Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage of 2012 Coke 600

Cubs Are Latos Intolerant, Shut Out By Padres 2-0

Starting pitcher Matt Latos of the San Diego Padres throws the ball during the first inning of the game against the Chicago Cubs at Petco Park in San Diego, California. (Photo by Kent C. Horner/Getty Images)

When Mike Quade put his "kids lineup" on the field on September 19, 2010, they defeated the Florida Marlins 13-3.

That day, they were facing the Marlins' Andrew Miller, who posted an 8.54 ERA in 2010 and has a career ERA of 5.79 (and 5.54 in 12 starts for the Red Sox this year, which could go a long way toward explaining Boston's troubles).

That wasn't the case Monday night in San Diego. The Padres' Mat Latos is a very good pitcher; his 8-14 W-L record coming into the game reflects the 3.3 runs/start of run support he had received this season before Monday. That ranked 64th among 70 qualified starters in the National League.

That number actually went down Monday night; he got just two runs from his teammates, but Latos was outstanding and he and two relievers shut out the Cubs 2-0 on just two hits. The loss was the Cubs' 90th of the season; I've taken down the "loss countdown" box that was on the left sidebar. Now, I'd just like to see them win their last two games to finish up on a high note.

Star-divide

Latos, in fact, was perfect through four innings. Carlos Pena walked leading off the fifth, and Latos kept a no-hitter through 5⅓ innings, when Casey Coleman broke it up with a triple.

Yes, that's right. The only Cubs hitter who could hit Latos through six innings was the opposing pitcher. Coleman is a pretty good hitter, but once again, the Cubs had a runner on third base with fewer than two out and could not get him home. The only other Cubs hit -- or baserunner -- was recorded by Starlin Castro, who singled leading off the seventh. It was the 38th consecutive game in which Castro reached base. But he, too, never left that spot.

Give Latos, Chad Qualls and Heath Bell some credit. They were lights-out last night. Coleman was also good -- he allowed Will Venable's home run that was the only run the Padres needed, but apart from that, just four other hits and two walks, along with seven strikeouts. It does appear to me that Coleman's work with his father (former major leaguer Joe Coleman) has helped him; Casey's delivery looks completely revamped. He should definitely get the chance to be next year's fifth starter. Rafael Dolis (who is a large man!) made his MLB debut and threw 1.1 scoreless innings, and then John Gaub got a pair of outs in the eighth.

At which time Mike Quade decided he just had to have a righthander in the game. So 38-year-old Ramon Ortiz came in. He got the out, but really: when a pitcher is going good, and maybe you'd like to see what a LHP can do against righthanded hitters, why not leave Gaub in? The reflexive moves by managers to get the platoon advantage can be taken to extremes. Quade has done this more often than almost any Cubs manager I can remember.

Two games left. Just remember that.

I wanted to say a few words here about Carlos Pena, whose walk was his 100th of the season. I'm not sure that some of you understand how rare that is. First, Pena ranks third in the NL in walks -- only Prince Fielder and Joey Votto have drawn more. That's pretty good company. And it's not as if they're pitching around Pena -- he has exactly one intentional walk this season.

In the last 81 years -- since 1930 -- there had been only four Cubs 100-walk seasons before Pena: Richie Ashburn in 1960, Gary Matthews in 1984 and Sammy Sosa in 2001 and 2002.

This has value. Pena is third on the team in runs, largely as a result of being on base so many times. He has a .358 OBA -- even with his low batting average, that ranks 21st in the NL, just below Corey Hart. He has a .466 SLG -- that ranks 25th in the NL, just below Brian McCann. It is true that he has not hit well with RISP this year. In his last good year with the Rays (2009) he hit .264/.430/.614 with RISP. Perhaps this year is the anomaly.

I'm not saying that I'm 100% convinced he should be back. But at this point, I doubt the Cubs are in the running for Albert Pujols or Fielder. And I'm still not convinced that Bryan LaHair is the answer.

All I'm saying is that Carlos Pena has had a decently productive season and has been worth the contract he's signed.

Two games to go and this misbegotten season will be history. Matt Garza throws tonight; he's been one of the few things really worth watching all year.

Comment 197 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I've been using 'Latos Intolerant'

since he broke in. I still will, until he’s a Cub.

I'm a Cubs fan. The Jaded Bitterness comes as a Standard Feature.

by timh815 on Sep 27, 2011 8:06 AM CDT reply actions  

The other sad thing about the game was

11 K’s and 1 BB (Pena). Looks like the “kids” take after the adults. That game was sure worth the buildup for playing the kids.

I have absolutely seen enough of Tyler Colvin for this year. He needs to spend all of 2012 in the minors trying to rework his swing.

John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.

by rlpete on Sep 27, 2011 8:09 AM CDT reply actions  

Here's the thing about that

One recently starts a job, you notice that no holds anyone responsible. What do you do?

by Madison Cub Fan on Sep 27, 2011 8:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well, you'd never play a team like that every day.

Right? That was essentially the Iowa Cubs (who weren’t very good this year) playing a major league team.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Sep 27, 2011 8:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

This might be a Josh question

But could the 1st or 2nd best farm teams of another team be able to beat the 2011 Cubs?

by Madison Cub Fan on Sep 27, 2011 8:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

Phillies could

And Sandberg would be managing the Iron Pigs whilst they did it.

Drew

by SecTaylor on Sep 27, 2011 8:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

Are some of his players

the type that would be on major league rosters if they were in a farm system that was playing .500 or less ball?

Besides having Ryno as manager what makes them a good team?

by Madison Cub Fan on Sep 27, 2011 8:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

No

I mean, if they played ten times I’m sure they’d win two or three games, but the Cubs would easily win a best-of-seven series against a Triple-A team.

by Josh Timmers on Sep 27, 2011 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

The Astros...

… essentially have had a Triple-A team on the field since the trading deadline.

They are 21-31 since then.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Sep 27, 2011 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Kind of

Wandy Rodriguez, Bud Norris and Carlos Lee aren’t Triple-A players. Don’t think Brett Myers is either. Having a couple of major league starters helps.

But I see your point. It’s something that I’ve often argued: That the difference between the guys playing in Triple-A and the guys sitting on a major league bench is pretty negligible.

by Josh Timmers on Sep 27, 2011 9:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Right.

Houston has three decent starting pitchers and one or two major league players on the field every day — but basically, have a minor league team performing.

But they are still losing two of every three games since the deadline.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Sep 27, 2011 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

I've wondered many times

not just this season but last year too, where the Iowa Cubs end and the Chicago Cubs begin? Is there a difference besides the stadium they play in, the teams they play against, and the bloated contracts?

Do the Iowa Cubs have a Little Z?
Do they have some kind of pee-wee form of ivy growing in the stadium in Des Moines?

by ddoubleheader on Sep 27, 2011 2:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh, of course

But a lot of people are advocating the Cubs go exactly this route.

by Not Bruce Froemming on Sep 27, 2011 6:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

that's a very simplistic way of putting it....

I understand you disagree with the approach of eating salary and moving on with different players from this point forward.

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Sep 27, 2011 6:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes and no

Some players (like Z), yes. Other players (like Ramirez), no.

No major-market team should field a typical lineup like the one the Cubs fielded last night.

by Not Bruce Froemming on Sep 27, 2011 7:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

But yet...here we are.

No major-market team should have a payroll over $100 million for a 70 win ballculb…but yet..here we are.

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Sep 27, 2011 10:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Whatever, SWL

Go post a picture of the Hindenburg or something. You do that well, at least.

by Not Bruce Froemming on Sep 27, 2011 10:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

You're not the boss of me.

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Sep 27, 2011 10:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

OK, don't do it

Maybe reverse psychology is in order.

by Not Bruce Froemming on Sep 27, 2011 10:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

The problem next year will be middle of the order.

If Ramirez does walk and the Cubs don’t get Fielder or Pujols then the middle of the lineup is going to be bad barring some surprise deal. I’m not sure who might be available.

John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.

by rlpete on Sep 27, 2011 8:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed

It was bad this year. It will be atrocious next year without one of those two guys.

by krummy12 on Sep 27, 2011 8:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yup.

And like Al said, I’m beginning to doubt the Cubs go after Fielder or Pujols.

Seeya Jimbo! Good job, Tommy Boy!

by shoemile on Sep 27, 2011 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

They won't.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Sep 27, 2011 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

But who

will they go after and hype as a bargain version of Fielder or Pujols, to try and sell it to the fans that they’re ‘trying’ to put together a winning team?

Will they try to sign whichever sausage is the fastest in the Milwaukee Sausage Race?

by ddoubleheader on Sep 27, 2011 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

Carlos Pena.

This team isn’t going to look drastically different in 2012. The new GM and new manager (god please let there be a new manager) will have to be enough for us…other than a new SP and another infielder we won’t be very excited about.

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Sep 27, 2011 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

What! You mean you can tell us on September 27, 2011

that the players in the game last night will have terrible 2012 seasons? Well, I wish I was as prescient as you. Maybe you should root for the Royals with that kind of attitude.

/Meatball

Step Two: Develop an organizational plan

by Shanghai Badger on Sep 27, 2011 8:41 AM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

Where do you see this improvement coming from?

I have never claimed to be omniscient, but don’t I see the Cubs even improving to even .500 next year?

by Madison Cub Fan on Sep 27, 2011 8:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

You need to click on the "up" tag in my original comment

And then think about posting histories.

Step Two: Develop an organizational plan

by Shanghai Badger on Sep 27, 2011 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

I guess I missed it too.

It is hard remembering who is who around here sometimes.

John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.

by rlpete on Sep 27, 2011 9:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

A lot of people agree with him.

The Cubs “kids” are not very good. It doesn’t take a crystal ball when looking at Colvin to realize he isn’t a 2012 starter. So many people love to criticize DeWitt as useless but he and Colvin are almost the same age. If DeWitt is useless, what does that make Colvin and his .150 average? Will Barney develop power over the off-season? DJL brings one skill, hit for average. He doesn’t walk, has minimal power and average defense. Do you really think Campana is a major league starter? Are the Cubs really going to start LaHair at 1st base next year?

I don’t frequently agree with NBF but in this case I do, I don’t understand the love for this group of kids.

John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.

by rlpete on Sep 27, 2011 8:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree

But sadly I see some of these kids filling holes in the line up next year. Some of them might be more talented at digging holes. :(

by Madison Cub Fan on Sep 27, 2011 8:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think they can all be totally blamed for last night

Latos was nasty last night, and some of the kids hadn’t played in days, Clevenger and Colvin, most notably.

by Mulhollandmania on Sep 27, 2011 10:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yep

The kids will become as solid as Cubs players of previous years. So, don’t expect much past 2nd place in NL Central at best without other elements. They might be ok as connective tissue, but the Cubs are going to need bone and muscle to get anywhere.

by ddoubleheader on Sep 27, 2011 3:02 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Go deeper

With the exception of Brett Jackson, the rest of the kids mentioned as future contributors are equally as bad. Count Vitters, McNutt, Jay Jackson and just about every other purported “top prospect” in this organization among that. But boy that Tim Wilken is doing a fabulous job….just look at all the success he had elsewhere as evidence of it. Sarcasm be damned.

by krummy12 on Sep 27, 2011 8:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agree with you on most of the higher minors except for McNutt.

I’m definitely not sold on Jay Jackson or Vitters. On Jackson, I think people here are also overrating him. He will hopefully be a solid regular but I don’t see star. As some have mentioned, a Steve Finley type.

John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.

by rlpete on Sep 27, 2011 8:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well

Brett Jackson will be a productive major leaguer because his skill set is more than one-dimensional. It remains to be seen how productive he will be at the plate, but he at least adds other things…unlike guys like Campana who are simply one-trick ponies.

As with most of the other guys in the Cubs system, Vitters isn’t highly skilled at anything. He makes contact but still gets himself out regularly which is a recipe for hitting .220 in the majors. Other than his contact skills, he doesn’t add enough to be a legitimate regular.

McNutt has skills but believing he’ll be a difference maker is highly speculative. Jay Jackson probably shouldn’t have even been brought up as he’s quickly becoming 40-man roster fodder. I wouldn’t hold my breath on guys like Simpson, Dolis or others. Guys like Clevenger are backups and waiting and hoping for someone like Baez is like flipping a coin. Matt Szczur offers some reasonable hope as a regular CF as his skill set isn’t one dimensional…..but after that….pass. There just aren’t difference makers in this system at any level.

Couple that with the financial crises and it isn’t difficult to see how this rebuilding process could take quite a while.

by krummy12 on Sep 27, 2011 9:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

No disagreement.

It is going to take time to rebuild through the minors. I’m not expecting McNutt to be an ace but he could develop into a mid-rotation guy otherwise I don’t see a lot in the foreseeable future.

John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.

by rlpete on Sep 27, 2011 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not in favor of being below .500 just to play the kids...

but if its getting terrible contracts off the books, a new philosophy and new direction in place, then i’m all for getting kicked around in 2012 to hopefully be relevant in 2013.

So i you can give you can take it.

by epsilon on Sep 27, 2011 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

I just don't see enough minor league help arriving in 2013 to make the team relevant.

If things go well maybe Szczur, Vitters and McNutt see some 2013 time but I doubt any would be difference makers that soon. FA’s will be needed to make 2013 relevant.

John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.

by rlpete on Sep 27, 2011 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

exactly...

and the old/bad money off the books, new philosphy, new direction should take care of some of that.

So i you can give you can take it.

by epsilon on Sep 27, 2011 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

Jackson

has a lot more power than Steve Finley.

by Josh Timmers on Sep 27, 2011 9:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Finley hit over 300 career home runs.

You sure about that?

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Sep 27, 2011 9:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

I guess the question is

the early Steve Finley or the later Steve Finley and we can leave it at that.

John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.

by rlpete on Sep 27, 2011 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

I was referring

to the young Steve Finley.

I don’t want to insinuate anything, but Finley didn’t become a power hitter until he turned 30 and became a teammate of Ken Caminiti.

by Josh Timmers on Sep 27, 2011 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Point taken.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Sep 27, 2011 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think this a 70 win team

I believe that the Pirates this year even with their swoon are a slightly better team

by Madison Cub Fan on Sep 27, 2011 8:10 AM CDT reply actions  

I'm confused.

As of today, the 2011 Cubs are a 70-win team. I believe that’s just what they were projected to be.

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Sep 27, 2011 10:52 AM CDT via iPhone app up reply actions  

Yeah.

As it turns out, that was pretty much spot on.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Sep 27, 2011 11:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

...

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Sep 27, 2011 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I personally ( just my opinion don't have stats to back it up) think this is worse

than 2006 team which has less than 70 wins. So I am surprised they ended up with 70+ wins.

by Madison Cub Fan on Sep 27, 2011 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

It definitely felt like 2006 all over again back in June.

But this team feels marginally better than that one to me, if only because of Starlin Castro and Matt Garza.

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Sep 27, 2011 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Totally agree...

2006 Cubs would win a 7 game series in 6 games against the 2011 Cubs, IMO.

"When I came up to bat with three men on and two outs in the ninth, I looked in the other team's dugout and they were already in street clothes." - Bob Uecker

by Easy Ed on Sep 27, 2011 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why?

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Sep 27, 2011 1:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'd be real excited about...

… seeing Les Walrond pitch against Rodrigo Lopez.

That would be ugly.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Sep 27, 2011 3:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

It would be kind of fun...

…to use a computer simulator to play bad Cubs teams against other bad Cubs teams throughout history and see who comes out on top.

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Sep 27, 2011 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

My guess is..

… the 1962 team would come in last. Sure, they had Williams, Santo and Banks, but Banks had a bad year that year and Santo and Williams were still kids. That team had no pitching at all. Both the 1962 and 1966 teams lost 103 games, but the ’62 bunch was much worse.

Further, any of the teams from the late 90’s or 2000’s that were 95-loss teams would probably crush that squad.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Sep 27, 2011 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

And this might be a fun thing to do in the offseason.

If anyone has any sort of computer simulator that could do this, let me know and we can set up some kind of bracket, and have an offseason tournament. I’ll write recaps and everything.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Sep 27, 2011 3:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

I've had a lot of fun watching Campana this year...

I can’t remember the last time the Cubs had someone with that kind of speed. It’s great to see a guy taking a big lead at first, and you KNOW he’s going to steal second with no problem.

But I really hope the next manager realizes that Tony Campana is not a major league starter.

As much fun as it is to see him come into the game in a pinch-running situation, it’s painful to see his approach at the plate over the course of 4 at-bats. The time he hit an inside-the-park home run was one of the most exciting things that I watched this year, but mostly we’ve seen him lay down mediocre bunts and swing really late at fastballs. I love seeing him come into a game, but I don’t like seeing his name on the starting lineup.

by Zachary on Sep 27, 2011 8:18 AM CDT reply actions  

He did look bad

especially striking out on the pitch 5 feet in front on the plate.

John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.

by rlpete on Sep 27, 2011 8:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

Bunting with a man on 3rd and less than 2 outs...

…with the infield 25 feet away from him AND the suicide squeeze NOT on, pretty much told me everything I needed to know about Campana. Quade didn’t seem too pleased by it either. Yep, he’s fast. Maybe soccer? Not baseball.

"When I came up to bat with three men on and two outs in the ninth, I looked in the other team's dugout and they were already in street clothes." - Bob Uecker

by Easy Ed on Sep 27, 2011 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Absolutely

but did Campana do this on his own or was there a sign? This was a terrible play and a pivotal moment in the game. If we score the game is completely different. If the kid did this on his own he should be benched for the last 2 games…………

by If we only had Hubbs on Sep 27, 2011 4:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

You are right...

…he is not a starter and I’m not so certain he should even make the team in 2012. The guy can sure run though.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Sep 27, 2011 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

At least we are assured of a 7-10 draft pick.

Unfortunately, we may need 2-3 years of high draft picks to even get back to being a team with a bright future.

If you think you've seen it all...just wait!

by CubFanSince1970 on Sep 27, 2011 8:21 AM CDT reply actions  

Yeah 7-10 ....

I wonder if their will be a Hayden type player avaible. (ok little to much snark) but I am a little leery of their pick

by Madison Cub Fan on Sep 27, 2011 8:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

Top 5 hopefully

Two more losses and we will be assured of a #5 pick….one more loss and assured of #6!

by cowboy2024 on Sep 27, 2011 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm with you on Peña, Al.

As long as we can get a true clean-up hitter in some other position and a good # 5 hitter (could be Aramirs Ramírez). Peña’s high OBP, his bursts of power, plate discipline and outstanding defense make him an asset in the moneyball age. Don’t forget that he may also be saving other players in the infield from making a lot of errors.

by Fraggin Judge on Sep 27, 2011 8:24 AM CDT reply actions  

Well

Look at it the way it should be looked at. If you’re counting on your 1B to prevent a “lot of errors” and your team already has the worst fielding percentage in the majors, perhaps you should find better players at other positions instead of worrying about the defense of a 1B that despite the sugar-coating of OBP, is not a run-producer or a middle of the order hitter. When the Cubs finally stumble upon one again, you’ll know it immediately….but Pena is not that and his defense is simply a red herring that the rest of this team is so bumbling bad in the field that he somehow ends up appearing as a positive. Only the Cubs. Only the Cubs….

by krummy12 on Sep 27, 2011 8:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

Very well said, krum...

…if EVERYONE fields their position at a league average (or better) fielding percentage, then we won’t have to settle for a good glove, .220, non-clutch hitter playing 1B…or a 40 RBI, everyday guy playing CF. “Accountability” should be the motto of the new GM.
Also…I’m not sure a 1B (which is a power position) who walks 100 times is all that great of a thing if he hits below .200 with RISP.

"When I came up to bat with three men on and two outs in the ninth, I looked in the other team's dugout and they were already in street clothes." - Bob Uecker

by Easy Ed on Sep 27, 2011 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

But

He hits under the Mendoza line with RISP.

by Clark Addison on Sep 27, 2011 8:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

I, for one, am over Pena.

100 walks. good job.

So i you can give you can take it.

by epsilon on Sep 27, 2011 8:39 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Two things

1) I don’t want to say I’m okay with Pena coming back but it would…suck less…if they found a true middle of the order hitter (in addition to Ramirez), which I don’t think they will.

2)

It does appear to me that Coleman’s work with his father (former major leaguer Joe Coleman) has helped him; Casey’s delivery looks completely revamped. He should definitely get the chance to be next year’s fifth starter.

Mark Riggins is waiting for his credit in helping with Casey…

They have two liter bottles now? To think I spent all that time demanding a liter!

by Say Ramrod on Sep 27, 2011 8:47 AM CDT reply actions  

Why not hire Joe Coleman?

He has been a MLB pitching coach before. He’s only 64 years old. Why not?

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Sep 27, 2011 9:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

Actually

He’s been a major league bullpen coach before.

by Josh Timmers on Sep 27, 2011 9:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Actually

He was Joe Torre’s pitching coach in St. Louis from ’91 to ’94.

by Spewoo on Sep 28, 2011 3:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

That would be cool...

…though I wonder if there would be too much of a conflict of interest with Casey presumably on the team. Then again, didn’t Moises Alou play on a team that his father managed?

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Sep 27, 2011 10:41 AM CDT via iPhone app up reply actions  

wasnt duncan's kid on the cardinals forever?

but he wasnt a pitcher so not sure how that dynamic works…

So i you can give you can take it.

by epsilon on Sep 27, 2011 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

Latos Intolerant...Your best headline ever.

Guys, hitting is not about muscle. It's simple physics. Calculate the velocity, v, in relation to the trajectory­, t, in which g, gravity, of course remains a constant.... It's not complicate­d. - George Costanza

by troutfishin on Sep 27, 2011 8:58 AM CDT reply actions  

Thanks.

Sudden inspiration.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Sep 27, 2011 9:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

You should milk it every time the Cubs face him.

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Sep 27, 2011 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ugh...

I’d be surprised if 2% of people can stand it. Maybe Al should skim the population before making a whole decision on that.

Weekend contributor and official editorial lackey/waitstaff at Windy City Gridiron
If a people-avoiding gaming hermit is on Twitter, I should be too. Follow me!

by Steven Schweickert on Sep 27, 2011 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Those of us who dig it...

…should continue to butter him up.

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Sep 27, 2011 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

My stomach churns at the thought.

Weekend contributor and official editorial lackey/waitstaff at Windy City Gridiron
If a people-avoiding gaming hermit is on Twitter, I should be too. Follow me!

by Steven Schweickert on Sep 27, 2011 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Whey a minute you guys...

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Sep 27, 2011 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

We've wasted one whole day on this.

Minor League Contributing Writer, Athletics Nation.

State high point count: 4/50

If you are grouchy, irritable, or just plain mean, there will be a $10 charge for putting up with you.

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Sep 27, 2011 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm half-and-half on whether we should continue.

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Sep 27, 2011 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well I'm not going to cry over it.

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Sep 27, 2011 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

These are all sorta cute...in a milky way

"When I came up to bat with three men on and two outs in the ninth, I looked in the other team's dugout and they were already in street clothes." - Bob Uecker

by Easy Ed on Sep 27, 2011 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just a couple of comments.

If the Cubs win the last two, I still don’t see the “high note”.
Pena(with a reasonable contract), would be OK next year for a rebuilding team.
All you had to do was watch this team this year to know next year is going to be ugly. But that’s OK if they hire the right GM and staff. Starting in two days, it’s all about who the Cubs are going to be for the rest of our lives(at least for us older guys). Are they going to be a winning organization, with a cohesive plan or a team that puts bandaids on their holes each year to try and ’compete".

by Rick B on Sep 27, 2011 9:11 AM CDT reply actions  

Pena will be 34 next year

Is he really a good fit at $10M for a team that is rebuilding and has tons of holes in the roster. Let’s not forget that he also had 160 Ks. He hit .134 vs LHP and that’s what he’ll face 25% of the time. In the late innings of a close game we’ll see the opposing manager bring in that loogy just for him.

Pena has only 111 hits this year. That’s only half of Castro’s total. Walks are nice. But Pena isn’t a top of the order guy. His value is putting the ball in play and driving in runs. The money paid him is better spent elsewhere. Pena in 2012 will be no better than Pena 2011. That’s not what this team needs moving forward.

If it wasn't for the injuries, we'd be printing WS tickets right now.

by tharr on Sep 27, 2011 9:46 AM CDT reply actions  

What's the other option?

Giving something over $25 million a year for six or seven years to Prince Fielder or Albert Pujols? Trusting that Bryan LaHair’s season in Iowa translates to the majors?

Maybe the Marlins will trade us Logan Morrison. But other than that, I’m not sure what our options going forward are other than Pena. And he wants to stay.

by Josh Timmers on Sep 27, 2011 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed.

Pena doesn’t excite me but the Cubs cannot put out a starting lineup like last night for all of 2012. A middle of the order of Castro, LaHair and TBD?

Resigning Pena if they can’t get anyone else (Fielder, Morrison) would not hinder the rebuilding process nor would it block any up and comer. The Cubs have no first base prospects anywhere close in the minors.

So if not Pena, who? Loney? LaRoche from the Nats?

John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.

by rlpete on Sep 27, 2011 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

How did Pena do last night?

We have 70 wins using Pena. Just how much of a factor was he? Are you suggesting the mere loss of Pena is going to drop us to 50 wins? LaHair seems to me to be a good risk with a $9.5M savings.

If it wasn't for the injuries, we'd be printing WS tickets right now.

by tharr on Sep 27, 2011 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well the loss of A-Ram and Pena and replacing them

with DJL and LaHair might push them to 50 wins. That is my main point here. I don’t like Pena much but the Cubs have to try and be competitive. They cannot field a team for all of 2012 that looks like the team from last night.

John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.

by rlpete on Sep 27, 2011 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

But we're talking about Pena here

not Ramirez. Switching LaHair for for Pena only changes those 2 guys, not the entire lineup. The Cubs would not drop 20 wins simply from replacing Pena. The big loss based upon this year, is Ramirez.

If it wasn't for the injuries, we'd be printing WS tickets right now.

by tharr on Sep 27, 2011 10:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'd be very happy

to roll the dice with LaHair. How much worse can we reasonably expect him to be for a $9.5M savings? We’re a 70 win team with Pena. Suppose we only win 68 games next year with Bryan but we acquire some long term asset with the savings.

Pena is a great guy but he’s a band aid. That’s not how you rebuild. We know what pena will give us. We can only speculate about LaHair. At this stage of the organization’s rebuilding, it makes good sense to me to cut Pena and divert his salary to future needs.

If it wasn't for the injuries, we'd be printing WS tickets right now.

by tharr on Sep 27, 2011 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

I understand your point but

the Cubs have to try and be competitive. As for how bad he could be. I know it is small sample size but here is his last 14 days: .194 / .297 / .323.

John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.

by rlpete on Sep 27, 2011 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

Pena's last 14 days

.152/.364/.364.

You’re right…..very small sample size.

If it wasn't for the injuries, we'd be printing WS tickets right now.

by tharr on Sep 27, 2011 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't disagree in principle with the "have to try and compete"

But it really hinders the overall plan.

Does keeping Ramirez and Pena (apparently meaning the Cubs are “trying to compete”) really help the team? They are both on the wrong side of their careers… so it isn’t likely they can substantially outproduce this season’s numbers. That means you have to look around the rest of the roster and find enough improvement to win ~20 more games next year. Where exactly is that coming from?

Replacing Ramirez and Pena with DJLM and LaHair is a recipe for a long season. But does it really, really matter if they lose 92 or 102 games in the grand scheme?

"Stuff like this is why they should shut off the internet."

by Orval Overall on Dec 17, 2010 1:19 PM CST

by fsuapollo on Sep 27, 2011 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Doubtful.

What’s the percentage of people going to the game to see those two guys play? 0.5%?

And you really think “hey everyone, we’re bringing back the same ‘heart’ of the line-up as last year” is going to sell tickets?? Seems more likely it would have the opposite effect.

Ticket sales will be far more dependent on price this year than who mans the corners. And if they are that worried about ticket volume, just hire Ryno.

"Stuff like this is why they should shut off the internet."

by Orval Overall on Dec 17, 2010 1:19 PM CST

by fsuapollo on Sep 28, 2011 9:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

If they want...

…to be competitive, they better concentrate on pitching and defense first, because the lineup will have to be like the 27 Yankees to score enough runs to be competitive.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Sep 27, 2011 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

111 hits...

… and 100 walks.

Only two other Cubs have been on base that many times — Starlin Castro and Aramis Ramirez.

He plays plus defense, too.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Sep 27, 2011 10:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

And yet

Here we are still at 90 losses.

Color me indifferent mostly on the matter, but I get the suspicion that you and I both know the dye has been cast on Pena coming back, so this is all pretty much moot. If it were up to me though, I’d say do better. You won’t get Fielder or Pujols, but this would be a very nice time to go and find a young potential cornerstone (even if it’s not a 1B), and spend that money there.

by Damen Jackson on Sep 27, 2011 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

But the Cubs can do that too.

They have the Ramirez and Grabow money to start with. If keeping Pena prevented getting a young cornerstone I agree but the Cubs have to try and be competitive.

John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.

by rlpete on Sep 27, 2011 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

You know

For all the talk about changes with the Cubs this off-season, the think that I’m most anxious to here about is the payroll budget for next season, I guess followed by any indication of where they’d like to place it for the next few years. I’ve played with some numbers, and my sense is that it’s going to surprise some people. But I also think that Al will get his ticket prices reduced as a side effect, so there’s that. Just my opinion though.

by Damen Jackson on Sep 27, 2011 10:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

Goodness,

Does not pay to type fast. I meant “the thing” and “hear”

by Damen Jackson on Sep 27, 2011 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed

We have no one who appears ready to be in the rotation soon that was in the high minors this year. Maybe Jackson. maybe not. The rest of our the guys seem to be a Wells/Coleman type….have to have excellent command or bad things happen.

If it wasn't for the injuries, we'd be printing WS tickets right now.

by tharr on Sep 27, 2011 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

Seems like the Cubs have been shopping at the Goodwill store the past few offseasons.

Ever since Jim Hendry went on his shopping spree at Best Buy, it’s been the Goodwill store for the Cubs. If only Jim Hendry hadn’t declined buying the extended warranty on the electronic’s and appliances. Now with no warranty, the electronic’s and appliances have broken down, and the Cubs are stuck with them.
SARCASM

Jack Brickhouse: "Hey! Hey!" Harry Caray: "Holy Cow!"
Vince Lloyd: "The Chicago Cubs are on the Air!" Len Kasper: "Oh Baby!!!!"
Ron Santo: "YES!" "All Right! Let's do it!" "Ohhh Nooooo!" "Gee Whiz! Come on!" AND... "This Is The Year!"

by #1 iowan cubs fan on Sep 27, 2011 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

And no one has struck out 160 times

for the Cubs since 2003. Pena is paid to drive in runs. He has not done enough of that to justify his $10m salary. Just where would we be without him? 68 wins? He’s a minus runner.

If it wasn't for the injuries, we'd be printing WS tickets right now.

by tharr on Sep 27, 2011 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

Pena is paid to be a baseball player.

One of the reasons he hasn’t driven in runs is that no one else on the freaking team can draw a walk!

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Sep 27, 2011 11:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

So the .177 BA RISP

was someone else’s fault? Let’s be honest. Pena has done horribly as a RBI player and that’s what he was brought here to do, not get on base for Byrd, Soto, Soriano and the rest of the team.

If it wasn't for the injuries, we'd be printing WS tickets right now.

by tharr on Sep 27, 2011 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

yeah people may not get on base before him,

but when he gets the chance he isnt exactly proving his detractors wrong.

So i you can give you can take it.

by epsilon on Sep 27, 2011 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

Pena has hit with RISP in other years.

That’s not necessarily something that would continue next year.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Sep 27, 2011 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

sorry over it

if he couldnt hit more than 177 in a contract year…

So i you can give you can take it.

by epsilon on Sep 27, 2011 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why would you ever want someone

Who just performs better in a “contract year”?

by Josh Timmers on Sep 27, 2011 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

i dont.

but someone who IS in a contract year is only hitting .177, what does that say? thats his best? thats what Boras is going to use going into negotiations?

So i you can give you can take it.

by epsilon on Sep 27, 2011 3:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

You're focused too much on one statistic, batting average....

… which does not reflect what the player can do.

Pena hit .196 last year, not .177. Further, he had a serious foot injury.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Sep 27, 2011 3:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

.177 BA RISP

He’s an abject failure at the plate with men on base.

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Sep 27, 2011 3:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

He wasn't in 2009.

Some of that is because of the team he’s on.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Sep 27, 2011 3:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

How so?

Seeya Jimbo! Good job, Tommy Boy!

by shoemile on Sep 27, 2011 4:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Please explain this statement.

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Sep 27, 2011 4:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

I must admit...

I’d really like to hear this spin of an answer myself.

by Damen Jackson on Sep 27, 2011 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

I didn't laugh in this thread til Damen popped up.

Then I laughed hard.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Sep 27, 2011 5:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

His career RISP is only .241

He’s older and seeing fewer FBs. I’d guess he’s close to his projected number than you hope for. But for $10M, I want an RBI guy who isn’t declining in value and is susceptible to seeing a loogy late in the game. I’d rather base my year on his projection than your "maybe he’ll be better approach.

If it wasn't for the injuries, we'd be printing WS tickets right now.

by tharr on Sep 27, 2011 5:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

That career RISP is close to his career average.

Granted that he is in his decline years. But he still has value.

I admit he has not been good at it this year. That does not mean he can’t do it in the future.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Sep 27, 2011 6:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

It more likely indicates

his skills are declining and the probability of a reversion to peak performance is not a good risk. In a down year, 2012, do the Cubs spend $10M for 1 or more years on Carlos? I can’t recommend that kind of investment when other needs are more pressing.

The Rays were happy to trade a $10M Pena for a $750K Kotchman. I’d guess Freidman doesn’t regret that decision. If he comes here, I’d bet Pena would be gone in 2012.

If it wasn't for the injuries, we'd be printing WS tickets right now.

by tharr on Sep 27, 2011 7:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

OK now you are discussing a different option.

I’d go with a third option other than Pena and LaHair. Maybe someone who actually has major league experience. James Loney?

John Grabow: $4.8 million in 2011.

by rlpete on Sep 27, 2011 10:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Um...

He hits behind Castro, Barney and Ramirez – I’d say he has his share of RBI opportunities. They’re getting on-base a decent amount at least.

by John916 on Sep 27, 2011 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

Walks

Without sounding like Dusty with the base clogging line….those 100 walks are more hollow than 100 singles. I’m all for a patient approach and the 100 walks are fine…but for a middle of the order hitter, he better be driving in runs and hitting with RISP as well. If Pena could run, which he can’t, and hit at the top of the order, then the walks are meaningful. But in a vaccuum they sound a lot better than in the middle of a very soft order.

Fact of the matter is, the 1B in 2012 must produce more than what their 1B has done in 2011, defense be damned.

by krummy12 on Sep 27, 2011 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

You sound like Dusty.

I’ll take a guy who can get on base as many times as Pena has.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Sep 27, 2011 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Disraeli

said it, and Twain quoted him.

by Bad Dogs on Sep 27, 2011 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

man!

I honestly already forgot about Fukudome….awesome.

So i you can give you can take it.

by epsilon on Sep 27, 2011 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

This gets my vote for Rant of the Day.

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Sep 27, 2011 10:54 AM CDT via iPhone app up reply actions  

Pena is a three-outcome guy

He’s going to walk, strikeout, or homer. The problem is that he does way too much of the middle one. When a pitcher does leave it in his wheelhouse, it is a site to see, but the other 500 at bats can be painful to watch.

I think I speak for everyone here when I say, "Wait, what the hell are you talking about?"

by Ross on Sep 27, 2011 11:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

Strikeouts by hitters are overrated.

They are just outs. It’s better than hitting into double plays all the time, right?

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Sep 27, 2011 11:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

Nothing personal,

but I’ve never understood that rational. Good things happen when the ball gets put in play. Defenders makes miscues, allowing hitters to reach. Runners get advanced. A sac fly may allow a runner to score. A strikeout does what exactly?

Be wary of hitters who kill rallies with excessive strikeout totals. All outs are not the same.

by Damen Jackson on Sep 27, 2011 11:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

And

Worse than advancing the runner on some other type of out, including driving him home.

Strikeouts in and of themselves are tolerable. Excessive strikeouts are pretty signfiicant negatives when you get into the 120’s and above….even more so if you don’t hit 40+ homers and/or drive in over 100 runs.

by krummy12 on Sep 27, 2011 11:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yes and no

A strikeout is better than a double play, equivalent to a pop-up, and less productive than a ground ball or a long fly ball. Runner on second and nobody out? I don’t want to see a strikeout.

I think I speak for everyone here when I say, "Wait, what the hell are you talking about?"

by Ross on Sep 27, 2011 8:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

You forgot his bunts!

BUNTS!!!!

"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza

by RiskyBusiness on Sep 27, 2011 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

Nice

"When I came up to bat with three men on and two outs in the ninth, I looked in the other team's dugout and they were already in street clothes." - Bob Uecker

by Easy Ed on Sep 27, 2011 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Draft pick count down

Unlike last season, I’m not cheering for the Cubs to lose games in the last series to get a better draft pick. The draft next year is projected to be weak and there’s no real consensus on who the top players are. Any pick 5 through 10 is likely to be as good as another.

But right now the Cubs are tied with the Padres for the fifth pick in the draft. The Cubs hold the draft tiebreaker on San Diego (which is the 2010 record). Houston has the top pick wrapped up and the Twins are locked in at #2. Seattle and Baltimore will definitely pick before us. Oakland and Colorado will definitely pick after us as they lose to tie-break. If we win out and Pittsburgh loses out, they pick before us.

So the Cub could pick anywhere between 5th and 9th.

On the other side, there are five teams with 71 or 72 wins right now. So the Cubs could pick anywhere between four (if the Cubs lose ou

by Josh Timmers on Sep 27, 2011 10:15 AM CDT reply actions  

Oops

That last line got cut off and I didn’t proofread (shame!) I meant to say we could pass Kansas City, Florida and Pittsburgh.

by Josh Timmers on Sep 27, 2011 10:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

A top-five pick

would almost make this season bearable, at least in retrospect.

by Damen Jackson on Sep 27, 2011 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

We'll get the #5 pick

If we lose our last two games. We could split with SD and still get the #5 pick if KC wins at least once.

by Josh Timmers on Sep 27, 2011 10:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

KC is playing Minnesota.

So yeah, they’ll win at least one.

"I'm not a broadcaster! I'm me!"--Ron Santo

by chilango2 on Sep 27, 2011 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

And maybe a compensation pick for Aramis.

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Sep 27, 2011 10:46 AM CDT via iPhone app up reply actions  

Ramirez

is Type B, so we’d only get a pick in the comp round.

The Type A free agent we have is Ryan Dempster, but from the sound of it he’s going to pick up his option.

by Josh Timmers on Sep 27, 2011 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Cubs should trade Zambrano for Ozzie and flip Ozzie to the fish for minor leaguers.

by drodd on Sep 27, 2011 10:18 AM CDT reply actions  

Uh, I believe Ozzie already has a deal in place.

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Sep 27, 2011 10:45 AM CDT via iPhone app up reply actions  

LaHair - maybe not the answer

But possibly a useful piece in the puzzle. He’s left handed and he can generate a lot of power with a short quick swing. He’s serviceable in the outfield and could work in a platoon.

"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza

by RiskyBusiness on Sep 27, 2011 10:32 AM CDT reply actions  

LaHair has been worth more for $500K

than Pena has been for $10M. He has the fewest hits of all qualified 1B in the majors. We have 70 wins. Just how valuable was Pena the past year? How many wins is he worth for $9.5M compared to LaHair?

If it wasn't for the injuries, we'd be printing WS tickets right now.

by tharr on Sep 27, 2011 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

He has the fewest hits of all qualified 1B in the majors.

So? He has the third most walks of all qualified 1B. Why is the number of hits relevant, but the number of walks not?

Pena is a 2.4 WAR player. LaHair has put up 0.4 WAR. LaHair has certainly NOT been “worth more”.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Sep 27, 2011 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Pena put up slightly above average WAR in 152 games...whee!

LaHair has only played in 19 games….you’re not really going down this road are you?

As I've told you before, I never repeat myself.

by santoswoodenlegs on Sep 27, 2011 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Pena makes 20 times as much

but his WAR is only 6 times as much with far fewer PAs. Do the math.

How many RBIs did those BB achieve? There is a huge difference in walks vs singles.

If it wasn't for the injuries, we'd be printing WS tickets right now.

by tharr on Sep 27, 2011 4:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's not what the OP said.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Sep 27, 2011 6:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

What is OP?

If it wasn't for the injuries, we'd be printing WS tickets right now.

by tharr on Sep 27, 2011 7:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's hard to compare the two in terms of value...

…because of their vastly differing playing times.

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Sep 27, 2011 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

You must be happy about the Ozzie thing.

You’ve stated a certain dislike for him in the past, no?

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Sep 27, 2011 10:56 AM CDT via iPhone app up reply actions  

Oh sweet merciful crap, I'm so happy.

He’s going to hell (aka Miami)!!! I’m sure they’ll appreciate him there.

And maybe, just maybe, I can stop despising the Sox so bad.

"I'm not a broadcaster! I'm me!"--Ron Santo

by chilango2 on Sep 27, 2011 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Pena also leads the league in check swings (laughs).

But when I think about it, if Pena reduced his check swing strikes on pitches outside the zone, he might have at least 10 more base-on-balls than he does now.

Jack Brickhouse: "Hey! Hey!" Harry Caray: "Holy Cow!"
Vince Lloyd: "The Chicago Cubs are on the Air!" Len Kasper: "Oh Baby!!!!"
Ron Santo: "YES!" "All Right! Let's do it!" "Ohhh Nooooo!" "Gee Whiz! Come on!" AND... "This Is The Year!"

by #1 iowan cubs fan on Sep 27, 2011 11:08 AM CDT reply actions  

Latos reminded me of Sutcliffe

They have similar builds, though I think Sutcliffe was a little lighter at the same age. But the mechanics are very similar.

I was impressed with Dolis – he threw so easily and was hitting 95. Liked what I saw there.

And Coleman was pitching, throwing strikes, changing speeds. That was outstanding to watch.

I think I speak for everyone here when I say, "Wait, what the hell are you talking about?"

by Ross on Sep 27, 2011 11:09 AM CDT reply actions  

I liked Dolis as well.

First time I’ve ever seen him pitch — seems like he has a live arm, decent repertoire and good mound presence. I hope he makes the bullpen next season.

Baseball is pitching, offensive production, baserunning and defense.

by daver on Sep 27, 2011 11:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

todays article

i have enjoyed reading bleed cubbie blue all season thanx for the great place for fans to share thoughts and follow the minor leagues which i really enjoy but dont forget the great batting average with runners in scoring position which is somewhere in the 170-180 range the worst in baseball; im sure jim hendry if still here would think that warrants a multiyear deal at about 10 -15 million a year look at berkman what the redbirds got for the same price thats why we r the cubs.

by notcubbiewubbie on Sep 27, 2011 11:09 AM CDT reply actions  

So is this a Cubs website

or a fricken commercial. The ads are getting worse

"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry

by Hammer on Sep 27, 2011 12:14 PM CDT reply actions  

On the bright side, the Cardinals lost to the Astros!

Jack Brickhouse: "Hey! Hey!" Harry Caray: "Holy Cow!"
Vince Lloyd: "The Chicago Cubs are on the Air!" Len Kasper: "Oh Baby!!!!"
Ron Santo: "YES!" "All Right! Let's do it!" "Ohhh Nooooo!" "Gee Whiz! Come on!" AND... "This Is The Year!"

by #1 iowan cubs fan on Sep 27, 2011 12:40 PM CDT reply actions  

Best title of the year.

"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks

by dtpollitt on Sep 27, 2011 12:51 PM CDT reply actions  

Depressivo...

If the Cubs still have a chance, no matter how small, it’s still Go Cubs, damn the math and pass the KoolAid.

by eths on Sep 27, 2011 3:28 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Why do we assume that the kids 'suck'

just because they had one bad game against a VERY good pitcher? Do we need to remember ‘small sample size’ here?

[...]when Giants coach Steve Owen, a certified defensive genius, was asked how he planned to stop Nagurski, he said: "With a shotgun, as he’s leaving the dressing room."

by NobodySpecial on Sep 27, 2011 8:15 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Maybe it's time to take a deep breath

Recent FanPosts

Small
Top 10 things I liked about watching the Cubs lose at PNC Park
Seinfeld_jerk_store_black_shirt_small
Cubs pitching problems answered!
Zambrano_background_2_small
What is the most likely move in June regarding current players?
Small
Draft Prep: Pierce Johnson
Small
Trying to be positive (need some help)
Small
Soriano back to Second?
Small
Javier Baez Peoria Bound?
Small
Draft Prep: Conference Tournament Version
Despite-an-inflated-babip-lahair-is-no-one-month-wonder
Suddenly, I feel your pain

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Former MLB PItcher Bob Ojeda On Pitching And Pain
Wrigley Field Supporters Propose Tearing Down Rest Of Chicago
Doug Glanville On His Teammate, Kerry Wood
Thanks.
Samardzija takes a dig at Hawk Harrelson

Recent FanShots

A Day In The Life Of An A-Ball Minor Leaguer
Baez to Peoria
2012 Stars and Stripes Hat
Sveum moves Castro back to #2 spot
OT: Tyler Colvin bats 2nd
The Pittsburgh Pirates Offensive Catastrophe
Roy Halladay Bobblehead Fail
Full sized image

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
Should the National League adopt the designated hitter rule?

  1008 votes | Results

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Chicago Cubs Game Threads

Yahoo_full_count

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Profile_small Josh Timmers

B_w_avatar_small Brett Taylor

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima