Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Ugh. Just what we didn't need to hear. Tweeted by Muskat.

about 1 year ago Images_tiny Ross 103 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

If he has any damage..

I highly doubt the Cubs will pursue him as a starter anymore.

"It's easy to do what's ordinary, it's difficult to do what's deemed impossible -- I guess that explains why my life is so hard, because nothing is impossible for me"

by Unique on May 16, 2011 7:00 PM CDT reply actions  

I hope that's not true

We have so few TOR caliber prospects, and we really don’t need any more bullpen prospects.

by Mulhollandmania on May 16, 2011 7:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree

I really hope Casher is given a full chance to make the rotation. He has alot more potential than just a bullpen arm.

by lj121711 on May 16, 2011 9:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe we'll see him in 2012 for another start

"They sell every ticket to every game, win or lose!" - Tom Ricketts

by bluemagic9 on May 16, 2011 7:30 PM CDT reply actions  

This.

Sucks. Hope you have long term housing plans Doug Davis.

We'll miss you Big Boy. #10 for Hall of Fame.

by mrcubsfan on May 16, 2011 7:31 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Not good

Hope it’s nothing serious, but …

by Not Bruce Froemming on May 16, 2011 8:00 PM CDT reply actions  

Not surprising...

…the Cubs continue their inept ways when it comes to handling injuries.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 16, 2011 9:20 PM CDT reply actions  

How so?

Plenty of other teams have similar situations. Don’t know if you pay attention to that, but I do.

by Not Bruce Froemming on May 16, 2011 10:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Medically...

…the injury was likely handled very well, it is the PR part of it the Cubs have struggled with for a long while.

By the way, it is not a good sign he is getting yet another MRI.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on May 16, 2011 10:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well

It wasnt exactly a bold decision to sit him down in the first place. The screw up was not getting it thoroughly checked out immediately after the injury.

The initial time table for his return was right about now (4-6 weeks) and here we are back basically at the same point as we were when he came out of that start. The Cubs seem to have no idea what specifically is injured and how bad it is injured. That is inexcusable.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 12:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

And you know this how?

The Cubs have never been a team to lay out everything to the press.

John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.

by rlpete on May 17, 2011 6:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

The New England Patriots are geniuses and trailblazers

The Cubs are idiotic and unable to properly notify fans of injury information.

by bdlugz on May 17, 2011 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

Apples and oranges

The injured list is a part of NFL strategy. We are talking about an arm injury to the guy that is supposed to be the future of this pitching staff.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

And the point remains, it doesn't matter if you know what they really see or not.

It’s not like the mismanaged him. They got it checked out, had him play long toss, throw a sim game, and when it acted up, they’re getting another MRI.

They couldn’t envision another injury. What do you want them to say, “If this is what we think it is, we can expect him back in 4-6 weeks. But, it probably will start flaring up again around that time and we’ll do another MRI then.”

They don’t know what’s going to happen with the injury until the player starts throwing, and can you imagine the uproar if they waited 4-6 weeks to give us a preliminary report? Heads would roll.

by bdlugz on May 17, 2011 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

He is getting a 2nd MRI 6 weeks after

This stuff doesnt happen unless there is some kind of structural damage. For the Cubs to proceed with any kind of throwing program before completely ruling out structural damage to their supposed future ace is the mistake. Why even put a time table on his return in the first place? Why not just be honest? This guy is our future and he is not going to to throw untill we are 100% sure he is ready and we dont know when that will be. I trhink most Cub fans would have accpeted that.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

Do you know what an MRI is??

The first MRI didn’t show any structural damage. If it did, they wouldn’t have started him on a throwing program.

He starting throwing and is continuing to have pain and they will do another MRI to see if anything has changed.

by bdlugz on May 17, 2011 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Six weeks after the initial injury he is having another MRI

that tells you right there that they still dlont know what is wrong with him. Is that hard to understand?

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's not like a mechanic

Shoulder injuries are not easy to diagnose. It happens all the time that organizations have to update rehab schedules for a variety of injuries. It’s even worse when you are talking shoulders with pitchers which is so very unpredictable.

Not that Peavy is a shoulder, but look at that example. Months after the injury and the surgery, the White Sox didn’t know the schedule he needed to be on. You write like the Cubs should have undergone some diagnostics on Cashner and a computer somewhere would spit out the plan for him. It doesn’t work that way.

I think the Cubs learned huge lessons with regards to Prior and Wood. in this case, I just don’t see how the Cubs are at fault. If you didn’t know that there was a lot of risk in the initial estimates, that’s your issue and not the Cubs.

by jerry morales rules on May 17, 2011 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

This is 2011

It doesnt take much to figure out if someone has any kind of structural damage or not. Yet 6 weeks later the Cubs still dont know if he has any.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 11:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ok doc

I’m sure it’s that simple.

by Wreckard on May 17, 2011 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

As someone who has had elbow surgery I can assure you that

it is more or less pretty simple.

I felt a lot more discomfort in my right elbow than usual after working out. I got an MRI and 2 weeks later I had surgery.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 11:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

OMG!!!!!

This is truly ignorant.

The complexity involved with elbow issues is so much easier than shoulders by multiples of times.

by jerry morales rules on May 17, 2011 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

Wrong

There are many more ways to injure an elbow than the shoulder.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh that's reminds me of how I had my wisdom teeth out once

so now I’ve opened a dental practice in my basement.

Also, my car broke down once so I’m currently applying to be a NASCAR pit mechanic. Clearly the expert qualifications are there.

by Wreckard on May 17, 2011 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

You are a jerk

I remember the lies you tried to spread a few weeks ago about the Bonds case.

Now I see the lies that you have used to try to prove Liriano’s fastball velocity isnt down this year.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 12:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Lies?

Oh my. That’s quite an accusation.

Maybe you saw a show met a lawyer once and can use that expertise to get me for perjury.

by Wreckard on May 17, 2011 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Close

Im a cop and am working through law school as we speak.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm guessing you're doing it pretty slowly.

I guess I'm just a worrier, that's why my friends call me whiskers

by Nunyabidness on May 17, 2011 2:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

This is ridiculous

I need you to read this article. http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/rumors/post/Cubs-Cashner-suffers-setback?urn=mlb-354728

According to the first MRI, there was no structural damage. They looked for it and couldn’t find it. It’s not as if Hendry was looking at the results. These are trained professionals. It’s not “The Cubs” that can’t tell if he has structural damage. It’s trained medical professionals and it’s not as easy in all situations as you write.

They are now taking a second look for structural damage. We’ll see if anything appears this time, but this is not uncommon, even in 2011.

by jerry morales rules on May 17, 2011 11:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yes it is uncommon

You never hear about this kind of stuff from other teams in any sport. Guys have setbacks all the time, which is true, but you never hear about multiple MRIs.

You seem to be missing a key point, this guy is supposed to be the future of this staff. Why not exhaust all avenues upon his initial report of discomfort?

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not going to do the research to prove how wrong you are

This is ridiculous, but it happens all the time and I gave you one example that the Withe Sox are going through right now.

What avenues are you referring to that the Cubs didn’t pursue? One pitch after initial discomfort, they shut him down and had him undergo MRI’s which were found to be negative.

by jerry morales rules on May 17, 2011 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Why not send him to Andrews or some equivalent?

As far as Peavy goes, you even admitted that is a different situation.

I watch a ton of sports, and I never hear about a player in any sport requiring multiple MRIs on the same body part 6 weeks apart just to get even an initial diagnosis. It doesnt happen.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

Andrews is a surgeon

Not a radiologist.

You go to him after you’ve diagnosed damage.

Of course, I don’t need to be telling you this – you had surgery once.

by Wreckard on May 17, 2011 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

And yet teams of all sports send players to him

for a diagnosis before any surgery is done. I would guess that Andrews spends a majority of his time reading x-rays and MRIs not performing surgery.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'll say this as politely as possible...

You clearly have absolutely no knowledge of the medical field, and you’re making some outlandish comments. As someone in the medical field, you are incorrect in your statements.

Your argument is one of Neil Patrick Harris in the commercials, “I used to be a doctor, in pretend.”

by bdlugz on May 17, 2011 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

So teams never send players to Andrews for diagnosis

That is news to me. Because you hear about it all the freaking time. He doesnt just perform surgery. In fact in many cases he recommends against surgery.

If you dont know this and are really in the medical field then I feel sorry for your patients.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh My.

This is just too funny. Sometimes you have to know when you’re wrong. This is one of those times.

by lj121711 on May 17, 2011 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

People go see Dr. Andrews after they have a diagnosis...

Once you FIND SOMETHING WRONG in an MRI, you would go to him with those results and the reviewing Drs. suggestion and he would determine the best course of action for your particular case.

The Drs. who review the x-rays and MRI are NOT orthopedic surgeons and, although they would make a suggestion, they are NOT the best source to determine the course of action. THIS is where someone like Dr. Andrews steps in. Just like Dr. Andrews would NOT be the Dr. to perform and review an x-ray or MRI, because that is not his area of expertise.

You’re really grasping at straws here, and you’re really wrong.

by bdlugz on May 17, 2011 1:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

You mean how the Cards though that Wainwright would be fine in the fall and

by the spring, presto Tommy John surgery. I won’t argue that the Cubs frequently are not forthcoming with the press but to argue that the Cubs should know exactly what is wrong on the first day is a little naive.

John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.

by rlpete on May 17, 2011 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

He didnt get hurt until after he made his first spring training start

I am sure that if Wainwright had already been injured he would not have even made that start.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

But he missed his final 2010 start due to pain.

Why didn’t he have TJ surgery in October?

John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.

by rlpete on May 17, 2011 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Do you really think the Cardinals

didnt have Wainwright checked out in the offseason? He came to camp said he felt good, he threw multiple times and then made the teams first start of spring training. It was during that start that he got hurt. Maybe it was just a matter of time before Wainwright was going to need TJ surgery but the bottom line was that he did not have any structural damage until after that first spring training start.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Do you really think the Cubs

didn’t have Cashner checked out after they pulled him from the game? After his MRI he said he felt good, he threw multiple times, and then made his first simulated game start. It was during that simulated game he got hurt. ….. the bottom line was that he did not have any structural damage until after that first simulated game start.

…. see what I did there?

by bdlugz on May 17, 2011 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Wainwright probably made a 1000+

throws between the end of last season and his first start in spring training. Cahner probably made about 100 between MRIs. Just a tiny little difference.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

You probably have zero idea what actually happened

You’re making assumptions to better fit your scenerio.

I would actually argue that after the fatigue from last year, he was on an offseason program that mostly rested his shoulder, making sure it wasn’t further strained.

He probably had very limited action before he reported to camp in February, and certainly wasn’t throwing thousands of pitches.

But… keep telling yourself that.

by bdlugz on May 17, 2011 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Cubs

are either dishonest about injuries or get caught flat-footed about injuries on a regular basis. It’s been one of the consistent themes of the Cubs in the Hendry era.

DEJESUS!!!

by tomas21 on May 16, 2011 10:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yep

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 16, 2011 11:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Gorzelanny would fit nicely in the rotation

Hendry dumps Gorzey and breaks camp with Mateo & Russell. Yet another brilliant decision by our brain dead GM.

I'm wet nurse to a last-place, dead-to-the-neck-up ball club, and I'm choking to death!

by Eisman57 on May 17, 2011 6:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Russell is very good as a LOOGY

Mateo is… right handed. You know the difference between which hand they throw with, right?

You wanted FOUR lefty relievers? Yikes.

by bdlugz on May 17, 2011 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well, he's decent as a loogy

but he almost certainly could have broken camp in Iowa and it wouldn’t have hurt us at all.

I guess I'm just a worrier, that's why my friends call me whiskers

by Nunyabidness on May 17, 2011 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

I wont argue that.

I don’t want to start this entire argument over again, but you don’t take a reclamation project (Gorz) and build his value as a starter simply to put him in your pen as an emergency starter.

by bdlugz on May 17, 2011 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

I guarantee that I know more about and watch more baseball than you do

No other team has a track record like the Cubs when it comes to handling injuries especially to pitchers. Take the Yanks with Phil Hughes, he has arm problems and they shut him down just like the Cubs did with Cash. The difference was they IMMEDIATELY sent him to see a specialist. That is just one example that has happened already this season.

Many people predicted that something like this would happen as soon as word came out that Cash was injured in the first place. It wasnt just pure pessism that led people to predict this, we have all seen it again and again and again.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 16, 2011 11:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

I like that, "uniquely weird"

That sounds a lot better than saying that Cubs management are just a bunch of bald faced liars.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 12:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

If you tell fans the truth...

it doesn’t sell tickets. Cashner has just bought a ticket on the Prior / Wood rollercoaster ride.

by montecarlo on May 17, 2011 4:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not true about Hughes

Hughes began to suffer lack of velocity in his first start on April 3. The Yankees started him two more times before putting him on the DL on April 15. He threw a bullpen session again on April 20 and then another one on April 23. Hughes didn’t get an MRI until April 26 and didn’t see a specialist until April 27.

I don’t know what you mean by IMMEDIATELY, but 24 days isn’t immediate to me. It was even a full 12 days after he was placed on the DL.

by jerry morales rules on May 17, 2011 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

Stop the facts.

They get in the way of relentless bitching.

by bdlugz on May 17, 2011 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

And furthermore on Hughes

In his first start, he went 4 innings and gave up 5 earned runs. In start 2, he went 2 innings and gave up 6 earned runs. In the third start, he had his best results going 4.1 innings and 5 earned runs.

In contrast, the Cubs threw Cashner for only one more pitch after he experienced discomfort. One pitch..

by jerry morales rules on May 17, 2011 10:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

Again,

logic and rational thought have no place in the world of Bitch Cubbie Blue.

by Not Bruce Froemming on May 17, 2011 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

He wasnt complaining of discomfort or injury at the time he was making starts

Maybe he was lying about how he felt, but the facts are many pitchers have trouble with velocity in the early part of the season, the Yankees felt Hughes was in that same boat.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

That doesn't explain why it took 12 days

after being placed on the DL before he saw a specialist. It was your premise that the Yankees sent him to a specialist immediately. That is false. It was not immediate.

by jerry morales rules on May 17, 2011 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

He wasnt complaining of any injury

Why is that so difficult for you to understand? Again maybe he was lying, but he didnt complain about his arm feeling dead until after the bullpen sessions.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 11:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

As someone who lives in NY....

the Yankees knew about Hughes’ arm. He’d been suffering from “dead arm” even in ST, and there was talks of his velocity being down the whole time.

I’m no expert, but I think they knew.

by SenorGato on May 17, 2011 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

That didnt make the national media then

Because all you heard on ESPN and the MLB network was that he felt fine. It wasnt untill he had made a few starts that they started talking about the possiblilty of a dead arm, at least not nationally anyway.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 1:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

And this didn't make the national media either.

Not every case like this makes the national media, which is probably why you think no other team does this.

This kind of stuff happens ALL THE TIME with arm injuries. I cannot stress enough how unpredictable the shoulder is.

by bdlugz on May 17, 2011 1:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wrong on the facts

A lot of pitchers have early season velocity problems. See Dempster, Ryan for a reference. Hughes wasnt complaining of any type of tightness or discomfort at first. The Yanks and Hughes thought he would work out of it. Once he began to feel discomfort, which was following the two bullpen sessions they shut him down got an MRI and flew him to a specialist all within a week.

Good try though.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

There is no comparison between Dempster's and Hughes' lack of velocity

Dempster was a little down. Hughes was WAY down.

Yes, some pitchers do have some issues early, but what was going on with Hughes was much worse than normal early season rustiness. There was something wrong with Hughes and they knew it in early April but the tried working him through it. Regardless, he didn’t see a specialist when they knew something might be wrong, It was weeks after. It was almost 2 weeks after they placed him on the DL.

And it was a good try on my part. It totally hit the mark.

by jerry morales rules on May 17, 2011 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

You better tell the Twins to put Liriano on the DL then

Because his velocity is way down too.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 11:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

Are you trlying to claim Liriano's velocity hasnt been down?

Because that is just a lie.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not claiming anything

I was just passing by, tripped, fell on my keyboard, and accidentally pasted a chart of Liriano’s fastball velocities over the course of his career.

By sheer coincidence, that chart appears to contradict your claim that his velocity is “way down”, seeing how his average fastball velocity this season is well within his career norms.

by Wreckard on May 17, 2011 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not sure what you linked to because its not there,

but fangraphs did an artilce showing his velocity on his fastball to be down.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

You can't see the chart?

Huh.

Well at any rate, from Fangraphs’ own website here are Liriano’s average fastball velocities for his career:

2008 90.0
2009 91.5
2010 94.2
2011 92.1
Total 91.3

His velocity is down slightly from 2010, but higher than his career average. It is not “way down”.

by Wreckard on May 17, 2011 11:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

This is BS

He was rehabbing from injury in 08 and 09. His two completely healthy years in his career have been 06 and 10 . 94.7 in 06 and 93.7 in 10. That is what you should compare his fastball to, not 2 seasons were he was rehabbing.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 11:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Look at the distribution on the chart

his velocity this season is right in line with what he was throwing the last couple months of 2010.

by Wreckard on May 17, 2011 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Simple explanation

Maybe he got tired at the end of last year. That doesnt change the fact that his velocity to start this season is down significantly from his average velocity from the entire season of last year or from 06 the only two seasons he has been healthy.

And it also doesnt change the fact that it is a very common problem for pitchers to have trouble finding their velocity to start the season. Liriano may have been a bad example, because he doesnt seem to be getting any more on his fastball 6 weeks into the season. Maybe that is all he’s got left. We will see.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

You're changing the argument

When did I say that pitchers should go on the DL just because velocity is down?

by jerry morales rules on May 17, 2011 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

That seems to be your point about Hughes

Because again for the 1000th time, he wasnt complaining of any discomfort initially.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

My point about Hughes

was that the Yankees recognized at least 12 days before they sent him to a specialist that something was very wrong. 12 days is not immediately.

I’m not even saying that they Yankees did anything wrong in real time as this was playing out. However, they could have sent him to a specialist on April 16 when they put him on the DL,but they did not. 12 days is not immediate and that is my only point.

by jerry morales rules on May 17, 2011 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ok

Ill concede the point that 12 days is not immediately.

As long as you concede the point that it is unacceptable that the Cubs have gone 6 weeks without a full idea of what is wrong with their future ace.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

And Hughes was touching low 90s in a start I saw him make

maybe the stadium gun was off, but the Yankee announcers were not talking about his lack of velocity, but his location in that game.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

He didn't see a specialist until 12 days after being placed on the DL.

The Yankees knew this was a serious situation on April 15 otherwise he wouldn’t have been put on the DL. I will give you that from April 3 (when it was identified that something was off) until April 15, they didn’t want to overreact. On April 15, though, they knew it was more than just regular early season rustiness and 12 days later he saw a specialist.

Your premise is wrong, you know it, and you can’t spin out of it.

by jerry morales rules on May 17, 2011 11:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

So what excuse do the Cubs have for waiting 6 weeks?

Thats a helluva lot longer than 12 days.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well, since we are changing the subject now

I don’t know what you are referring to. This is a second MRI. The first MRI was done the day after (Maybe 2?) after initial discomfort where they found no structural damage. This MRI, I presume, was not reviewed by Jim Hendry, but was actually reviewed by trained medical experts. Now that more discomfort is being felt, they are running through this a second time.

by jerry morales rules on May 17, 2011 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think initially the Yanks put him on the DL

because of ineffectiveness sort of like what the Red Sox just did with Lackey.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

Larry Rothschild comments on April 8
“It is the arm strength, everything emanates from there,” New York pitching coach Larry Rothschild told ESPN.com. “There is no remedy. When strength comes back, it comes back. We have tried to lessen the work load in spring to try and get it. I think it is just going to come naturally.”

Phil Hughes comments on April 12:

“It’s obviously something to be worried about,‘’ Hughes said in the clubhouse Tuesday. "This is my job, my livelihood and I don’t have the stuff I know I’m capable of going out there with. It’s worrisome and it’s frustrating.’’

Does that sound like the Yankees are only concerned about ineffectiveness?

by jerry morales rules on May 17, 2011 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yes that is exactly what it sounds like

It sounds like they thought he would work his way back to full strength. When he continued to get pounded they decided to shelf him to see if they could get him to work his way back without costing the team games. Then during that attempt he complained of the dead arm.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Read Hughes' comments again.

He’s worried that something is wrong.

I have Hughes and Dempster on my fantasy team. The reason I write that is that I was monitoring both of these guys from the beginning of the season. Based on the information from quotes and other things that I was privy too, I realized that the Hughes situation was much worse than Dempster just based on what was and wasn’t being said. It resulted in a DL stint 3 days after the Hughes comments I listed.

by jerry morales rules on May 17, 2011 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree about Hughes' comment

but if you will notice he still is not saying anything about feeling discomfort or feeling injured. He didnt have his stuff and he didnt know why. I would think that if he felt discomfort it would have been a lot easier for him to accept that he didnt have his stuff.

With the benefit of hindsight, it is easy to say that you could see the differnce between Dempster and Hughes then. But the bottom line is that both of them like many MLB starters (Chris Carpenter is another who comes to mind) had trouble finding their velocity in the early season. Hughes said his arm felt fine, obviously there is some other problem there, but at the time the Yankees had really no choice but to trust the guy to be honest about how he felt and hope that he would work his way back into form.

I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. Robert Plant 1975

by cmpody on May 17, 2011 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

I "felt" at the time that the two situations were different

and that the Hughes situation was something serious. Many pitchers do have velocity issues early on in the season. Only some of those issues, the most serious, go on the DL for it. On April 15 the Yankees knew this was one of those situations.

I don’t think the Yankees necessarily did anything wrong, but my whole point is in relation to the idea that the Yankees sent him to a specialist immediately. They did not. It was 12 days after they recognized this was a somewhat serious situation.

by jerry morales rules on May 17, 2011 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

This sounds more like a repeat of the Tim Leary scenario than it does Wood/Prior...

No, not that Tim Leary…I’m referring to a 23-year old hard throwing right-hander on the 1981 Mets, destined to be the new Tom Seaver until he injured his shoulder during his big-league debut on a miserable Sunday in 40-degree early-April weather at Wrigley Field. IIRC, the Mets’ front office spent most of that strike-torn season giving hopeful status reports on Leary, and explaining why it made sense to give him that start in Chicago.

Leary never did recover for the Mets, although years later he did have a great season pitching for the ‘88 Dodgers toward the end of his mediocre career. Also, it should be noted that Mets’ manager Joe Torre and longtime pitching coach Rube Walker were fired at the end of the 1981 season, presumably in part for mishandling Leary’s development.

"Elder White! Look at the talent on those Cubs!" Harry Caray, KMOX Radio, 4/22/62

"And you have to wonder – What's the matter with Broglio?" Harry, KMOX, 5/24/64

by ernaga on May 17, 2011 9:26 AM CDT reply actions  

I think this was handled well.

Cubs have done a lot of poor things the last 3 years, I don’t think this is one of them. Cashner was treated like fine china in the minor leagues. This isn’t a Wood/Prior issue.

by Grockcubs on May 17, 2011 9:43 AM CDT reply actions  

May I ask...

what’s accomplished by informing the fans of the exact injury an the nature of said injury?

by SenorGato on May 17, 2011 12:46 PM CDT reply actions  

I don't think that is the complaint

the complaints stem more from the “oh he’ll be back in three weeks” and then eight weeks later still saying “he’ll be in three weeks!”

I guess I'm just a worrier, that's why my friends call me whiskers

by Nunyabidness on May 17, 2011 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

According to 670 the Score

Cashner reaggrevated (SP) his shoulder. Shut down for 3 or 6 weeks, I couldn’t hear.

Come on Lisa, I'm trying to impress people here. You don't win friends with salad. ~ Homer J. Simpson

by TheBeerBaron on May 17, 2011 5:39 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Maybe it's time to take a deep breath

Recent FanPosts

Zambrano_background_2_small
What is the most likely move in June regarding current players?
Small
Draft Prep: Pierce Johnson
Small
Trying to be positive (need some help)
Small
Soriano back to Second?
Small
Javier Baez Peoria Bound?
Small
Draft Prep: Conference Tournament Version
Despite-an-inflated-babip-lahair-is-no-one-month-wonder
Suddenly, I feel your pain
Small
Start of the LaHair Regression?
Dsc06783_small
Rookie Season Ticket Open House

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Doug Glanville On His Teammate, Kerry Wood
Thanks.
Samardzija takes a dig at Hawk Harrelson
Chicago vs. Chicago, Round 2.
Wrigley Field Photo Gallery

Recent FanShots

Former MLB PItcher Bob Ojeda On Pitching And Pain
Wrigley Field Supporters Propose Tearing Down Rest Of Chicago
2012 Stars and Stripes Hat
Sveum moves Castro back to #2 spot
OT: Tyler Colvin bats 2nd
The Pittsburgh Pirates Offensive Catastrophe
Roy Halladay Bobblehead Fail
Full sized image
All The Topps Baseball Card Cubs, 1951 - 2012
Rob Neyer answers the question: When should the Cubs call up Anthony Rizzo?

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
Should the National League adopt the designated hitter rule?

  973 votes | Results

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Chicago Cubs Game Threads

Yahoo_full_count

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Profile_small Josh Timmers

B_w_avatar_small Brett Taylor

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima