Ignominious Departures Of The Hendry Era
This feels a bit more like a pattern and less like bad luck.
So Al's not backing Hendry anymore; does just leave the Ricketts in his corner?
10 months ago
BWoodrum
18 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Still nothing compared to Bill Bavasi
I asked Bavasi on Monday about Bedard’s pitch-count threshold. After bouncing between defending and explaining Bedard, the axed GM — clearly exasperated — said I needed to ask the pitcher.
“You gotta ask him,” Bavasi said. “You gotta ask him. Good luck. And he’s gonna have some stupid answer, some dumbass answer.”
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/jerrybrewer/2008001424_brewer17.html
by jerry morales rules on Aug 15, 2011 2:09 PM CDT reply actions
Crane Kenney thinks
Hendry is doing well.
I'm a Cubs fan. The Jaded Bitterness comes as a Standard Feature.
So the question remains if Hendry is leading the club in 2012
Which player that Hendry has handed large sums of money to will need to be suspended next season??
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry
Let's hope...
…Hendry is done; suspending guys, making trades, hiring managers, filling out the roster, and most importantly, running the baseball operation.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Aug 15, 2011 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
You can't blame Hendry entirely.
Stone, Sosa, Silva, Bradley, and Zambrano all had personality issues.
Z and Sosa were coddled by management so their thoughts that the world revolved around them were reinforced.
Silva is a fat, lazy slob. Bradley is totally nuts. Hendry can be blamed for both of them. Like Frey when he traded Lee Smith, and was forced to trade Palmeiro for Williams the following year.
Stone wasn’t Hendry’s hire or his problem. His ego is what did him in. We are better off without him. Stone couldn’t carry Brenly’s microphone.
The "coddled by management" thing is the issue.
The baseball operation is set up that way. That’s a big part of the problem.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
It's called...
…doing the “due dilligence” on the type of players you allow on your club and also tolerating behavior until it gets so bad, it turns out like this.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
by MPH73 on Aug 15, 2011 4:00 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
couldn't agree more
maybe it’s just that the cubs need a good HR person in the front office that does all the due diligence you would hope a major league team would do before handing out multi-year contracts. the major league melt downs are well documented but i also seem to recall some draft picks that have, at least in part, failed to develop due to behavioral/emotional/mental health issues.
by circuitclout on Aug 15, 2011 11:05 PM CDT up reply actions
Joe went to Creighton
Jim took Creighton to the CWS. That’s a good enough reason to keep Jim, isn’t it? Even though Joe has apparently never been to WF.
Joe could also care less about sports.
You really think that Joe is going to retain someone that will cost him money on his investment because the GM coached at his alma mater? Don’t think so.
I honestly
wouldn’t mind if Hendry was retained as GM IF they brought in a team president with a baseball background that would provide vision for the team and act as an advisor/supervisor to Hendry. Someone like Gillick.
For all Hendry’s faults (and they are many), this biggest to me is that he has absolutely zero long-term vision/plan for the team. He kow-tows to the manager’s whims, rather than finding a manager who shares a philosophy with him. Minor league development seems to be an afterthought, with all his focus on making a “big splash”.
But he does seem to have good personal relationships with other GMs, and he does seem to be respected by players. When he wants a guy, he generally gets them.
So if we had someone who oversaw Hendry, took away a little power from him, and told him what the 5 year plan would be, what kind of players we needed in the system, how to overhaul the minor league system so players were well-developed, evaluated and promoted—then I could be ok with Hendry staying. But that someone, whether it’s Gillick or someone else—HAS to be someone Hendry will defer to. It can’t be someone afraid to tell Hendry what to do.
DEJESUS!!!
His best success came when he kow-towed to managers
Hendry needs guys like Baker and Piniella to provide him with some focus on the players he needs to go after. He can’t do it by himself. I don’t know that he has a philosophy and I think that’s the problem.
Honestly, the things that you ascribe to the President really should be done by the GM.
by jerry morales rules on Aug 15, 2011 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions
Hendry is a master of the reverse-detail.
Most folks try to fix up the old jalopy. Not Jim. He highlights the dents.
Hendry's problem is that he isn't proactive.
He’s reactive. His approach has been to buy expensive band aids to resolve immediate problems that resulted from his lack of a long term vision.
can we just fire Hendry and move on
Chronologically inept since 2060
Q: Why did Chuck Norris cross the road?
A: Ditka
Ditka's mustache can block a Chuck Norris round house
Ditka's mustache can kill two stones with one bird
It is better to spend money like there's no tomorrow than to spend tonight like there's no money! - Irish toast.
slcathena is my wonder twin, and our battle cry is "Twinners rooting for the Winners (by which I mean Starwin and Darwin)"
Not unless
you take up a collection for around a billion and buy the team from Ricketts. Otherwise it’s his call, and he seems to think Hendry is doing a good job.
It’s the injuries.
DEJESUS!!!























