So the 90's Braves pitchers were a bunch of filthy cheaters
I'm sure we'll soon see congressional hearings and guys being kept out of the hall of fame for this!
..right?
8 months ago
Wreckard
20 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Obviously, the difference is...
… doctoring baseballs is not against the law of the land.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
Correct....
Its baseball rules only and the umps should have caught it.
But they didnt….I wish the Cubs pitchers did the same thing and we could have a winning team.
what makes you think they didn't?
I have a hard time believing that the difference between John Smoltz and Mike Harkey was that only the former used a little pine tar on his pitches.
by Orval Overall on Sep 23, 2011 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions
That would make sense if the problem people had with steroid users was their illegality
But you don’t hear people calling Bonds and McGwire criminals – they’re called cheaters. They get asterisks not because they broke the law but because their numbers are considered corrupt. They’ll be kept out of the hall of fame because they didn’t respect the rules of baseball, not because they didn’t respect the laws of the US.
In the case of the Carribean players – for all we know, most of them were juicing in the off season in their home countries where it is legal. They may have never broken US law and yet they’ll still be held out of the hall.
That may be why congress had hearings but it’s not why people have so much indignation about what they did.
You have a point.
But you mentioned congressional hearings in your post. That’s why I said what I did.
There won’t be hearings about this. It would be interesting to hear what the pitchers involved have to say about this, though.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
Calling Joe Niekro and his nail file to the witness stand
"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
by RiskyBusiness on Sep 22, 2011 11:19 PM CDT up reply actions
Throwing an object towards someone and having that person's face caved in
is against the law of the land, and is worthy of misdemeanor battery charges should the cavee choose to press charges.
Don’t cross the streams.
WWOZ.org - New Orleans Jazz and Heritage Station
by Gibbon Jockey on Sep 22, 2011 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions
That Cheater George Brett Made the Hall
using too much pine tar. Maddux, Glavine, and Smoltz should also make it. It would have been something if any of those pine tar using pitchers had ever pitched against George Brett in a regular season game.
Good things come to those who wait... and wait....and wait.
There's a world of difference between Brett accidentally having pine tar too high on the bat
…and altering a baseball in order to make it harder to hit. Brett’s was a technicality that he was likely ignorant of. This was a deliberate use of foreign substances to alter the ball.
Fair Enough
Maybe, I can equate what the Braves pitchers did to what Gaylord Perry did for years with throwing spitters. Perry made the Hall of Fame.
Good things come to those who wait... and wait....and wait.
Right
So why is Perry in, but Palmeiro is probably going to be kept out? Pretty similar situations – both cheated to longevity, racking up gaudy career totals that put them in line for the hall. But for some reason, Palmeiro’s cheating is awful while Perry’s gets shurgged off.
I know (hope) you're joking about Brett
but in case not, just thought I’d point out that the rule against having pine tar too close to the barrel of the bat is a rule designed to keep the ball from getting smudged, thereby forcing it to come out of play. It’s a cost saving rule so that the league doesn’t need to change out the ball everytime a guy makes contact. If anything, having pine tar in the hitting area would be a disadvantage to a hitter, not an advantage.
(and for what its worth, the remedy provided for in the rulebook is that they take the bat out of action; the ump who disallowed Brett’s homer really screwed it up).
by Orval Overall on Sep 23, 2011 12:31 PM CDT up reply actions
The cheating arrived some 20 years ago, from every aspect of ALL professional sports...
…and it’s here to stay. When you’re talking about 9 digit contracts AND gazillions of dollars in endorsements, some players are going to look for every advantage they can find…honest or not…and I can’t blame them one bit.
$100,000,000 dollars. That’s a crazy amount of cash. It sets up, NOT just the player, but, practically every member of his immediate family for generations.
"When I came up to bat with three men on and two outs in the ninth, I looked in the other team's dugout and they were already in street clothes." - Bob Uecker
Wow that's revisionist history at it's best
People have been cheating at sports since the dawn of time. Do you really think no one was doctoring baseball until the 90’s?
Sure they were...
…my point is that the money flying around nowadays makes cheating MORE of an option to the player, then back in the “glory days”.
"When I came up to bat with three men on and two outs in the ninth, I looked in the other team's dugout and they were already in street clothes." - Bob Uecker
Pine Tar
It seems to me that these days a lot of pitchers have some illegal substance on top of the brim of their cap that I believe is pine tar. On TV, its clear that there is a dark spot about the size of a quarter and the pitcher will regularly go to this spot on their cap with one of their fingers on their pitching hand and readjust their cap.
Cheating has always been a big part of the game.
Anything to gain a little edge, I’m sure tons of Hall of Famers have gotten away with cheating somehow at some point in their careers.
Maybe Bobby Thomson's "shot heard 'round the world" can be struck from the records
because he may have been tipped off to the pitch from a Giants spy in centerfield.





















