What to Root for Sunday: Retaliation Against Holliday
Picture evidence:
Holliday is borderline within an arm's length of the base, cleating Castro, and to boot, flying an elbow in his gut. Dempster's starting tomorrow under the lights on ESPN, and we're shooting for 100+ losses. What do we have left to cheer for? Quade, Dempster, & Co. issuing some good ol' fashioned retaliation against Matt Holliday. I vote for a Ryan Dempster split-fingered fastball to the ribs. This isn't the first time he's tried this stunt against the Cubs, but it should be the last time Holliday tries to take out our all-star. What's to lose? LaRussa pussyfooting around the fact that he's got a dirty player on his hands? A lil' chin music for one of our batters?
In the words of Omar Little, "You come at the king, you best not miss" (ignore the fact we're far from kings.) What says you, BCB? Vote below.
Dan
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
110 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
That is a great angle
for my comment. Yes, Holliday was close enough to contact the bag. But MH had no interest in the base. He wanted to put Castro on the DL.
Not usually a fan of retribution. Any MI for the Cardinals should be sent into LF by any baserunner. Knees are good. Unless it’s Theriot, then pull up.
As for Holliday, if you can get his wrist on a pitch, go for it. Plunk at will.
I'm a Cubs fan. The Jaded Bitterness comes as a Standard Feature.
I agree completely with this analysis...
… in particular, I am in the “not usually a fan of retribution” camp.
Not this time. Do it. Start a bench clearing brawl if you have to. Sick of having this done to the Cubs.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
Good. Use your aggressive feelings. Let the hate flow through you.
by sanshokubento on Jul 31, 2011 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yes, your thoughts betray you. Your feelings for them are strong
by lshaffer_69 on Jul 31, 2011 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions
Mr. Ricketts ..

You will pay the price for your lack of vision.
Blue mountains high .. Blue valleys low
I don't know which way we shall go ..
One summer dream .. one summer dream ..
coda
ELO, 1975
Especially against a TLR managed team
Their in a pennant race so let them get some players suspended.
If Quade...
…felt the slide was over the top, he should have ordered for Holliday to be thrown at yesterday. If it happens today, it will simply look as if the Cubs are responding to external pressure to do so and that is lame and will make them look even more foolish.
The slide was borderline and was something you saw more often in the game from years past. If I was Quade, I would have thrown at Holliday just for the fact it was borderline and it involved what could be a future superstar of the franchise. How, can you not protect a guy like that and send a message that you can’t screw with our franchise player???
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
He's not a veteran player yet
so he doesn’t deserve that protection. He does deserve to be called out in the media though.
by LT on Jul 31, 2011 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions
Retaliate ok but it wasn't dirty.
While I agree that some retaliation might be in order, please don’t start with the dirty player or he intentionally tried to put Castro on the DL as TimH above mentioned. This is aggressive baseball, it is not dirty. Just because the Cubs are a sleepwalking unit this season doesn’t mean every team is. Holliday knew he needed to break up the DP and he did. Winning teams do that. The Cubs just lose.
John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.
I agree with this
I don’t think it was Holliday’s intention to put Castro on the DL. What would be the point of that? The Cubs aren’t competing so there is no reason to take out their best player. Holliday is not a dirty player. He was trying to break-up a DP. It happens in baseball. It should be expected. However, the Cardinals should expect some form of retaliation today. Dempster is a ball player. One of either Pujols or Holliday will get plunked by a Dempster fastball today. I would like to see this team show some fire and clear the benches.
I don’t want to play golf. When I hit a ball, I want someone else to go chase it.
by cub in louies nest on Jul 31, 2011 7:47 AM CDT up reply actions
Also, the umpires blew the call.
He was out of the baseline. A DP should have been ruled.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
I think it was borderline.
Watching the replay, his hand looked like it went over the base. Barney was more out of the baseline in the first inning than Holliday.
John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.
Yes, and the umpires made the right call on Barney.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
I wasn't sure why Barney was called out.
Was it for being out of the baseline or because the ump thought he was tagged? Buck and McCarver weren’t sure either.
John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.
Check out the picture below and tell me his had went over the base.
by Don't Fear the Reaper on Jul 31, 2011 8:18 AM CDT up reply actions
It has have to go over the base.
In the picture if Holliday’s left arm was extended it would be close to the base. It was a borderline call to me.
John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.
If he extends the arm to the base,
he doesn’t wipe out Castro.
That’s all.
I'm a Cubs fan. The Jaded Bitterness comes as a Standard Feature.
by timh815 on Jul 31, 2011 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions 5 recs
The replay was a 3/4 view. His hand was more than a foot off the right-hand side of the base.
FOX didn’t have, or didn’t show, the down-the-line view.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
The play by Holliday...
…was a hard play and exactly what you want to see from a player like him. It reminds me of what Ted Lilly did when he forearmed the catcher a few years ago (I think it was against the cards). Lilly even did that with his pitching arm, but it sent a message to his teamates that he will do whatever it takes to win.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
Castro should have stomped on his ankle.
THAT’S proper retaliation.
[...]when Giants coach Steve Owen, a certified defensive genius, was asked how he planned to stop Nagurski, he said: "With a shotgun, as he’s leaving the dressing room."
by NobodySpecial on Jul 31, 2011 6:28 PM CDT up reply actions
Oooh
I get the reference! I just started watching the Wire, I’m on season one epidode 10. It’s so exciting to get references to pop culture!
DEJESUS!!!
I think it was a dirty play by Holiday
The key for me is how he deliberately extended his right foot out to make sure he got Castro’s shin with his spikes. He needs one in his ear. Be interesting to see if the Cubs do it today or wait for another series.
I enjoy this website because it's so interesting to see folks pole vaulting over mouse turds.
In the ear, yeah right.
Let’s end his career while they are at it. Maybe they can knock him unconscious too. That would be fun.
It wasn’t dirty, he had to take out Castro he did. The problem for Cubs fans is the Cubs don’t have anyone who plays aggressive baseball. It is a foreign concept.
John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.
In the ear is a bit extreme, maybe the neck
that was a joke, but Holliday’s slide was not a joke. Looking at the phone below, tell me iw as clean? He weighs 235 lbs, and he threw his entire body weight down towards Castro knee to ankle area. It was dirty.
by Don't Fear the Reaper on Jul 31, 2011 8:17 AM CDT up reply actions
Perhaps my reference to "in his ear" was a bit abstruse.
It was meant to be a play on that line from Field of Dreams, “but watch out for in yer ear”.
I enjoy this website because it's so interesting to see folks pole vaulting over mouse turds.
It was dirty, he could have broken Castro's ankle
Castro said that he was wearing plastick cleats, and he still tore a hole in his sock. Show me how he could have touched the base? He didn’t slid till he was even with the base. We are lucky cstro was on the up movement because if he was planted, he would have broke his ankle. Here is a good angle of this dirty slide:

by Don't Fear the Reaper on Jul 31, 2011 8:11 AM CDT reply actions
Good photo of the incident.
Thanks for finding this.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
If this were Aussie Football,
he’d get 4 weeks.
I'm a Cubs fan. The Jaded Bitterness comes as a Standard Feature.
I still say aggressive not dirty.
Retaliation with a pitch in the ribs is fine with me. As for your question, if Holliday’s hand was on ground, it would be pretty darn close to the base. The rule isn’t that he has to touch it but rather that he can. It is a judgement call and I think the call could go either way.
John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.
by rlpete on Jul 31, 2011 8:18 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
He is three feet to the right of the base and at least 2 feet past it.
I do not understand the reflexive need to defend the indefensible around here.
Especially considering that it was STL doing the deed in question.
Holliday threw a cheap shot. He didn’t even start his slide until he was past the base, and he had absolutely no interest in touching the base whatsoever. He cleated castro, and threw his entire body into Castro while he was at it.
He couldn’t have touched that base in a million years. His entire momentum was carrying him in the opposite direction. We don’t say “at this moment in time, if Holliday were frozen in space, he could have extended his arm and maybe, depending on where you sit, he could have reached the edge of the base.”
That is interference, plain and simple. It’s practically the dictionary illustration.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Jul 31, 2011 8:52 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Watch the video, that's not right.
The picture snapped above is when he’s still several feet in front of the bag. On the video, you can see his left hand go over the bag.
I’m no Cardinal-lover. But this is just tough baseball, and I think the reason its so unfamiliar around these parts says more about our own players than it does about Holliday.
by Orval Overall on Jul 31, 2011 8:56 AM CDT up reply actions
I phrased that poorly.
I know you have watched the video and see it differently. I’m just saying, to my eyes, he’s at the edge of where he needs to be to reach the bag, and that’s all the rules demand.
by Orval Overall on Jul 31, 2011 9:00 AM CDT up reply actions
About 1 step before he cleats Castro, he reaches his hand out to the left
He’s signaling to the umpire that he’s “able to touch the base”. Never mind the fact that he’s already out of the baseline. He’s also demonstrating premeditation – he knows this is gonna be WAY outside the baseline, and wants to avoid the interference call. Cousins buys it.
Holliday’s hand never goes over the bag. At all times, it’s a solid foot+ to the right of the bag, and that’s where it stays, all the way to the ground. Because he doesn’t even start his “slide” until he’s even with or past the bag, he winds up landing about 3 feet behind the base, and still a foot to the right of it.
The argument from STL fans is that his hand COULD have “broken the plane” of the bag, albeit about 3 feet off the ground, if he’d fully extended it to the left at the right moment.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
You admit your bias.
Because it is the Cardinals it is bad. I admit it is borderline but I don’t think Holliday was trying to put Castro on the DL as some have claimed. It was aggressive baseball which is a foreign concept to the Cubs.
John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.
I certainly don't think he wanted to put Castro on the DL.
I do think he interfered, in a rather flagrant and obvious fashion.
I’m not biased against the Cardinals. I don’t think Holliday’s actions are “worse” becasue he was a Cardinal. Here’s my point – I’m a little surprised that the constant contrarian attitude on this site (i.e. “Hendry knows what he’s doing”), carries over to actually defending the Cardinals, of all teams, on a play like this.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
I'm only defending the dirty play accusation.
I don’t think it was dirty. Whether he should have been called out I won’t defend as he could have very easily been called out.
I’m also ok with a plunk in the ribs today but personally I think it should have happened yesterday.
John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.
Agreed
It should have happened 1st or 2nd pitch in Holliday’s next at bat.
by Don't Fear the Reaper on Jul 31, 2011 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions
I just want to see someone on this team show that they care enough to plunk him.
never forget...
1.7%
anything is possible...
by wrigleyrocker12 on Jul 31, 2011 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions
More than that
I want someone on this team to care enough to break up a double play like Holliday did. We should want guys who play this way.
by Orval Overall on Jul 31, 2011 10:36 AM CDT up reply actions
We should want guys as good as Holliday, too.
never forget...
1.7%
anything is possible...
by wrigleyrocker12 on Jul 31, 2011 11:16 AM CDT up reply actions
Exactly.
This isn’t that wild of a play. You can easily make the case he should be out. Its much harder to make the case that some are making, e.g., that this was “dirty”. Its hard-nosed baseball, nothing more.
by Orval Overall on Jul 31, 2011 10:36 AM CDT up reply actions
and by "out"
I mean the batter going to first should be out. Holliday was out either way.
by Orval Overall on Jul 31, 2011 10:36 AM CDT up reply actions
It wasn't dirty
But it was interference and Holliday was off the line. Al is right. A DP should have been called.
Blue mountains high .. Blue valleys low
I don't know which way we shall go ..
One summer dream .. one summer dream ..
coda
ELO, 1975
I bet they are all going to be warned before the game
so nothing happens.
Fasten those seat belts...
We need Wood to start
He wont be afraid to hit him
by Don't Fear the Reaper on Jul 31, 2011 8:26 AM CDT reply actions
A little OT: Ensuing argument
Did anyone else find it odd/interesting that Pat Listach found it necessary to go all the way to 2nd to restrain Quade. I’ve seen players restrained by managers and coaches, but not managers by coaches. Can anyone shed a little light on this for me…?
by tcjhawk on Jul 31, 2011 8:32 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
Quade planned to get thrown out.
I saw that one coming. He wasn’t going to stop until he was.
John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.
I'm guessing Listach...
…. wanted to prevent Quade from bumping Cousins, which would have resulted in a suspension.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
I have no problem with drilling him in the ribs.
There should be some sanction for a hard play like that if only to make him think twice about doing it again in the future. But what Holliday did was not “dirty” or illegal. His left hand was plainly able to reach second base, which is all that’s required. Of course the purpose of the slide was to hit Castro – that’s what a hard slide is supposed to be. This one achieved its intended effect of preventing a double play. I wish we had more ballplayers who played that way.
But having said that, a nice 4-seamer into the rib cage is just as much a part of baseball as a hard slide. So I’d have no problem with it.
Baloney. He couldn't have reached second base with a fungo bat.
I have no idea what angle you are looking at, but I have a feeling it was the “behind the plate” angle from the FOX broadcast.
In the pictures in this thread, Holliday is already past the bag and moving in the opposite direction.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
You got me.
That is the angle I’m watching. The picture above is not past the bag – it’s before it, you can tell from how early he is in the slide and how early Castro is in his throwing motion. I don’t know where you’re getting this idea that he’s past the bag.
by Orval Overall on Jul 31, 2011 8:57 AM CDT up reply actions
He would need Holliday to stay in the box for about 14 pitches
to hit his target.
Angel Guzman is the man.
by cubzfan on Jul 31, 2011 9:02 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Retaliation?
I want him dead! I want his family DEAD! I want his house burned to the ground! I want to go there in the middle of the night and piss on the ashes!
Or dan’s plan will work too, although I’m a little worried about a split-fingered fastball into the ribs? Wouldn’t that have to start like two feet above his head?
"It's all in the game, yo"
"Slider that didn't slide"
“And came in at 90+”
"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root
The whole argument about before or after the bag...
Here is the deal, Castro pulled his body exactly opposite from third base, maybe a 1/2 step behind 2nd. So, based on the picture above, there is no way Holliday is clearly in front of 2nd because when he made contact with Castro (who was even with 3rd or slightly behind), his ass hadn’t touched the ground in his slide.
He slid late, and did not slide in front of the bag.
by Don't Fear the Reaper on Jul 31, 2011 9:27 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Here is something I hate:
Said Cardinals manager Tony La Russa: “I watched it on tape. He’s sliding into the bag. He’s in the vicinity of the base.”
by Don't Fear the Reaper on Jul 31, 2011 9:45 AM CDT reply actions
"Vicinity"?
Like all the phantom DP’s we see?
Ridiculous. The umpires should have, at the very least, called a DP, inning over.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
And I can agree with that.
It was a borderline play and I can see the argument that he should be out.
John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.
One final comment
Holliday is a punk. When bad things happen to him, I will laugh.
I'm a Cubs fan. The Jaded Bitterness comes as a Standard Feature.
What I see from the pic above, even considering the angle:
I’ve looked at a ton of video frames in my working life, still and moving, as has Al, I suspect. Understanding perspective when we know the geometry of the field is not difficult.
Holliday is past the base, and putting both his foot into Castro’s ankle and his elbow into his abdomen. No way it’s an accident, no way he makes contact with the base unless he’s Elastic Man. It’s deliberate, and an open attempt to injure Castro.
I hate to go all The Dude on this, but “This aggression will not stand, man!” (OK, I didn’t hate it that much.)
So yes, retaliate. Don’t just knock him down, drill him, hard. Don’t go behind his head, don’t go at his knee, just make sure he carries a reminder for a while. Maybe every time he comes up.
Do you seriously believe he tried to hurt him?
I’m sorry but that is crazy. He wanted to break up the DP and he did.
John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.
Thought experiment for you.
If I intentionally crash into you, kicking at your ankle while planting an elbow in your abdomen, am I trying to hurt you or not?
It’s not really that difficult to draw a clear conclusion. Breaking up a double play does not have to come with that sort of thing. On the street, he’d stand a chance of arrest for that.
Baseball isn't always nice.
If Holliday slid in like a nice little boy, Castro would have made the throw and completed the double play. He did what he needed to. He was not trying to put Castro on the DL. I guess we’ll have to disagree.
John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.
Spiking a guy in the ankle is dirty.
End of story. No way to call that good, aggressive baseball. It’s easy to break up a DP hard and still be clean. Holliday chose the other route.
I love Holliday’s production, but he’s always been a punk. Being on a TLR team just gives him freedom to be his most punkish.
"The cheaper the hood, the gaudier the talk" - Philip Marlowe
by ForTheLoveOfBiitner on Aug 1, 2011 1:04 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
There's absolutely nothing crazy about it
Its crazy to call it crazy. Breaking up the DP and being dirty aren’t mutually exclusive.
"Prince Fielder is too fat even for the Oakland A’s" - Billy Beane
My problem is
That Holliday didn’t try to touch the plate till after he was under Castro. Missed Call by the Ump. Also if Castro thinks it was dirty he has to get into Hollidays face and tell him that was BS.
Ridiculous
This call was blown, that’s for sure…. but this is all a part of the game. Kudos to Holliday for playing aggressively. People who are calling this “dirty” haven’t actually played the game of baseball themselves, or at least enough. If this was Castro trying to take out Theriot, would we still be complaining?
Now, am I going to be upset when Holliday gets beaned his next AB? No :)
If a Cub goes after a guy cleats up?
Yeah, I’ll be disgusted, because cleats into a body part is never clean. Any player who needs to resort to that to break a play up is lazy.
You should have heard the players in Daytona tonight talking about it being dirty. That’s both the Cubs and Hammerheads. I’m gonna guess they’ve played a fair enough amount of ball.
"The cheaper the hood, the gaudier the talk" - Philip Marlowe
by ForTheLoveOfBiitner on Aug 1, 2011 1:08 AM CDT up reply actions
As long as he's at it...
Dempster should throw at the ump as well for blowing that call so badly.
It's not the slide towards Castro that bugged.
But he pretty clearly extended his leg top try and trip Castro up WHILE he was in mid-air.
never forget...
1.7%
anything is possible...
by wrigleyrocker12 on Jul 31, 2011 11:17 AM CDT reply actions
I will bet you a milkshake.
This deadass team will do nothing. Nothing at all.
by BrewCrew'sPrinceofDarkness on Jul 31, 2011 11:56 AM CDT reply actions
GIT ER DONE
Can you make it in one of those big metal glasses and let me keep the left overs?
by Don't Fear the Reaper on Aug 1, 2011 11:39 AM CDT up reply actions
Hehehehe....pussyfooting
Great word
Ok five year old rant over, the play was pretty obnoxious, but it seems to be one of those rules that isn’t enforced in the majors, along with actually touching second during double plays and the 12 second rule between pitches. I think the league could come out and say don’t do it again but nothing is going to happen at this point. Throw at him, great, but it won’t stop him in the future
"Baseball is almost the only orderly thing in a very unorderly world. If you get three strikes, even the best lawyer in the world can't get you off." ~ Bill Veeck
0-4, 3 Ks and a GIDP?
Effective.
BTW: 38,000 comments on BCB! Wewt!
I’d like to thank the Cubs and the boredom of my former jobs for everything! This is for you, not me!
"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root
Why would Dempster use a splitter to throw at someone?
A splitter??? Really?
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
Maybe 0-4 with 3 K's and a GIDP was a better way of retaliation.
never forget...
1.7%
anything is possible...
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 1, 2011 10:11 AM CDT reply actions
Nope... fastball in the ribs would've been better.
by bdlugz on Aug 1, 2011 11:26 AM CDT up reply actions 5 recs
I agree, but you can't argue with 0-4.
never forget...
1.7%
anything is possible...
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 1, 2011 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions
and a hat trick
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Aug 2, 2011 8:28 AM CDT up reply actions
Can't believe I'm doing this...
but Bobby Valentine actually made sense to me when he spoke of how the Cubs have this future star of the franchise that isn’t protected when put in possible harms way by an opposing player. Or something along those lines, I can’t remember verbatim.
Was it dirty? Possibly. Should we have doen somethign? Yup. Do you really just let ‘hard plays’ go unaswered? Why not give em a hardplay back? I like the wrist idea. Put his azz on the dl and that’ll be the last time he goes in hard at second.
Maybe it’s just me but the atittude of this team is pathetic. I lost a little bit of respect for Dempster. Never liked bullies. On second thought, scratch the wrist, go earhole style.
MAKE THE ADJUSTMENT ALREADY. THIS GAME IS ABOUT ADJUSTMENTS.
I believe a baseball team should try to get hits
Not all of those hits occur when you’re at-bat.
"On offense, your most precious possessions are your 27 outs" - Earl Weaver
Could Matt Holliday reach 2B?
It doesn’t matter. That’s just lazy umpiring at work. Being able to touch the bag is not the criteria. Purpose is the criteria. Rule 6.05(m):
A preceding runner shall, in the umpire’s judgment, intentionally interfere with a
fielder who is attempting to catch a thrown ball or to throw a ball in an attempt to
complete any play:
Rule 6.05(m) Comment: The objective of this rule is to penalize the offensive team for deliberate,
unwarranted, unsportsmanlike action by the runner in leaving the baseline for the obvious purpose of
crashing the pivot man on a double play, rather than trying to reach the base. Obviously this is an
umpire’s judgment play.
Was Holliday’s purpose to crash the pivot man, or reach the base?
"On offense, your most precious possessions are your 27 outs" - Earl Weaver
by RiskyBusiness on Aug 2, 2011 1:17 PM CDT reply actions 3 recs
Looked like "crash the pivot man" to me.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
Was there ever a comment by Holliday?
"Prince Fielder is too fat even for the Oakland A’s" - Billy Beane
He didn't talk, just texted
“I was within reach of the bag,” Holliday wrote in a text to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. “… I was just playing the game the way I was taught — that’s as hard as I can.”
"On offense, your most precious possessions are your 27 outs" - Earl Weaver
by RiskyBusiness on Aug 3, 2011 11:16 AM CDT up reply actions

by 




















