Tuesday Morning Headlines
Ok -- tomorrow morning my wife is scheduled to have her labor induced, and I will become a father. The upshot for you -- other than the fact that you're caring people -- is that you get your headlines early, albeit less comprehensive.
So, that said, let's dive right in. The main things are the fact that the Cubs played a ballgame, and they're being sold at the end of the season. Not much to talk about, really.
First, the sale.
Jerry Colangelo says he'll wait and see on the Cubs. That's an intriguing possibility, really.
And it seems like all of the Trib's columnists have something to say about the sale -- of the Cubs, that is. None of them seem to hint at how they feel having their corporate parent taken over by a guy called "the Grave Dancer" on Wall Street. Eeyore thinks it will at least shut up the people at the Sun-Times. Eventually. Mike Downey funs around with the idea. Steve Rosenbloom says things. Some of them may be true. He also unleashes this chestnut: "The Astros have a good lineup, maybe great, and a combination rotation-slash-closer that I trust more than any other team, although the Brewers are close."
I try to be nice to the mainstream media folks, partly because I respect them but mostly because I'd like a job out of college and one of them might be an editor when I graduate. So I say this with some manner of trepidation and restraint. Ok, here goes: That statement, Mr. Rosenbloom, is rarified stupid. That is stupid carefully and lovingly raised, hand-picked, packed for maximum freshness and distributed using only the finest ones and zeroes. I seriously think someone needs to take Rosenbloom aside and explain to him that baseball isn't scored with overs. The Astros rotation? Oswalt is great, sure, but Petite is gone and Clemens isn't back yet -- and may yet wander to the AL East or, just possibly, actually stay retired. Jason Jennings is a creditable pitcher, but beyond that... Woody Williams is a flyball pitcher moving from Petco Park to Minute Maid Park. Does anyone see his ERA shooting up like a Roman candle? Yeah, me too. Wandy Rodriguez got toched for a 5.64 ERA last year in the majors, and there's no reason to forecast an improvement. Fernando Nieve... is probably better than those two, but that's not saying much. Closer? Brad Lidge? Trust? I'm not even going to touch that. As far as having a good lineup -- Brad Ausmus slugged .276 last year, and there's no reason to think that's a fluke. Adam Everett is an all-glove shortstop. Craig Biggio is chasing his 3,000th hit with grit, determination and steadily diminishing skills at the plate. And in the NL, those pitchers I listed get to hit, too. That's a good lineup? Ok.
Where were we? Oh, right, sale of the Cubs. Sun-Times website is silent -- although I'd bet money that they will have an article bragging about how their inane Tribune on Trial series had results.
Two big wrinkles here. One, Wrigley Field has not been mentioned as part of the sale yet. That probably bears watching. And the sale has slowed contract talks with Carlos Zambrano. Sam Zell, you may not know this yet, but Carlos is a force of nature who cannot be stopped. You will give him his millions, or he will take them from you. Don't make this any harder on yourself than this has to be.
On the field, we lost one. There are 161 others before we start the postseason. We'll win some of those.
The Employee has been told by the I-Cubs that he needs to get stretched out in Arizona bit more before he can join the rotation. And he needs to stop just wearing the minimum amount of flair.
And, finally, a poll. Vote early, vote often.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
30 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
From this Tribune article
But the article also says what I've been saying--Mark Cuban would be a tough sell to Selig and the other owners.
Jerry Colangelo now looks like the favorite. But as Cuban said, nine months is a long way away,
And I really worry about this not selling Wrigley Field with the team. I don't get that at all. I mean, I get why Zell doesn't want to sell Wrigley (the Wayne Huizinga plan: lock the team into a horrible lease, sell the team and keep the stadium) but I don't get why an owner would want to shell out all that money for the team without owning the park. That's just asking for the Cubs to threaten to build a new stadium in Evanston or something. And since Wrigley's a landmark, it would just sit there as a white elephant if the Cubs left, so they would have some power.
I'm not saying the Cubs would ever move to a shiny new suburban stadium, I'm just saying they'd threaten to move. And then we'd have years of ugly fights and lawyers getting rich. It's a lose-lose for everyone.
Congratulations on your new baby!
But I put this here because I agree with you -- leaving Wrigley Field is just not something any prospective owner would want to do.
It's probably mentioned this way because Wrigley Field is seen, in the context of the entire Tribco sale, as "just another asset". But we all know it's not.
I cannot imagine any prospective owner, especially one like Colangelo or anyone else local, would buy the Cubs without the ballpark.
BTW
Colangelo and Cuban are the first two candidates to buy the team.
Question about Colangelo and Comment on Cuban
I WOULD love to see Mark Cuban, and though I could see the other owners not liking him very much (but who really LIKES Steinbrenner?), I don't know if I agree with him butting heads with Selig. If we've learned anything from the Extra Innings deal and some of the other ridiculous decisions they've made, MLB seems to be about the bottom dollar first and foremost. Cuban to the Cubs would be huge for baseball, his name and reputation alone would increase fan base and in turn, increase revenues. I think the cash registers in Buddy-boy's head would be clinging too loudly for him. So, I don't know it would be interesting.
by eamuscatuli1881 on Apr 3, 2007 8:08 AM CDT reply actions
Colangelo...
Colangelo and Bud Selig have a good relationship going back many years -- any group headed by him would be approved immediately.
I think he'd be a good thing for the city and for the team. Not to say that there aren't others around who wouldn't also be so, but I'd have to think that presuming Colangelo is interested, he'd almost become the immediate front-runner.
Not Everyone Loves Colangelo
This article from 2004 covers how Colangelo is great at spending other people's money but can't stay within a budget. He was forced out with the Diamondbacks because he had them looking at a possible bankruptcy, according to the article. It also says he doesn't play well with others.
Both of those articles...
That's obviously true, and he clearly mortgaged the D'backs future to "win now". I doubt any D'backs fan would give back the 2001 WS title; you sure wouldn't, would you?
I'm guessing he's learned some lessons from that. If Colangelo is to be the Cubs' managing general partner (likely his title if he headed up a group), I'm thinking the group would have to have FAR deeper pockets than the D'backs group did.
Congrats
Also, I love the headlines all in one place. So I vote that you definitely continue then. You know, when you actually have those five free minutes.
*Not a real doctor, but still.
Another candidate?
What he did have was great ties to MLB owners since he previously owned the Mariners in the early 90's and was reported a good friend of Reinsdorf. He served on the MLB Ownership and Television committee.
Smulan's ownership of the Mariners was not a success but he could put together a group that would be favorable to MLB. He is an Indianapolis resident.
Smulyan...
re: Smulyan
Which is why...
Smulyan
What he doesn't have going for him is a billion dollars to toss around. He'd have to put together a group and would probably only end up owning about 10% of the club. There might be some worry about debt levels with Smulyan.
His tenure in Seattle is remembered badly because he kept trying to move the team. But it should be noted that the Mariners had their first winning record under Smulyan and the Mariners went from being a joke to laying the foundation for their success in the 90s under his ownership.
But if he had money problems owning the Mariners in the early 90s, he'd really have money problems owning the Cubs today. He'd have to put together a big ownership group (as he did with the Nationals) and then there would be instability on the board, like with the Diamondbacks.
Just about anyone...
The Reinsdorf-led group that owns the White Sox and Bulls doesn't seem to have dissension. Just because the D'backs had some, doesn't mean that's automatically the case with any group ownership.
Can we trade him to the Diamondbacks?
He does seem to like it down there.....
by salparadise23 on Apr 3, 2007 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions
re: "The Employee"
Quick! Somebody Photoshop the poster for this Dane Cook movie.
LMAO
"THE EMPLOYEE"
Employee of the Month
THANK YOU!!!
Al, you should put that on the front page at some point. Maybe when Prior makes his first start for the (Chicago) Cubs. Then again, by September, you'll probably have forgotten about it. (OK, OK, I had to make that joke...)
Don't Stop the Headlines
Congratulations on your baby!
by BJ Simpson on Apr 3, 2007 8:04 PM CDT reply actions

by 






















