is not a lot of follow up.

But the Cubs are used to the beat reporters not asking obvious tough questions so why take it from fans.

by TJ11 on Feb 11, 2011 8:46 AM CST up reply actions  

That's what most journalism has become.

No one in the White House Press corps ever follows up a vague answer from a President with what an administration would call an impertinent question because they’d never be called on again.

by the nth on Feb 11, 2011 12:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks.

Things like this lay the groundwork for some future talks where maybe I can ask more in depth questions, or maybe even have a session here where he’d take questions from BCBers.

Good point, too, on “sitting across the desk”. Something to ponder.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 11, 2011 3:05 PM CST up reply actions  

perfect reply to a lot of posts here

well said, rec’d

Chronologically inept since 2060
Q: Why did Chuck Norris cross the road?
A: Ditka
Ditka's mustache can block a Chuck Norris round house

by Cubbie-Tim on Feb 11, 2011 7:49 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree, if you push too hard the interview is going to stop and you’re not going to get any real answers and probably won’t get chance at an interview at a later date.

by Villeslgr on Feb 13, 2011 7:05 PM CST up reply actions  

True story
…beat reporters not asking obvious tough questions

Back when I was doing pre- and post-game shoots here, Ron Gardenhire was holding a small post-game presser in his office, and the Twins had just lost a one-run game after winning in a blowout the night before. I was there solo, placed my stick mic on the table for sounds.

One of the print guys actually asked something along the lines of whether they wished they had a few of the runs from the preceding game back.

Gardy gave the guy a look that said “I can’t believe you’re actually asking me that!” without uttering a word.

Cliches in action, film at eleven!

by MN exile on Feb 11, 2011 1:30 PM CST up reply actions  

I wonder if he would ever sit down for a live internet chat with fans?

He may not like the questions……

It would test his spinning skills greatly!

by TJ11 on Feb 11, 2011 8:32 AM CST reply actions  

I wonder if he would ever sit down for a live internet chat with fans?

I’ve thought about this. If I can figure out a way for him to do it, I’ll try to ask him if we can arrange it.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 11, 2011 8:39 AM CST up reply actions  

Another suggestion would be for an interview with some BCB member questions asked by you

Give us a thread to post our questions, tell us to vote on what we want to see asked by rec’ing, and pick the ones with the most recs. You would have a chance to clean up wording or veto any trollish questions before talking to him.

by madcow256 on Feb 11, 2011 9:14 AM CST up reply actions  

That's a possibility.

I’ll work on this.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 11, 2011 9:43 AM CST up reply actions  

Good to know.....

“as a fan of the cubs as you said you were before you bought the team, what did you think of the Milton Bradley signning?” Have you ever had a discussion with Jim Hendry about that move and the fact your first offseason needed to spent unlaoding his massive mistake?

Thank you,
You friend-TJ11

Would that fly?

by TJ11 on Feb 11, 2011 10:36 AM CST up reply actions  

Sure.

I don’t know what kind of answer you’d get, but it’s not an unreasonable question.

Although, it’s kind of water under the bridge now, isn’t it?

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 11, 2011 10:51 AM CST up reply actions  

I think it would be a glimpse into the mind of Ricketts as a fan.

If he was not bothered by that, he is not the Cub fan he says he is…

by TJ11 on Feb 11, 2011 11:46 AM CST up reply actions  

Pithy?

Contributing Editor, SB Nation Chicago. Please follow us on Twitter!

by daver on Feb 15, 2011 12:53 PM CST up reply actions  

From experience

In non-baseball-related areas – those things tend to turn into utter chaos very quickly.

What I would like to see is a live-streamed interview with (moderated) email questions. Hell, I’d help you webcast that one.

by MN exile on Feb 11, 2011 1:32 PM CST up reply actions  

And one day, Tom will be saying this

TR: And the other thing that was interesting about those people from out of town, most of them came because they wanted to come to a baseball game at Wrigley in Schaumburg.

/sarcasm

"Easy on the words, brother,'' Quade said.

by RiskyBusiness on Feb 11, 2011 8:59 AM CST reply actions  

Sarcasm is right.

It’ll never happen.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 11, 2011 9:16 AM CST up reply actions  

Sink or Swim test

Ideas like this always sink or swim when say them out loud.

"Easy on the words, brother,'' Quade said.

by RiskyBusiness on Feb 11, 2011 9:24 AM CST up reply actions  

Interesting read, one concern though

BCB: What would you say your goals are now for the next year?

TR: First and foremost, we want to start wrestling this Wrigley issue to the ground. I think we owe it to everyone to take these issue head on and try to get through them. Obviously, always improving as a team on the field. Looking at ways that we can get better; I think that’s something that just never ends. With respect to the in-game experience that’s sort of a thing that never ends. We started a lot of initiatives last year. Obviously, the Ambassadors, we tried a lot of stuff. We did a lot of surveys for the first time. We’re really trying to understand what we can do better in the park on an ongoing basis. I think that’s another thing that’s good for next year. Just a lot of work.

I apologize, tried the blockquote thing and can’t seem to figure it out. Not too computer smart here.

It almost seems like winning is an afterthought. I’m not saying that the other things mentioned aren’t important, but shouldn’t winning have been the very first thing he said?

Did you get any impression on what he feels the team’s chances are this year? Does he feel, like many of us do, that this is kind of a “play it by ear” season? Hope to be competitive, but really waiting for some contracts to fall off the books?

by Southside Steve on Feb 11, 2011 9:20 AM CST reply actions  

I apologize, tried the blockquote thing and can’t seem to figure it out. Not too computer smart here.

First copy and paste your quote in the message box. Then all you do is highlight it and click those blue quotation marks above.

by katie casey on Feb 11, 2011 9:26 AM CST up reply actions  

Another point on block quotes

They do not work well with paragraph breaks.

"Easy on the words, brother,'' Quade said.

by RiskyBusiness on Feb 11, 2011 9:28 AM CST up reply actions  

Like this?
First copy and paste your quote in the message box. Then all you do is highlight it and click those blue quotation marks above.

Thanks! And d’uh on me.

by Southside Steve on Feb 11, 2011 9:31 AM CST up reply actions  

Yay for me!

I feel like I’ve accomplished something today. Maybe now I can get my butt into the office.

by Southside Steve on Feb 11, 2011 9:41 AM CST up reply actions  

Oh, my.

Now you’ve deflated my ego.

I tried turning my laptop upside down and typing, but that didn’t seem to work too well.

by Southside Steve on Feb 11, 2011 9:54 AM CST up reply actions  

Sorry.

Here.

To make the graybar you need to put an @ before and after a comment and it can’t be done in the subject line.

by katie casey on Feb 11, 2011 9:59 AM CST up reply actions  

Thank you.

Will you be my Yoda? Much I can learn from you

by Southside Steve on Feb 11, 2011 10:05 AM CST up reply actions  

YES

"Baseball is ninety percent mental. The other half is physical." -Yogi Berra

by imacubman on Feb 11, 2011 3:09 PM CST up reply actions  

I didn’t know how either!

"A dream you dream alone is only a dream. A dream you dream together is reality." John Lennon
"My favorite food is Macaroni and Cheese, from the blue box." Geovany Soto

by Cubbiegoon on Feb 11, 2011 4:37 PM CST up reply actions  

The winning is secondary is what i got out of that as well....

As long as the park is full I guess….But that is too becoming an issue….

by TJ11 on Feb 11, 2011 10:26 AM CST up reply actions  

Those kinds of issues were more in the first two interviews

I do think there is a pretty hard baseball operations budget through 2013. What I hope that means is that the lower Major League payroll in 2011 will mean more money spent in the draft and player development. That will improve the team more than any FA who was on the market this offseason.

by ClarkFan on Feb 12, 2011 9:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, that surpised me too.

Even some cliche about getting back to the playoffs would’ve been better than nothing.

GM's are in charge of Managers, not the other way around.

by shoemile on Feb 11, 2011 12:58 PM CST up reply actions  

well, i think that you have to ynderstand that he is being asked questions from a business standpoint,

and he is a businessman, his mind is on business. he has people to take care of the baseball side of things. thats my thought…i could be totally wrong though.

I just want to win...

by bilbosbuttons on Feb 11, 2011 7:27 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks Al.

Really enjoyed the interview.

by katie casey on Feb 11, 2011 10:01 AM CST reply actions  

Congrats on getting the interview Al

Unfortunately, I don’t feel like I have a better handle on what Ricketts has in mind for the club for the future.

One thing that I don’t like is the idea of team-owned shops, restaurants and bars in Wrigleyville. I imagine more things like the Captain Morgan club. Corporate, sterile and boring. No thanks. I also am not in favor of the team taking over the rooftops.

I do wonder though if Wrigley can generate enough revenue to keep the Cubs at the top of the heap. Although we complain about ticket prices, there is a price to pay for not having some of the other revenue-generating items that newer ballparks have.

by JSB on Feb 11, 2011 10:31 AM CST reply actions  

Here's the thing about team-owned restaurants & bars.

If they’re not better than the ones already in the area, either in price or food/drink, people won’t go there.

Same thing on the rooftops. If the Cubs bought them and didn’t provide good value, people wouldn’t buy the tickets.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 11, 2011 10:34 AM CST up reply actions  

It could ruin the atmosphere though

Part of the charm of Wrigley and the surrounding neighborhood is that it doesn’t feel manufactured. If the Cubs put up a bunch of shops and restaurants that had a corporate feel, it would ruin that. Same as if the Cubs bought the rooftops and made them all the same.

by JSB on Feb 11, 2011 11:29 AM CST up reply actions  

Right.

They have to be very careful how they program these things.

They could, for example, put a Harry Caray’s in the Triangle Building. That would work, right?

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 11, 2011 12:55 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

And what's that healthy/diet meals service that Santo was always pitching?

Something about Alpaca Taco Pie being his favorite flavor? (obviously I have it wrong – at least I hope I do. That’s just how it always sounded to me over the radio)

Ahh… got it. I think it was Seattle Sutton or something like that. They could have a little booth/counter somewhere in the Triangle Building so folks could order up something before/during the game and then stop by after the game to pick it up and take home a nice healthy meal for dinner.

Put Todd to work on this one – he’s the healthy/nutrition Ricketts, right?

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Feb 11, 2011 3:00 PM CST up reply actions  

The bars have already been manufactured

Casey Moran’s looks like Merkle’s which looks like Rebel which looks like Rockwood which looks like The Yard which looks like The Stretch which looks like the remodeled Sports Corner.

Big wooden bar, flat screen TVs, etc.

These are not all mom and pop little bars. The corporate money is already in Wrigleyville and it’s not just the Cubs.

"Easy on the words, brother,'' Quade said.

by RiskyBusiness on Feb 11, 2011 5:46 PM CST up reply actions  

That's true

But none of those are as bad as the Captain Morgan Club.

by JSB on Feb 11, 2011 7:46 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

It is shoe-horned in there

And the outside looks really cheap. Plaster?

"Easy on the words, brother,'' Quade said.

by RiskyBusiness on Feb 11, 2011 8:04 PM CST up reply actions  

True.

My guess is — once the Triangle Building goes up, the Captain Morgan Club vanishes.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 11, 2011 9:27 PM CST up reply actions  

It can probably be a little bit more expensive, due to the fact it's connected to the ballpark and would be "official".

On gamedays, the Triangle Building Cubbie Bar would obviously be packed.

Just spitballing here – I’d probably be willing to accept the Ricketts’ proposal, if they were willing to accept the idea of an “escrow-style” account, to be funded by a 2-3% tax on Triangle Building revenues.

Then, to the extent that the marginal increase in the amusement tax is actually sufficient to cover the Wrigley bonds by Year 35, the Ricketts get the escrow funds back. If there is a shortfall with the amusement tax revenues, the escrow funds would be used to cover the shortfall.

And in the interim, the Cubs would be put in a position where if they tried to pass the cost of the tax on to the customers, the existing businesses would enjoy a bit of a competitive advantage. Which is only fair, because the Cubs would be getting hundreds of millions of dollars for essentially free.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Feb 11, 2011 2:28 PM CST up reply actions  

That's not a bad proposal.

Something similar could be proposed when they revisit this later this year.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 11, 2011 3:06 PM CST up reply actions  

I also am not in favor of the team taking over the rooftops.

Why? That would be a significant chunk of additional revenue for the club which could allow them to increase payroll, spend more money on the draft, hire more scouts, or in a nutshell, do all of the things that most of us Cubs fans want the team to do

by magicblue on Feb 11, 2011 1:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Because I think it would turn all of the rooftops into a variation of the Captain Morgan club

The rooftops are fun because they are independently owned and operated. If they were owned and operated by the team they would likely become more like luxury boxes than rooftop parties.

by JSB on Feb 11, 2011 2:03 PM CST up reply actions  

It depends on how they'd be run.

They could still be run the way they are now, only with the money going to the Cubs instead of the private owners. They’re essentially luxury box type parties now anyway.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 11, 2011 3:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Having been to luxury boxes and rooftops they are far different

Although the crowd at the two might be similar, the way they are run is far different. Food/drink is far less corporate and more backyard bbq.

I really don’t see the Cubs continuing to run them the way they are now if they bought them. To me it wouldn’t be a good thing for the atmosphere at Wrigley.

by JSB on Feb 11, 2011 4:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Why wouldn't they run them the same way?

If they’re successful the way they are, why screw with it?

The difference is, too, that you can’t see the game very well from the rooftops. Thus, you can’t really market to the same crowd.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 11, 2011 4:26 PM CST up reply actions  

When was the last time you were on a rooftop?

I just don’t see how the Cubs would be able to maintain the independent feel of the rooftops. It seems likely that they would choose one model and run all of them like that.

by JSB on Feb 11, 2011 4:42 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd like to think...

… that they could keep each one running the same way it has, maybe even with the same managers, just the money would go to a different place.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 11, 2011 4:50 PM CST up reply actions  

The value proposition to Rooftops is different from the Luxury Boxes

I wouldn’t feel very luxurious sitting on a bleacher on a roof top, as high as the upper deck reserve seats, and the farthest person from the game.

Luxury Boxes are at least on top of the game.

"Easy on the words, brother,'' Quade said.

by RiskyBusiness on Feb 11, 2011 6:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Yep

Luxury boxes are about entertaining your guests. Not catching a ballgame.

by JSB on Feb 11, 2011 7:47 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

I for one who got to meet TR feels

he is a genuine, thoughtful person who takes this organization very seriously and does care enough to listen. I was the Old Style Fan of the Game; got on the field for pictures and TR struck up a conversation with me.My first reaction was not the lasting reaction. I remember him not trying to brush me off and actually cared about the conversation and acted interested. Of course my first reaction was “WOW THIS IS AWESOME!!”.

Al, great article, great groundwork at future conversations. I wish TR and family success, because I wish the Cubs team success. Ten years down the road is exactly the time to evaluate their tenure, I hope it starts with “Ending the draught”.

We'll miss you Big Boy. #10 for Hall of Fame.

by mrcubsfan on Feb 11, 2011 11:05 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

As an Old Style Fan of the Game

are you planning to buy a Six Pack plan today?

by katie casey on Feb 11, 2011 11:10 AM CST up reply actions  

No. I'm in Iowa,

I usually plan 2 or 3 trips into Chicago on weekends that fit my schedule. Of course the games I’m looking at are all the premium games. Hard on out of towners to get to Chicago for value dates. Guess I will bite the bullet.

We'll miss you Big Boy. #10 for Hall of Fame.

by mrcubsfan on Feb 11, 2011 12:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Completely OT:

If you live/work in the city, the Southern’s Mac and Cheese truck is absolutely delicious. Bacon and bleu cheese = WIN.

by Schwa on Feb 11, 2011 12:22 PM CST reply actions  

Don't tell my wife

She’d absolutely leave me for someone that could provide her Bacon and Blue Cheese anything on a regular basis.

by Josh Timmers on Feb 11, 2011 12:34 PM CST up reply actions  

I have to find that.

I live pretty close to the Southern, and most of their stuff is pretty delicious. Brunch can turn into an all-day event when they have some sort of Shiner Bock deal going, which is almost always.

MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown

by D98 on Feb 11, 2011 2:33 PM CST up reply actions  

I wish

I would’ve seen a little more about Rickett’s vision for the baseball team. I thought that would be coming in one part of the interview, but it never happened. I agree with those above who were disappointed that the first thing he said in terms of goals was “this Wrigley thing”, and nothing to do with baseball.

I think a lot of us hoped that Ricketts, being a Cubs fan, would be single-minded in his desire to win (a la Steinbrenner), not single-minded in his desire to enhance the business side. I don’t mean spend recklessly, I mean be passionate about winning above everything else. Winning seems to be an afterthought to Ricketts. He seems to want to maximize his profits first, and then focus on winning in due course.

DEJESUS!!!

by tomas21 on Feb 11, 2011 1:48 PM CST reply actions  

It may be an afterthought.

Or it may be that he’s fully confident in the people running the baseball side of things. I think both scenarios are cause for concern.

GM's are in charge of Managers, not the other way around.

by shoemile on Feb 11, 2011 1:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Similar to....

……the Favre/Van Susteren interview.

by DavidArthurKingman on Feb 11, 2011 2:54 PM CST reply actions  

Great 3 part interview Al

Couple of things. I think TR does want to win, but there is no question he really wants to get Wrigley refurbished. That I take is No. 1.
 I thought your questions were no soft balls, fair and reasonable. I take his family is in this for a long haul.
 My one beef with TR is the Sandberg situation. It seems to me that Quade was the only choice and any one else getting a interview was a second thought.
 The next time we see Sandberg in Wrigley is when he is managing the Phils in 2013.

by Grockcubs on Feb 11, 2011 3:14 PM CST reply actions  

I disagree with you on the Sandberg thing.

… and I doubt he’ll ever manage the Phillies.

The Wrigley refurbishment is something I think he wants very badly because of the new revenue sources the Cubs can get from that. That could produce larger payrolls going forward, which would help the Cubs win more consistently.

At least that’s my take on it.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 11, 2011 3:29 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't know Al

Once the Cubs started winning games in September, the vault was closed. Quade won the job, that is my opinion.
 And I think Sandberg has a good shot if he holds his own. I think the Phils brought him on board with the possibility of replacing Manuel. Not saying it is in stone, but the opportunity is there. Lets put it this way, he has a better chance of managing the Phils than the Cubs.

by Grockcubs on Feb 11, 2011 7:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Sandberg's future with the Cubs ...

hinges almost entirely on what happens in the next two seasons. I really can’t see a situation where Jim Hendry hires Sandberg.

But if the next two seasons don’t show significant signs of improvement, I’m guessing we have a new GM and a new manager by 2013. And that could open the door for Ryno.

Note that I’m not hoping the Cubs suck for two years in order to give Sandberg the job.

by elgato on Feb 11, 2011 3:50 PM CST up reply actions  

actually, they'll show some promise this year, and just enough improvement in 2012...

…to get Quade a 1 year extension. Then the bottom falls out in 2013 and the Cubs will be on the hunt for a new manager again.

Hmm… let’s see… I wonder what current managers out there have contracts expiring in 2013? Hmm… I wonder…. ;-)

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Feb 11, 2011 7:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks Al and Tom.

I enjoyed reading the interview and look forward to future interivews.

A lovely story:

One day, long, long ago, there lived a woman who didn't whine, nag or bitch. That would be me....

But that was a long time ago and it was just that one day.

The end

by sue369 on Feb 11, 2011 4:29 PM CST reply actions  

the irony in the entire 3-day interview is

he made fun of the patchwork job done to Wrigley and how it really needs an major over-haul. And then I am thinking, ’just like your major league team, huh Tom?"

I keep waiting for him to realize the Major League Team and Organization needs this same over-haul. Hendry is operating in a piece-meal state plugging a hole in one spot to open a gash in another. If he wants to spend $200MM of his own family money, invest in the entire organization—scouting and player development. Don’t ever get out-bid for Chapman! Don’t get outbid for Darvish! And when you sign those guys hold a huge press conference and have them give out 5,000 Cubs jerseys to all the kids in that area building the Cubs brand. Then that next kid will want to be like the star before him and want to be a Cub.

Increase scouting departments domestically as well as globally. Spend the money on people who can find more talent to pipeline into the orgranization. Find those hidden gems. Pay overslot on the draft—just import the most talent as possible. By increasing your player development you win in 2 ways—increase your chances of acquiring proven major league players in a trade or infusing homegrown talent will lower your payroll during cost-controlled years opening up other revenue streams. Spend your money in your system.

Instead of having 1 manager, a pitching coach, and 1 “all other” coach and the team trainer on every minor league team. Have a fuller staff where there is a specializes hitting coach preaching the same philosophies as the organizational “head of hitting” and have the same reporting structure for the pitching coach, IF/OF coach, baserunning coaches. They should be solely focussed on developing the players. Beef up the staffs and hire organizational department heads responsible for hiring the minor league coaches, teaching them on the Cubs philosophy, and then holding them accountable to develop the players. But it starts with the top guy on down.

This whole notion of a “roving” instructor is garbage. You see the guy for 3 days, work on some things and then don’t see him again for 60 more days. Have a real development plan. Example, do you think Starlin Castro spent more than 10 days per year with Bob Dernier learning the art of stealing? Hell no he didn’t. They should have spent months together, not days.

So, Tom, if you are reading, please spend your money building the organization. I know I am in the minority, I don’t care about Wrigley Field. I want a World Series winner and I’ll root, cheer, and spend my money wherever the Chicago Cubs play. I want your first thought to be on the team on the field, not on the building they play at.

by socalbob on Feb 11, 2011 5:09 PM CST reply actions   2 recs

With the renovations and Triangle Building construction

It looks like they’re trying to ensure that the Wrigley “complex” is a money maker even if the team sucks.

GM's are in charge of Managers, not the other way around.

by shoemile on Feb 11, 2011 5:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Which could be an insurance plan, if you plan to radically restructure how operations are run in the future. Create a reliable revenue stream and then attack some of the on field product problems in ways you might have been reluctant to try for fear of hurting your revenue.

Or not, maybe i’m just dreaming.

by Villeslgr on Feb 13, 2011 7:21 PM CST up reply actions  

Create a reliable revenue stream and then attack some of the on field product problems in ways you might have been reluctant to try for fear of hurting your revenue.

I believe this is exactly the plan.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 13, 2011 9:09 PM CST up reply actions  

no, I don't

At least not to a grand scale. And, let me ask you, why is it that everytime he speaks about #1 priority or things top of mind that it always starts with Wrigley Field and not the Cubs product on the field.

I think he is focussed so much on Wrigley like it is an amusement park much like if Disney soley focussed on Disneyland and Disney World and forgot Mickey Mouse and the Princesses. Without the characters there is no Disneyland or Disney World. I think he would be a better far return on investment loading up the organizational staff. The problem is he has people selling him on their way and their way is antiquated and “it’s just how it’s been done” for years on end in baseball. Invest in people, first, and then worry about the building.

I’m not down on him. I just wish his focus was the team and organization and those 2 things were first from his mouth.
BTW, Nice work. It’s not everyday we get to hear the words directly from the horses mouth when it comes to owners in sports.

by socalbob on Feb 12, 2011 4:31 AM CST up reply actions  

As I have said elsewhere...

… getting Wrigley renovated and getting that building constructed will give the team new revenue sources that they can use to increase player payroll and do some of the other things you’re talking about.

It doesn’t happen overnight.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 12, 2011 7:40 AM CST up reply actions  

it's backwards, in my mind

if he has $200MM to burn, then spend it on the organization. The buildings can wait. Get the team on the field and in the minors churning out annual talent to the big leagues, then fix the buildings. Make the commitment to the players first and foremost, and us, the fans, will come out as we have. There is not a revenue “shortage” for the Cubs.

by socalbob on Feb 12, 2011 10:51 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

But if they fail in their efforts to strengthen the team and their decisions don’t work, fan support continues to decrease and will become harder to win back all the while your revenues are decreasing.

It seems like the family is really counting on revenue from the team to fund their operations.

by Villeslgr on Feb 13, 2011 7:23 PM CST up reply actions  

they have been able to fund

their operations without all of that in the past while maintaining a top 5 payroll. And they apparently have $200MM ready to dump into Wrigley.

Winning baseball will bring more dollars than crappy .500 or below baseball with great facilities. I still maintain it’s ass-backwards thinking.

by socalbob on Feb 14, 2011 8:56 AM CST up reply actions  

In the past it was different ownership.

I’m not saying it’s a smart decision, just that this might be the thinking behind it.

by Villeslgr on Feb 15, 2011 3:52 PM CST up reply actions  

I get where you're coming from but if TR doesn't talk about these things (rebuilding Wrigley), who will?

It’s not like he has a strong and highly visible president on point for all this. Sure, I suspect Crane has a lot of responsibility in this area, but he’s not the public face of the rebuild Wrigley effort – Tom is. Tom has to be – right now there’s no one else.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Feb 12, 2011 10:47 AM CST up reply actions  

does it matter?

my point is for him to say “the priority is to put the best talent on the field and it starts with an organizational philosophy about producing the best hitters, pitchers, and fielders the Cub fans deserve. Therefore, we have hired………..(fill in the blanks) to oversee all these areas of development adding staff in each minor league city to teach our kids daily so when they arrive in Chicago, they are ready to play as a part of a perennial World Series contender. In additon, we have hired 50 (just throwing a number out there) scouts both international and domestic and have increased our budgets to attract, sign, and develop the best talent in the world—period.”

When given the chance to speak what is top of mind, he starts with Wrigley Field and that disturbs me. I think it is lack of baseball accumen that forces him to the business side of the facilities instead of the team/players. You can put it on a spreadsheet and run numbers and projections on buildings, you can’t solely do that on people or player development. He is a great business man and his previous track record proves.

by socalbob on Feb 12, 2011 11:04 AM CST up reply actions  

I think you answered your own question/concern - lack of baseball acumen

He may be a big baseball fan but he’s not a baseball guy – how many owners are?

If it’s baseball specifics you want, I think you need to look to the top baseball guy for those answers. And that would be Vice-President/General Manager Jim Hendry.

Lou Brown: "My kinda team, Charlie, my kinda team..."

by ballhawk on Feb 12, 2011 11:46 AM CST up reply actions  

There is probably a happy medium.

I imagine we’d all be saying the exact OPPOSITE thing if Cuban had gotten his ownership bid through. He’d be sitting behind home plate shrieking at the umpires… BUT WE’D DAMN WELL KNOW HE CARED ABOUT WINNING.

I was always behind the dude (and to be clear, i LIKE Ricketts) and would have been ecstatic if he’d bought the team because you do know he’d put it all in to winning… but man he’s obnoxious with his involvement.

٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶ Dum spiro spero... | Twitter: @andrewjstone.

by AndrewJStone on Feb 12, 2011 12:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Shrieking at the umpires ...

… indicates you care about winning?

We’ve got 40,000 people who do that every day at Wrigley. I don’t think yelling at umpires has anything to do with it.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 12, 2011 1:40 PM CST up reply actions  

If anyone here's

main beef with Ricketts (or even in their top 10) is that he doesn’t yell at umpires, I’d be shocked.

Nobody thinks Ricketts doesn’t care because he doesn’t yell at umpires. They think he doesn’t care about winning because he doesn’t talk about winning as a priority.

DEJESUS!!!

by tomas21 on Feb 12, 2011 3:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Except for the very first thing he said at the press conference when he took over the team.

The other things are all related to producing a winning team.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 12, 2011 4:27 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't think

anyone expects him to be an expert on baseball. But it would be nice to know that making the baseball team an annual contender is his number 1 priority, and that he’s taking steps to make that happen.

As it is, he seems to have rehabbing Wrigley the top priority, and winning seems to be an afterthought—something that will happen eventually once increased revenue from the new Wrigley starts coming in.

That’s not good enough for me. The baseball people in the organization are clearly, to me, inferior to those in the organizations Ricketts wants to model after. Until he does something to rectify that, I will question his dedication to winning.

DEJESUS!!!

by tomas21 on Feb 12, 2011 3:14 PM CST up reply actions  

if I bring up the "H" word

I get labeled a hater, so I refrain. It’s up to Ricketts to figure out his organization lacks in top shelf management.

by socalbob on Feb 12, 2011 9:49 PM CST up reply actions  

The business side of Wrigley is also something that is fresh in the press, so if you’re doing an interview you’re going to want to touch on that.

by Villeslgr on Feb 13, 2011 7:34 PM CST up reply actions  

And the odd thing is that all the changes you are advocating would cost less than one big FA signing

They really amount to hiring guy who would make low 6-figures at most. But I agree that kind of top-to-bottom approach could improve the whole organization. Maybe even produce hitters who know how to take a walk!!!!

by ClarkFan on Feb 12, 2011 9:52 PM CST up reply actions  

Personal Seat Licenses

Basically, you pony up for the chance at being a season ticket holder. A scam used to finance teams moving into new stadiums.

[...]when Giants coach Steve Owen, a certified defensive genius, was asked how he planned to stop Nagurski, he said: "With a shotgun, as he’s leaving the dressing room."

by NobodySpecial on Feb 11, 2011 8:04 PM CST up reply actions  

It's a bit more than that.

If you buy a PSL, you own the right to your season ticket. Now, STH can have their tickets revoked and cannot leave them in wills.

If you have a PSL, you can bequeath it to your kids, or sell it on the open market.

Please note I am not advocating for this, just trying to explain how it works.

Also to anvilcrawler, please hit the “reply” link if you are replying to a comment. Helps it thread better.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 11, 2011 9:29 PM CST up reply actions  

Aha!

I didn’t know you could leave your PSL to kids. Not that I could afford one! :]

I didn't understand the "white-collar Cub fans", "blue-collar Sox fans" until much later in life. Harry Smith~ "For Cubs Fans Only".

by jeffstorm2 on Feb 11, 2011 9:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks Al

Really good job of getting the info out of Mr. Ricketts. Some have said you weren’t direct enough. I think I can only imagine how hard it was to be “tactful” when you wanted to ask deeper questions w/o offending. I enjoyed all 3 parts.

I didn't understand the "white-collar Cub fans", "blue-collar Sox fans" until much later in life. Harry Smith~ "For Cubs Fans Only".

by jeffstorm2 on Feb 11, 2011 9:29 PM CST reply actions  

Agree

Great work. I like how TR will sit down with you Al and let you fire away. It says alot about the man. Your range of topics were spot on.

There goes one over the fence...a Tru-Link fence.

by truelinkfence on Feb 12, 2011 8:34 AM CST up reply actions  

I've been to well over...

200 games through the years, and spent 75% out in the leftfield bleachers. I sat in the luxury suites one time and I felt so disconnected with the fans and the game. I will never do that again. Give me the bleachers anytime.

by montecarlo on Feb 12, 2011 2:23 AM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Maybe it's time to take a deep breath

Recent FanPosts

Seinfeld_jerk_store_black_shirt_small
Cubs pitching problems answered!
Zambrano_background_2_small
What is the most likely move in June regarding current players?
Small
Draft Prep: Pierce Johnson
Small
Trying to be positive (need some help)
Small
Soriano back to Second?
Small
Javier Baez Peoria Bound?
Small
Draft Prep: Conference Tournament Version
Despite-an-inflated-babip-lahair-is-no-one-month-wonder
Suddenly, I feel your pain
Small
Start of the LaHair Regression?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Former MLB PItcher Bob Ojeda On Pitching And Pain
Wrigley Field Supporters Propose Tearing Down Rest Of Chicago
Doug Glanville On His Teammate, Kerry Wood
Thanks.
Samardzija takes a dig at Hawk Harrelson

Recent FanShots

Baez to Peoria
2012 Stars and Stripes Hat
Sveum moves Castro back to #2 spot
OT: Tyler Colvin bats 2nd
The Pittsburgh Pirates Offensive Catastrophe
Roy Halladay Bobblehead Fail
Full sized image
All The Topps Baseball Card Cubs, 1951 - 2012

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
Should the National League adopt the designated hitter rule?

  997 votes | Results

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Chicago Cubs Game Threads

Yahoo_full_count

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Profile_small Josh Timmers

B_w_avatar_small Brett Taylor

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima