Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: UFC 146 Results: Junior dos Santos TKO's Frank Mir

Time to trade Pie?

I don't know how all of you feel about this one, but I honestly think it's time to trade Pie at this point.

We have a one year stopgap in Jones that will give us time to think of other options for the future.  However for now Pie has shown absolutely no indication that he will be able to hit major league pitching. Watching him swing at nearly every pitch reminded me of Patterson.

His perceived value is still high.  Hendry needs to pull the trigger.

I'd go for a young SP with a lot of upside.  When you look at the Indians a big reason they had the year they did was because of Fausto Carmona. Having a pitcher of this caliber behind Z would even out our rotation and to a long way to making us real legitimate contenders.  

Remember, against AZ, the one game where things were close and we had a chance was game 1... because Z was lights out.

If they would go for it (and I think they might), I would push the Royals for a Pie/Veal trade for Zach Grienke.  I've said it before; when he is on, it can be dazzling.  I think he's just rotting away in KC and that the constant losing has numbed his senses.  It happened to Beckett in Florida also after the 2003 season.

I really think it's worth the risk.  Both players have not yet lived up to their potential.  I think we really need another potential ace pitcher much more than we need Felix Pie right now.

Please... trade the man while his value is high.  I don't see him being a savior for this team.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.

Comment 75 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Pie/Veal for Grienke?
What? Huh?
FREE CARMEN PIGNATIELLO!

by cwyers on Oct 10, 2007 10:49 AM CDT reply actions  

HA HA
Yes, I admit it, I was wrong about that one.  That said, we would have only had him for a year and offered him as an option as opposed to Jeromy Burnitz (or Jacque Jones).

I however did have a point with my hopes we would get Kenny Lofton and Ted Lilly, which were met with widespread derision.  You all thought I was crazy when I proposed that we be the ones to trade with Florida for Beckett and Lowell (and trade Ramirez).  I still feel, if we can't get another pitcher by trade, we should try to sign Schilling to a one or two year deal.

Grienke is a young, talented fireballer who is about to break out and have a career year.  He is cheap, is signed for the long term, and would do well to play for a contender.  I would think the Phillies will be talking with the Royals if we won't, but we have more to offer than Philadelphia does.

Right now Grienke is a player under the radar, and Pie is overvalued.  I think it would help both teams.  

by nickler on Oct 10, 2007 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm assuming this was tongue in cheek...
 or at least the Greinke part. I've no problem trading Pie (albeit not my preference), but it wouldn't be for less than a solid young pitcher with at least 2 arbitration years left (that's not Greinke), or a an extremely promising right fielder. Think more like Ian Snell for example.

by Damen Jackson on Oct 10, 2007 11:12 AM CDT reply actions  

the thing is...
Ian Snell isn't going anywhere.

Grienke is a person who KC would take offers for.  

I know, I know, you look at his numbers....  I've seen the boy pitch.  He can be amazing, believe me.  I honestly think a change in scenery and some magic from Rothschild could turn this kid around and make him another Beckett.

And if he doesn't...?  Do you REALLY think Pie is going to be all that special, because I just don't see it.

by nickler on Oct 10, 2007 11:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

I said for example...
 although I have strong suspicion that the Snell-Pirates relationship won't last. But the point is, this sounds like some Fantasy baseball move. I don't pick up the phone as a GM, and offer my top organizational prospect for Zach Greinke. Period. End of discussion. It's a move in real life that gets people fired. Literally.

by Damen Jackson on Oct 10, 2007 11:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

*sigh*
I guess we'll have to see what Grienke does next year and what Pie does next year.

Hopefully, it will be with Grienke playing for the Cubs but I have a bad feeling he'll be playing for another team in the NL next year.

by nickler on Oct 10, 2007 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

Then I wish...
 him good luck, and much success. And if the Cubs chose to acquire him, fine. But I highly doubt any team will be sending one of their top 3 prospects for him.

by Damen Jackson on Oct 10, 2007 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Question--
In all seriousness...

After this year, is Pie still considered a top prospect?  I mean, the guy swung at everything!

Who are our other top prospects?  I would think Samarzija (sp?) would be one.  Gallagher?  He was terrible in the majors.  Veal had a rotten year.

Pie reminds me a litte of Andy Marte.  Living in Cleveland, a big deal was made when we got him from Boston for Coco Crisp.  He always was felt to be good with the glove but never hit well at a major league level.  Sure enough, he's been a huge disappointment and Casey Blake has taken over 3rd base.

Don't forget that we traded Bobby Hill and Hee Seop Choi also, which turned out to be great trades for us.

Not saying I'm right, just that I wouldn't be crushed to watch Pie go at this point.

by nickler on Oct 10, 2007 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ironically,
Kelly Shoppach (a throw-in) turned out to be the best part of that trade!

by nickler on Oct 10, 2007 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

Nickler...
 Whether Pie is still considered a Top 50 baseball prospect remains to be seen, however he is generally regarded as the Cubs top guy. Followed by Veal, Samardzija, and Patterson (thought maybe not exactly in that order). You're getting away from your own point. There is no Pie for Greinke deal awaiting. Few fans would have interest, and no credible baseball man (or woman) would even suggest it. Trading Pie? Perhaps. Acquiring Greinke? Maybe. But one for the other? Lord no. And while Pie has issues to work out, I'm fairly confident that he'll at least be an above average center fielder eventually, even if it may take another season or two to get through his plate discipline issues.

by Damen Jackson on Oct 10, 2007 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

Felix Pie is not the club's...
...top prospect anymore, technically -- if we go by the Baseball America criteria, he got enough playing time this year that he can't be considered a prospect.

Prospect rankings are wildly subjective things, anyways, and it's not like stats alone can provide you with a lot of help here. (Vitters was slugging .190 in Low A at the end of the year -- does that mean he's not a top prospect anymore? Psh.)

The fact is that Pie was never given a chance to play through any of his slumps - for Pie to have success at the majors he is going to have to make adjustments. You're absolutlely right that there's no guarantee that he will make those adjustments, but you can't use last year as evidence that it's UNLIKELY he will make those adjustments, because he didn't get the opportunity.

FREE CARMEN PIGNATIELLO!

by cwyers on Oct 10, 2007 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

I lean in this direction also
after watching Pie for a while, his swing is a ways off from being major league ready.  He seems to be a good kid, and I wonder how much they worked with him to shorten his swing going back a couple years.  Also, I was a little surprised the kid wasn't using the bunt as a tool more often to bring the infield in.  I am not so sure they missed the boat on trying to get him to be more of a power guy vs working with him to make more consistant contact to utilize his speed.

If he fails to hit next spring, his value will start to plummet and it wouldn't be a bad idea to use him as trade bait this winter.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Oct 10, 2007 11:50 AM CDT reply actions  

Scouting report on Grienke

http://www2.sportsnet.ca/baseball/mlb/players/Zack_Greinke/

Not that this is the end-all, but I am not alone in thinking this kid is special.  Honestly, his value is low right now and KC has soured on him a bit.  I'd pounce on them now.

by nickler on Oct 10, 2007 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

And
I think Pinella and Rothschild will be very good for him.

by nickler on Oct 10, 2007 11:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

And...
... I respectfully disagree. Greinke's a head case. Stay away.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Oct 10, 2007 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

I respect your opinion.
and certainly you are entitled to your opinion.

But I really DO think he's something special that could actually change the fortunes of a team.

by nickler on Oct 10, 2007 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

He wouldn't be the only
fastball-throwing headcase on the Cubs.
"Any employee wishing to miss work because of death or serious illness please notify the office by 11 AM on the day of the game."

by vtcub on Oct 10, 2007 4:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

goodness
"However for now Pie has shown absolutely no indication that he will be able to hit major league pitching."

this is just an incredibly stupid reason to trade the guy.  he hasnt even been given a sniff of a decent chance to prove himself yet.

how many rookies just jump into the league guns blazing?  and the corey patterson comparisons are just ridiculous if you take the time to look at how much better and at a younger age pie performed in the minors than patterson.  also,

.362  .410  .563  .973    

that triple a line, combined with the fact that he's never hit below .285 at any level PLUS the fact that he's been at least two years younger than the average player at each level....oh and his outstanding glove tell me you are off your rocker.

Kevin Hart Watch: IP: 11 K: 13 ERA: 0.82 WHIP: 1.00 K/BB: 3.25 a productive farm system is a wonderful thing.

by kylejo on Oct 10, 2007 11:56 AM CDT reply actions  

Honestly, it's not.
OK OK.  I know you think I'm crazy.  And clearly, I'm not managing any teams any time soon.  So I'm just giving you what I think as a layperson.

Living in Cleveland, I am a big Tribe fan and got to see some of their young players including big time prospects.  

Players like Ben Broussard, Andy Marte, Brandon Phillips all caught the ire of the manager (Wedge) and GM (Shapiro).  They were highly rated, but when given a chance would swing at anything.  They were let go, so the Indians could acquire other players more likely to develop.

Asrubal Cabrera and Kelly Shoppach are at the other end of the coin.  They show patience at the plate, and realize they don't have to belt every ball 500 ft to make a difference.

I see Pie as more of the former.  Maybe it's just me but I have no patience whatsoever for a player that can't take an obvious ball.  Pie was facing NL central pitching for Goodness sake.  If he is truly going to be something special, he should have been able to generate an OBP that is at least equivalent to a decent BA.

And if he's not going to be something special... why not trade him while his value is high for something or someone that might be?

Watching a player with that little plate discipline leads me to believe that they will never develop into major league talent.

by nickler on Oct 10, 2007 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Stupid?
"this is just an incredibly stupid reason to trade the guy.  he hasnt even been given a sniff of a decent chance to prove himself yet."

Soto wasnt given a chance either, but he hit MLB pitching and started in two games during the playoffs.  Pie's plate disciple alone shows what kinda hitter he is.  He may not crush every pitch, but he certainly misses alot and swings at alot of balls.  This is something that is very difficult to teach a young hitter.  He needs to realize it himself and apply it, and for a few years now he has been unable to.

Cub fans need to realize that Pie is not a hitter, given a chance or not.  He is a .200 hitter, and that is why he was held in the minors for so long.  All you Pie lovers can continue to love him, but at some point you will have to realize that you need someone with a decent bat to play center.  Defense can only take you so far, ask any college ball player.

"I love this world. I hope hell is as much fun!"

by HIGGY on Oct 11, 2007 8:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

wow
do you know how many players have struggled to hit in their first 177 AB's and turned out to be just fine???

do you have any idea?

here's some names of top prospects and top players in their first season...

Player            Age    Line         K Rate

Justin Upton      19  .221-.283-.364   26.4%
Alex Rodriguez    19  .232-.264-.408   29.6%
BJ Upton          19  .258-.324-.409   28.9%
Andruw Jones      20  .231-.329-.416   26.8%
Gary Sheffield    20  .247-.303-.337   9.0%
Barry Bonds       21  .223-.330-.416   24.7%
Grady Sizemore    21  .246-.333-.406   24.6%
Torri Hunter      23  .255-.309-.380   18.8%
Felix Pie         22  .215-.271-.333   24.3%

Its just a random smattering of ballplayers, all of them have at least 130 AB's under their belt and these are their results and their ages....

to think you know for certain something about a hitter in their first 170 ABs at the big league level and at this young of an age seems pretty short-sighted

by DartmouthCubsFan on Oct 11, 2007 10:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

Here's another one...
... you might not have thought of.

Here's Ryne Sandberg's first 208 major league AB, a sample size similar to Pie's first ML season (a bit larger, actually).

He hit .221/.244/.284 with 6 (!) walks and 33 strikeouts. From that date to the end of the 1982 season he hit .295/.343/.415. There is a point in any star player's career, unless he hits the ground running, when he suddenly "figures it out".

Pie might still have that point in his near future. Is he worth trading? Yes, because clearly he has value and could bring, say, a starting pitcher in return (probably not alone, probably have to throw someone else in such a deal). But ONLY if clear value is received. Otherwise, keep him and see if he can get to that "figures it out" point.  

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Oct 11, 2007 11:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree
I'm not saying to give up on Pie.  I think he needs to be given a chance next year at least against RH pitchers.  I still would consider trading him though if the return was good enough.  Based on my opinion, I don't think he will be a star.  

A point on Sandberg is that he was a 2nd baseman.  If Sandberg was an outfielder, he wouldn't be in the HOF.  I see Pie's high upside to be someone like Torii Hunter.  Is that good, yes but Hunter is not a star.  Torii Hunter is not someone I would consider untradable if the offer was right.    

by rlpete on Oct 11, 2007 11:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yes but there is such a thing
as scouting and projection.  Major league teams pay a lot of people a lot of money to do that.  I think I can safely say that after seeing Koyie Hill's first 200 AB's that he isn't going to ever hit like Mike Piazza.  That's pretty certain to me and Hill was once a Top 10 prospect for the Dodgers.    

That's all anyone is saying.  Based on their opinion that they don't think Pie will develop into the star player that other people might.  Of course, Pie might develop into the next Alex Rodriguez or Barry Bonds.  I happen to doubt it.        

by rlpete on Oct 11, 2007 11:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

agreed
and scouting has rated Pie as a top 100 prospect each of the last 4 seasons... so scouts think he can be a good major league player as well

I dont think Pie is going to be an uber super star either, but to say he's a .200 hitter and wont ever make adjustments like the previous poster said, seems very shortsighted

Plus a "good" major league CF like Hunter, etc who's cost-controlled for 5-6 years is almost as valuable as a superstar level CF that we pay 15-20 million annually at this point. Especially given all the high priced talent we have.

If Pie can be average next year or above average, he'll be one of the more valuable additions we can have.

by DartmouthCubsFan on Oct 11, 2007 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree now
Last year I would have thought that this was a crazy statement.  I think Jones will continue to be our CF for all of 2008 and I don't see any reason why he wouldn't.  He's had some spectacular plays there.  

I liked Pie as a defensive replacement in later innings but if we can get something good back and he can get better playing time somewhere else I say why not?

by ak123 on Oct 10, 2007 12:17 PM CDT reply actions  

The core of this team
has about a 2-3 year window to win a championship.  To me, you have to go after it now and if you have a bargaining chip (that is not proven) that could get you over the top now, you go for it.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Oct 10, 2007 12:25 PM CDT reply actions  

Clarification
If we could trade Pie for Carmona, Peavy, Young, or Beckett, of course we'd do so in a second.  Anyone would.  It would be a no brainer.  But no other team would be crazy enough to go for such a trade.

The Grienke trade is one that could actually happen.

Fausto Carmona lost (LOST) 12 games last year... in the BULLPEN.  They guy was terrible.  But Shapiro held to his guns and told everyone that the kid had tremendous potential and stuff.  He was right, and Carmona is a big reason I think the Tribe will make it to the World Series.

I see Grienke in much the same way.  If he can work with a team that is a contender in an exciting city with a lot to play for, and with a manager that could tap the best out of him, I'd say go for it.

If we could get our hands on that kind of talent it could put us over the top.

by nickler on Oct 10, 2007 12:56 PM CDT reply actions  

You're still missing your own point...
 Still not for Pie.

 It's not even the post WS signing window, and we've already heard names like:

Haren
Lowry
Garland
Pelfrey

 As potentially tradeable this off-season. So, if the Cubs are shopping for starters, why on earth would they put Greinke at the top of the shopping cart? Especially for Pie.

by Damen Jackson on Oct 10, 2007 1:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

because Greinke
is better than everyone on that list sans Haren

and he's arguably a more valuable piece than Haren because Haren will be hitting FA soon and becoming VERY VERY expensive

Lowry????
Garland????
Pelfrey????

BLAH

by DartmouthCubsFan on Oct 10, 2007 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agree with this.
Again, this is just a pipe dream and I agree with DartmouthCubsFan in that the Royals may ask for way too much.

However... I do think that Grienke can produce numbers every bit as good as Garland's or Haren's.  

What can I base that off of?  Having seen him play when he is on.  I lived in KC for a number of years and had the opportunity to follow his career for a while now.  He has excellent control and throws few walks.  

I think if he were in an environment that were more focused, with an opportunity to win, that he could be special.

by nickler on Oct 10, 2007 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Weighing in
Its interesting reading through this thread because I really feel many of you in here are right, or at least my opinion lies with almost everyone.

Pie is going to be a very good player, I believe that. His numbers in the minors suggest as much and he hasnt been given enough of a chance to prove himself at this level. He's a very valuable chip and definitely far and away our top prospect.

I love him.

With that said, Greinke is a special talent as well. As I have mentioned before in another thread discussing Greinke, he's dealt with anxiety issues. This doesn't make him a "headcase" which is a pretty insensitive term for someone who has a real problem and is dealing with it. I have friends in the Royals organization who have told me they think he's a totally different person than the one they saw in 2006, and he's completely changed and has things under control.

Not only is he a special talent, but he's also a young pitcher that put up very good numbers pitching in the AL Central, a much tougher division than our NL Central.

His numbers: K/9 = 7.82, BB/9 = 2.66, HR/9 = 0.88, GB Rate 32% (not so good).

for comparison's sake lets look at Ted Lilly's numbers in the AL East (a similarly tough division).

Lilly: K/9 = 7.93, BB/9 = 4.01, HR/9 = 1.39, GB Rate = 38%

Now the majority of Greinke's #'s are out of the pen which is easier to compile than as a starter, but they stack up pretty darn well. Which means right now Greinke could probably be similar to a Rich Hill or a Ted Lilly, at his age with control over him for quite some time, that's a pretty big addition over last year's team.

Add in the fact that it's much tougher to find pitching as opposed to hitting on the FA Market and I think you've got the makings of a very very valuable commodity in Greinke.

Which is where "the rub" comes in. Greinke's actual value in straight baseball terms is probably very similar to Pie's, but his market value (because pitching costs so much more than hitting to acquire) is going to be much more to the point where we'd likely need to throw in another piece.

At that price Pie + a piece, I don't think I'd make the move.

At Pie for Greinke straight up, I think its a move very much worth considering IF KC was interested.

and that's where I don't think we could get KC to bite. They have an average CF in DeJesus right now and their organization as a whole has a hitting heavy bias in their prospects. Which means they need the young pitching and thus I don't think Greinke would be going anywhere.

It's not as crazy an idea as many would lead you to believe (mostly because a lot of us are enamored with Pie and not understanding quite how good Greinke is)

But i'd also agree with the majority in here that its WAY too early to draw conclusions about Pie. And if we are going to draw conclusions about him it makes a lot more sense to look at his thousands of AB's in the minor leagues, specifically the 700+ in AAA, as opposed to the Hundred or so in the majors which came in inconsistent doses.

by DartmouthCubsFan on Oct 10, 2007 1:21 PM CDT reply actions  

The issue with Pie
is his swing.  It may get by in AAA, were the quality of pitching is a notch below, but it gets exposed at the major league level.

His swing is far too long to make consistant good contact at the ML level, as he broke about 200 bats this year from getting jammed (even on breaking balls).  His swing needs a complete revamping and should be geared towards contact, so he can utilize his speed to his advantage.

Can he make the change?  I really don't know, but if you can get a proven player by packaging him this offseason, I say go for it, the window is not open forever.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Oct 10, 2007 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

i agree with
your last sentence to some extent

Hendry has built this team with a small window and players that can make an immediate impact and are known quantities certainly have an elevated value attached to them

but you have to keep in mind a couple things:

  1. we still have no clear indication of how much the Cubs can afford to add in payroll. Past year-to-year payroll increases suggest the team will grow closer to $105-$110 Million than $130-$140 million. Since we're already a $94 with 13 players, and the other 12 roster spots have to make at least $300k, we're limited in our flexibility. So trading prospects for someone "proven" and already making quite a bit whether through contract or arbitration may not be a realistic idea
  2. You don't want to trade a potential very good young player for just an "average" guy in return. Moves like that are the ones that keep teams in perpetual mediocrity
and as for your "swing analysis" on Pie... I'd be interested to see your credentials as a major league scout. I know i'm not one so I'm not going to make the calls on how his swing translates...

I know for one thing, his numbers translate

and plenty of players with big long swings have been able to overcome them and be quite successful, one of them off the top of my head mans LF for us....

by DartmouthCubsFan on Oct 10, 2007 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Must so many of your posts...
 come down to this? Most of us here don't think much of Greinke. And after spending much of the season, in the bullpen, we're left to wonder what the Royals organization thinks as well. This is an upside debate, pure and simple. Many think that Pie in this scenario has more. The stats may be encouraging for Greinke, but requiring performance therapy is not. And that's besides the point of the real world ramifications of giving up on your top prospect after 100 ML ABs. For someone who has yet to prove that they can make it through a season not only healthy and productive as a starter, but without clinical mental issues as well. Love to see how that would play in the front office. Pass.

 Any many here have played, coached, managed, and or owned baseball teams of various levels. I really don't think it takes a ML scout to have an intelligent opinion about the mechanics of a player they watch with some frequency.

by Damen Jackson on Oct 10, 2007 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Amen
to your last paragraph.  Furthermore, I believe MPH73 once mentioned that he was college teammates with Will Clark and Raphael Palmeiro, two of the best left handed hitters of our generation.  He's as qualified as anyone around here to offer an opinion  on Pie's swing.

by cubsbak on Oct 10, 2007 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thank you
I taught Palmeiro and Clark everything they knew (yea right) and did learn a little from standing in the box against Roger Clemens.  Anyway, although I only played through college, I have been around the game (in various ways) for quite a while and do feel I have at least a partial clue.

A good friend of mine played in the bigs for 12 years (some with the Cubs) and I get a chance to talk baseball with him quite a bit.  It' always fun to bounce thoughts off him to get his take and he agrees with me on Pie.

Bottom line, no one knows what will happen (for sure) with Pie or any young player, but it's not difficult to see where he needs help.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Oct 10, 2007 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agreed with your post above...
But i am responding here.

You definitely know that to get to the bigs, you either need to be able to throw a ball over 90 with movement, or hit the ball with consistency.  Defense alone does not get you up there.

Pie, has struggled with his long swing and discipline his entire career, personally i dont think it is going to change.

Last year when Theriot came up, many players asked him when Pie was joining the club, Theriot usually said not for a while because he swings at too many bad pitches.  He may hit well in triple A, but the scouts and coaching staff look more at the actual swing than they do his numbers.  Pie just doesnt have the swing.

Hey who is your friend?  If you would rather not post it here i can give you a personal email.  Just wondering if we know the same friend, because i have a friend as well that fits your description a little.

"I love this world. I hope hell is as much fun!"

by HIGGY on Oct 11, 2007 8:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

shoot me an email
n/t
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Oct 11, 2007 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

out of curiosity?
what is "this"?

and Greinke's gotten through a full season, he threw 183 innings in 2005....

by DartmouthCubsFan on Oct 10, 2007 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

to be more clear
"must all of your posts come down to this?"

i'm interested in what the "this" references

by DartmouthCubsFan on Oct 10, 2007 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

As I recall...
 that was a 5-17 season, with an ERA of 6. I said healthy AND productive.

 You needn't insult people. I think nickler is a way off on this idea, but I can't question his ability or capacity to form it. You're a grown man, so you say and do what you like. Just understand this seems to happen a bit, and really doesn't do much to advance your position.

by Damen Jackson on Oct 10, 2007 3:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Kouzmanoff
I think it's hilarious that people want to give up on Pie already.  What was our record with him in the lineup again?  Not that that stat isn't faulty, but still.  Also, Kouzmanoff in San Diego was considered a top prospect, and hit like .083 the first two months, but because the Padres were patient with him and told him the job was his, he eventually came on and is a very good player.

Pie strikes me as the positional player version of Rich Hill.  His numbers in the minors are simply too good to be considered a miss.  He just needs time.

by SamFels on Oct 10, 2007 1:45 PM CDT reply actions  

I'm not giving up on him
I just don't know if he will be a productive major league hitter.  The only thing that will determine that is time and hard work, and no one know how it will turn out.

If the Cubs were on a long term building plan or had a lower payroll, I would say hold on to him no matter what, but that is not the case.

Most would agree the Cubs core on offense is DLee, Soriano and Ramirez.  My question is this; how much longer will these guys be at the top of their production?  My thought would be about 2-3 years and you need to take advantage of those years by building your team with as many proven players as possible.

I'm not saying to trade Pie no matter what, but you have to consider packaging him to fill a need that helps get this team over the top.  If other teams want ot rip you off, you simply hold on to him.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Oct 10, 2007 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

If he's
 the positional player equivalent of Rich Hill, does that mean we have to wait until he's 27 to be a productive Major Leaguer?  

by BigFatZ on Oct 10, 2007 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe We Just Need...
... a new hitting coach.

It seemed that the plate discipline disappeared for all players ranging in salaries between $390K and $136M.

by initram on Oct 10, 2007 3:02 PM CDT reply actions  

Actually
the teams OBP went up this year and not one of the new starters had a worse OBP this year as opposed to their career average.  This tells me the issue is who they acquire, not who the hitting coach is.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Oct 10, 2007 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Can't argue with that
especially in the playoffs.  But there is something to be said for how this plays out over 162, and the Cubs need some help here.
"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Oct 10, 2007 7:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Actually with pitching such a premium
I would make this deal but I don't know if KC would.  They have outfielders and badly need pitching.  Where do you get they soured on him?  Did you see his August/Sept numbers?

16 games/7 starts: 43 innings, 37 hits, 13 BB's, 40K's.  His ERA was sub 3.00 from July through the end of the year.  

Why would KC be sour on that?  He's likely their #3 starter next year behind Meche and Bannister.  Oh yeah, he's turning 24 this year.  I think KC will ask a lot for that if they want to move him.    

by rlpete on Oct 10, 2007 3:41 PM CDT reply actions  

Trade for value.
Pie is an unknown commodity right now with great expectations by any team willing to get him. Trade now that his value is high. BTW, that value is high precisely because he is a highly ranked prospect. That is a reason to trade if the Cubs can get someone of value in return.

As to Pie's talent and future, my main concern is that his hitting against lefties is bad, even in AAA.

by Fraggin Judge on Oct 10, 2007 7:42 PM CDT reply actions  

IMO
ive posted this several time before but hasnt changed one bit since being in the majors. he swings like he wants to be a homerun king. he's another cpat. i see that as one of our probs. holding on to players to long. gotta take chances. pie isnt major league ready and we dont have a team built to wait on talent to perform. were a team built to win asap!!i'm not saying trade every minor leaguer for anything but i am saying if it can help us win ballgames right now--pull the trigger. teams want cheap talent with a ton of upside. pie fits the bill.
Here comes the nasty leftie to shut it down in the 9th......Clay Rapada!!!!

by cubsluver22 on Oct 10, 2007 7:56 PM CDT reply actions  

well said
Whoever has been guiding him in the minors has taken him down the wrong path.  He needs to be a contact hitter first and worry about power later.  This way, he can take advantage of his speed and be a productive major leaguer quicker.

If you put him in CF next year and he fails to hit again, his trade value will plummet.  Need to look at moving him (if the deal is right) while he has value.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Oct 10, 2007 8:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

If they go after Peavy or Santana,
the best trading chip is Rich Hill, and yes I'd give up Pie in such a deal too.
SORIANO! YESSSSSSSS! JIMBO!!!

by CubFaninCA on Oct 10, 2007 8:47 PM CDT reply actions  

Santana will get dealt this winter
because that is when his value will be highest.  If they wait until mid-season, they might not get as much and if they are in the race, it makes no sense to deal him.

I would trade Hill, Pie and another player in a heartbeat for Santana.  He had a bit of an offseason, but he is the best pitcher in baseball when on.

The problem is he only has one year left on his deal and you may have to try and sign him before you agree to a deal.

"I don't like them fellas that drive in two runs but let in three" Casey Stengel

by MPH73 on Oct 10, 2007 8:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

While I do say "Don't trade Pie"
The only player I would consider trading Pie for is Santana and ONLY if we get to sign him to a long-term deal or make some kind of vocal agreement with him before he lands with the team.  Pitching is always at a premium and Santana is the best and only 28 years old.  Santana/Zambrano would be the best 1/2 combo in the NL (unless Chris Young steps up from his post All-Star performance).  Also imagine how many more wins Z would get if he wasn't going up against Harang, Sheets, Oswalt, but Arroyo, Suppan, and who even is the Astros No. 2 pitcher?  Ted Lilly going up against number 3 starters in the NL?  Some teams don't even know who their No. 2 starter is going to be next year.  

by IllinoisCubs on Oct 11, 2007 7:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

People always complain
about how bad the Cubs are at producing position players from within, but the lack of patience some people have with our prospects is astonishing!

He only got 177 ABs this year, and only 38 after the all-star break. How is he supposed to make the adjustment to the majors with such limited/sporadic playing time?

Personally, I love Pie, and think he should be given as much time as he needs. I want Pie starting in centre field next year, and I want him to stay there for the next 10+ years.

by MadHatterBlues on Oct 11, 2007 4:53 AM CDT reply actions  

Ding! Ding! Ding!
We have a winner!  

Most guys are not like Ryan Braun where they come up to the majors and smash the ball right away.  He's only 22 years old!  The Rockies were patient with Tulowitizki this year and look how that worked out for them.  Pie needs more starts and at-bats so that he can learn to make adjustments.  Someone above mentioned that it looks like he is swinging for the fences every time he's at bat.  Perhaps that's because he is trying to get into the starting lineup and he only got one at-bat every other game this year?  

The same people who say 'Trade him!  Trade him'!  Will be the same people complaining in two years when Pie is rocking whatever team he's on and the guy we traded far has fluked out.

by IllinoisCubs on Oct 11, 2007 7:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

A winner?
177 ABs - 43 Ks?  OPS .271?

G. Soto 54 - 14 Ks.  Was he given a chance?  Do we assume he is going to hit even better next year when given a chance?  Probably not.

Now Soto's are a little high for my liking, but i would consider him a power hitter, and he might have struck out alot but his average was .389.

177 ABs is giving the guy a chance, look at his scouting report, and his minor league report.  He swings at too many pitches, and when he has that much speed and bats .215 in a 177 ABs that is not good.  You guys will be killing him on the message boards like you did Jones when he does the same thing, when given a so called chance.

You brought up Ryan Braun, he is a direct opposite of Pie.  Can hit the ball a ton, but cannot field.  Who would you rather have had last year, Pie or Braun?

Guys like Braun are usually guys that are like Pie in the minors.  You hear about how great they are, and when they get to the bigs, they play like their reputation serves them.  Pujols is another example.  There is an adjusting period yes, but guys like Braun and Pujols (i know he is an exception) have the swing, they are controlled at the plate and have discipline.  Now Braun did strike out a lot, but his .324 batting average and 34 HRs and 97 RBIs kinda covers that up.

I guess what i am saying is it is all how you look at it.  When is a chance a chance?  177 ABs took away Pie's rookie status, he is now a major leaguer.  I think that is enough of a chance.  

"I love this world. I hope hell is as much fun!"

by HIGGY on Oct 11, 2007 9:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

Just a note on Braun
His fielding was so, so bad that it really did hurt the team almost as much as it helped.  So despite his .326 EQA (!!!) his WARP3 was only 5.4 - thanks in part to a -21 FRAA (-6 FRAR).  

That's some extraordinarily poor fielding right there.

As far as Pie, I'll defer to my favorite blog (FireJoeMorgan.com):

Pie is 22 and has a total of 177 AB in his life. Now is probably not the time to give up on him. In 1952, at the age of 21, Willie Mays had 127 AB and hit .236. Am I saying Felix Pie will turn out to be as good as Willie Mays? Yes. In fact, I am guaranteeing it. If Felix Pie does not turn out to be as good as Willie Mays, I will give everyone who reads this blog one hundred dollars.

...

You are extremely certain that Felix Pie is going to fail, considering that the man has had 177 AB and is 22. In 1967, Reggie Jackson was 21 and had 118 AB. He hit .178/.269/.305. Now, am I saying that Felix Pie will end up being as good as Reggie Jackson? Absolutely. In fact, if Felix Pie retires with fewer home runs than Reggie's 563, I will get a tattoo of Joe Morgan's face over my entire face and I will name my first son Timothy McCarver Is Tremendous and I will give everyone who reads this blog one hundred thousand dollars. Book it.

by Wreckard on Oct 11, 2007 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

I read FireJoeMorgan.com today.
I'm going to hold him to that.
"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al Yellon on Oct 11, 2007 5:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Suggesting a Pie trade
doesn't necessarily imply giving up on him.  Anyone should be available in a deal if the return is good enough.  Greinke is turning 24 this month and looked pretty good this past season.  He was the #6 pick in the 2002 draft and appears over his anxiety issues.  It's a matter of who you think will become a better player.  In baseball, pitching is always tougher to get so I would make that deal.  Personally, I don't think KC would so it's really a moot point.    

by rlpete on Oct 11, 2007 8:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

but
we already have Marshall/Gallagher looking for a place in the rotation. I'm not saying Greinke is a bad player to have, but how much of an upgrade would he be? Is that difference worth giving up our best position prospect for?

A quick scan of the Cubs farm system shows there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING brewing for CF after Pie. What would you recommend we do for the future? Re-sign Jacques Jones?

I had a root around Pie's numbers for 2007, and despite the very poor levels overall, I still found a couple of encouraging points:

with RISP his OPS was .810 (54 AB)
when facing a starting pitcher for the 2nd time in a game his line was 313/371/656 (32 AB)
when he got ahead in the count - 333/484/563 (48 AB)

Pie is the future. Give him time and he'll make us proud.

by MadHatterBlues on Oct 11, 2007 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

I understand your point
I'm just not as high as you and others on Pie.  I don't see his upside as a superstar.  That's not due to last year's results but more his swing.  It's got a lot of holes so unless he can develop 40HR power, I'm not sure how high his ceiling will be.  Of course, that's just my opinion.  

On the other hand, Greinke has #2 stuff.  You mentioned Marshall.  Here is a comparison from last season and Greinke is a year younger.  Greinke was also in the AL.  

Marshall: 103 IP, 107 H, 35 BB, 67 K
Greinke: 122 IP, 122 H, 36 BB, 106 K

As a 20 y.o., Greinke put up the following before his problems: 145 IP, 143 H, 26 BB, 100 K.      

The only reason I wouldn't make that deal is if Greinke wasn't over the anxiety issues.  Seems like he was last year but obviously as an outsider I'm only guessing.        

by rlpete on Oct 11, 2007 9:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

But you see...
this is exactly why someone of Grienke's talent MAY be available.

I honestly doubt any high-end pitchers would be available for Pie... not after what he's shown so far.  So you are looking for a high end player with a few questions.  Again, I'd be counting on Lou and Larry to help get his head screwed back on.

After missing 60 games the last 2 seasons, KC may be ready to trade him while HIS value is still considered high.  I honestly think playing for a contender will help him get his focus back.

by nickler on Oct 11, 2007 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Colvin?
Is Colvin projected as a RF or LF?  I know he's played some CF.
SORIANO! YESSSSSSSS! JIMBO!!!

by CubFaninCA on Oct 11, 2007 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's the question.
To be honest, nobody knows for sure, but the club is deperately hoping that he can play center field, as he doesn't seem to project as a top-flight hitter in a corner spot, and his lack of power fits better in center.

Of course, the kid's scandalously young and power blooms late, so there's a lot of alchemy to this. But that's prospect evaluation in a nutshell.

FREE CARMEN PIGNATIELLO!

by cwyers on Oct 11, 2007 7:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Pie this winter?
Does anyone know if Pie is slated to play winterball this year?

My concern with CF at this point is the uncertainty.  It would be easy if JJ was a righty so he and Pie could platoon, but obviously that won't work.  So, where does that leave us?

I am not opposed to trading Pie, but we shall see.  In the past Hendry has done a good job of pulling the trigger on trading some prospects right before their stock fell (Choi and Hill), so its possible, but somehow I doubt it with the uncertainty this year.

So, that brings us back to the question, what about winter ball?  With all the breaking stuff (at least that is what "they" say) in the winter leagues this might be an interesting test for him and he should be fresh with so few AB this year.

Eamus Ursuli!

by WGNstatic on Oct 11, 2007 3:09 PM CDT reply actions  

yeah yeah
corey patterson was the next willie mays and angel guzman was the next cy young award winner. trade pie while he still has value.
Here comes the nasty leftie to shut it down in the 9th......Clay Rapada!!!!

by cubsluver22 on Oct 11, 2007 6:19 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Maybe it's time to take a deep breath

Recent FanPosts

Small
Top 10 things I liked about watching the Cubs lose at PNC Park
Seinfeld_jerk_store_black_shirt_small
Cubs pitching problems answered!
Zambrano_background_2_small
What is the most likely move in June regarding current players?
Small
Draft Prep: Pierce Johnson
Small
Trying to be positive (need some help)
Small
Soriano back to Second?
Small
Javier Baez Peoria Bound?
Small
Draft Prep: Conference Tournament Version
Despite-an-inflated-babip-lahair-is-no-one-month-wonder
Suddenly, I feel your pain

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Former MLB PItcher Bob Ojeda On Pitching And Pain
Wrigley Field Supporters Propose Tearing Down Rest Of Chicago
Doug Glanville On His Teammate, Kerry Wood
Thanks.
Samardzija takes a dig at Hawk Harrelson

Recent FanShots

A Day In The Life Of An A-Ball Minor Leaguer
Baez to Peoria
2012 Stars and Stripes Hat
Sveum moves Castro back to #2 spot
OT: Tyler Colvin bats 2nd
The Pittsburgh Pirates Offensive Catastrophe
Roy Halladay Bobblehead Fail
Full sized image

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
Should the National League adopt the designated hitter rule?

  1014 votes | Results

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Chicago Cubs Game Threads

Yahoo_full_count

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Profile_small Josh Timmers

B_w_avatar_small Brett Taylor

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima