Should the Cubs keep Jeff Baker?
I mean, they are not going to get anyone really good from him and he is a very useful player because he can play many positions(1B, 2B, 3B, OF) and he is awesome at hitting lefties. Plus, he's cheap. So, in my opinion, the Cubs should keep Jeff Baker. Do you think that the Cubs should trade him to another team or do you think that the Cubs should just keep him on the team.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
78 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I say we trade the whole 2011 Chicago Cubs team
minus Castro obviously but seriously yes why not. The trade deadline and the winter meetings are what I have been most excited about with the Cubs the last few yrs and thats bad. I heard somebody on MLB Network earlier (ESPN baseball guys drive me nuts they are annoying, kinda like Buster Onleys comment a few days ago, a 30 game hit streak is really tough lol no shit) ha sry for that but whoever said it was saying the Cubs wanna keep some of these guys in place so guys like Fielder Pujols whoever makes the Cubs a good spot to go to. I dont agree with that at all they are 20 some games under what is so great about this group of guys?
"Women...you can't live without them, and they can't pee standing up." Rube Baker
I agree with this, or most of it.
However, regarding Jeff Baker: he has little trade value and is fairly inexpensive — might as well keep him.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
Thats true
but I kinda consider him as Mark DeRosa 2.0. He can play many postions, he may not be a starter for us because Ramirez and Barney takes up his 2 main spots but he could be very valuable for another team where he could start. Thats a trade where you probably wouldnt see it as breaking news on the bottom line or nothing but it could be a very good under the radar move, and his ability to hit lefties very very good
"Women...you can't live without them, and they can't pee standing up." Rube Baker
Yeah, the Cubs decisions have really ticked me off this year, but this one isn't too bad.
never forget...
1.7%
anything is possible...
by wrigleyrocker12 on Jul 31, 2011 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions
We have no knowledge of his value
but he takes up a spot that one of our prospects should be using. Baker isn’t the future and this team desperately needs to look at what the prospects look like in Wrigley.
If it wasn't for the injuries, we'd be printing WS tickets right now.
What prospect?
LeMahieu, maybe. But otherwise, I’d keep him.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
he wouldnt bring back anything
but the fact that hendry refuses to even talk about these people is beyond stupid
I personally believe that damaged ligaments and tendons (among other abrasions) aren't the reason for the team playing so poorly relative the rest of Major League Baseball, so accordingly, James Hendry should be relieved of his highly important duties as General Manager of the Chicago Cubs franchise.
by jesus christos on Jul 31, 2011 12:51 PM CDT reply actions
Just curious-
Am we going to have to see "Should the Cubs keep -———— -——— until we’ve gone through the roster?
Help bring Boys of Spring The Movie to life!
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1742828131/boys-of-spring-the-movie
Yep.
And eeeeeaaaaacccch and eveeeeeerrrrry single one of those threads will be filled with garbage “give him away for nothing because the team sucks” logic that this place is filled to the brim with right now.
In 10 years, you will wonder why you spent your 22nd year defending Jim Hendry
You are wasting your youth on one of the most misguided causes I have ever seen. Given the benefit of hindsight, you’ll eventually come to wonder how you managed to back yourself into this corner.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
by D98 on Jul 31, 2011 2:16 PM CDT up reply actions 4 recs
Is that really the best you have?
Well…yeah…probably.
Along with "Astros offered AZFL player for Garza and Hendry refused to discuss it."
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jul 31, 2011 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions
Did you see what TEX just traded for a reliever?
just wondering.
MLBMilestone.com - following the numbers to Cooperstown
Yep and they guy they got appears to be the top set up guy in baseball
with an ERA of 1.13 and BA against of .155 and 49Ks to 9 walks Who exactly did the Cubs have to trade of that value? You think Marshall would have brought that or anything close to it?
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jul 31, 2011 4:39 PM CDT up reply actions
Yes... Marshall is pretty much on the same level as Mike Adams, or close to it.
Marshall has a slightly higher K/9, slightly higher BB/9, lower FIP and xFIP and a lower HR/9 rate. He’s also pitching in Wrigley vs Petco, which makes a drastic difference in ERA.
Marshall has a WAR of 1.8 and Adams has a WAR of 1.4 and Adams is also a righty.
oh jeez forget the freaking WAR and look at the actual stats.
Maybe Marshall back in June. BOTH guys play half their games at home and half on the road and you are right Adams is MUCH worse outside of Petco where he has an ERA of .75 and on the road it balloons to 1.50. He pitches lights out on the road. Marshall’s ERA that silly worthless number is twice Adam’s both at home and on the road.
Marshall is a very good pitcher this season, but Adams is a GREAT one and he is going to get a far better haul than Marshall would have. Also did it ever occur to you that the Rangers probably wanted a righty for set up?
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jul 31, 2011 5:50 PM CDT up reply actions
I like how I posted all that stuff and you focused only on WAR...
Your slightly on the obsessed side with ERA – have you actually WATCHED this Cubs team play? I wouldn’t look at any pitchers value on what these guys are able to get to and make plays on. FIP and xFIP are better indicators of how their peripherals are, and Marshall is better in both.
As I said, while he walks slightly more, he strikes out slightly more as well. He also gives up about half as many HR/9 innings, which is a HUGE deal for closers/set up men. If you can’t keep the ball in the park regularly, you can’t be successful in the long run.
Finally, your argument about wanting a RH for a set up role would make sense if Marshall wasn’t just as effective against righties and lefties.
It's also worth nothing that Marshall has a BABIP of .331 this year,
Adams BABIP is .202. Neither are sustainable, and every indicator says that Marshalls numbers will only improve while Adam’s numbers will only get worse.
Also, I really think Adams is a good pitcher, so don’t think I’m trying to take anything away from him. Marshall is really just that good.
Right NOW Marshall is NOT as good as Adams
not even that close and NOW is what the Rangers want. Would Marshall get better away from Wrigley and his bad fielding teammates? Probably, but the Rangers can’t afford to risk it. Adams has the best numbers out there by far. Odd as it may seem there are baseball people who believe that a pitcher whose ERA is half what another’s ones is are actually better pitchers.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jul 31, 2011 7:27 PM CDT up reply actions
If baseball people look at ERA when determining who to go after
They should immediately be fired.
If they don't look at ERA they should be fired
I would love to hear the scout explain why pitcher A was just “unlucky” to have an ERA near 5, but hey if he comes to our team he will get to his “real” ERA of 2.5 and don’t worry about those extra 2.5 runs per game, it isn’t his fault.
I get there are factors to take into account, but ignoring ERA and justifying it is just stupid.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jul 31, 2011 11:07 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah they look at ERA and then go...
“OK on the the numbers that help get that result.”
K/9, BB/9, H/9, and HR/9 are the best predictive stats, and Marshall stacks with Adams in all of them. Not only that, but he’s younger, left handed, and didn’t have the advantage of the biggest park in the big leagues as a home field.
and yet his ERA is over twice as high
and it is NOT because Petco. Adams was worth far more than Marshall and the Padres did well in the trade.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Aug 1, 2011 1:26 AM CDT up reply actions
Why isn't it because of Petco?
His xFIP is a full run a half higher than his ERA at 2.69. Marshall is at 2.40.
His FIP is 2.05. Marshall’s is 1.88.
He’s not worth more than Marshall.
His ERA
is 1.5 OUTSIDE of Petco. Marshall’s is twice that. ERA matters
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Aug 1, 2011 9:45 AM CDT up reply actions
Yes, it does.
The Padres wanted to sell high on a reliever, and he’s posting a nice fancy ERA (and obviously other very strong numbers) that would entice quite a few teams at the trade deadline.
That said, he still shouldn’t and wouldn’t cost as much as Marshall/Marmol if either was available at the same time as him.
The Rangers got the best arm that they could get for what they were willing to give up.
If a scout isn't focusing on WHY or HOW a pitcher got to those numbers they are useless as a scout.
You look at WHIP but then determine if his WHIP is high because of a high H/9. If his H/9 is high, look at his BABIP to see if he’s getting unlucky on balls that batters make contact on. Look at his K/9 and see how much of his stuff misses bats, look at the swing and miss %, look at ANYTHING but just ERA.
I know you’re locked into these stats as being useful and important, but it’s the numbers behind them that are useful and important that tell a MUCH better story regarding the quality of the player.
I know you’ll absolutely never want to get fully behind stats, and that’s fine, but don’t try and claim that these don’t have significant importance. You can’t discount that baseball executives use advanced metrics and not stats like ERA. There’s a reason for that.
I’m sure you’ll have some other retort about WHIP or ERA, so let’s just say agree to disagree…
Actually I do think a scout in his own way is....
focusing on WHY or HOW a pitcher is able to produce. Mechanics, stuff, makeup, and other observational/anecdotal data are all key parts in what make up a player, and that’s what scouting is for. For instance, IMO if you scouted Marshall 3-4 years ago and Marshall over 2010/2011 you’d see a much more developed pitcher in 2010/2011 with crisper pitches and better, more consistent mechanics.
Not to take away anything from your point….you’re exactly right. DS is overvaluing basic stats like ERA and WHIP, which have been outdated for going on a decade now…
Adams WHIP the past 4 years ranged from .76 to 1.06
Marshall’s has ranged from 1.11 to 1.44.
Adams is dominant. Marshall is very good.
If it wasn't for the injuries, we'd be printing WS tickets right now.
That and he is having a spectacular year.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Aug 1, 2011 1:25 AM CDT up reply actions
Weird, I think that goes into my line about how Marshall has a career high BABIP and Adams has a career low??
WHIP and ERA are great for baseball cards – they’re not good for determining why something is happening to a certain pitcher. It doesn’t show the pitchers skill, it shows you what number you get when you add up two other numbers .. sweet!
by bdlugz on Aug 1, 2011 9:25 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
WAR at least the one by Fangraphs
( as opposed to BR which seems realistic)Often seems better suited to super stat fans then on field play.
Frankly I am waiting for the real WAR , Wins Above Reality, which will explain why a team filled with players with great WAR nevertheless keeps losing to teams without far lesser WAR numbers and this stat will tell you that those losses don’t really matter.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Aug 1, 2011 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions
The obvious answer is... just because a player is better (higher WAR)
Doesn’t mean he’s better every single day. That’s pretty common sense.
BR is only better suited to your reality – Fangraphs is much more widely accepted across stat circles.
And you’re not even addressing my actual point, which is that WAR is not even a small part of my argument. I’m clearly using DOZENS of stats to prove my point and you cling to ERA and only ERA. Guess what, baseball stats are about much more than that. It’s not as bad as using W-L record for pitchers, but it’s close – it simply ignores ALL other factors involved and all other peripherals for that pitcher.
Over this season Adams has been significantly better
than Marshall. That is what matters to Texas.
I am going to assume Nolan Ryan and Mike Maddux can figure that out for themselves.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Aug 1, 2011 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions
What??
I’ve proven through many different stats that Marshall is at worst an equal to Adams through this entire season, you’ve simply chosen to ignore it looking at only ERA – awesome.
Let’s try your second line a new way, “Adams is a better pitcher than Halladay because Nolan Ryan and Mike Maddux traded for Adams and they’re smart!”
Ever think for a second that Marshall wasn’t offered for the package Texas was offering? Maybe, just maybe they wanted Marshall but couldn’t land him? I love how you throw that bit in there as if they agree with your point.
That's just plain nonsense
WHIP is the single most significant stat that defines a pitcher’s success or failure. BABIP for Adams the past 4 years .264, .159, .271 and .202.
BABIP for Marshall .276, .309, .294 and .329. So your contention that this is Adam’s lowest career level is obviously wrong. Additionally, it is factual that BABIP ignores a pitcher’s control problems and K rate, both of which are significant. Adams numbers show higher values for K/9, BB/9, and LOB%.
Now those are actual numbers. Tell us what you feel proves Marshall is at the outstanding level that Adams has achieved over his time in the pen.
If it wasn't for the injuries, we'd be printing WS tickets right now.
No one uses WHIP too seriously in 2011...
and it’s certainly not the stat that defines a pitcher’s success. I’m not sure there’s a stat that does that, but if there was it’d be WAR.
Your opinion is so insane
that it’s not worth the effort to discuss.
If it wasn't for the injuries, we'd be printing WS tickets right now.
With an attitude like that....
it wouldn’t be much of a discussion anyway.
If I can make the attempt…Why is WHIP the single most significant stat that defines a pitcher’s success or failure?
Over the past 1.whatever seasons:
Marshall – 4 WAR
Marmol – 3.8 WAR
Adams – 3.1 WAR
That .7 difference with Marmol is all this year btw...
as Marmol is worth .7 WAR so far this year according to Fangraphs.
Last year Marmol was worth 3.1 WAR. He’s 28, as is Marshall. Adams is 33.
Again the Rangers don't care about LAST season
They care about last month and the next two months
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Jul 31, 2011 11:04 PM CDT up reply actions
Why would they care about last month?
I think what Adams and Marshall have done in the last season and a half play into price, amongst other factors.
You really don't seem to get why teams make "deadline" deals
For the buyers it is to win NOW and you want the guy who is lights out NOW, not in June, not last year. This is not to say they want a one month wonder, but the priority is to get the best guy you can and Adams is far better than Marshall. This is why teams wait till now to make big deals, they know exactly what they need. Often they pay a premium price, but it often beats trading in the off season when your needs are not so specific and you might for instance trade your top prospects for a player who really can’t make a difference.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Aug 1, 2011 1:32 AM CDT up reply actions
He's not far better than Marshall.
That’s fully up the debate, and there’s plenty of numbers that back up Marshall being just as good if not better.
Otherwise I agree that teams will get the best they can....
and I’d say that the price they wanted to pay for Marshall is not worth it. This is especially true if they plan to compete next year.
PS as long as Fangraphs
Keeps proclaiming Garza is a significantly better pitcher this year than Jair Jurrjens I won’t put any faith into it.
I will stick with the Baseball Reference “version” of WAR.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Aug 1, 2011 1:39 AM CDT up reply actions
They're not proclaiming anything.
Just giving you the facts.
So you think Garza has been a much better pitcher this year than
Jurjjens? Gosh we should trade him now, his value may never be higher.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Aug 1, 2011 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions
WAR is not a perfect stat - no stat is perfect.
JJ is obviously a very very rare case of a pitcher who doesn’t miss a lot of bats that still is an elite pitcher.
There are always one offs that can be picked out to argue a stat, but they are few and far between. Overall, WAR is quite accurate, sitting on one example of where it appears to not be right is hardly damning for the stat as a whole.
The two BIG problems with FG WAR
is way overvalues Ks and way undervalues groundball pitchers
Whereas hitting stats are considerably easier to measure (NOT just BA, but OBP, pitches per at bats etc) fielding remains highly subjective and trying to factor fielding into a pitchers stats simply does not work for me. I simply don’t trust UZR, FIP and other ways of measuring fielding and fielding effects on pitchers. Pitchers play on a field and to judge their effectiveness largely on on Ks and home runs gives you a very twisted picture. I remember UZR saying that Soriano was a above average fielder his first two seasons with the Cubs when my eyes said different. Again stats that rely on both subjective measures of fielding and using questionable methods for “compensating” pitchers for the fielding around them, are simply not reliable in my view.
ERA is an imperfect stat, and certainly factors like the ballpark and the league play a role, but WAR for pitchers is obsessed with using highly subjective measures to make up for the supposed flaws of ERA that it goes much further in the other direction. I will take ERA with a little common sense over WAR with a lot of unreliable methods,
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Aug 1, 2011 1:05 PM CDT up reply actions
Stats should be used to measure a pitchers "stuff"
K/9 tells you how many bats they miss, K/BB ratio tells you how many more strikeouts than walks they give, GB% gives you an idea of how good a pitcher is at keeping his pitches down with more of a chance to make plays on them, BABIP tells you if the pitcher is unlucky due to a lot of balls finding holes.
These are things ERA will NEVER show you and it leaves a gaping hole in the stats. ERA should be a team stat and should never be tied to a pitcher alone – it’s insulting to their abilities.
Again to me BAPIP is a more subjective stat.
K/BB is a fair thing to look at it. GB% not so much even if Maddux is all time favorite baseball player. However it the vastly over valuing of strikes and the attempt to quantify fielding related to pitching that I have a problem with. It overvalues Garza this season and undveralues JJ and I don’t think it is a fluke.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Aug 1, 2011 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions
I think you tend to overvalue JJ a little bit as well from the sounds of it.
He’s a good #2, he’s not as incredible as you’re making it sound though.
How is BABIP subjective?? It’s hard factual data. When a player makes contact, their BA on those balls is… BABIP. It’s not a SSS, we have years of data of thousands of games a year. I’m not sure where you can argue with the data.
I understand you don’t like WAR, as I’ve said, I don’t care, I know you hate it, we’ve had that talk before. I’m talking about much more than just WAR.
He is not incredible but he is much better than
Garza this year and WAR is penalizing him greatly due to low strikeout rate.
I don’t like WAR for pitchers in particular because it uses highly questionable methods to attempt “even” up “differences” in the fielding behind a pitcher which I think is simply not possible to quantify. It assumes that a pitcher who has much higher K rate, but also has a higher ERA than a pitcher with fewer K’s is probably suffering from bad luck and or bad defense, when in fact he may simply be not as good a pitcher who fails to get outs when they are most needed.
You seem to be talking an awful lot about WAR in explaining why Adams is either inferior to or no better than Marshall and thus his 1.13 ERA must be the result of A. playing at PETCO ( when he has a road ERA half that of Marshall’s) or B he is really , really lucky and the Padres have the best defense in baseball. Yep forget that silly ERA & WHIP stuff it is better to imagine how much better or worse a pitcher would be if he had better fielders or had more K’s instead to many pesky ground outs.
"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either
by Doggie Stalker on Aug 1, 2011 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions
DS... I literally brought up WAR once in one post in reference to Adams and Marshall
You went off on a tangent about it and I’ve just been going back and forth, saying multiple times WAR is not my point at all. It’s a secondary discussion I’ve been trying to get away from!
How is BABIP subjective?
How is GB% not significant? We know from GB% that a pitcher is more likely to give up Hs, but those Hs are more likely to be singles than XBHs. That’s pretty significant.
I'd take Garza over JJ if I was starting a team...
especially since he’s joined the NL.
- Better K rate.
- Better FIP and xFIP in his first year in the NL. (Jurrjens is at 3.46/3.82)
- More groundballs this year.
- Not as lucky (.263 BABIP for Jurrjens, .311 for Garza).
Then there’s scouting side….Garza is bigger, throws harder, throws better breaking stuff…
Jurrjens is having a great season, but Estaban Loaiza and other randoms have throw up ace-like ERAs in a season before too. It doesn’t actually make them an ace, it signifies what an awesome season they had for themselves. This is the same pitcher who threw up a 4.64 ERA just last year in 118 IP…He’s a good pitcher, but I don’t find him to be particularly special. He’s not even the Braves’ best pitcher…Hanson is.
This is really Jurrjens third "ace-like" season.
Plus, I believe he’s younger as well.
never forget...
1.7%
anything is possible...
by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 1, 2011 3:49 PM CDT up reply actions
I should add....
that at the young age of 25 he’s mysteriously lost 2 MPH to his avg. FB velocity. It’s helped contribute to an already mediocre K rate (keep in mind he’s pitching in the NL his whole career where he’s facing the pitcher) dropped below (yes, even if barely) 6 per 9.
I honestly wouldn’t be surprised if Jurjjens hit the trade market this winter now that this conversation has got me thinking about him….The Braves have a crap ton of pitching coming up and his ERAs and W-L record combined with his youth might make him quite appealing to a team looking for some proven pitching. He’s a FA after 2013.
2nd...
2009’s 5.3 WAR season….which was promptly followed by last year’s -.1.
The guy’s a very good pitcher, but I’m not sure he’s established himself as much more than that so far. For instance, even this year where he brings his control to ace levels (2.3 BB/9), his K rate drops from maybe league average to slightly below (5.9 K/9).
As far as this year though...
The surface numbers say JJ is having a better year, and people like surface numbers. Moving forward, give me Garza.
are we going
to have to listen to you defend Hendry and the Cubs at every turn at scoff at any report they might not be trading anyone?
DEJESUS!!!
I'm not defending him
I asking for all these reports to be properly sourced- big difference. I’m not willing to believe some asshole with a Twitter account.
Help bring Boys of Spring The Movie to life!
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1742828131/boys-of-spring-the-movie
Do you have proof
he is an asshole? Is your information properly sourced?
If it wasn't for the injuries, we'd be printing WS tickets right now.
Matter of fact I do
Anyone reporting non-sourced information is, indeed, an asshole.
Help bring Boys of Spring The Movie to life!
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1742828131/boys-of-spring-the-movie
Do you realize how arrogant
you sound?
If it wasn't for the injuries, we'd be printing WS tickets right now.
Not in the least
Help bring Boys of Spring The Movie to life!
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1742828131/boys-of-spring-the-movie
Moreover....
As I said in another thread- It’s how I feel. It’s the lawyer in me. It’s what I do for a living and it’s worked rather well for me. I tend not to believe hearsay- second or third hand, unsourced information does not impress me. It’s rather incredible to me that people get upset when someone asks for something to be sourced, especially if it might interfere with their preconceived notions.
Help bring Boys of Spring The Movie to life!
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1742828131/boys-of-spring-the-movie
No, because DeWitt >>>Baker
Or so I’ve been told
Fire Jim Hendry. Injuries aren't the problem.
by Shanghai Badger on Jul 31, 2011 10:14 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Albeit your lawyer frame of mind
I’d bet most reasonable people would find it unwarranted to call someone an asshole based upon your evidence.
If it wasn't for the injuries, we'd be printing WS tickets right now.
The Cubs should trade no one
They are very competitive.
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry

by 























