Farm System Rankings Based Off John Sickels' Grades
This work was done by a member at MinorLeagueBall - Dougdirt.
It's a very in depth and analytic look at farm systems rankings based on John Sickels' grading scale and a weighted value based on work by Victor Wang.
It gives, what I think, is a very interesting view into the balance of hitting and pitching among minor league clubs. The work places the Cubs at #17 in terms of farm system, which feels about right to me.
The one issue I see with the work is it is impossible to differentiate a high ceiling C+ prospect from an organization C+ guy, which would effect all clubs, but not likely equally. It should be noted this is only based on the top 20-25 prospects in each system.
4 months ago
bdlugz
15 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Interesting stuff.
I think it is worth noting / lamenting that the Cubs have the third lowest value for pitchers, ahead of only San Fran and Houston.
On the flipside, they rank 9th for hitters… if I counted correctly.
"Stuff like this is why they should shut off the internet."
by Orval Overall on Dec 17, 2010 1:19 PM CST
The advantage is, that scale doesn't take into account the higher upside arms in the system at low levels.
A lot of those guys in Boise/Peoria might change from a C+ to a B- or B with good years. a C+ with a high ceiling is weighted the same as a C+ that is likely organizational filler, which makes it difficult to judge.
where they stand right now
This seems accurate to me. The highest quality near-ready arm is McNutt and he is a gigantic question mark. There’s really nothing of value in terms of starters in the higher levels.
Come on Lisa, I'm trying to impress people here. You don't win friends with salad. ~ Homer J. Simpson
by TheBeerBaron on Jan 21, 2012 8:33 AM CST up reply actions
McNutt is definitely a question mark, and he's the best potential rotation arm we have.
That’s pathetic.
We need a great rebound season from Hayden Simpson to improve our outlook.
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)
"Might" is the key word.
Overall I’m not too excited about the pitching in the minors.
John Grabow - Who will pay you $4.8 million in 2012?
Of course it's not a guarantee...
But there are a pretty solid amount of high upside arms in the lower minors. Boise and Peoria will be a lot of fun to watch.
Ben Wells is one...
As are Maples and McNutt. Then you’ve got a lot of the 2nd tier like Rhee, Beeler, Whitenack, Cates, Kirk, etc.
Yeah, a few of these guys could read B status
which would make a huge difference in the overall rankings. Actually, I expect a regression to the mean for many of our minor leaguers, which implies our pitching will look a little better, while some of the hitters will be exposed at higher levels or once we see them play a full season (Lake, Baez, Szczur).
What is there to "expose" with Baez yet?
He’s had 18 professional ABs.
Unless he completely bombs in 2012, I wouldn’t think his prospect ranking would fall at all.
Lake I definitely see as a regression candidate. I was/am kind of hoping they can deal him “high”.
Szczur is really interesting since he did so well in Peoria and then struggled in Daytona. His second full season of baseball will be really, really important to his development.
"Stuff like this is why they should shut off the internet."
by Orval Overall on Dec 17, 2010 1:19 PM CST
I think Szczur just kind of wore out...
I was encouraged that he had a great playoffs to end the year. Showed that he can make a difference even when he hadn’t in the regular season.
Totally agree.
He’ll have some ups and downs as he continues to learn about the day to day stile of baseball. But now that he’s seen it, he should be much more prepared.
I could see him playing well and pushing for a jump to Tennessee.
"Stuff like this is why they should shut off the internet."
by Orval Overall on Dec 17, 2010 1:19 PM CST




















