Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: The Skip Shot: For Water Polo Fans!

Non-Random Cubs Recap: September 30, 1962

Photo courtesy ebay member "nicepictures"

At the suggestion of a BCB reader in the comments to yesterday's random recap, I'm going to recap the last game of the first 100-loss season in Cubs history.

The 1962 season was notable for a number of things; it was the second of the comical "College of Coaches", which led to a combined 123-193 record under five different "head coaches" -- Vedie Himsl, Harry Craft, El Tappe, Lou Klein and Charlie Metro. None of them was any good at it, though Craft later managed the Houston Colt 45s for their first three seasons. The rotating system confused both players and coaches. Metro wound up as "head coach" for the final 112 games of 1962 and hoped to be retained, but P.K. Wrigley and his "athletic director" Robert Whitlow replaced him with Bob Kennedy. The "head coach" system technically stuck around until Leo Durocher declared, "I'm the manager!" at his introductory news conference in October 1965, but the rotating system ended after 1962.

1962 was also an expansion year in the National League, with the Houston squad and the New York Mets added. Both teams were bad, but the Cubs managed to be worse than Houston, allowing them to finish eighth while the Cubs were ninth.

And for the final three days of the 1962 season, a unique thing in major league history occurred -- it has not been repeated. The three games between the Cubs and Mets were the only time that two teams that lost 100 games in a season met after both had already lost 100 games. The series began with the Cubs at 57-102 and the Mets at 39-118.

The photo above was taken on Sept. 14, 1962, about two weeks before the game I'm recapping here, during a Cubs/Dodgers game. Attendance that day was 5,356, only about 1,400 more than showed up for the 1962 season finale between the Cubs and Mets.

Star-divide

It's finally over, the worst season in Cubs history.

Never before had a Cubs team lost 100 games in a season, but this one cleared it good, losing 103. It's been 17 years since the Cubs won a NL pennant and never has another one seemed so far away.

Thank heavens for the Mets -- if not for them, the Cubs would have finished 10th in the new 10-team league. It's bad enough finishing ninth behind the Colt 45s, and it's all because the Cubs let them win the season series 11-7. Imagine that, losing 11 of 18 games to a brand-new team.

This weekend's series wasn't seen by many people, just 7,425. That wasn't for today, that was for all three games; it was beautiful today, one of those days you get in late September that you wish would stick around all winter, 70 degrees, cloudless and pleasant. And yet, just 3,960 paid to see the Cubs' season-ending 5-1 win over the Mets. Maybe I shouldn't say "just" -- 20 crowds this year have been smaller than that, and I use the word "crowds" advisedly. Despite having 10 more home dates this year over last (65 in 1961, due to 12 doubleheaders, 75 this year, with only six DH), attendance overall was down; the total this year was 609,802 (8,131 per date) compared to last year's 673,057, or 10,355 per date.

That's a pretty large decline, almost 20%. At least you can still get into the bleachers for 75 cents; there hasn't been a price increase there since 1958, when it was raised from 60 cents. Hopefully they won't raise prices next year to make up for the attendance drop.

Maybe today's game will be a harbinger of better things next season. The Cubs executed a neat triple play in the eighth inning. Joe Pignatano hit a soft liner to Kenny Hubbs on what looked like a hit-and-run. Hubbs threw to Ernie Banks at first to double off former Cub Richie Ashburn and then Ernie fired it to Andre Rodgers, covering second, where yet another ex-Cub, Sammy Drake, had wandered too far off, to complete the triple play. (Figures, right -- two ex-Cubs get caught off base. Ashburn, incidentally, played second base today for the first time in his career, just for fun, I suppose. It seems likely he'll retire.) It was the team's first triple play since April 27, 1958, when they turned one at San Francisco against the Giants.

Meanwhile, Bob Buhl threw a nice complete game, giving the Mets just five hits and a single run, on a homer by Frank Thomas, and striking out six, and the Cubs' hitting stars were George Altman, who went 3-for-3, and Nelson Mathews, who had a pair of doubles and drove in two runs. Mathews is only 20 years old and has hit really well in his September callup. He looks like a keeper, as does Altman, who has completed his second straight All-Star season and hit 22 home runs. Altman also stole 19 bases this year; with Maury Wills shattering the stolen base record this year, it looks like steals will be far more important in the future. Altman finished sixth in the NL; he should be a fixture around here for years to come.

So maybe there's hope for 1963. It couldn't get much worse, right? Enjoy the offseason.

Comment 43 comments  |  Add comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

75 cents huh?

Talk about inflation!

We'll miss you Big Boy. #10 is going into the Hall of Fame!!

by mrcubsfan on Jan 29, 2012 10:06 AM CST via mobile reply actions  

Well, after those games

the fans were probably complaining that 75¢ was a ripoff. Probably something along the lines of: “Two-bit team isn’t even worth two bits!”

by ddoubleheader on Jan 29, 2012 8:14 PM CST up reply actions  

It's kinda hot in Houston in the summer.

I wonder if there will be a way to counter that. Sprinklers in the outfield, anyone?

10-25-2011. Theo Epstein joins the Cubs. Now, the fun begins.

by timh815 on Jan 29, 2012 10:14 AM CST reply actions  

1962

I was at that game with my sister and have never forgot it. Ken Hubbs made a terrific play chasing the “soft” liner going in to right field to get things started. He wheeled and fired to Ernie. I still have the audio tapes at home of that game (of the Met announcers) who raved
about Ken’s play. Charlie Metro was a good guy and the best of any of the coaches.

The Cubs were really assembling some talent that had not been unlocked yet.

Great memories though ! Thanks Al.

by If we only had Hubbs on Jan 29, 2012 11:30 AM CST reply actions  

Would love to hear that audio

… if you could ever get it uploaded to a .mp3 file.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Jan 29, 2012 11:33 AM CST up reply actions  

seconded

10-25-2011. Theo Epstein joins the Cubs. Now, the fun begins.

by timh815 on Jan 29, 2012 11:40 AM CST up reply actions  

Yes

history should be archived. They just found Game 7 of the 1960 World Series in some actor’s basement (Bing Crosby?). He was so superstitious he left the country while the Pirates were playing and hired someone to film the game. It appeared one of the best games in World Series history was lost to time until a year or so ago.

by ddoubleheader on Jan 29, 2012 8:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Terry Jones bought the videos

from the BBC just before they taped over the Monty Python episodes, or so I hear.

I agree.

10-25-2011. Theo Epstein joins the Cubs. Now, the fun begins.

by timh815 on Jan 29, 2012 8:34 PM CST up reply actions  

I love these recaps

Would you do one from May 17, 1964? It would be interesting to see what fans were thinking on the day of my birth.

I don’t want to play golf. When I hit a ball, I want someone else to go chase it.

by cub in louies nest on Jan 29, 2012 11:41 AM CST reply actions  

audio @ Al

IT would be my pleasure to tape it for you and send it to you if you give me an address. Sorry I am don’t have that kind of equipment’knowledge but still have a tape to tape device to make a copy. It is still very clear. I guess you could do the rest Al to share with great Cub fans…………

by If we only had Hubbs on Jan 29, 2012 11:42 AM CST reply actions  

Email me.

Or, if anyone here knows how to digitize an audio tape, let me know and I’ll put you in touch with this reader.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Jan 29, 2012 1:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Anytime I see Hickman was in CF, I haffa cringe.

He was younger then, but still.

10-25-2011. Theo Epstein joins the Cubs. Now, the fun begins.

by timh815 on Jan 29, 2012 11:50 AM CST reply actions  

Hickman

It was ok he was the Mets Center Fielder
…LOL

by If we only had Hubbs on Jan 29, 2012 11:54 AM CST reply actions  

Mulched Altman at home.

Throwing wasn’t his problem, though.

Most cringe-worthy defensive CF in your Cubs memory, with Hickman as the starting point. Juan Pierre’s arm being the other.

10-25-2011. Theo Epstein joins the Cubs. Now, the fun begins.

by timh815 on Jan 29, 2012 12:01 PM CST up reply actions  

It's certainly been quite a slog but believe it or not 9/30/62 represents...

…that first brave step in the thousand-mile journey that Chairman Phil had planned for us. So deep was the hole Wrigley had dug for the Cubs since the mid-1930’s with his refusal to run the team on modern terms that it is only now, 50 years after the absolute low point of 9/29/62, that we finally may be able to see at least the surface of MLB, if not exactly on a level playing field.

"Elder White! Look at the talent on those Cubs!" Harry Caray, KMOX Radio, 4/22/62

"And you have to wonder – What's the matter with Broglio?" Harry, KMOX, 5/24/64

by ernaga on Jan 29, 2012 12:05 PM CST reply actions  

The Cubs came out of that low point in the early 1980s

… under Dallas Green. Had Green been kept, the franchise would have flourished through the 1990s.

Instead, we’ve had to start over several times.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Jan 29, 2012 1:05 PM CST up reply actions  

Leo, Dallas, even Andy, Sam, and Jim have staked-out an oasis or two on the Long March...

…But not until now have we had an owner who presumably makes winning priority #1.

"Elder White! Look at the talent on those Cubs!" Harry Caray, KMOX Radio, 4/22/62

"And you have to wonder – What's the matter with Broglio?" Harry, KMOX, 5/24/64

by ernaga on Jan 29, 2012 1:21 PM CST up reply actions  

The Cubs suffered through decades

of horrible ownership. PK Wrigley was just plain weird. Tribune Company didn’t really care. It’s nice have ownership that are fans of the team and have the pockets to spend when the time comes.

I don’t want to play golf. When I hit a ball, I want someone else to go chase it.

by cub in louies nest on Jan 29, 2012 3:43 PM CST up reply actions  

So...

the last time the Cubs had an owner that cared was when they were on the West Side? Or did Weeghman care? They got Wrigley Park (Weeghman Park) out of the deal. Of course, maybe they should have exorcised the ghosts of the Chicago Whales of the Federal League first. Wrigley is the only Federal League ballpark left.

by ddoubleheader on Jan 29, 2012 8:20 PM CST up reply actions  

The elder Wrigley knew what he was doing.

After the thirties, things went downhill in a hurry.

10-25-2011. Theo Epstein joins the Cubs. Now, the fun begins.

by timh815 on Jan 29, 2012 8:35 PM CST up reply actions  

Correct.

William Wrigley (the elder, not PK’s son) was a passionate baseball fan who cared greatly and built the great teams of the 1930s.

When he died, his son PK didn’t care about baseball. He’d probably have sold the team, except (reportedly) he promised his father, on his dad’s deathbed, that he never would.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Jan 30, 2012 6:56 AM CST up reply actions  

Well...that's sort of the case...

Wrigley Sr. was a great showman and entrepreneur who obviously thought winning baseball games was an important part of promoting the Wrigley brand.

But according to Albert Lasker, Wrigley didn’t know much about baseball when he started investing in the Cubs in 1916. Lasker, the advertising pioneer who held majority interest in the Cubs from approximately 1916 until he sold his shares to Wrigley in 1923, played an important role in making Wm. Wrigley understand baseball’s enormous potential for promoting the Wrigley brand.

Today we all know the value of “naming rights.” and if they are worth tens of millions each year to relatively obscure names like Safeco, Comerica, and US Cellular, imagine what they’re worth to a business that sells non-essential retail goods like chewing gum worldwide.

Lasker and Wrigley Sr. were just slightly ahead of their time in this regard, and it seems obvious that Phil Wrigley held on to the team principally for the value inherent in having the Wrigley name (and, indirectly, the Wrigley brand) appear daily in every sports section in America, as well as having it repeated constantly over TV and radio. No wonder the Wrigleys gave away broadcast rights to Cubs and Angels games to as many outlets as wanted them. Clearly, the Wrigleys believed in the benefits of free advertising, as they do to this day.

Of course, as he refused to compete on modern terms in MLB for what may have been sound business reasons that applied to the Wrigley empire at large, he also became the anti-Vince Lombardi, demonstrating time and again that winning certainly isn’t the only thing.

"Started hummin' a song from 1962..." – Bob Seger
"Those who ignore the past, yada yada yada." – Rafael Santana

by ernaga on Jan 30, 2012 10:07 AM CST up reply actions  

Don Young

in ‘69 didn’t do us any favours in CF.

by If we only had Hubbs on Jan 29, 2012 12:19 PM CST reply actions  

Still don't get

how he was Plan A without a realistic Plan B that year.

10-25-2011. Theo Epstein joins the Cubs. Now, the fun begins.

by timh815 on Jan 29, 2012 12:29 PM CST up reply actions  

I think Adolfo Phillips was Plan A.

He was so bad he was exiled to Montreal. THEN there was no Plan B.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Jan 29, 2012 1:05 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks for the

clarification. I think. :)

10-25-2011. Theo Epstein joins the Cubs. Now, the fun begins.

by timh815 on Jan 29, 2012 1:10 PM CST up reply actions  

That last previous triple-play came in the 1958 game where Dick Drott,

the Kerry Wood (if not the Tim Leary) of his time, injured his shoulder in that lousy Bay Area cold and dampness. Unfortunately he never fully recovered, and soon became one of the Cubs’ great might-have-beens.

"Elder White! Look at the talent on those Cubs!" Harry Caray, KMOX Radio, 4/22/62

"And you have to wonder – What's the matter with Broglio?" Harry, KMOX, 5/24/64

by ernaga on Jan 29, 2012 12:28 PM CST reply actions  

The Drott/Wood comparison is a good one.

Check out his 1957 numbers; he finished third in RoY voting (behind Jack Sanford and Ed Bouchee, two other middling talents), and even got some MVP votes (finished 21st).

As ernaga points out, he was hurt early the next year. If there had been modern surgical techniques then, he’d have had surgery, been shut down, missed a year and come back in 1959 — at age 23.

A real shame. Drott had talent. He died young, too, in 1985 at age 49.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Jan 29, 2012 1:07 PM CST up reply actions  

Check out his numbers as a 19-year-old, pitching for the AAAA LA Angels...

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=drott-001ric

With that kind of overwork at 19, it’s almost a wonder he made it to the bigs.

"Elder White! Look at the talent on those Cubs!" Harry Caray, KMOX Radio, 4/22/62

"And you have to wonder – What's the matter with Broglio?" Harry, KMOX, 5/24/64

by ernaga on Jan 29, 2012 1:26 PM CST up reply actions  

All young pitchers got "overworked" in those days like that.

That kind of thinking stuck around until the 1970s. Players were disposable.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Jan 29, 2012 1:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Well, to look at the bright side, it could have been worse....

Besides, the Cubs will win a WS in our lifetime, i.e. before this man on the moon stuff comes to pass.


If the Cubs still have a chance, no matter how small, it’s still Go Cubs, damn the math and pass the KoolAid. I'm a Sheeple and proud of it!
Spelling and grammar errors are included for creative and artistic reasons.

by eths on Jan 29, 2012 1:02 PM CST reply actions  

With his 3-4 day (3 whiffs in 4 tries)

Buhl completed his perfect batting season. Naught for 70. One at bat was for the Braves. The rest were as a Cub. The high point in his Cubs career was fetching Fergie Jenkins in trade.

10-25-2011. Theo Epstein joins the Cubs. Now, the fun begins.

by timh815 on Jan 29, 2012 1:45 PM CST reply actions  

Wow...those Mets are awful....

,,,at least I can say with the utmost confidence that we’ll most assuredly will win a World Series again before they ever win one…so, we got that going for us.

by Easy Ed on Jan 29, 2012 5:21 PM CST reply actions  

Pennant

Hard to believe today that in 1962, we were only into our 17th year without a pennant. Amazing to think that the original 7 N.L. teams by 1961, had all won at least one pennant since we had. And we’re still waiting! 67 yrs. and counting, a record (when it’s finally over) that may NEVER be equalled.

"It's a funny old world. Man's lucky if he gets out of it alive." W.C. Fields

by KedzieKid on Jan 29, 2012 8:37 PM CST reply actions  

Who knows

Given the $$ differentials between teams and the sheer # of teams to compete with, I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the record falls. Heck, the Nationals/Expos are already 43 years into a drought and the Pirates are 33 years in.

Eamus Ursuli!

by WGNstatic on Jan 30, 2012 10:12 AM CST up reply actions  

Excellent write-up, as usual

Lot of details many of us readers would have likely overlooked.

And I need to make an important correction. I misspoke when I said it was the only time 2 100 loss teams met. I missed the only other occurrence because of bedeviling name changes (Superbas & Beaneaters) and occurring several days into October. Before I go into the details, let me apologize for the error. And I went through my text-file notes where I had all 100 loss teams combed from the records, both before & since 1961 (start of expansion) to double-check that I didn’t miss any others. I even went back to look at the Cleveland Spiders, but nothing there (only 100-loss team in 1899). There were only 2 occurrences and 2 close calls.

The other woeful series was the Brooklyn Superbas (Dodgers) vs. the Boston Beaneaters (Braves) on October 5th, 6th, 7th, 1905. It was fought at Brooklyn (…checking notes), which would be Washington Park (2nd version of it). Over 3 days, these 2 abysmal teams played 5 games (doubleheaders on Oct 5th & 7th). In the 1st game, the Beaneaters came in at 99 losses and the Superbas handed them their 100th loss. So, the standings of each team after each of the 5 games were: Beaneaters: 100/101/102/102/103, Superbas: 103/103/103/104/104. So, there would be 2 series in baseball history where 2 100-loss teams met, one in the modern (expansion) era, one in the era of 8 vs. 8.

.
Otherwise…
Of all the 100 loss teams, the only time it ever got close, behind this Cubs-Mets series and the above series, was in 2002 and 1949.
- 2002: There were 4 100 loss teams (Rays, Tigers, Brewers, Royals) and the Royals played >100-loss Tigers, but because the Royals sucked less than the Tigers, they won enough to keep from hitting 100 losses until after the series (Royals at ~96-97 losses during that series).

1949: The Senators (future Twins) & the Browns (future Orioles) lost 104 & 101 games that season. They played a 2-game series just before they each hit 100 losses. The Senators held at 99 losses while the Browns lost their 97th & 98th games vs. the Senators.

And about 100 losses pre-1961, the National League had it happen 26 times vs. the American League’s 38 times. That’s despite the NL going into the 1800s for more chances for it to occur. Lobbing off pre-1901 100-losses, NL had 20. Over half were from the Boston Braves. The AL 100-losses seemed much more spread out. The Athletics had 12 of ‘em, Browns (and Orioles 1 year) had 10, otherwise the AL had the 100-loss seasons spread out much more over all 8 teams than the NL. And the year for Sox to Sux was 1932. Both the Red & White Sox lost over 100 games (111, 102 losses). Didn’t come close to meeting after 100 losses though.

by ddoubleheader on Jan 29, 2012 9:21 PM CST reply actions  

Thanks for picking up on that other 100-loss matchup.

When I looked this up myself last summer, I didn’t see that one, either.

Between 1959 and 1966, the Cubs had xx announced crowds of fewer than 1,000, as follows:

1959: 2
1962: 3
1963: 1
1964: 3
1965: 2
1966: 2

Virtually all of them were September weekdays, after kids were back in school, and most of them on cool or rainy afternoons. The 595 people that attended the Sept. 28 game (a Friday) was the third-smallest in Cubs history, at least since the 1930s when attendance figures began to be more reliably reported.

There were two smaller ones. I think I might write up the smallest as a non-random recap.

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Jan 30, 2012 7:10 AM CST up reply actions  

It would be interesting

what the lowest attendances were for any team since the numbers really started going up (when was that? 1990s? Early ‘80s had some low numbers from what I’ve seen). I think there was a Cubs at Reds game which had very low attendance because it was a makeup day from an earlier rainout and Len or Bob described the parking lot as a lake. And then there’s the bizarro 2 games at Komiskey, Expos vs. Marlins at Komiskey in 2004 (due to Ivan). Weird game. 2 teams playing nowhere near their home territories, 1 team would effectively be no more in 2 or so weeks and they’re playing in the opposing league’s ballpark.

by ddoubleheader on Jan 30, 2012 7:47 PM CST up reply actions  

I went to one of those Expos/Marlins games.

About 4,000 people, all serious baseball fans. Funny thing was, the Cubs and Marlins were both in the wild card race at the time. So the Cubs fans in the crowd were cheering for the Expos, the White Sox fans for the Marlins.

There was a Cubs/Braves rainout in 2000, made up the next day on an off day, that had a paid crowd announced as 5,267. That’s the smallest attendance at Wrigley in at least the last 25 years.

Boxscore

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Jan 31, 2012 7:49 AM CST up reply actions  

I am surprised by the speculation with 100 losses for 2012

With the various Cubs moves this season, I have seen it repeated here on BCB numerous times. I am doubtful the Cubs will reach 100 losses in 2012. First, it is difficult to do. Houston lost 106 in 2011 and that was 6 games more than their Pythagorean loss prediction. And with trading away Pence and Bourn at the deadline. Second, I think the Cubs have added enough pitching depth to stave off 100 losses, especially if they are improved defensively.

I started assembling the Cubs 2012 roster projections (based on Billl James) and it’s not pretty. But it’s not 100 losses either.

"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
"Pain is inevitable, suffering is an option." - Dale Sveum

by RiskyBusiness on Jan 30, 2012 10:18 AM CST reply actions  

The Astros

will probably be the greatest ‘player of the game’ contributing to keeping the Cubs from 100 losses. If they’re projected to be as bad or worse, the Cubs can beat them up for some easy wins. I know from looking at 100 loss seasons over the 20th century, pre-expansion, usually there was one 100-loss team per league if any in a given year. The other weaker teams would beat them up for easy wins, keeping themselves from joining the 100-loss club.

by ddoubleheader on Jan 30, 2012 7:51 PM CST up reply actions  

I thought about that after I posted

While the NL Central has improved – relative to the Cubs – it is still probably considered a weaker division. The Astros and the NL Central should be like a mild climate for the Cubs and insulate them from the 100 losses in 2012.

"Just shut up and play" - Matt Garza
"Pain is inevitable, suffering is an option." - Dale Sveum

by RiskyBusiness on Jan 30, 2012 11:16 PM CST up reply actions  

95 appears to be the new 100...

…the modest result of free agency, revenue sharing, the first-year draft and of course new media, where fans and bloggers can apply the heat to third-rate owners.

"Started hummin' a song from 1962..." – Bob Seger
"Those who ignore the past, yada yada yada." – Rafael Santana

by ernaga on Jan 31, 2012 7:36 AM CST up reply actions  


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Jazz Up Your Recs!

Recent FanPosts

Cubs_small
Cubs have $0 committed past 2015
Small
Broadway Joe Namath - almost Wrigley Joe??
Small
Draft Prep: Georgia Southern Eagles Matter Why Edition
Small
Soriano's Three Home Run Game at Atlanta (2007)
Small
White Sox Series
Small
Part 1: Cubs Top 30 Honorable Mention
Small
To Season Tickets or Not To Season Tickets...
18411906020167513808_small
Which Cub robbed Barry Bonds' 714th home run?
Castro_small
Getting Excited For Baseball Season
Small
Arguably OT: Aussie Baseball Finals Go To Decisive Game Three

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

OMG SAM FULD! SAM FULD BASEBALL WINNING SAM FULD
How Cub fans are seen...
2012 Chicago Cubs Consensus Top 31 Prospects
Cubs Among Several Teams Interested In Jorge Soler

Recent FanShots

For $140 A Cub Player Can Rub Your Butt
Cubs Bunt Contest
Ex-Cub Video Of The Day!
Sweet Lou Says YES
Cubs Could End Their Affiliation In Boise
Got your bracket filled out?
Get Your Pocket Schedules Here
This is hilarious!
Releases April 2012

Thought it was kinda cool that one of our guys was getting some recognition, and I love McFarlane figures, so I figured I would post for others to see.
4 Cubs on BA's Top 100

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
Chris Carpenter was sent to the Red Sox as compensation for Theo Epstein.

  425 votes | Results

It Is Only...

It Is Only...

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Primary_fc_small Josh Timmers

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

B_w_avatar_small Brett Taylor

Other Contributors

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski