2003...Eight Years Later or Catching Hell Will Give Me Nightmares
ESPN released the documentary Catching Hell. The well known story of Steve Bartman and how because of his (and other fans' interference,) a domino effect of errors by the Cubs, clutch hits by the Marlins, and karma/bad thoughts by Cubs fans caused a monumental collapse. After the jump, I present my thoughts about the documentary (to an extent) and how eight years later, my feelings change.
Note: I apologize of this FanPost isn't well written, I am a chef. I went to culinary school, not college for an English major.
The documentary I thought was absolutely well done. The way it started with Buckne, to the Cubs (and their failures and how the "curse" started) was great. When it got to the "foul ball" and Bartman (and originally, Pat Looney) it really got juicy and that amount of perspectives, scenarios, angles, and the timeline of from the foul ball, to hiding Bartman inside the booth. I will say it now, I was so pissed from that moment, not only was my face red (along with my whole body,) I lost my voice for the next 3 days, and my BP was 160/90.
Anyway, about Bartman getting out of the stadium, that was quite interesting. He ended up staying at the woman's apartment for the night, then to the hotel where he AND two of his friends had rented (and were to celebrate the supposed win) and they were gone. The written apology, him staying in hiding, and the fact that people just dismissed Game 7. Yeah, really doesn't help to use that negative energy. I am a firm believer of karma, positive thoughts/positive energy, and yeah, that didn't help. It also didn't help that we blew that game.
Back to the documentary and look who makes an appearence, Moises Alou! They asked if he would've had that ball, and he said yes because, he finally did everything right. Even to this day, I actually agree with him. On another note, I still can't understand half the time, so I'm just going to assume that he's still kind of angry because he wouldn't get to another World Series because of him.
We get into the idea of fan interference and that it should've been called. Yeah, I agree about it. End that discussion about it.
Oh so now we get into the scapegoat story from a minister and how ties into Bartman. Okay, I'll buy that one. They both intertwine really well. Oh snap, Buckner on a horse! Yep, this documentary has everything. He explains how the momentum and that where the ball went, was where the glove was suppose to be and it closed. So the documentary goes into the Red Sox wins in 04 and 07, and how the organization invited Buckner and the fans forgive him. He finally said yes and on opening day, 2008, he appeared at Fenway. I remember seeing that, and it was a nice moment. Made me a little teary eyed. I think what they were going with is that when the Cubs win it one day, we'll collect our breath and say it's okay Bartman, you can come back now. Okay so with that, I'm going to now put my two cents in eight years later...
I won't lie to you BCB, it still hurts me when someone mentions 2003. It still hurts to know that we had five outs, even a whole game left to win it. But eight years later, we can put all the blame on Steve Bartman. So many people deserve it overall too. How about all the other fans that tried going for the ball? What about Alex Gonzales for botching that easy double play ball? How about Prior for that wild pitch? Or Farnsworth for giving up those four runs? How about the whole Cubs team for Game 7? So much blame can be spread, not just for one guy.
I might not know much since I'm 24, I cook, and work at Starbucks to pay my bills. I know 1984, 1969, the trades we've made, the players we've signed, even the fact that we had military personnel manage the team for a while, but I know I'm a die hard Cubs fan. I say this though: Eight years later, maybe we need to forgive the past and to be ready for the future.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
209 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I have lots of video that I shot at that game.
They used a couple of fan’s videos…I wish I had found a way to get my video to the director. I’d love to put it on YouTube but the MLB gods will surely smite it.
Fukudometer: Created 3/31/08 Wrigley Debut 4/5/08 WGN and Japan TV Debut 4/6/08 Sun Times Debut: 4/20/08 Coffee Table Debut: 7/17/08
If it is your own personal video there's nothing they can do.
Post it.
"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks
Here's a link to my video from the 2003 NLCS game 6
Interesting stuff starts around 6:00. Check my notes to skip forward.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94X0xmi5CDo
Hope MLB doesn’t squash it….
Fukudometer: Created 3/31/08 Wrigley Debut 4/5/08 WGN and Japan TV Debut 4/6/08 Sun Times Debut: 4/20/08 Coffee Table Debut: 7/17/08
ty
Fukudometer: Created 3/31/08 Wrigley Debut 4/5/08 WGN and Japan TV Debut 4/6/08 Sun Times Debut: 4/20/08 Coffee Table Debut: 7/17/08
The reaction of the fans is really disturbing
Some of the crap that people said . . . and one jackass smiling 8 years later about the garbage that he pulled.
Nice.
Step Two: Develop an organizational plan
by Shanghai Badger on Sep 27, 2011 9:22 PM CDT reply actions
That was my biggest take away from the show
what a complete jerk that one guy was and still is. He actually seems proud of himself.
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Sep 28, 2011 7:36 AM CDT up reply actions
The guy is a loser
Shame on ESPN for casting him.
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry
I see your point, but
maybe the point of including him was to show the worst of the fan reactions, and to show what a douchebag the guy still is. He is so dumb, Ihe probably does not even grasp how bad his appearance on the show makes him look.
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Sep 28, 2011 4:38 PM CDT up reply actions
and I see yours
That guy just really rubbed me the wrong way.
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry
absolutely
and he has no clue how bad he came off which is sadly amusing
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Oct 1, 2011 7:52 AM CDT up reply actions
I found that striking as well
But particularly given the contrast to people who were jerks in the moment but clearly felt regret (to one degree or another) years later. I can’t remember all the names, but the filmmaker in particular struck me as someone who had come to regret his own role in piling on during the game, something he couldn’t avoid acknowledging because he’d captured himself in that moment on film; his after-the-fact interview revealed a much more reflective, sympathetic understanding.
Ditto John Kass who was embarrassed for what he said to Bartman in the moment.
Ditto Wayne Drehs who felt regret after following through on an ESPN assignment to try and track Bartman down.
Somewhere in the middle was the guy who owned the pub, who expressed some sympathy for Bartman but seemed to whitewash the full extent of his own actions (claiming for instance that he pulled back when he saw Alou coming, when the video shows something different).
But the guy I think you’re talking about – the one who bragged about getting thrown out after tossing a beer on Bartman – was a glaring exception who should be embarrassed for his actions both then and now.
by Orval Overall on Sep 28, 2011 5:37 PM CDT up reply actions
In case anyone is still reading this post...........
………..I feel compelled to clarify my situation.
I didn’t see the show on Tuesday (just caught it last night), but I’d been told I was displayed several times, and in not-too-glowing fashion.
In short, I was filmed as being VERY PISSED OFF, but it had NOTHING to do with Bartman. I was engaged in a heated disagreement with a fan in my section, so they took this clip and ASSUMED it involved Bartman.
Completely out of context, as we Hollywood types like to say………
So for the record, cut the guy in the blue Cubs floppy hat some slack.
"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day." ~ Frank Sinatra
I never did blame poor old Steve.
I always think back to the A-Gon double play ball that could have been.
Sigh.
I got chills during that last scene when they simulated Bartman pulling his hands away and Moises making the catch btw.
Sigh.
BEAR DOWN!
I blame Dusty,
he should have gotten off his ass and walked out to Prior and had him relax. Instead, he sat there and did nothing.
I'm going to the 2012 Randy Hundley Fantasy Camp!!! Who's with me?
by VegasCubFan on Sep 27, 2011 10:12 PM CDT up reply actions
I used to think this...
…but after watching the entire inning again, I’m not so sure I feel as strongly about this. Dusty, certainly could have visited the mound, but I didn’t get the feel (watching it real time) that is was as necessary.
Rothschild did visit the mound shortly after, but the botched ground ball was the real killer that inning.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
Dusty should probably have taken Prior out at that point.
Other managers would bring in a closer for a five-out save.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
In hindsight...
…your probably right, but when you have a guy who has been your ace, most managers follow the philosophy of going with who brought you. Going back to 84, I thought it was far worse how Fry left Sutcliffe in as long as he did.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
True about 1984...
… but though Prior might have been considered an “ace”, he was also a 23-year-old kid in his first full MLB season.
Dusty should have taken him out. Like most people connected with Cubs management over the last 10 years, he deferred to his player.
Tony LaRussa would have taken him out, because that would have given the team the best chance to win.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
I agree...
…LaRussa may be, the best “in game” manager of the last 30 years. He has won with excessive amounts of injuries and sometimes lessor talent and you have to be pushing the right buttons most of the time to pull that off.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
LaRussa would have visited the mound
I’m not convinced he would have taken Prior out right there and then.
This whole thing is about momentum – positive and negative. Just like a hockey team will call a timeout after a couple quick goals against or change goalies (that’s not 100% comparable to baseball since goalies taken out can come back in), it’s meant to break the momentum.
Dusty saw Alou blow a head gasket. The normally in-control Prior looked like he had his cage rattled. A visit to the mound, with all the IF’ers coming in for a conference, just to say, “OK guys, let’s cool off here, focus on what we have to do, and go do it” would have done a world of good.
The mental aspect of sports is so underrated. Just like the old deodorant commercial used to say, “never let them see you sweat”, the same holds true with, “never let them think you’re beat”. A visit to the mound would have done wonders there.
Just win the next game...!
by blackhawk24 on Sep 28, 2011 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Agreed on most of this.
Whatever the case, a winning manager would have done SOMETHING. Dusty sat on his butt.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
This is called...
…“having a feel for the game” in front of you and a lot of managers/coaches freeze up when things start going south.
Prior still had excellent stuff and in hindsight, yes, it may have been best for Dusty to go out there and say; “hey, no problem, just get the next hitter, we are in good shape”.
If Maddux was on the mound in that circumstance, he would have gone to the rosin bag 3 or 4 times, tossed over to 1st a half dozen times and the hitter would have been all out of whack.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
Prior was 22 years old!
It’s hard to feel for Prior nowadays, but VERY few players his age are immune from rattling.
I can’t believe someone made, and continues to make, Dusty Baker a leader of men.
"It's all in the game, yo"
He was 23, actually.
But your point is valid.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
Eric Karros comment
I remember him saying years later that he wished he was in the game at that point so he could have gone out to the mound to calm down Prior.
When your closer is Joe Borowski and your starter is Mark Prior?
I don’t think I would’ve done that one even with the benefit of hindsight.
by Orval Overall on Sep 28, 2011 5:37 PM CDT up reply actions
agreed
go out and talk to Prior and let him catch his breath, but staying with Prior was logical at the time.
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Sep 28, 2011 5:54 PM CDT up reply actions
Hindsight should have nothing...
to do with bringing in your closer who in that season had a 2.63 ERA, 33 saves with only 4 blown saves (2 in May, 1 in June, and 1 in August).
In the playoffs he had an ERA of 2.08 to that point giving up just 1 run in 6.1 innings. He pitched 2 innings in Game 1 of the series, and 2.1 innings in Game 3 so not only was he capable of getting 5 outs, he also should have been fresh not having been used in either Games 4 or 5.
If anything you might be able to argue that he might have been too rested and could have been rusty but that would still be a stretch.
To be honest, I just looked up those numbers because I knew Borowski was having a good season but to me, considering exactly what his numbers were, it makes Dusty’s decision to not bring him in (or even have him warming up at that point) even more ludicrous.
Crazy “What if:” Dusty has Borowski warming up to start the inning, just in case. Castillo’s foul pop heads towards the seats (conveniently where the Cubs bullpen is) and Joe is able to yell at the crowd to stay back.
Reliving Dustys postgame interview sucked too
Everything he said was just wrong -
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry
He was shell shocked!
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
Sad Irony
that said jackass is so proud to be part of the documentary, when Bartman politely declines. He, jackass, seemed oblivious to his portrayal like so many reality goons of today. Bartman’s dignity since that night is impressive.
"Chicago Cubs fans are ninety percent scar tissue." - George F. Will
I really liked the part that said Bartman was the only one with honor and he was the perfect guy for this. Because it could have happened to anyone, but he handle it with class.
I’ve always hate the guy that actually came up with ball, because he was actually hoping for a Cub loss to sell the ball for more money.
"He was just a young skinny guy who looked like a winner. We didn’t know he was going to be as good as he is."
—Popovich on Manu Ginobili
My main problem with the flick
Other than the fact that 3/8 of it focused on the Red Sox, was that it could have been shot in December, 2003. There was very, very little on the feelings of Cubs fans about Bartman today. If you lived in Nepal and watched this tonight, your overall impression would be that we still hate the guy, or at least that we only care about him and him alone, even 8 years later.
Hint, Gibney: Cubs fans know more than that. We do blame Gonzalez more than Bartman. We do blame Dusty for leaving Prior in too long (something you never mentioned, BTW) more than Bartman. We already feel bad about the way he was treated and you clapping that hairshirt back on us feels so off because we’ve moved on. You and the rest of the baseball world may not have, and if that’s the only view you have of us as Cubs fans, you can feel free to stay the hell away from Wrigley for fear you’ll be the next to be nearly lynched.
Utter lack of perspective and respect.
"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root
by Clutch16 on Sep 27, 2011 9:42 PM CDT reply actions 10 recs
I agree with you clutch
the whole second half was about the BoSox (hence ESPN loving it so much).
I'm going to the 2012 Randy Hundley Fantasy Camp!!! Who's with me?
by VegasCubFan on Sep 27, 2011 10:12 PM CDT up reply actions
I disagree
Not with your take on how Cubs fans feel today, but with the suggestion that this wasn’t captured on the film. I thought a lot of the people they interviewed – from Wayne Drehs to the filmmaker to the folks on the WGN radio broadcast – made the central point that they’d moved on and didn’t blame Bartman. Granted these weren’t “man on the street” interviews, but I thought it was pretty clear that sentiment today was not what it once was. Maybe it could’ve been presented better, but I dont think it was missing to the extent you say.
by Orval Overall on Sep 28, 2011 5:41 PM CDT up reply actions
I do not blame Bartman, never did
but anyone who felt the air go out that ballpark the moment the play happened was not imagining it, I think everyone felt it even the players. Gonzalez failure to field the two hopper, Dusty’s failure to go out to the mound after Pierre reached base.
I do feel awful for Bartman, I think the documentary was able to convey the animus aimed at Bartman that I certainly didn’t realize at the time was as strong as it was.
Guys, hitting is not about muscle. It's simple physics. Calculate the velocity, v, in relation to the trajectory, t, in which g, gravity, of course remains a constant.... It's not complicated. - George Costanza
by troutfishin on Sep 27, 2011 9:44 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Dusty should have had somebody warming up in the pen...
Prior was almost up to around 120 pitches. Even though he was pitching well, this was Game 6 of the NLCS. You can’t manage a game in October like it’s a game in April or May. You’ve got to have Remlinger and Farnsworth warming up. Or you go to someone else like Zambrano or Clement. My point is that you manage that game like it’s Game 7. You go for the knockout punch, not wait for the split decision. And Dusty messed it up by leaving Prior in the game and not going out there to calm the team down. All he had to do was “Dude, it’s just a foul ball. It’s just a long strike. Now let’s get this guy out.”
If Gonzalez turns that double play, it’s 3-1 Cubs. Then the Cubs tack on another run in the 8th inning and it would be 4-1 Cubs. They could then have brought in Joe Borowski to get the save. Cubs win the game and Wood starts Game 1 of the World Series.
by jeffmills1972 on Sep 27, 2011 10:04 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Then we win the series
and repeat the next year. Dusty gets the biggest statue in Chicago, and both Sox teams don’t win in 04 and 05, and still have the curses upon them. Tribune uses the cubs to get out of bankruptcy which helps out Chicago and the US. Then we do not see a recession/depression, so unemployment is at an all time low and gas is still under 2 dollars.
All because the cubs win the world series.
by lshaffer_69 on Sep 27, 2011 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I only caught the past 15 min
and saw something that said Bartman wanted this to happen. Then it shows him waving at the camera during another foul ball.
What did that mean I got confused.
I thought the show was kind of showing him as the victim but for that scene it said he wanted this o happen.
If any body has any insight on that part of the show. I am going to try to find this show on the web and watch the whole thing.
It was showing that Bartman was trying to get on camera...
But after the unfortunate incident, he stayed away from the media.
I think it was trying to signify the impact the incident had on him...
In that he was having the time of his life, the Cubs were a game away from the playoffs, he wanted to be seen at the game by the cameras, but after it happened his life changed…for the worse, unfortunately.
because NOBODY at a ballgame ever waves to the camera
I'm going to the 2012 Randy Hundley Fantasy Camp!!! Who's with me?
by VegasCubFan on Sep 27, 2011 10:13 PM CDT up reply actions
As the others pointed out...
the cameras caught him on an earlier foul ball waving his arms to try and get some attention and get on camera. I think it was meant to foreshadow a “be careful what you wish for” type moment. Especially because of the absolute nightmare the media attention has caused him.
It never said Bartman wanted this to happen, never even implied that
like most fans, when the camera is pointed your way, you mug for the camera. That does not mean he wanted to interfere with a play and have the majority of the crowd verbally abusing him and being pelted with beer and threats. Huge difference.
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Sep 28, 2011 7:40 AM CDT up reply actions
All of the Buckner garbage shouldn't have been in there...
I only caught the last hour of it, it was well done.
I found myself screaming at the TV when Miguel Cabrera hit that home run, I still hate that guy!
I still haven’t gotten over that NLCS, in fact I probably never will. The only way I feel I can get over that is if the Cubs win the world series, and in all honesty I doubt it will happen while I’m alive. And I’m 23!
Graned i missed 3/4 of it
But it shows how Buckner caught hell for his play.
by lshaffer_69 on Sep 27, 2011 10:13 PM CDT up reply actions
Actually the 2008 NLDS crapfest still pisses me off even more...
97 wins, best team in the NL, and 1,2,3 DONE!!!
When I think of Lou Piniella, I think 0-6.
thta was not as painful for me
maybe because the 2003 collapse had already happened, so I was not surprised by being swept away in 2008. Also, the 2008 loss was in the 1st round, not five outs away from a trip to the Series.
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Sep 28, 2011 7:42 AM CDT up reply actions
Saw some things that I hadn't heard about before.
Very interesting that he was trying to get on camera during the sixth inning, and he really stood out in that shot for how many people were in it.
I wonder where Bartman is tonight and if he had any desire to watch this. It really made my sympathy for him go to a whole new level.
Have you ever wondered
if he’s part of BCB? I mean, what better way to anonymously participate in the ups and downs of the Cubs season?
If so – welcome, and hopefully realize from this thread and others that 99% of Cubs fans think you got a raw deal.
by Orval Overall on Sep 28, 2011 5:44 PM CDT up reply actions
ERIC HANNA?
Fukudometer: Created 3/31/08 Wrigley Debut 4/5/08 WGN and Japan TV Debut 4/6/08 Sun Times Debut: 4/20/08 Coffee Table Debut: 7/17/08
I bet he is at least a lurker
being a big fan like he supposedly is
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry
I suppose.
But as far as I know, he is not a member here.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
I DVR'd it, maybe I'll watch it this weekend if I can stomach it.
feet firmly nailed to the floor of the Tyler Colvin bandwagon...
by wrigleyrocker12 on Sep 27, 2011 10:19 PM CDT reply actions
If only WGN had scrapped its seven-second delay for those playoffs,
Steve might have continued to live in blessed anonymity.
On related matters, it was disgusting to see that lout brag eight years later about throwing beer at Bartman. Also, I don’t know if it was mostly the result of Gibney’s editing, but the film does show many fans at and around the ballpark going over the top in their reactions.
Viewers with no special attachment to the Cubs prior to watching this movie certainly won’t be queuing up in the donor line anytime soon to Bleed Cubbie Blue.
"Elder White! Look at the talent on those Cubs!" Harry Caray, KMOX Radio, 4/22/62
"And you have to wonder – What's the matter with Broglio?" Harry, KMOX, 5/24/64
by ernaga on Sep 27, 2011 10:20 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
I really don't think the seven second delay would make a difference.
Once he saw the ball he probably would have lost all focus on what he was hearing through the headphones anyway.
Agreed - that 7-second delay argument made no sense whatsoever...
he obviously saw what was happening in real time, stood up (along with everyone else) and reached out for the ball (just like everyone else did)…
Get 'em on, Get 'em over, Get 'em in!
I still remember talking to my brother and going
“5 more outs, finally! As soon as this is over, let’s buy our plane tickets”
then I sat there in stunned silence for many hours.
I'm going to the 2012 Randy Hundley Fantasy Camp!!! Who's with me?
I hope he is at piece with himself
and is living his life to the fullest. Hey when we win the WS next year he can come and sing the 7th inning stretch.
Damn straight!!!!
I'm going to the 2012 Randy Hundley Fantasy Camp!!! Who's with me?
by VegasCubFan on Sep 27, 2011 10:27 PM CDT up reply actions
I hope the same too.
Seriously, we are talking about a mans life. No way should he have to be protected over a baseball game. Especially when he was NOT the reason we lost that game and lost that series.
'Never look down on anybody unless you're helping him up.'
by Unique on Sep 27, 2011 10:30 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I hate that moment and it made my stomach hurt watching it.
I never blamed the fan for anything. I blamed the mental mindstate of the players, Alex Gonzalez, and the lack of common sense by Dusty Baker in that series. Baker had to get Prior out of there after the first run scored.
Regardless if the Cubs ever win the World Series, 2003 will always be a tough pill to swallow. I do think however, that the Marlins were a better overall team – and that they were better managed than the Cubs in that series. Baker wasn’t as horrible as many say here, but he certainly deserves some blame for his decisions in that series. Sadly, when I think of 2003, I think of the following year — which we certainly had ALL the talent to win that year, and the total lack of leadership when it was needed the most.
'Never look down on anybody unless you're helping him up.'
If Zambrano could have held a 4 run lead they would have swept the damn series!
All of this nonsense would never have happened.
Ugh!!!!!
If they win the first game,
which I thought they would after Sosa’s homer tied it, ditto.
by Not Bruce Froemming on Sep 27, 2011 10:54 PM CDT up reply actions
Nobody talks about Game 1...
That game was just as important as Game 6…
Get 'em on, Get 'em over, Get 'em in!
2003 was bad
but 2004 in many ways was worse.
by Not Bruce Froemming on Sep 27, 2011 10:53 PM CDT up reply actions
listening to that final weekend on headphones
at the Purdue Illinois football game.
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry
2003 was a lightning bolt
2004 was like watching a flood slowly come up over the sandbags in your backyard.
"It's all in the game, yo"
The guy who threw the beer
I feel sorry for his family. Also, I wish they would go charge him with something – throwing a beer at someone has to be against the law. So I am sure he feels great today because odds are he is hanging out with his other DBAG friends laughing it off.
I am thankful to not know that loser.
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry
It's amazing
7-8 years later, and that guy still comes off as an a-hole.
"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
by RiskyBusiness on Sep 28, 2011 9:19 AM CDT up reply actions
I still remember every second BTW
of that Wood home run. End result aside that is up there as my best Cubs memory ever.
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry
wood game 7
i didn’t watch the “documentary” / espn-sleeze film… from the comments, it seems like this was not a documentary in that it was too speculative, didn’t tell an objective story, and didn’t sound like it even got any new commentary at all…
anyway, after 8 years of being mad at “he who shall not be named” (i’ll admit, i suck as a human being), i’m over the loss. i was avoiding all things about this espn-filmed garbage, but the only reason i came on this post today was to talk about that wood homer in game 7.
when game 7 started, i was still a little angry ,but as a fan, i had high hopes for game 7… at home with kerry pitching. if not, why even bother being a fan? when wood killed that homer, i was so elated – i was running all around my house screaming – and i was like 30-something. that moment, loss be damned, is what i think of when i think of 2003, too, hammer!
i love baseball too much to worry about the bad shite that has happened – if i only thought about all the bad crap, why the hell would i still be a cubbie fan to this day? live like santo – believe that this is the year!! and if not, then next year is!
I was upstairs (age 23)
younger brother downstairs. I told the family I needed to be alone cause Im weird. When Wood connected I swear my brother was upstairs before it landed in the bleachers.
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry
I've never seen Game 7
I had to work that night and I taped it. But I checked the score before watching the game. I couldn’t handle watching a loss again.
Deleted the tape. Never seen a second of it
"It's all in the game, yo"
A couple notes...
I don’t quite understand all the complaining about the Red Sox and the Buckner inclusion. The entire premise of the documentary was about the idea of scapegoats and assigning blame in sports. Buckner and Bartman are without a doubt the two most famous in American sports. The majority of the film focused on Steve and the Cubs but only as a catalyst for discussion for the overall premise.
If it had only been about Bartman then I swear people would complain about ESPN only showing the Cubs fans in a bad light, and we’ve moved on…why can’t they, blah, blah, blah.
As for me, I was surprised at just how much those scenes from 2003 stung. I was at Game 1 and still remember the feeling I had when Sammy hit the HR in the bottom of the 9th to tie it. I blamed Steve for about an hour during and after the game but then got excited for Game 7. It might have helped that I didn’t have cable at the time so I didn’t see a million replays and PTIs and Sportscenters that night and the next day.
I think what stings the most for me is the same for everyone. They were so close that year and this current team is so not. Hopefully this off season begins moving the team in the direction we all want it to go and we all crash the BCB servers when it does finally happen.
To me the most poignant part of the film for me was his apology in which he specifically mentions Ernie and Ron. The years must have subdued my memory of how awful those fans were to him but that was some truly disgusting behavior. It doesn’t help that one of the guys appears to still be proud of throwing beer on him to this day.
I don’t have to forgive Steve for anything but I await the day when he is able to return to Wrigley, head held high and toss out the first pitch. If only because that might mean the Cubs have won the World Series and everyone loves a good PR story.
by CubFan81 on Sep 27, 2011 11:03 PM CDT reply actions 7 recs
I hope they win the WS
and he is happy with his family and friends at home/bar etc. I also hope that he turns down the Cubs to throw out a pitch – as I suspect (if they ever win) it will be a stiff NO.
Nice post
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry
Good post
A couple of notes of my own:
I understood the reasons for the Buckner stuff. Just seemed like it went on a little too long. I thought they could have made their points in about half the amount of time they spent on Buckner.
I agree with you on the apology. That was one of two parts where I got choked up and felt just awful again last night. The other was seeing him wiping the beer off of himself while seated in his seat and staring straight ahead with all the commotion going on around him.
I almost hate to admit this now, but that night, I was so shell-shocked and crushed by what happened, that I wanted to kick Bartman’s ass, too. Like the film pointed out, the fans just needed a scapegoat, and everyone turned their wrath on him. Had it been a regular season game, it would have been no big deal, but because of the circumstances and how heartbreaking that game turned out to be, I needed an outlet.
By the next morning, I no longer felt any anger towards Bartman and turned my blame towards Gonzalez, Dusty, etc., and began to feel bad for Bartman. And once his story and apology came out, it was hard to not empathize and imagine what it would have been like had that been me. How awful would I have felt and still feel? I can’t imagine it.
I’m glad that I watched it and hate that I had to relive it at the same time. I really don’t think we’ll ever see Bartman make any appearances at Wrigley (at least not formally), even if/when the Cubs win the World Series some day. I just hope he has found peace and this hasn’t ruined his life.
Oh, one other note: I forgave Bartman right away, but I never did forgive Bernie Mac.
Harry Caray: Marshall is going back to LA to get cocaine for his injured foot.
Steve Stone: Harry, that’s Novocaine.
by Julio Zuleta's Voodoo on Sep 28, 2011 9:43 AM CDT up reply actions
My two cents
That moment was the angriest I’ve ever been watching a baseball game, in person or on TV. Were it not for my wife stepping in front of the television – and threatening divorce – I would have thrown an unopened bottle of champagne through it.
That game and the collapse of 2004 has left me scarred. Back in 2007 and 2008 I did not watch, listen to, or follow online any of the playoff games because I was afraid of them blowing it. When they did, it only served to heighten my skepticism and pessimism. Now I’m at the point where I still won’t watch the Cubs in the playoffs unless they’re one out away from the pennant and up by at least five runs.
But I don’t blame Steve Bartman. I blame Alou and Gonzalez and Dusty and Prior. In fact I think it says a lot about the character and courage of Bartman that he didn’t follow in the footsteps of Donnie Moore. A lesser person might have taken that path, but Bartman has much more to live for than an impulsive act some eight years ago.
by EalyEagle on Sep 27, 2011 11:29 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
rec'd for your last sentence alone.
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry
Naw
There is no parallel. Donnie Moore’s sad demise had much more to do with the disintegration of his family life life and the impending estrangement from his wife and kids than it had to do with losing to the Red Sox in the ALCS.
However
… some of that disintegration was credited by people he knew, as having started that day in Anaheim.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
rec'd
for your last sentence alone.
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry
What I didn't realize at the time
And I don’t know if this is due to youthful ignorance or what, but the hate that was directed to him was remarkable.
I’m not sure why but I never considered him to be the reason the Cubs lost. Did his interference (which I would contest to this day should have been called but that’s for another time/thread) affect the atmosphere of the ballpark? You bet. But there were so many other factors into why the Cubs lost that game.
I just hope for his sake (and all Cubs fans, so we don’t have to be reminded of him and 2003) that they win sooner rather than later.
They have two liter bottles now? To think I spent all that time demanding a liter!
Didn't watch it...and never will...
…I know the ending. I’ve never, ever blamed Bartman. I’m not sure who should, but, someone owes that man an apology. It was just one of those baseball deals. Moises Alou is an idiot. First he said he coulda caught it…then he couldn’t have…then he coulda again…he doesn’t know. Yet, there was always game 7…and that one was worse yet.
"When I came up to bat with three men on and two outs in the ninth, I looked in the other team's dugout and they were already in street clothes." - Bob Uecker
The ending doesn't drive the film
There are some very good interviews with fans, broadcasters, producers, reporters, and Cubs security personnel. There is some interesting video footage that I had never seen before. I don’t agree with Gibney final editorial comment. But knowing the ending doesn’t tell you the story the Gibney portrayed.
"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
by RiskyBusiness on Sep 28, 2011 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions
Agree on Alou
Only times I liked him was when he got a fastball middle in – otherwise forget him.
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry
Alou was the stupidest "good" player I've ever seen
He ran bases like someone had put a ferret in his pants. His stance in the outfield was an absolute joke. No way does he make that catch.
"It's all in the game, yo"
If I had to guess...
…I would say it was 50/50 whether he comes down with that ball. He appeared to be right under Bartman’s hand, but he was reaching quite a bit.
I do think, the ump made the right call by not calling fan interference.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
Why would you call interference?
Against the home team?
Bartman had every right to that ball.
And Gibney, on the Simmons podcast, has pointed out that from the Bartman seat, because of the high wall, you don’t always see the fielder against the wall unless you’re craning your neck to look at the field.
No way Alou closes his glove. That’s my story and I’m sticking to it.
"It's all in the game, yo"
Read my post...
…I said the ump made the right call by not calling interference.
I do think Alou had a legit chance at catching the ball, because a player is allowed to jump and reach to catch one.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
I knew the Cubs were done after that foul ball.
I turned off the TV after that. I may not be Nostradamus, but you could see the team winding tight all series and you heard the ‘sproing’ when everybody went for the ball instead of letting Alou have a crack at it.
Yeah, I’ll say it, if I’m in that seat and I see it’s close enough for a Cub to have a shot at it, no way in hell I’m reaching for it. I’m covering my head. I can get a baseball any time, a World Series appearance is a different subject. Of course, you get TV time for catching a foul ball, don’t you?
[...]when Giants coach Steve Owen, a certified defensive genius, was asked how he planned to stop Nagurski, he said: "With a shotgun, as he’s leaving the dressing room."
by NobodySpecial on Sep 28, 2011 3:54 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
You nailed it on several counts...
No rational person condones the post-event treatment of Bartman, yet the significance of the play was immense, not only because of late inning, but even more because of the Cubs unique history, ballpark, and fans, all of which created a perfect firestorm when Bartman and others interfered with Alou’s catch.
Gibney failed to show one very important element to this storm’s buildup: this was the fourth consecutive foul Castillo hit off a 3-2 count, after being down 1-2. The impatience to put this guy away was enormous as Alou approached that ball, and in this pitch count era every foul ball Castillo hit added a thousand gallons of gasoline to the buildup waiting to explode.
In any case, I think more knowledgeable fans in some other venues, especially Boston, might have backed off. The lawyer featured in this film, along with the bar owner and her friend who grabbed the ball seem all too typical of the baseball diletantes who populate so much of Wrigley Field.
"Elder White! Look at the talent on those Cubs!" Harry Caray, KMOX Radio, 4/22/62
"And you have to wonder – What's the matter with Broglio?" Harry, KMOX, 5/24/64
How could any Cubs fan turn off the TV after the foul ball?
The Cubs were still up 3-0 just five outs away from the World Series, and you turn off the TV? Now I’ll admit that I had a feeling of dread come over me after the foul ball that this was the beginning of the end, but I could never have just stopped watching at that point. I find that very hard to believe. Maybe after the Marlins took the lead, but not with the Cubs leading.
Harry Caray: Marshall is going back to LA to get cocaine for his injured foot.
Steve Stone: Harry, that’s Novocaine.
by Julio Zuleta's Voodoo on Sep 28, 2011 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions
you didn't turn of the tv
come on
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry
Can believe it or not, but no.
Didn’t see the Gonzalez boot of the double play ball until the year after, when a friend who insisted that Bartman was 100% innocent of all wrongdoing had me look at it. I still have never seen the rest of the last two innings, and I never saw games 2 and 3 of either exit under Piniella, either.
Now that we have DVR’s, I simply will refuse in the future to watch or listen to a single Cubs playoff game in real time. I deal with depression already, don’t need it magnified watching them fail over and over again when I have the choice to pretty much avoid it.
[...]when Giants coach Steve Owen, a certified defensive genius, was asked how he planned to stop Nagurski, he said: "With a shotgun, as he’s leaving the dressing room."
by NobodySpecial on Sep 29, 2011 6:32 AM CDT up reply actions
To be fair
He only called him kind of an idiot.
Harry Caray: Marshall is going back to LA to get cocaine for his injured foot.
Steve Stone: Harry, that’s Novocaine.
by Julio Zuleta's Voodoo on Sep 28, 2011 3:16 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
OK, that's not acceptable here either.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
No team that is so mentally weak
as to be undone by something like that wins the World Series. Yankees probably sweep them
"It's all in the game, yo"
Maybe.
But you know what? Just making the WS would have ended a 58-year drought. That would have been an accomplishment in itself.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
Agree...
…sometimes, once teams “get over the hump” they relax and play much looser. I have the feeling, that if the Cubs would have eliminated the Marlins, they would have been very difficult to play against in the WS.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
Most of the 1969 Cubs say the same thing
Kenny Holtzman and Billy Williams come to mind as having said if they won that year they would’ve repeated in 1970.
I believe that group would have won three or four pennants before they inevitably got too old.
Ron Santo might have played longer. They wouldn’t necessarily have been broken up after 1973. And, with free agency dawning, a Cubs winner might have attracted some of the first free agents.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
I'm just pointing out that
I do not believe the play decided the game, but if it did, I do not believe a team that LETS such a thing decide a game is worthy of winning the World Series.
"It's all in the game, yo"
Not to mention...
that the so called “curse” on the Cubs is that they’ll never MAKE it to the World Series. It doesn’t say anything about never winning it. Had they made it to the Series that year, win or lose most of this curse garbage would have been mostly eliminated. Then, who knows how the team plays in 2007 and 2008 with less pressure.
I, sadly, believe that the longer the Cubs go without going to or winning the World Series the harder its going to be. The pressure is already so great and every passing year it continues to build I’m not sure any one team can realistically push through it these days.
by CubFan81 on Sep 28, 2011 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
That's my feeling exactly.
You’re now talking, what, seven generations of Cub fans who have never seen a winner? And all that pressure is turned on the men on the field. Maris’s career probably ended early because of the stress of that one year. That said, the pressure for a Cubs team to win it all makes that look like cake.
Nope, I don’t see it happening ever. I’ll be pleasantly surprised if it does. But after 2003, I expect nothing.
[...]when Giants coach Steve Owen, a certified defensive genius, was asked how he planned to stop Nagurski, he said: "With a shotgun, as he’s leaving the dressing room."
by NobodySpecial on Sep 29, 2011 6:17 AM CDT up reply actions
Torn now on watching this
A lot of BoSox / BillyBuck stuff in there? What’s that? Different story, totally different story. That happened on the field, exclusively.
So there’s different camera angles, eh? Always thought Alou would have caught the ball but the kids hands were above the top of the wall, not past it on the field side of the wall.
Too bad it went that way. And there were others there waiting to do the same. Maybe others will learn from this in the future, especially if it could negatively affect their team. Unfortunately this night, there was no home field “advantage”.
Nothing can be changed now but MMA42 does bring up an interesting thought on karma. It too believe in that as much as in the moment and in the successive moments, hours, days afterward. Momentum…..that’s huge. Most can’t explain how it affects a player, most will try though. I can’t explain how it works but I’ve seen on both sides of it as a player many times, both in baseball and hockey. One play, one event, one action can significantly change the approach and mindset of the players in the succeeding plays.
Oh, BTW MMA42 don’t fret you’re not an “English” major. If we had to be that to write a fan post, 98% of the fan posts would not be allowed. Good write up anyway. So how’s the world of cooking going for you? Takes a special talent. People think its easy it’s not, especially if you want to be one of the better chefs.
Just win the next game...!
Watch it.
Alot of people say they dont want to relive it, but we do even without watching it.
The Buckner stuff was interjected more an perspective and the fact of the Cubs link with him. The fact that Durham took his place in 84 then did exactly what Buckner would do 2 years later, and also the hatred towards Buckner until the Sox broke through. It ties in.
People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring. ~Rogers Hornsby
I was waiting for them to point out
that Buckner finally got his redemption during a recent episode of Curb Your Enthusiasm. That was classic.
Harry Caray: Marshall is going back to LA to get cocaine for his injured foot.
Steve Stone: Harry, that’s Novocaine.
by Julio Zuleta's Voodoo on Sep 28, 2011 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions
My thoughs...
1. I thought there was way too much of Bill Buckner. I guess the director had to do something to stretch it out to fit a two hour TV slot or something, but I was expecting a film about Bartman/the Cubs, not about Bartman and Bill Buckner.
2. I didn’t remember how ugly the scene was at the time. I didn’t remember the whole stadium chanting “asshole, asshole.” That’s disgusting. It’s a freaking FOUL BALL. Granted, it was all started because of FOX’s constant replaying of the play, but still. And the fan who said something to the effect of “put a 12 gauge in his mouth and pull the trigger” is a danger to society. What kind of psychopath says that?!
3. I really, really wish that the director would’ve acknowledged the fact that Cubs fans don’t blame Bartman. I live two blocks from Wrigley and have been to countless Cubs games… I have never met one single fan who actually blames Bartman at all.
4. I would’ve liked to see more player perspective than Eric Karros and Moises Alou. Not sure why he chose those two and only those two.
5. The salesman they showed a few times – the one who proudly recalled his encounter with Bartman, where he went down 15 rows and cussed him out then threw a beer at him – is a jackass. The guy was smiling about this. What a moron. Fans like him give Cubs fans a bad name.
6. Finally, if Steve Bartman blames one person for this whole thing becoming what it has, that person should be Moises Alou. If Alou doesn’t freaking flip out after not catching the foul ball, this never happens. If he walks away, FOX probably shows the replay a couple times, but that’s it. I’ve always felt that his overly aggressive and stupid response to the play is what triggered the whole thing. I always liked Moises, but he’s got no one to blame but himself for that play being his legacy.
by kanderber on Sep 28, 2011 7:37 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Alou's response was entirely normal and predictable
He probably could have caught the ball and he knew how important that out would have been. Hard to figure why any blame should be assigned to Alou.
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Sep 28, 2011 7:45 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
MB in LA?
"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
by RiskyBusiness on Sep 28, 2011 2:56 PM CDT up reply actions
MB arrrested again today
Who will he blame now??
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry
Alou's response mirrored the reaction of millions who saw the play...
And to this day the question on the mind of millions is: How the #%$* could any team’s supposedly passionate fans screw up a play like that? I think we know the answers, but many of us still repeat the question, not only to examine the play itself, but even more to understand the reaction of players, fans, and media.
"Elder White! Look at the talent on those Cubs!" Harry Caray, KMOX Radio, 4/22/62
"And you have to wonder – What's the matter with Broglio?" Harry, KMOX, 5/24/64
Seriously!
In that situation with a Series berth on the line, completely normal expression of frustration.
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Sep 28, 2011 4:43 PM CDT up reply actions
I don't blame Alou for his understandable response – he almost certainly would have caught the ball...
…and finally put Castillo away after the batter had fouled-off several pitches on a 3-2 count.
What I do note in both the Alou and Karros interviews is the fatalism, ironic humor, and deadly lassitude that must be typical of any veteran who suddenly finds himself playing for the Cubs at Wrigley Field.
Deep down, they know it’s a nearly-impossible task to overcome the built-in handicaps to winning in this environment. To survive, they relax, earn millions, and enjoy the ambiance. Makes me think of the smile Bobby Murcer used to have as he chased-down balls in right field back in the 70’s.
"Elder White! Look at the talent on those Cubs!" Harry Caray, KMOX Radio, 4/22/62
"And you have to wonder – What's the matter with Broglio?" Harry, KMOX, 5/24/64
I think Alou was trying to get the umpires to call fan interference...
He was trying to sell it – and to this day I have no idea why the umps didn’t just call the batter out and move on. That’s what that play is all about to me…
Get 'em on, Get 'em over, Get 'em in!
Well said. I agree 100%.
"Elder White! Look at the talent on those Cubs!" Harry Caray, KMOX Radio, 4/22/62
"And you have to wonder – What's the matter with Broglio?" Harry, KMOX, 5/24/64
Because
From watching the play in real time, the umpire saw Alou jump and reach his glove above the wall. From the umpire’s angle, Alou was reaching into the stands; Bartman was not reaching over the wall.
It was a very, very close play. And without replay, I don’t think any umpire would call fan interference on a foul ball that lands in the stands. It’s a rare call in the regular season and even rarer in the post-season.
"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
by RiskyBusiness on Sep 28, 2011 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions
Agreed - we got to see 1,000 replays from 10 different angles
The umpires had 2 seconds to digest all of it in real time. What I always see/saw was Alou jumping straight up to catch the ball. I’m not just saying this as a Cubs fan, but the fans were extending their arms out into the field of play more than Alou was sticking his arm/glove into the stands.
Get 'em on, Get 'em over, Get 'em in!
I believe it had to do with the "home field"...
if it was a Marlin going after that ball and it happened the exact same way, I really think they’d have called interference.
"When I came up to bat with three men on and two outs in the ninth, I looked in the other team's dugout and they were already in street clothes." - Bob Uecker
I don't know
I think umpires want to see a fan clearly over the boundary and that’s hard to do in real time with that wall and padding. If only Bartman had stiff-armed Alou to the face while making the catch one handed – that’s how you get fan interference.
"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
by RiskyBusiness on Sep 28, 2011 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions
It was close but if the ball wasn't over the wall
why would Alou have needed to jump? You don’t need to jump straight up for a ball, unless you’re trying to rob a home run. Or you’re Alfonso Soriano.
Harry Caray: Marshall is going back to LA to get cocaine for his injured foot.
Steve Stone: Harry, that’s Novocaine.
by Julio Zuleta's Voodoo on Sep 28, 2011 3:05 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
If anything...
Alou jumping showed just how close his glove was to the ball before the “interference.” If that would have become the second out of the inning, there’s a much greater chance the Cubs would have won the game. And speaking of names, we would never know Steve Bartman by name.
Get 'em on, Get 'em over, Get 'em in!
I wish none of us had reason to know Bartman's name
Harry Caray: Marshall is going back to LA to get cocaine for his injured foot.
Steve Stone: Harry, that’s Novocaine.
by Julio Zuleta's Voodoo on Sep 28, 2011 3:38 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Sure, the ump's instinct was to call the play by-the-book,
but I believe an ump more experienced than Everitt might have called interference under those same circumstances. From any angle we’ve seen, the call could have gone either way. The instincts of an experienced ump on a split-second call might have been to avoid producing a total momentum shift in a game that one team clearly had dominated up to that point.
Had he called it for the Cubs, you can bet McKeon would have put on a memorable show to rattle Prior, the umps, and the Cubs’ defense. The crowd would have gone nuts, and the Cubs still might have choked. But my guess is that after Jack was either back on the bench or out of the game, Prior or Borowski would have held the lead and the whole mess would be forgotten today, except perhaps for Bartman telling his kids how he once helped the Cubs reach the World Series by sticking his hands out.
"Elder White! Look at the talent on those Cubs!" Harry Caray, KMOX Radio, 4/22/62
"And you have to wonder – What's the matter with Broglio?" Harry, KMOX, 5/24/64
It wasn't interference
And you don’t get that call if you’re the home team in the field.
And the only reason momentum shifted is because the Cubs let it. A play that doesn’t score a run or put a man on base and isn’t even the final out of the inning, let alone the game, didn’t decide shit.
"It's all in the game, yo"
Agree...
…interference is one of those calls that needs to be pretty clear to be called. If you objectively look at the replay, I don’t see how anyone could say, Bartman was reaching into the field of play.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel
it was interference, but
the home team will never get that call, nor should they.
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Sep 28, 2011 4:45 PM CDT up reply actions
It's not a perfect analogy, but if you remember a famous scene in Monty Python: The Meaning of Life,
the one where the waiter asks Mr. Creosote if he’d like one last wafer-thin mint to top off his feast of eggs benedict, frogs’ legs amandine, pate de fois gras, etc.
The fans’ interference with the foul ball on the NINTH pitch of Castillo’s miserable at bat produced the same emitic effect on Cubdom that the movie mint did on the diner. With the specter of pitch counts already well-established by 2003, most fans knew instantly that Alou’s non-catch meant that Prior would not get through the inning, and that what seemed a sure win a moment earlier now would be in doubt with Farnsy or Jobo on the mound.
Like the diner with the mint, the action of Bartman and his neighbors in the stands would in normal circumstances have meant nothing. But with the combustible buildup that existed in both scenarios, each move proved to be fatal.
"Elder White! Look at the talent on those Cubs!" Harry Caray, KMOX Radio, 4/22/62
"And you have to wonder – What's the matter with Broglio?" Harry, KMOX, 5/24/64
Oh please
Every player, coach and manager had a chance to do something different and chose not to. The fact that idiots like Alou, frauds like Prior, cowards like Gonzalez and hacks like Baker even let this kid take a shred of blame is disgusting.
Not one fucking shred.
"It's all in the game, yo"
by Worf on Sep 28, 2011 5:54 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
After reading this alternate reality tale of woe
Your idea to reroute Addison street sounds inexpensive, sane, and practical.
"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
by RiskyBusiness on Sep 28, 2011 7:29 PM CDT up reply actions
cuz interference is the kid at the RF wall in the Yankees game
Glove well over the wall, clearly showing a disruption to the OF’er.
Bartman didn’t think before he acted. Unfortunately for him it started a chain of events that could simply not be stopped.
Like a close friend told me, it’s not just that the Cubs lose, it’s the way they lose.
Just win the next game...!
No, it didn't
It was one play in an 8-3 game and any team with any backbone, managed by someone with a functioning cerebellum, and staffed by someone besides an blistering idiot in LF, could have recovered.
"It's all in the game, yo"
Really?
If that foul ball play didn’t happen you’re saying the Marlins still score 8? Really? Oh, really?!? You really have a shot at that insanity plea. You know, they’re doing wonders these days in the Psychiatric field.
The Cubs couldn’t over come that one play. It was their issue. The plain truth is if there’s isn’t anyone touching the ball in the play, Alou catches it and they’re 4 outs away. They could still have blown it, sure.
But to say that foul ball had no impact is asinine. Too bad for the Cubs they let it happen.
Just win the next game...!
no doubt,
but his reaction was due to the fans preventing him from making the play
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Sep 28, 2011 4:44 PM CDT up reply actions
his reaction was a lot like your usual reaction when someone disagrees with you actually
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Sep 29, 2011 7:42 AM CDT up reply actions
Just watched the show last night.
Your thoughts seemed to echo mine the closest. I totally agree with you about Alou. I too thought the Buckner part was overdone and somehow I managed to forget exactly how mob like the crowd turned. I don’t know anyone that blames Bartman either and I didn’t feel they properly addressed that.
I’d also like to add that:
Hearing his apology again made me teary.
There were parts that made me feel like if I was not a Cubs fan and was watching this, I would hate Cubs fans. It was embarrassing to me.
I found the whole thing about the reporter finding him and talking to him in the parking garage disturbing. It made it seem too easy to find him and I couldn’t help but worry that it might give ideas to some deranged individual.
I’m glad I watched it because there were several things I didn’t know, but I was happy to hit “delete” from my DVR the moment it was over. It’s way past time for the media to move on from this.
Football? Football? What's a football?-Ralphie Parker
You know, I read Drehs' article when he wrote it....
… he put the whole parking garage story in there. It did seem disturbing at the time. Hearing Drehs explain that he didn’t really want to do it but was forced to by an ESPN editor made him a bit more sympathetic to him.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
I felt sympathetic to him too.
That had to be an awkward situation to be in. Still kind of gave me the creeps in a stalker kind of way.
Football? Football? What's a football?-Ralphie Parker
I understand.
I suspect Drehs thought he’d lose his job if he didn’t do it.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
Also...
it’s amazing to me that Steve Bartman has managed to go this undetected for so long. With social media where it is today, with the advent of sites like pipl.com and so forth, it’s incredible that no one seems to know anything about this guy.
Wasn't sure I wanted to watch it ... glad I did.
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
Don't blame him, but
Earlier in the game a foul pop behind the plate was interfered with and cost Bako a chance to grab it. I was very upset at the time, but Bako did not make a scene. Prior DID get the guy out, but I think he had to throw several extra pitches. Maybe if Bako had protested at the time, it might have sent a message to the fans to give “our guys” a chance to catch a foul pop. I DO blame Baker more than anyone. It was obvious the team was very tight tight after the Bartman play, and it would have shown leadership to bring the infield together on the mound and settle eveyone down. I’d also have Borowski warming to start the inning, since Prior had a very high pitch count starting the 8th.
"It's a funny old world. Man's lucky if he gets out of it alive." W.C. Fields
I couldn't bring myself to watch it
too many bad memories….I’m sure I’ll check it out some day though.
Coming from a chef
The documentary I thought was absolutely well done.
Perfect description.
"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
I watched and turned off, then came back and forth.
It could have been a 20 minute show IMO. I couldn’t stomach most of it but you know, it’s over. The error was the biggest blow in the game. Next was leaving Prior in too long. Should have been fan interference. It made me sick but it’s over!!
We'll miss you Big Boy. #10 for Hall of Fame.
Bob Stanley and Alex Gonzalez
What I found interesting in the documentary is that these guys were perhaps more responsible for what happened to both teams than Buckner and Bartman, respectively. But, as the doc pointed out, it was Buckner and Bartman who received all the blame. Having said that, watching the edited footage that indicated that Alou would have easily been able to catch the ball still stung. As did having to watch clips of 1969 and (sigh) 1984.
I’ll give kudos to Buckner for agreeing to be interviewed. You can still tell how much the incident, and how he was subsequently treated, affected him. His willingness to go on camera is probably why so much of the program did center on Boston. (And I had completely forgotten that Buckner had been traded from the Cubs to the RS in 1984.
Alou and Ramirez
What angered me the most was Alou saying that he and A-Ram didn’t think they could win game 7, that they purchased their flight tickets home after game 6. Frankly, if that’s true, I don’t want ARam back on this team next year. If players don’t have a winning attitude, I don’t want them.
by CrimsonCub on Sep 28, 2011 11:36 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Alou likely made the suggestion to Ramirez...
At the time, he was the cynical vet who knew deep down that the Cubs could not recover. Rami was only in maybe his third full season, not enough time to give up, settle-in and enjoy the delights of Cubdom, such as they are.
That’s why if the Cubs ever do get over the hump, it likely will not be with big name free agents. Put Pujols in this enviroment for a year, and he’d be showing the same bemused and fatalistic manner that Moises did in this interview.
"Elder White! Look at the talent on those Cubs!" Harry Caray, KMOX Radio, 4/22/62
"And you have to wonder – What's the matter with Broglio?" Harry, KMOX, 5/24/64
I really enjoyed the documentary
A little bittersweet, obviously bitter but it did bring back great memories of hanging out around Wrigley field after the away games – especially after game 4, since I looked a lot like Matt Clement back then.
I thought the best part was the discussion of the origin of the term scapegoat and then the video clips that showed many Cubs fans acting exactly like the Israelites on the Day of Atonement a millenium ago.
Bartman, Alou, and Alex Gonzalez - none of them are really the story
Th documentary – and probably a lot of Cubs fans – ignores probably the most important player in that post-season – Josh Beckett.
Beckett pitched the CG 2-hit shutout in Game 5 and then came back and pitched 4 relief innings of 1-run ball in game 7. That was a brillant move by McKeon. And then Beckett pitched another CG shutout in Game 6 of the WS and was named the WS MVP.
"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
by RiskyBusiness on Sep 28, 2011 1:18 PM CDT reply actions 2 recs
Here's my thoughts...
Catching Hell was really rough to watch at first. Conjured up all kinds of bad memories. And then, as fast as those bad feelings cropped up, the whole thing turned cathartic. For the first time, I realized that if the Cubs could break that easily in the NLCS, that even if they did somehow win game 7, they likely would have lost in the World Series where the pressure was even greater. I think there’s something to be said about the ‘04 Red Sox team who, despite being down 0-3, said fuck it, did their thing like it was any other game, and never lost another game in those playoffs. I haven’t seen a Cubs team that could remotely do the same thing.
I also felt incredibly bad for how Bartman was treated by everyone. He became the scapegoat for poor play and mental lapses, much like Buckner became the scapegoat for the poor play by his own team. Just awful treatment of a guy, who like everyone around him, was reaching up for the foul ball, he was just the unfortunate one to touch it first. And I know I said things in poor taste back then and I regretted saying them not long after those two games. I hope everyone else regrets their words and behavior as well.
The book on that whole event feels like it has been closed though, and I don’t have nearly the same amount of angst for those games that I once did. It’s done and over and nothing will ever change it. Time to move on.
www.facebook.com/craighudak
by Craig in South Bend on Sep 28, 2011 2:01 PM CDT reply actions
I think there’s something to be said about the ‘04 Red Sox team who, despite being down 0-3, said fuck it, did their thing like it was any other game, and never lost another game in those playoffs.
Agreed. The Cubs need someone who can be that kind of leader when the team gets good enough to get back to the postseason, because the pressure of 100+ years will come down on them whether they want it to or not.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
Oh man
I’m really sorry about the language there in this type of thread. I wrote that somewhere else and pasted it here and completely spaced on that.
www.facebook.com/craighudak
by Craig in South Bend on Sep 28, 2011 8:57 PM CDT up reply actions
Cubs fans do not deserve Bartman
He has handled himself with such class and dignity. He has refused financial incentives, which is more than Buckner or Branca or Denkinger have done.
He has refused every opportunity to take well-deserved shots at the animals who threatened to kill him and the lynch mob in the media, led by Michael Wilbon, who should have been charged as an accessory had anything actually happened to Bartman.
He has watched Baker and Prior fall from grace and refused the opportunity to shovel dirt on their baseball graves. he has stayed quiet as most thinking fans mock Alou and Gonzalez.
Bartman, with one interview with ESPN, could make Cubs fans an even bigger joke than they already are. He could paint Chicago as Deliverance North. They would only be too happy to help.
He has kept quiet. He could have shamed us all with his words and rage.
We should feel even more shame at his silence.
"It's all in the game, yo"
Someone -- and I won't identify the poster if you did not see it ...
… posted the name of the company at which Bartman works in this thread.
I can’t even begin to tell you how wrong that was. The man has worked very, very hard to preserve his privacy, and I will not have that violated at this site.
To the individual who did this — you should know better.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
You're so good
You erased that post from my mind. It was there one second and then gone to the netherworld.
"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
by RiskyBusiness on Sep 28, 2011 4:02 PM CDT up reply actions
That's why
The protests about Chicago fans accepting this and moving on have always rung a little hollow to me.
I think Bartman is dignified and classy by staying quiet.
But I also think he’s smart. He would endanger his life if he went public.
"It's all in the game, yo"
Al, my apologies
I didn’t know it wasn’t public knowledge. Obviously hundreds of people who work with him know this. Sorry ’bout that.
Fukudometer: Created 3/31/08 Wrigley Debut 4/5/08 WGN and Japan TV Debut 4/6/08 Sun Times Debut: 4/20/08 Coffee Table Debut: 7/17/08
Whether it is or not, it doesn't need to be posted here.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
Because some people might NOT know it.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
Ya know Al, they have this thing called the internet...
Just joking but it’s easy to find if you know how to look. And I’m not talking just “go google it”.
You’re totally fine to not want it posted here. But I found out a tidbit or 2 about the kid. I really don’t care any more. He’s made his choices the last 8 years and that is all fine by me.
Just win the next game...!
As for the Boston stuff...
Apparently, ESPN wanted two hours on this. If Bartman doesn’t talk, it’s hard to fill it.
The scapegoating thing is fine, but they could have made more of an effort to talk to Don Denkinger, or the family of Donnie Moore, or even Leon Durham.
As it stands, it looks awfully Boston-centric.
"It's all in the game, yo"
in that situation, with a Series berth on the line
completely normal reaction
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
Cards up 5-0 in the first
"Hey.....Cubs win!!!" ---Harry
"Cubs win....what a lucky break!!" ---Harry
How 'bout the way some of those games ended, eh?
Atl and Bos both blew 8-9 game Sept leads….wow. Almost as epic as 1969 … ah forget it.
Just win the next game...!
Alou couldn't have caught that ball anyway
Unless he was on someone’s shoulders. Have we talked about this issue yet?
Did you watch the film?
They dissected it pretty well, including showing Alou with everyone removed from the seats. It’s pretty clear he would have caught it if everyone had backed out of the way.
Not just Bartman, but about five other people also reaching for the ball.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
it appears no
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Oct 1, 2011 7:53 AM CDT up reply actions
you missed my point, Al
you asked subtle if he watched the film. I responded,
it appears nosince subtle believes Alou had no chance to catch when he clearly did. Bottom line, I was agreeing with you.
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Oct 1, 2011 8:56 AM CDT up reply actions
Oh.
Sorry — I didn’t realize what you meant by “It appears no”. I thought you were talking about Alou’s chance at catching the ball.
Sorry for the misunderstanding.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
no worries
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Oct 1, 2011 5:07 PM CDT up reply actions
I haven't seen it but it sounds interesting.
Bartman had nothing to do with the colossal choke by the players and their clueless manager. He reacted on instinct and then the players and a lot of fans over-reacted.
The bad managerial decisions and the players falling apart is what’s haunting. If a single person should have taken such heat then Dusty should have been fired after the series, but there was no way in heck that Hendry would have done that.
The entire incident fits nicely within the history of Cubs choking and excuse making, but it’s sad that a fan experienced such intense criticism for being a fan at a game.
As the film said...
… if the Cubs had won that game, or game 7, it would have been a footnote, or even forgotten.
Sigh.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
5 outs away
that’ll be on many a gravestone.and iwas as angry as any other cub fan.but to give up 8 runs and lose game7 was all on the cubs,not bartman.8 years later it’s part of history.
























