A Look at Chris Volstad
Chris Volstad, who just turned 25 at the end of this past season, was drafted out of high school with the 16th pick in the 2005 draft. In 2006, he was named the Marlins' #1 prospect by Baseball America, and just cracked the Top 100 prospects list - he came in at 97. In 2007, he jumped up the Top 100 prospects list and landed at #40, subsequently falling to #58 in 2008.
I'll be looking at each year of Volstad's career, so the following chart should help you follow along.

Volstad was called up to the majors in 2008, and has had mixed results since. In the 84.1 innings that he pitched in 2008, Volstad put up a 2.88 ERA/3.82 FIP/4.55 xFIP line, which was worth 1.5 WAR. As you could probably tell by his line, he was pretty lucky in 2008. His .271 BABIP, (career average .295 BABIP), and 3.9% HR/FB, (career average 12.3% HR/FB), have been the lowest of his career, while his 77.1 LOB%, (career average 70.4% LOB%), has been the highest of his career.
His luck dried up in 2009 - he actually ended up being unlucky - and he posted a somewhat atrocious line: 5.21 ERA/5.29 FIP/4.29 xFIP and a .3 WAR in 159.0 innings pitched. While his BABIP and LOB% came closer to his career averages - and league averages - his HR/FB% spiked to 17.5%. To put that a couple of different ways: his HR/9 increased from .32 to 1.64; he gave up 3 HRs in 2008 and 29 HRs in 2009, (albeit in roughly twice the innings).
In 2010, his line improved to the tune of a 4.58 ERA/4.34 FIP/4.43 xFIP due in large part to his decreased HR/FB rate.
While Volstad's HR/FB spiked once again in 2011, he had arguably his best year in the majors from a peripherals standpoint. Volstad posted his best K/9 and BB/9 numbers, 6.36 and 2.66 respectively, and he induced ground balls at a very high rate of 52.3%, which according to 2010 league numbers, would rank close to the 90th percentile amongst all qualified pitchers.
While some may be concerned about how his HR/FB and HR/9 numbers will translate to Wrigely Field, here is a collection of statistics, statements, and images that should help quell your fears. HR/FB rates are highly variable from year to year and tend to regress toward league average, so Volstad will likely have a lower HR/FB rate moving forward. In terms of Park Factor, Sun Life Stadium had a .991 runs factor, while Wrigely had a .934 runs factor in 2011. Furthermore, Sun Life Stadium's HR factor was .941 while Wrigley's HR factor was .987, not a terribly large difference, and one that could be offset in the aggregate by the aforementioned difference in runs factor. The last reassuring point will come in the form of the following image:

The above image maps all of the hits and outs Chris Volstad recorded at Sun Life Stadium onto Wrigley Field.* Of the seven home runs that Volstad gave up at Sun Life Stadium, five would have been home runs at Wrigely, (I'm counting the one that's on top of the left field wall as a home run), and only one non-home run in Sun Life Stadium would have been a home run at Wrigley, (the double to deep center field). So, of the hits and outs that Volstad recorded at Sun Life Stadium, he gave up 7 home runs at Sun Life, which would have theoretically been 6 home runs at Wrigley. Volstad's move to Wrigley should not result in an increase in his HR/FB rate; in fact, Volstad will likely have a lower HR/FB rate going forward.
If Volstad continues to improve upon his K/9 and BB/9 numbers, and if his BABIP and HR/FB rates regress to the average - which isn't a huge "if" - he could become a very valuable middle of the rotation starter over the course of the next three years. In my opinion, Volstad is a pretty impressive return for Zambrano given the situation. Well done, TheoJed.
* These plots are taken from Gameday hit-location data, which track where the ball was fielded, not where the ball landed.
HR/FB: http://www.fangraphs.com/library/index.php/pitching/hrs/.
Thanks to MLB Gameday BIP Location.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
33 comments
|
17 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice visual.
10-25-2011. Theo Epstein joins the Cubs. Now, the fun begins.
I like reading your stuff.
"The riches of the game are in the thrills, not the money." --Ernie Banks
Great stuff
Who do his gb ratios compare to at his age?
by checkmate23 on Jan 5, 2012 8:19 AM CST via mobile reply actions
Unfortunately, I don't know where that can be found.
However, I looked up pitchers who were similar to Volstad through their age 24 season.
(Right-click and open the image in a new tab if it’s too small to read).
As we can see, he’s in some pretty decent company. Furthermore, his GB% easily trumps the group.
A couple of notes: (i) Here’s how the similar pitchers were determined: http://www.baseball-reference.com/about/similarity.shtml. (ii) 2001 was the first year in which GB% was recorded, hence the “No Data” entries.
by Naveen Nallappa on Jan 5, 2012 10:17 PM CST up reply actions
Vs. age I have no idea, and I have no idea where to find that out.
But he is in the 90th percentile among all pitchers in regards to getting ground balls.
Did he spend time in 2011 on the DL or did the Marlins send him down?
His game log shows a gap between July 22 and August 14. He had struggled leading up to the July date, but appeared to settle down and pitch pretty well after mid-August.
Sent down.
He made three starts at Triple-A New Orleans.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
I think this is the only real question coming out of this trade.
settle down and pitch pretty well
If we can get a guy to pitch pretty well (#4 starter) for a couple of years without being that expensive, we will have come out on top easily. Cumulative value added by Volstad’s addition and Zambrano’s off-the-field problems being taken away should far outweigh Zambrano’s possible additions on the diamond.
He's an intimidating presence on the mound.
And he’ll only be 25 throughout the entire 2012 season (Sep 23rd B-Day).
So, hopefully he begins to mature as a pitcher with the Cubs.
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)
Nice write-up Naveen.
But FWIW…… if you edit the post to move the page break up… it would be more smart phone friendly.
Not a damning indictment by any means… just an observation.
"Stuff like this is why they should shut off the internet."
by Orval Overall on Dec 17, 2010 1:19 PM CST
Thanks for the tip, fsuapollo.
I moved the page break up – hopefully that did the trick.
by Naveen Nallappa on Jan 5, 2012 10:23 PM CST up reply actions
awesome breakdown
thoroughly enjoy your contributions to the site
follow me on twitter for fantasy sports analysis @http://twitter.com/DrewDinkmeyer or get the full analysis at www.fantistics.com
by DartmouthCubsFan on Jan 5, 2012 12:39 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Rec-ified!
There is upside here.
"[The Cubs] have a very famous tradition in baseball, and it will be nice to be part of turning it around." ~ Jamie Quirk, Bench Coach
Unfortunately, dimensions at Wrigley are not the whole story
But we all know at Wrigley Field, you can’t just go by dimensions of the park when trying to determine the outcome. The wind at Wrigley seriously effects many balls throughout the year. Generally in the spring the wind blows in and the temperature is cool and makes it a pitchers park, later in the summer the wind will blow out making it a hitters park. So a flyball hit 380 feet in Miami may range anywhere from 360 to 400 feet in Chicago depending on the conditions.
I love articles like this and it does give some indication of what to expect from Volstad, but unfortunately, IMO Wrigley is one of the few parks that an analysis like this fails to translate well for.
You're absolutely right - we have to consider the effect of the wind.
My assumption is that the wind won’t be that big of a factor over the course of the entire season. Volstad’s HR/FB rates will likely benefit from the cool weather, and wind blowing in, during the earlier months of the season, and suffer from the warm weather, and wind blowing out, during the later months of the season. As long as the weather is cool, and the wind is blowing in, during half of the home season, Volstad should be fine.
That said, this assumption could be completely wrong. There could be more warm games with the wind blowing out than cold games with the wind blowing in. It’s something that I’d love to look into sometime in the future.
Thanks for pointing this out, MVZ. It’s definitely an important factor.
by Naveen Nallappa on Jan 6, 2012 6:58 PM CST up reply actions
People were concerned about this with Garza as well
And his HR/FB% and HR/9 dropped last year. I think it’s important to consider the wind effects at Wrigley, but it’s impossible to predict.
Good point, but I think that had more to do with Garza's evolution.
From a FanPost that I wrote a few months ago:
Garza’s decreased reliance on his fastball, more effective slider, and willingness to throw the slider more often have helped decrease his FB%, increase his GB%, and consequently decrease his HR/9. This is the largest reason that Garza’s FIP has fallen by over 1.30 points.
by Naveen Nallappa on Jan 7, 2012 2:46 AM CST up reply actions
Volstad also has trouble with lefties
Wrigley favors lefties on home runs.
Great point - I completely missed that.
Volstad’s L/R split is actually very concerning.
2011 vs L: 79.1 IP, 6.58 K/9, 3.86 BB/9, 19 HR, 2.16 HR/9, 5.96 FIP, 4.04 xFIP
2011 vs R: 86.1 IP, 6.15 K/9, 1.56 BB/9, 4 HR, 0.42 HR/9, 2.82 FIP, 3.28 xFIP
Career vs L: 292.2 IP, 5.60 K/9, 3.41 BB/9, 49 HR, 1.51 HR/9, 5.22 FIP, 4.32 xFIP
Career vs R: 291.1 IP, 6.05 K/9, 2.87 BB/9, 23 HR, 0.71 HR/9, 3.82 FIP, 4.05 xFIP
I hope it’s just a matter of his approach to pitching, and that TheoJed consulted Bosio about this prior to the trade.
by Naveen Nallappa on Jan 7, 2012 1:37 PM CST up reply actions
The approach change was a huge factor.
But so was Wrigley. As bdlugz noted, the weather is impossible to predict.
But last year Wrigley had its lowest park factor number in at least a decade (I only went back to 2000 in this post). Wrigley also had a HR factor under 1 last year. That only happened twice in the previous ten years (’01 & ’03)… and the number is usually north of 1.1 and as high as the 1.2 and even 1.3 range over that time period.
So if Wrigley returns to more “normal” conditions this year, we should probably expect Garza’s HR rate to climb a bit from last year, though not as high as his previous totals.
"Stuff like this is why they should shut off the internet."
by Orval Overall on Dec 17, 2010 1:19 PM CST
If Wrigley becomes more home run friendly next year
Randy Wells is going to like he’s throwing BP
Just stumbled across interesting research on home run park factors.
http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/home-run-park-factor-a-new-approach/
Scroll down to the last section of the article to read about accounting for temperature and wind.
by Naveen Nallappa on Jan 7, 2012 1:48 PM CST up reply actions
Also Volstad should never pitch to Ryan Howard while on the Cubs
8 homers in 31 abs!
http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/phillies_zone/136736318.html
Good thing the Cubs don't face the Phillies as often as the Marlins do.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
He won't have to worry about him at all this year.
The Cubs are done with the Phillies by mid-May… and Howard is out with his injury through at least May (and maybe June, IIRC). So enjoy the respite, Chris.
"Stuff like this is why they should shut off the internet."
by Orval Overall on Dec 17, 2010 1:19 PM CST
Interesting.
Had not realized the Cubs are done with the Phillies by mid-May.
Thanks, MLB schedulers.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation























