Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: VIDEO: Veterans Share Favorite Sports Memories

Cubs Lose To Astros On Walkoff Grand Slam

Recently, on a SABR discussion list to which I subscribe, there was talk of what one of the posters called the "Ultimate Grand Slam".

This describes a grand slam hit on a 3-2 count, with two out in the bottom of the ninth and the hitter's team trailing by three runs.

Last night's wasn't quite that -- the count was 2-2 and there was only one out in the inning -- but it's close enough. Pretty much everything else has happened in this house of horrors Cubs season, so why not give up a walkoff grand slam? And a pinch-hit GS as well -- the first pinch-hit grand slam of 2011 by anyone, and only the second home run of Brian Bogusevic's brief major league career.

It was the second walkoff slam, down three runs, this year -- Travis Hafner of the Indians hit one on July 7 against Toronto. It's the 26th such home run in MLB history. You'll note there is actually one Cub on that list, Ellis Burton, who did it on August 31, 1963. Oddly enough, it was also against Houston, and the final score was 6-5, just as it was in Tuesday night's loss to the Astros.

Had enough? I think we've all had enough of the 2011 season. Yet, it has 39 games to go.

Star-divide

Before that ninth inning, the Cubs had played another solid game. Ryan Dempster threw seven good innings. Kerry Wood was lights-out for the second straight day setting things up in the eighth inning for what you'd think would have been an easy save for Carlos Marmol. Tyler Colvin hit a two-run homer.

And then Marmol came into the game. Now, some of you will probably try to blame this loss on Jim Hendry, but Marmol -- who had posted eight saves, had a 1.04 ERA, 0.692 WHIP and 12 strikeouts in 8.2 innings this month -- looked like he was back on his game.

Until last night, that is. After retiring the first hitter in the ninth easily, Marmol lost it. In situations like that, a major league manager has to at the very least consider replacing the closer, as he would replace any other pitcher in any other inning who is struggling. Why wasn't Sean Marshall warming up after Marmol had struggled in throwing 18 pitches to the first three hitters? Then he threw another eight to Matt Downs and walked him. That would have been the perfect situation to bring in Marshall to throw to the lefthanded Bogusevic.

The Cubs have to decide what they're in the business of doing in situations like this: giving their closer "confidence", or winning baseball games. Just because a pitcher is a "closer" does not mean that you leave him in when he clearly doesn't have it. Sometimes, if you want to win, you've got to think outside the proverbial box.

Mike Quade didn't do that Tuesday night and so the Cubs join the list of 25 other teams -- since 1881! -- to give up walkoff grand slams, leading by three runs in the bottom of the ninth.

Someday, maybe we'll look back at the 2011 season and laugh. Not yet, though. There's another game this afternoon; the game preview will post at 11:30 a.m. CDT.

Comment 205 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Ouch. Sorry I missed this one.

Well, maybe not.

There are 108 beads in a Catholic rosary and there are 108 stitches in a baseball. Who says baseball isn't a religion?

by Zeke on Aug 17, 2011 7:36 AM CDT reply actions  

LOL.

Rec’d.

'Never look down on anybody unless you're helping him up.'

by Unique on Aug 17, 2011 7:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

I can't take this anymore!!!

When will it end?? I turned off WGN last night thinking it was a win…then I hear on radio this morning that the Astros win on a walk off GS. I just can’t take this anymore and I have been a Cubs fan since 1976!

by 1967cubbie on Aug 17, 2011 7:38 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

I got home from work

and turned the game on in the BOTTOM of the 9th. Not sure which is worse.

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Aug 17, 2011 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

I am guessing...

that it is about time for a locker cleaning for about 15-20 guys on that team!

by 1967cubbie on Aug 17, 2011 7:39 AM CDT reply actions  

Does the pitching coach for the Cubs

EVER go out to a pitcher and talk to him? I don’t watch any games really, but I don’t think I have seen him yet this year.

Fire Jim Hendry. Injuries aren't the problem.

by BigJohnAZ on Aug 17, 2011 7:40 AM CDT reply actions  

He does.

But not often enough. And I doubt it would have made much difference last night.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Aug 17, 2011 7:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Am I wrong or does Marmol throw stricltly sliders now

It seemed in the past that he would use the heater to set up the slider. It seems this year it’s all White Castles all the time lol

Fire Jim Hendry. Injuries aren't the problem.

by BigJohnAZ on Aug 17, 2011 7:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Last night he threw a fair number of fastballs.

Bogusevic hit the home run on a slider.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Aug 17, 2011 7:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ok. The last game I watched Marmol a few weeks ago

I think his slider to fastball ratio was 10:1.

Fire Jim Hendry. Injuries aren't the problem.

by BigJohnAZ on Aug 17, 2011 7:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

That was a fastball

the MPH listed it a 91MPH, It was straight down the middle.

by Grockcubs on Aug 17, 2011 7:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

Huh.

Thought that one was a slider. Guess he should have thrown one.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Aug 17, 2011 7:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yep

Just watched it again this morning on MLB, and it was straight as an arrow down the heart. Still can’t believe it.

by Grockcubs on Aug 17, 2011 7:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

It was a fastball.....It was the only thing that seemed to be getting over for a strike.

Quade didnt see this of course and let Marshall enjoy the game from a chair.

by TJ11 on Aug 17, 2011 8:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

I disagree

He has been shaky in the last 2 saves and has been demoted already once this season. Is it worth the closers confidence to lose the game? What about the feelings of the rest of the team?

It was obvious to most he didnt have it. That Quade didnt have Marshall ready or at least up, is on the manager.

by TJ11 on Aug 17, 2011 9:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

While you make a good point about the lack

of confidence in Marmol, the loss is not on Quade.

Quade is a horrible manager, but having Marshall “up” isn’t going to change the outcome of the game.

'Never look down on anybody unless you're helping him up.'

by Unique on Aug 17, 2011 9:27 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Right.

At a certain point, your closer’s “confidence” has to take a back seat to winning.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Aug 17, 2011 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

at a certain point you throw out the proverbial Conventions of a MLB Manager

A friend once told me: "I don't buy the idea that a team learns anything from a loss, the only thing they learn is how to lose games."---Knight

by Ivy Walls on Aug 17, 2011 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

Walk off grand slams

are not good confidence builders, anyway.

A good manager is situational, and needs to know when to stick with the guy and when he is better off pulled. In this case, pulled is kind of the obvious choice, even without hindsight.

by cubmudgeon on Aug 17, 2011 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

It was a slider.

tha’ts how bad his slider was, it looked almost straight. He got away with 2 hangers to downs. But it was a slider. says Marmol…

http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/cubs/post/_/id/5994/marmols-bad-day-blows-win-for-cubs

by MDavis on Aug 17, 2011 8:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

By the way, that Marmol quote suggests it wasn't a slider...

He said the slider wasn’t good, so with two strikes he couldn’t go back to the slider.

He had just thrown two sliders for balls after 3 fastballs for strikes. So he went back to the fastball (92mph). It was down in the zone, but the hitter got it and drilled it.

by SouthernCub on Aug 17, 2011 8:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well Levine seems to believe it was a slider, and i would like to think he asked Marmol what the pitch was...

“Bogusevic, an Oak Lawn native, took his next slider out of the park for his his first career grand slam. "

either way, he shouldnt of been in the game at that point. doesn’t matter what he threw ha.

by MDavis on Aug 17, 2011 9:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

It had the velocity of a fastball and the trajectory of a fastball

I saw the pitch last night. Marmol’s slider is pretty distinctive, and this wasn’t it. Add to that the quote you provided seems to suggest it was a fastball as well. I’m inclined to believe that Levine was mistaken on this one.

But yes, it doesn’t really matter whether it was a fastball or a slider – the result was a long long HR.

by SouthernCub on Aug 17, 2011 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

True points.

i guess that shows how bad is slider was last night if i’m thinking a fastball looked the same haha.

by MDavis on Aug 17, 2011 9:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

Honestly even if the magic manager fairy

came down and made Q a great manager. This team sucks.

by Madison Cub Fan on Aug 17, 2011 9:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

you mean something like this?

A friend once told me: "I don't buy the idea that a team learns anything from a loss, the only thing they learn is how to lose games."---Knight

by Ivy Walls on Aug 17, 2011 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

Your right...

…it was clearly a fastball.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Aug 17, 2011 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'd guess he throws the slider about 75-80% of the time...

He gave up a HR on a fastball, by the way.

Marmol apparently doesn’t have much confidence in the fastball these days.

by SouthernCub on Aug 17, 2011 8:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Len and Bob spoke of this

During the broadcast Len and Bob talked about this and what it would be like if Marmol went out there and threw nothing but heaters.

by rbarnold2626 on Aug 17, 2011 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

In which Bob qualified as a blowout game and to just mess with the advanced reports

by Donbedouin on Aug 17, 2011 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Riggins talking to him

may or may not have made a difference, but you should still go out and talk to him.

Go Cubs Go! Go Cubs Go!
Hey Chicago what do you say,
The Cubs are gonna win today!

by revtrh on Aug 17, 2011 9:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

Great observation...

and you’re right.

You never see him chatting with pitchers in the dugout either. What the hell does Riggins do?

by kanderber on Aug 17, 2011 11:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

So glad....

I turned off the game after Colvin’s blast. I loved the reaction by the Astros pitcher, priceless! It was a no doubt abouter!!

Just curious, was there at least a mound visit by either Quade or the pitching coach during the Marmol melt down? Geez, I can’t even remember his name for the lack of times I’ve seen come to talk to one of his pitchers.

by cubbiefanTN on Aug 17, 2011 7:41 AM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Al, this is why u trade Marmol

at the deadline, not because he blew the save, because he actually had some value. His contract goes way up the next two years as well. This is why Hendry needs to go, he still believes this team can compete and will do everything he can to save his job.

Al, would u trust Marmol to save postseason games? You think u can win the World Series with a closer who doesn’t consistently throw strikes? Would anyone trust him in game seven of a postseason game? Not me, that’s why u trade him if winning the world series is really the goal.

by MikeJW on Aug 17, 2011 7:42 AM CDT reply actions  

I have no problem trading Marmol.

As long as you get decent value for him.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Aug 17, 2011 7:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

Same here

Fire Jim Hendry. Injuries aren't the problem.

by BigJohnAZ on Aug 17, 2011 7:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

Marmol

will make 7M next year and 9.8M in 2013. If he can’t find some consistency it will be tough to get value back.

by Grockcubs on Aug 17, 2011 7:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

I still think my man Kerry could still do a good job

I have no stats in front of me, but my rather round gut says he’d be ok again.

Fire Jim Hendry. Injuries aren't the problem.

by BigJohnAZ on Aug 17, 2011 7:50 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I'm with you.

Wood seems to have gotten back into the groove. If they can move Marmol for good value, do it. Let Wood and Marshall hold down the closer spot until Carpenter or, should he not go back to the rotation, Cashner are ready to take it. I don’t think youcan win post season games with a guy who throws 50% of his pitches for balls.

by MDavis on Aug 17, 2011 8:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

Trading Marmol

The time to trade him and get alot back has prolly passed. Shoulda dealt him at the deadline…….hopefully he can be moved this winter. “Value” for him would simply be getting rid of that contract

by plenz on Aug 17, 2011 8:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

While I do think trading Marmol would be smart

He’s definitely not bad enough that you simply look to drop for nothing.

by madcow256 on Aug 17, 2011 9:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

He was in his biggest slump right before the deadline...

so the time to trade him was probably last year or last offseason. His July had already really hurt his trade value.

by SouthernCub on Aug 17, 2011 9:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

What on earth
"Value" for him would simply be getting rid of that contract

Oh my.

First off, even a diminished Marmol is valuable. He’s still striking out 11+ guys per 9 innings, and his ERA is out of line with his FIP, which is decent. If he was available he would have suitors. He’s in a slump right now, and that slump started before the trade deadline, but he’s still got nasty stuff and can get back on track. He’s only 1 year removed from one of the most dominant seasons by a reliever in baseball history.

And you clearly don’t understand MLB contracts if you think the Cubs need to “get rid” of that contract – if they wanted to get rid of him they could just non-tender him in the off-season.

by Wreckard on Aug 17, 2011 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

But I think it's still dealable.

Someone will take him, and offer some value in return. I think the Cubs should do it.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Aug 17, 2011 11:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

I still think he has value.

He’s been good this year, just not as great as last year. I guess I don’t see any reason to deal him.

by Wreckard on Aug 17, 2011 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Good to see Colvin

hit a jack and Demp threw well after about 50+ pitches in the first 2 innings.
 I think Marmol is a good closer on a team that will win 80-85 games. He will have streaks like mentioned up to last night. He can be lights out for 3 weeks then turn on a dime and struggle for 4 games in a row. 2009 he struggled with a WHIP of 1.4, 2010 he was tremendous and now this year a struggle with a WHIP of 1.3. WHIP’s in that range for closers is not good.

by Grockcubs on Aug 17, 2011 7:48 AM CDT reply actions  

No offense TJ

but I think we should probably block each other that day. I’m sensing this is going to be quite a big day for you!!!!!! and since I’m generally a softie and likely to buy into anything Ricketts has to say it might be best to ignore each other.

WWFCD?

by katie casey on Aug 17, 2011 8:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hilarious!

Do you think I am gearing up for the incredibly stupid announcement that Hendry and Quade will return?

I am sure there will be a few defenders on that day. You will not be alone.

by TJ11 on Aug 17, 2011 8:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Just me guesinng

But with draft signing perfect time for him to talk about how the farm system is improving and that is a positive since he took over the team.

Deflecting questions that about any of the topics we care about.

by Madison Cub Fan on Aug 17, 2011 9:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

I do care if the farm system improving.

It’s one of the few things giving me hope. That is what I’d like to hear about.

WWFCD?

by katie casey on Aug 17, 2011 9:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

If thats all he talks about or possibly hiring an actual baseball guy to be president, fine..

But when he says Hendry and Quade are coming back next year, announcing it now for no reason, it is going to hit the fan.

by TJ11 on Aug 17, 2011 9:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yep there is no question

Tom will bring back the two. I see no other reason for this planned presser.

by Grockcubs on Aug 17, 2011 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Really?

I’d think there would be many possible reasons for Tom’s announcement. Until we hear it, everything posted here is guessing, including by me, and I have no guesses.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Aug 17, 2011 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Katie

There is another option, sign out of bcb & just read some of the comments. I find by scrolling though them not signed in keeps me out of the debate.

by Madison Cub Fan on Aug 17, 2011 8:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

When I want to stay out of it

I just read Al’s stories/recaps and skip the comments.

WWFCD?

by katie casey on Aug 17, 2011 9:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

That is what I will likely do

B/c I can think about maybe 5 things that I don’t want to hear. A few I’d like sincerely addressed with I just don’t see honest answers.

by Madison Cub Fan on Aug 17, 2011 9:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yes.

But the roof would have been closed in that case.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Aug 17, 2011 8:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Losing a game that way is more memorable than winning one with a slam...

The proof for me is that while I have no recollection of Burton’s HR in ‘63, I clearly remember the radio broadcast of Roberto Clemente’s inside-the-park slam against the Cubs in a night game at Forbes Field in 1956. Jack Quinlan’s dramatic call of this HR belongs in any collection of Cubs lowlights. FWIW, here’s the link to that game:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/PIT/PIT195607250.shtml

As you can see, the Cubs staged late-inning rallies to take the lead, only to have Turk Lown and Jim Brosnan give it all away without retiring a batter in the ninth.

On a positive note, Marmol’s collapse appears to be the Cubs first walk-off loss with a three-run lead since that game ’56. It happens every 55 years, just like clockwork.

"Elder White! Look at the talent on those Cubs!" Harry Caray, KMOX Radio, 4/22/62

"And you have to wonder – What's the matter with Broglio?" Harry, KMOX, 5/24/64

by ernaga on Aug 17, 2011 7:56 AM CDT reply actions  

I remember the Ellis Burton game

I got a refresher from the Baseball-Reference link in the original topic (above), but there’s a couple more things I can add …
Actually it was a FIVE-run come-from-behind victory - and all the runs came with two out! Ken Hubbs led off with a flyout, and Merritt Ranew (who hit just under .400 for most of the season) followed with a single. Then Dick Bertel flied out for the second out. Don Landrum pinch-hit, and reached on a drag bunt down the third-base line. Andre Rogers followed with a base hit (driving in Ranew), and Houston (then the Colt .45s) brought in Hal Woodeshick (who was lights-out that year) to pitch to Lou Brock. Leo Burke (!) pinch hit for Brock (!!!), and worked Woodeshick for a walk. That’s when Burton (my favorite player at the time) came to bat, and launced one into the bleachers …

by HotRuta on Aug 17, 2011 9:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

Never did understand why Burton didn't play CF for the Cubs for several years after his productive debut in '63.

Instead, in ‘64 we got Billy Cowan, with his 5-1 K to W ratio. IIRC, the Cubs gave the switch-hitting Burton a September call-up where he hit HR’s from both sides of the plate in a game against the Braves.

"Elder White! Look at the talent on those Cubs!" Harry Caray, KMOX Radio, 4/22/62

"And you have to wonder – What's the matter with Broglio?" Harry, KMOX, 5/24/64

by ernaga on Aug 17, 2011 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Because Burton wasn't really that good.

He hit only .230 in ’63. He did get that September callup in ’64 and played a lot of the time, but hit .184 that month. I imagine if he had done better in that callup, he might have kept the job.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Aug 17, 2011 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

... and in '64, the Cubs had found the next Duke Snider ...

They brought up their latest phenom: Billy Cowan. He played pretty good CF, had some power and was seriously fast.
Unfortunately, he wasn’t fast enough to steal 1B, and he struck out like Rob Deer. After the ‘64 season, they traded him to the Mets - for George Altman (who had been a much better player than Cowan, but didn’t do well over the next couple of years (injuries? I don’t remember)). According to an infallible source (Wikipedia …) he had some success playing in Japan from ’68 to ’75.
Meanwhile, Cowan had some modest success as a part-time player for the Angels (’69 –’71) before fading away into obscurity - like all the other Cubs’ phenoms of that time …
Burton got back up to the Cubs for a cup of coffee in ’65, but apparently retired after that. I guess once you’ve tasted the Cubs, nothing else is good enough.

by HotRuta on Aug 17, 2011 9:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

In the bag, then the bag leaked.

I thought the game was over and now this. Add it to the list.

I really think we can catch a team or two in front of us. The Reds are really limping and may call it quits on defending their title. They have to be disappointed and will probably check out soon.

We'll miss you Big Boy. #10 for Hall of Fame.

by mrcubsfan on Aug 17, 2011 7:57 AM CDT reply actions  

I could see the fear on his face

Seriously. When bad Marmol is on the mound, you know it. Look closely at his face. He looks scared. I’m not even joking. I had a strange feeling a walk of grand slam was in the making when there were still only 2 men on base. Have the pitching coach call me next time Marmol is closing and I’ll let him know when to take Marmol out. Something gets in his head and he can’t throw his slider. I think he only threw one or two good sliders last night.

by adam316 on Aug 17, 2011 8:03 AM CDT reply actions  

When his slider isn't working, it's real bad, real fat for the hitters.

Instead of coming in flat and breaking at the end, it is just what I would describe as a rainbow pitch, a big fat floater. I know nothing about pitching dynamics, but it really just seems like he has trouble finding his arm slot for those sliders, and then bad things happen.

by adam316 on Aug 17, 2011 8:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ah well, I suppose maybe I am just recalling what

I heard him say then, without realizing it. Bottom line seems to be that Marmol loses confidence in himself or his slider. We know he has a nasty slider, so it seems it must be in his head when he has trouble throwing it.

by adam316 on Aug 17, 2011 8:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

Of course I Bleed Cubbie Blue, but...

Part of me was happy for the Astros. Somewhere out there in that (small) crowd was a kid with his Dad watching his first ever Astros/MLB game. They got hot dogs and popcorn and ice cream and a new Astros hat and they cheered for the home team. And they stayed until the bottom of the 9th inning when, somehow, against all odds, the Astros loaded the bases against one of the nastiest (go with me here) closers in baseball and Brain B. (one of the new Killer B’s) crushes a grand slam to win the game!! ASTROS WIN! ASTROS WIN! The kid goes crazy, the dad hugs his kid and they have a memory that will last them a lifetime…

Now, don’t you feel good for that kid and his dad? I know I do…

Get 'em on, Get 'em over, Get 'em in!

by DKT on Aug 17, 2011 8:10 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

I like to see the good in things

But that is a tough one to come up with. I see the Dad getting his kid the heck out of there just before the end of the game so as not to hang around and soak up the disappointment, only to hear on the radio that they won. LOL!

by adam316 on Aug 17, 2011 8:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

(i agree with your scenario completely)

buy my cynical 2011 cubs fan brain is saying…somewhere there’s a dad and his kid who live in houston, but the dad was originally from illinois and so he’s passed on the cubs fan gene to his son, and they go to their first “cubs” game and they stick around for the win to so the dad and son can sing “go cubs go” to themselves, only to watch that Grand slam an the cubs love in glorious fashion. and now the kid will have a bitter taste/absolute love for the Cubs that will last a lifetime.

Now dont you feel terrible for that kid?

( this has all been in snarkiness)

by epsilon on Aug 17, 2011 8:22 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

For Cubs fans, it's a crushing defeat...

For Astros fans, it’s the BEST WIN EVER!!

I guess it’s easier to joke about this game because both teams are so bad this year. Can you imagine this defeat if the Cubs were in a pennant race?? It would have been worse than Brant Brown!

Get 'em on, Get 'em over, Get 'em in!

by DKT on Aug 17, 2011 8:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

They did have that one year in our lifetime...

when they actually went to the World Series.

--------------------------------
Just North of Wrigley Field

by jameslcrockett on Aug 17, 2011 1:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

This game is on Quade IMO

Al mentioned that…

Marmol — who had posted eight saves, had a 1.04 ERA, 0.692 WHIP and 12 strikeouts in 8.2 innings this month — looked like he was back on his game.

But in those last few games he has been putting a lot of runners on base, and looking very shaky in the process. Obviously, his slider isn’t doing the wonderful things it did last year and batters are taking more pitches off him, thus getting more walks. Just look at his WHIP in those last 8 games.

Bottom line is that Q needs to have a backup pitcher ready when Marmol is pitching and not be afraid to to take him out if he is struggling mightily (like last night).

If you think you've seen it all...just wait!

by CubFanSince1970 on Aug 17, 2011 8:10 AM CDT reply actions  

Putting a lot of runners on base?

Not with a 0.692 WHIP. Six baserunners in 8.2 innings. Not a lot.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Aug 17, 2011 8:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

He put 3 batters on in that last game against Atlanta and gave up 4 baserunners last night.

That’s seven by my counting (in just two games).

What did he do in the other 6?

If you think you've seen it all...just wait!

by CubFanSince1970 on Aug 17, 2011 8:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not sure.

I just used bb-ref to add up all eight games. That did NOT include last night.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Aug 17, 2011 8:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

In 8 of his previous 9 outings (prior to last night)

Marmol had given up only 2 baserunners TOTAL (no hits). He had 10 K in 7.2 IP.

by SouthernCub on Aug 17, 2011 9:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

?????

Marmol had 7 runners in the last 9 outings. 2 hits , 4 walks and one hit batsman.
I am not saying he was terrible but he was not totally lights out either.

"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either

by Doggie Stalker on Aug 17, 2011 9:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

The poster asked what his numbers were OUTSIDE of the Atlanta game...

So take away the 2 H and 2 of the BB as they were in the Atlanta game. I hadn’t seen the HBP, so make it 4 baserunners (no hits) in those 8 of the 9 last nine.

by SouthernCub on Aug 17, 2011 9:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

And to address your point

8 runners with 12 K in the last 9 outings is still pretty darn good. And that’s ignoring the fact that we were talking about the games other than the one big blowup game this month.

Marmol had had one bad outing this month, and hadn’t really been touched in the others. Of course, in hindsight, he didn’t have it last night. But going to him last night wasn’t a bad decision a priori.

by SouthernCub on Aug 17, 2011 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

My problem is just that he has pitched too much

in the last two weeks. Russell was warming up with him. With a 3 run lead and Marmol used so much I would started the inning with Russell. I don’t think leaving him in was so terrible because either he is your closer or he isn’t

"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either

by Doggie Stalker on Aug 17, 2011 9:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

Pretty much yes

Closers rarely get removed, especially if they have gotten a guy out and only one run has scored. Marmol may be a unique case in the good Carlos/ bad Carlos is easy to spot sometime, but to be fair this was not a case where he was just walking multiple batters on 4 pitches. 21 of his 32 pitches were strikes. As you know the HR was unusual for Marmol. If he had WALKED the guy with the bases loaded than maybe you take him out and Russell was warmed up.

"I am not ashamed to say I love Greg Maddux" - Jim Hendry
Me either

by Doggie Stalker on Aug 17, 2011 9:32 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

here is my gift to Quade and staff

A friend once told me: "I don't buy the idea that a team learns anything from a loss, the only thing they learn is how to lose games."---Knight

by Ivy Walls on Aug 17, 2011 11:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

But how was the game, Mrs. Yellon... ;-)

If the Cubs still have a chance, no matter how small, it’s still Go Cubs, damn the math and pass the KoolAid.

by eths on Aug 17, 2011 8:13 AM CDT reply actions  

AWESOME! Glad I didn't watch it.

"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)

Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)

by SackMan on Aug 17, 2011 8:19 AM CDT reply actions  

Marmol

28 for 36 is 78% save rate. Kevin Gregg was around there wasn’t he?? Get rid of this guy and put Woody in there next year and groom someone else for the job down the line. Another colossal waste of money

by plenz on Aug 17, 2011 8:22 AM CDT reply actions  

No.

He’s too erratic and walks too many guys — he’d be just like Marmol.

Carpenter is the guy I’d like to see.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Aug 17, 2011 9:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

Watching Marmol

It’s pretty clear, his slider is not dropping like it used to! If you watch Marmol, he gets fouled off a lot more and has given up more hits/inning than the last 3 years. Watch his slider next time…it has little downward movement (unless it’s clearly a ball).

by vin23 on Aug 17, 2011 9:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'd give Marmol the rest of the season off from closing...

and let those two try it. (Since I have to bother thinking about closers and saves at all.)

--------------------------------
Just North of Wrigley Field

by jameslcrockett on Aug 17, 2011 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes lets get rid of a guy coming off of one of the most dominant seasons by a reliever ever

…because of a couple of bad outings. And replace him with a pitcher who has been nearly as shaky this year.

by Wreckard on Aug 17, 2011 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

Just because Marmol was dominant in 2010...

… does not mean he can or will do that in 2012 or future seasons.

Wood may not be the answer. But Carpenter or someone else might be.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Aug 17, 2011 11:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

You could say that about any player in baseball.

My point is that he has very recently been not just ok, not just good, but amazing. Dominant.

He’s shown flashes of it this year. He’s healthy. He’s young. He still has good stuff. He’s clearly struggling with his mechanics.

I just don’t understand how a couple of inconsistent months has people ready to give up on someone who was so recently the best player on the Cubs team.

by Wreckard on Aug 17, 2011 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Because you can make just about anyone a closer.

If you think he has that much value, then maybe it’s time to sell high on him.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Aug 17, 2011 11:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

In what universe is trading someone after a bad season selling high?

My point is that he has a good chance of returning to dominance. The value you’d have if he does that is much higher than if you trade him. Especially considering that given what he’s owed, and that he’s had an off year, I don’t think you’d fetch a huge package in return. Certainly nothing like what the Padres got for Adams.

Because you can make just about anyone a closer.

This is a pretty absurd thing to say. But setting it aside for a second, sure anyone can be a closer – but dominant relievers are extremely rare. And Marmol has the potential to be just that.

You’re better off rolling the dice on him next year, and if you really aren’t competitive – trade him at the deadline then. If he returns to dominance then you might actually get a top-50 prospect in return. And if you are competitive – it will be because you have bounceback years from guys like Marmol.

by Wreckard on Aug 17, 2011 11:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

I wonder about a "bounceback year".

Because it appears that his year of dominance may be the outlier.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Aug 17, 2011 11:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

How many blown saves does this team have?

Aside from Marmol’s 8, Wood and Marshall have given up leads in late innings their fair share….Our bullpen is only average despite some quality outings.

I bet we’re in the top 20% of blown saves, and think Marmol is No. 1. I read somewhere he might add a changeup which he had and used when first came up as a starter. Good idea!!

by QuincyCub on Aug 17, 2011 8:23 AM CDT reply actions  

According to FanGraphs...

the Cubs have the 16th most shutdowns and the 11th most meltdowns.

Read more about these stats and why they’re much better than saves/blown saves here.

--------------------------------
Just North of Wrigley Field

by jameslcrockett on Aug 17, 2011 1:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Marmol's velocity appears to be down.

His Fastball is at 91-92, which would still be decent if he could throw it to spots. However, he can’t. Further, the velocity margin between his slider and his fastball has decreased and I imagine that is one of the reasons why both of his pitches are becoming more hittable.

I imagine at the end of the year we will hear about how Marmol needs offseason surgery.

"All I want is food and creative love" - Rusted Root

by TheRiot Police on Aug 17, 2011 8:29 AM CDT reply actions  

I'm guessing that the break on his slider isn't as sharp either

he’s still throwing it mid-80s, but it doesn’t seem to be buckling hitters quite as much as it used to do. But the 3-5mph loss of velocity on the fastball is worrisome.

by SouthernCub on Aug 17, 2011 9:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

what Valentine and Hershiser discussed

A slider dominant closer starts to lose his effectiveness over time, the lose their command and velocity of their fastball and start to rely on their slider even more, where they lose their effectiveness in their slider because batters begin to sit on it knowing they can catch or lay off the fastball anyway.

There is a fine line to closers, they need a fastball that is overpowering and a trick pitch, something that bends, where batters are keyed up in trying to catch a fastball that is in the strike zone, and either lay off a bender or swing and miss because of their timing.

Marmol used to have a FB at 95-96, though straight it was thrown for strikes, often the first pitch. Then he had a sharp late breaking slider, it bent down and he could either spot it on their hands or back door or have it break off the plate as they would swing and miss.

That was 2009-2010.

Now his FB is 91-92 at best, and not thrown for strikes where he is pitching his slider 65-70%. Cubs need to package him this year and dump him

A friend once told me: "I don't buy the idea that a team learns anything from a loss, the only thing they learn is how to lose games."---Knight

by Ivy Walls on Aug 17, 2011 11:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree with a lot of what you said here...

but Marmol never threw a lot of pitches for strikes. He’s been wild from the beginning. His walk rate has always been really high (it’s actually slightly lower this year than his career average).

It’s just that people used to not be able to hit him because his stuff was electric. This year, his stuff is less electric, and people are hitting him more. He’s giving up 7.4 hits per 9 IP (his previous norms were 4-5 hits per 9 IP), while his K rate and BB rate are about the same as his career averages.

by SouthernCub on Aug 17, 2011 3:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

just read this Gem by Gene Duffey(?) on cubs.com
Despite the talent on the roster, the Cubs were never truly in the National League Central race this season.

what talent? I mean this question in all honesty….What talent did he see that would carry this team to the division title? do we have a first baseman better than Albert, Joey, Prince? nope(maybe in the field, but all three are certainly not hurting their teams). do we have a better 2b, RF, LF, CF…is our pitching staff better than any in the division except houstons?

by epsilon on Aug 17, 2011 8:44 AM CDT reply actions  

Must mean

Talent compared to a high school team.

In my lifetime please!

by Kennabelle on Aug 17, 2011 9:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ok, so now we're at this.

We’re blaming Quade for not wanting to win?

Hasn’t the narrative been for a couple of weeks now that we don’t want a big dead cat bounce so that Quade keep his job?

Now he does what you want him to and you’re not happy?

Cubs fans, no pleasing them.

[...]when Giants coach Steve Owen, a certified defensive genius, was asked how he planned to stop Nagurski, he said: "With a shotgun, as he’s leaving the dressing room."

by NobodySpecial on Aug 17, 2011 8:45 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

I think we'd like to see competent managing on a consistant basis

Marmol has been EXTREMELY untrustworthy this season. He allowed three straight base runners after getting the first out. It’s not – you know – inconceivable to take Marmol out at that point.

Here’s my question, do you have a problem with the way the 9th inning was handled? Would you have left a closer who’s been pretty shaky this season on the mound after he loaded the bases with only one out? If you don’t, then…well, I don’t get you.

If you DO have a problem with that decisions, the STFU and stop attacking people for sharing your opinion.

Chiefs Chat: chiefs.sportsblog.com

by Nunyabidness on Aug 17, 2011 8:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

To clarify, at this point in the season, competent managing means playing the youngster over the veteran to see what he has

but it also means actually going for a win when you’re up 3 in the ninth. No one is asking Quade to throw games.

Chiefs Chat: chiefs.sportsblog.com

by Nunyabidness on Aug 17, 2011 8:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Marshall wasn't an option, as has been pointed out.

Wood hasn’t been lights out either. And the rest of the pen is no better than Marmol at that point.

Like it or not, Marmol is your closer, and you have to use him to close, especially after he’s had a day of rest. If he blows a save, that’s not bad management, that’s bad pitching. I can’t think of a single manager who would get up someone to supplant their reliever.

Oh, and STFU? Kiss off. Only one guy here gets to make that decision, and you aren’t him. Save your incivility for someone else.

[...]when Giants coach Steve Owen, a certified defensive genius, was asked how he planned to stop Nagurski, he said: "With a shotgun, as he’s leaving the dressing room."

by NobodySpecial on Aug 18, 2011 3:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

When Marmol is on

When Marmol is on, he has stuff that can be lights out. He can also be serviceable as a closer. When he’s off, he’s one of the worst pitchers I’ve ever seen. I’ll say this and I’ll say it again. I don’t like Marmol as a closer. He’s far too inconsistent and even when he’s on, he makes me want to forcefully yank the hair from my head.

What I don’t get is why many managers will watch their closer blow games. I know they talk about confidence, but what does a game like that do for Marmol’s confidence? I know the Cubs are out of contention, but the object is to win games. The Cubs should have gone to yellow alert and had Marshall getting ready in the bullpen. Who says the closer is the one who has to earn a save? Sometimes you have to think outside the box to win games and many managers aren’t willing to do that when it comes to their closers. It isn’t just a Quade problem.

RIP Ronnie James Dio (July 10, 1942 - May 16, 2010) and Ron Santo (February 25, 1940-December 2, 2010).
If you disagree with me in any way, you are wrong.

by Ace Venom on Aug 17, 2011 8:51 AM CDT reply actions   2 recs

Exactly.

Most modern managers won’t do what you suggest — but they should.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Aug 17, 2011 8:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree...

Quade’s handling of Marmol is pretty standard for managers. I guess the thinking is that the managers don’t want their closer looking over his shoulder to who’s warming up in the bullpen. It’s a show of faith move.

Stats guys have been suggesting the “using your closer in the toughest situation” argument for years. The problem is that the finances of baseball are stat driven. And right now, saves are the biggest stat for a relief pitcher.

It’s stupid, but that’s the way it is. Maybe someday someone will figure out a better system for valuing relievers (heck, there are options out there already) instead of the save, maybe we’d eventually see this happen.

by SouthernCub on Aug 17, 2011 9:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

There are better stats than the save out there

Marmol’s WHIP has skyrocketed from last season (1.185 in 2010 vs. 1.448 in 2011). What accounts for this rise in WHIP has been his elevated H/9 ratio. This confirms what I’ve seen from Marmol this year. His walks are about the same on average (5.7 BB/9 in 2011 vs. 6.0 BB/9 in 2010), but his pitches are much more hittable now (7.4 H/9 in 2011 vs. 4.6 H/9 in 2010). This is not very encouraging for someone you want as your regular closer.

For those of you who like WAR, he accumulated 3.0 rWAR as a reliever last season, which is a very successful season for a reliever. Many regular position players don’t crack 3.0 rWAR in a season. Marmol’s value as a reliever was at its highest after 2010, but it’s dropped significantly since then. He may have a problem with his mechanics this season, but the drop in his velocity is not encouraging either. It would probably be beneficial to him in the long run to start working on his changeup again.

RIP Ronnie James Dio (July 10, 1942 - May 16, 2010) and Ron Santo (February 25, 1940-December 2, 2010).
If you disagree with me in any way, you are wrong.

by Ace Venom on Aug 17, 2011 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

What else?

I keep asking myself that question and the Cubs seem to find ways to answer it time and again this year. I’ll stop asking now.

by DCCubsFan on Aug 17, 2011 8:53 AM CDT reply actions  

We've been HENDRIED again

As I commented in late July, the Cubs should’ve traded everyone and anyone except Castro (and maybe Barney).
Marmol can easily be replaced, especially without any type of qualified pitching coach. Also, we think of Marmol as a young guy still…he’s not. He’s expensive! Cubs could’ve got a real prospect for him.
I mean, would Kerry Wood be putting up any worse stats than Marmol? Would even Carpenter?

by vin23 on Aug 17, 2011 9:14 AM CDT reply actions  

Losses are good

I really don’t care about the loss (besides the 10 second sting0, I care that we have ANOTHER expensive contract that is wasting away here. Cubs could’ve saved payroll and added a quality prospect.

by vin23 on Aug 17, 2011 9:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hendry did not throw the pitch.....

But he has put this team and coaching staff together…..

But no, the closer did not do his job last night and that is on him.

That said Marshall should have been pitching to the last batter.

by TJ11 on Aug 17, 2011 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

2011 Hopes

As I posted…what do the cubs hope to get out of 2011??? Sitting on tradeable assets is dumb. Why waste everyones time and just play out the string. Like I said, the loss isn’t a big deal, it’s that cubs are wasting valuable 2 months and tradeable assets!

by vin23 on Aug 17, 2011 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

I disagree with that TJ

Marmol is the closer. He has been strong lately. You would think he could get a save against the worst team in baseball.
 But yes this is the 2011 Cubs.

by Grockcubs on Aug 17, 2011 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

Marmol is owed

17M in the next two years. For an erratic closer that is a ton of coin.

by Grockcubs on Aug 17, 2011 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Unfortunately in MLB...

he would have been a steal at that price, if you could count on him. The whole system of how players get paid and built-in increasing cost regardless of economic realities is broken.

--------------------------------
Just North of Wrigley Field

by jameslcrockett on Aug 17, 2011 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

What's the record?

Well, who’s responsible for being 15 under .500 in a medicore division? This roster is 100% Hendry. Besides that, he hired the most unqualified manager we’ve seen since Bruce Kimm!

by vin23 on Aug 17, 2011 9:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

Overall Problems

My point was, any fan who watches the cubs sees a clear problem with Marmol. His slider isn’t as devastating…so combine that with his usual lack of control and he’s very hittable…and expensive. Could have got a decent prospect and saved 8 mil towards a starting pitcher!

by vin23 on Aug 17, 2011 9:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

So, then what?

Your thesis is that Marmol should have been traded, a prospect inserted into that role, and then “Presto!” A Cubs closer never blows a save again?

Really, I can appreciate your thoughts about trading Marmol (I probably would have), but we’re talking about this game. Fact is, closers blow saves. When stats start getting collected for blown saves by GMs who should have traded the pitcher in the first place but didn’t, then we’ll have something to talk about.

by Damen Jackson on Aug 17, 2011 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

You don't have to insert a _prospect_ into that role

Marshall or Wood can easily fill the role for the rest of the season and help us accumulate some more meaningless wins. You trade Marmol to save money. You sell high and buy low, basic economics. Unless you are talking about Mariano Rivera, no one in the pen should be untouchable especially the costlier ones.

by cubsnlinux on Aug 17, 2011 11:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

Let's just deal with the matter at hand...

Premier closer comes in with a big lead, and blows it. That’s on the personnel, not the organization. It’s not like Marmol hasn’t been very, very good in these situations before. If not him, then who?

by Damen Jackson on Aug 17, 2011 9:28 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Few notes on last nights game:

1) Kerry Wood needs to close going forward. He wants to stay in Chicago and if he can do better than Marmol in this job, he should be the Cubs Mariano Rivera for the next 5 or so years.

2) Astros are a pesky team no matter how good or bad they or we are. I feel like they always get revenge in the 9th against us.

3) I hate that I texted my buddy 1 minute before the grand slam happened and said “I smell a grandslam”. He txt’d me back and asid how did i know. My only response: “I’ve been a Cubs fan way too long”.

by ak123 on Aug 17, 2011 9:24 AM CDT reply actions  

Wood ain't no Rivera and wishin' won't make it so

1) HA!

2) HAHA!!

3) HAHAHA!!!

WWOZ.org - New Orleans Jazz and Heritage Station

by Gibbon Jockey on Aug 17, 2011 9:34 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Agreed

Wood is not Rivera, even in our wildest dreams. But he may be an acceptable replacement for Marmol.

by DCCubsFan on Aug 17, 2011 11:08 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

If your mad about this get over it.

I was a good game we just blew it. If your really surprised about this just stop and look at the standings 17-18 games out and 15 games under .500. I wish we would have won but please do not get mad. Save your anger. Also what is with this Wood stuff he wasn’t any better when he was a closer and not any better this year he is just on a good streak but it will end

by lshaffer_69 on Aug 17, 2011 9:37 AM CDT reply actions  

On a Positive Note!

As easy and unfortunate it is to be angry, depressed and negative about the season, Ricketts is standing behind one major thing that I like about him from the start:
*Draft and farm system.
Spending almost triple on the draft is showing that he truly wants to make this a long term winner. I’m excited about several of the draft picks. Now while 2012 will be close to a repeat of this year, beyond that, there may be some hope!

by vin23 on Aug 17, 2011 9:37 AM CDT reply actions  

Give him a chance

These aren’t 7 year soriano contracts. Draftees are always a gamble, but that’s how it has to start! Ricketts is investing in DR and the draft, I really have a feellng he’s going to get some solid production out of both.

by vin23 on Aug 17, 2011 9:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

And the nightmare continues

Why didn’t Riggins go out to the mound at some point while Marmol was loading the bases? I just don’t understand this coaching staff.

by Mapmaker on Aug 17, 2011 9:50 AM CDT reply actions  

WILLING?

of course he’s willing! do you think anyone would take him for anything of value? we’ll get some z grade minor league hack job or we’ll eat the entire salary but $400,00.

by epsilon on Aug 17, 2011 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

I've said it before and I'll say it again.

Why is there such an emphasis on ensuring your pitcher has “confidence”? All of us working in offices, or driving trucks, or managing households, or whatever have our bad days but I can never remember my boss coming up to me and asking “how’s your confidence?” This may have happened in grade school (but probably not – nuns in the 60’s were not big on confidence building) but not in the real world. These pitchers who worry so much about confidence are grown men being paid millions of dollars to play a game. They have risen to the top of their profession and yet there is always a concern about confidence.

In a perfect baseball world this would be the conversation on the mound when a pitcher is throwing like Marmol did last night:

Pitching coach: “Are you ok? Are you hurt?”

Closer: “No, I’m ok. I’m not hurt.”

Pitching coach: “Then throw strikes or we will find someone who can.”

No discussions about confidence or feelings – throw strikes or get out.

OK, I feel better now.

Every player should be accorded the privilege of at least one season with the Chicago Cubs. That's baseball as it should be played - in God's own sunshine. And that's really living. ~Alvin Dark

The other sports are just sports. Baseball is a love. ~Bryant Gumbel, 1981

by CubSteve on Aug 17, 2011 10:02 AM CDT reply actions  

And if millions of people were watching you do something extremely difficult for your job, I’d think you’d need to have a little faith in yourself

There’s not really a good comparison between those jobs and playing baseball.

by Donbedouin on Aug 17, 2011 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

He's dead on....

throw strikes or flip burgers.

Fire Jim Hendry. Injuries aren't the problem.

by Easy Ed on Aug 17, 2011 5:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

After the second runner got on last night

I told my wife to put on whatever she wanted to watch because Marmol would put another guy on and give up the Grand Slam. Maybe 15 minutes later as we’re watching the news, she gave me this look like “How did you know that would happen?”

Marmol’s outing last night was one of those where the hitters refuse to buy his BS and just watched the balls sail by, sometimes literally. Only time he was getting something over the plate it was high and dead center over the plate, perfect pitch to swing on. It may have been the third batter he faced, and pitches 3 and 5 were exactly like that.

That’s why Marmol needs to be dealt. He works some seriously messed up voodoo sometimes, but other times hitters are just going to stand there like a statue because they know this guy can’t hit the strike zone to save his life. If we’re ever in contention again, he is not the guy I want in a closing situation because of the risk that comes with him.

www.facebook.com/craighudak

by Craig in South Bend on Aug 17, 2011 10:07 AM CDT reply actions  

Sounds like a broken record...

I remember watching games last season and thinking, “Hmmmm, Marmol really does like to walk guys,” and, “Hmmmm, if I were an opposing batter, I’d just keep my bat on my shoulder because this guy isn’t throwing strikes.” In fact, I remember a game @ATL where my friend (a Braves fan) was texting me congratulations in the bottom of the 9th. I told him that they’d win if Marmol walked the first guy… He walked two, gave up a couple of hits, then a bases clearing triple for the win. This is just par for the course for the guy.

Maybe that’s the worst part of it. I’m not even surprised it happened. I try to be a positive Cubs fan because the cliche of depressed, self-loathing, loss-expecting Cubs fan is just lame. Still, what do you do when you watch this, shrug your shoulders and move on. I should be livid, but I just find myself indifferent. This season can’t end fast enough.

Always check the words with the red squiggly line. They mean you probably screwed up.

by KennardHusker on Aug 17, 2011 10:13 AM CDT reply actions  

I agree

It will go a lot faster when Football starts.

by lshaffer_69 on Aug 17, 2011 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

Can't wait!

Always check the words with the red squiggly line. They mean you probably screwed up.

by KennardHusker on Aug 17, 2011 11:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

The reason Marshall didn't pitch last night?

He had pitched in each of the previous three games, so he had the night off (as did Shark). It’s the same reason Wood closed Monday’s game instead of Marmol.

by Jody Jody Davis on Aug 17, 2011 10:25 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Yep

Plus Marmol is the closer and had a day off the day before. I still can’t believe he didn’t get a visit from a coach though. At least to give him a breather.

by Mapmaker on Aug 17, 2011 10:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

I couldn't believe that either

Well, knowing how incompetent Riggins and Quade are, actually I can believe it. But someone should have gone out to calm him down, especially after the walk to load the bases.

by Jody Jody Davis on Aug 17, 2011 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

His mechanics were way off

he was dropping his arm and the slider was flat. Brenly commented on it several times. Why can’t Riggins or Quade see this?

by wolfcub on Aug 17, 2011 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Marmol

MLB used to have a Fireman Award for the guy that gets you out of a jam, when they give one for GETTING into jams C. Mar would be the hands down winner. every time he comes in I fear the worst, and for good reason.

by bb7132 on Aug 17, 2011 12:45 PM CDT reply actions  

My dad and brother

were at the game on Aug. 31, 1963 when Ellis Burton hit the grand slam. As the story goes, my dad was talking with the people around him as Burton came up and said that Burton was going to hit the slam and sure enough that’s what happened.

A baseball game is simply a nervous breakdown divided into nine innings. ~Earl Wilson

by tucsoncubsfan on Aug 17, 2011 3:40 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Maybe it's time to take a deep breath

Recent FanPosts

Small
Top 10 things I liked about watching the Cubs lose at PNC Park
Seinfeld_jerk_store_black_shirt_small
Cubs pitching problems answered!
Zambrano_background_2_small
What is the most likely move in June regarding current players?
Small
Draft Prep: Pierce Johnson
Small
Trying to be positive (need some help)
Small
Soriano back to Second?
Small
Javier Baez Peoria Bound?
Small
Draft Prep: Conference Tournament Version
Despite-an-inflated-babip-lahair-is-no-one-month-wonder
Suddenly, I feel your pain

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Former MLB PItcher Bob Ojeda On Pitching And Pain
Wrigley Field Supporters Propose Tearing Down Rest Of Chicago
Doug Glanville On His Teammate, Kerry Wood
Thanks.
Samardzija takes a dig at Hawk Harrelson

Recent FanShots

A Day In The Life Of An A-Ball Minor Leaguer
Baez to Peoria
2012 Stars and Stripes Hat
Sveum moves Castro back to #2 spot
OT: Tyler Colvin bats 2nd
The Pittsburgh Pirates Offensive Catastrophe
Roy Halladay Bobblehead Fail
Full sized image

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
Should the National League adopt the designated hitter rule?

  1007 votes | Results

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Other Reviews

Yahoo_full_count

Recent Stories in Other Reviews


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Profile_small Josh Timmers

B_w_avatar_small Brett Taylor

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima