The Way I've Always Heard It Should Be
And no, I'm not slamming the White Sox here, in fact, that's intended as a compliment.
The atmosphere at the Cell was electric last night; fans were jumping up and down screaming for their team even during the pre-game warmups and announcements. They saved their biggest boos for their opponents, the Angels, particularly Vladimir Guerrero, the Angels' best player. Their cheers got louder and louder for their heroes, the loudest for the manager, Ozzie Guillen.
I happen to be a sucker for pre-game playoff hoopla; I love when the players line up along the foul lines, and some medium-to-largely famous musician sings/plays the National Anthem (OK, so it's arguable how famous Alice Peacock, who sang last night, is outside of Chicago, or even IN Chicago, for that matter). They set off a few fireworks after the anthem, and that revved up the crowd even further.
And looking around, I kept thinking:
"Man, I wish this was us."
It hasn't been that long -- only two years -- since it WAS us, right there in a league championship series, so yes, I do remember how it feels when your team is the one on whom you hang your emotions on every pitch.
For me, and Mark (whose only other postseason game was, um, this one -- you know the one, I don't think I need to mention which one any further), it was just a chance to soak in that atmosphere, to watch a ballgame and be part of another important day in Chicago sports history.
I'd never seen the lower concourse at the Cell so crowded; we walked over from our LF bleacher seats to where Mark's friend Mitchell was sitting with his dad in the lower boxes down the RF line, and then tried to make our way through thousands of people milling around in the food lines. That took about 15 minutes, far longer than it would on a "normal" day. In fact, when we stopped to get some food, Mark, observant kid that he is, noticed the concession workers wearing Miller Park caps. Why? Sportservice, the concessionaire, had brought some Brewers employees down from Milwaukee to help out on this busier-than-usual night.
We ran into Mike; this time it wasn't possible to switch seats so he could sit with us, and his seat was in the right-field lower reserve.
Which is why I'm still waiting to hear back from him as to how close he was to Garret Anderson's second-inning HR that gave the Angels the lead they would wind up never relinquishing, and the supposedly-jet-lagged Angels beat the White Sox 3-2, taking a 1-0 lead in the series.
UPDATE [2005-10-12 09:16:13 by Al]: Mike e-mailed me about the Anderson HR:
That home run, and the two runs the Angels scratched out off Jose Contreras in the third inning, took the crowd right out of the game. It shouldn't have -- 3-0 isn't an insurmountable lead -- but for some reason, it got more quiet than it ought to be at a playoff game.
There was a fine mist falling at game time and it continued to fall off and on throughout the game, but it was never hard enough to stop play, or even be noticeable, for that matter; most of the time, you'd never even have known it was raining if you didn't look up into the lights and see the "mist-drops" reflecting off the light. The game-time temperature was 61 degrees and from our seats, we were fairly well blocked from the wind, and for mid-October it was actually quite a comfortable evening.
Despite this, the White Sox sent out vendors with hot chocolate, and since I wouldn't let Mark get cotton candy (he tried to negotiate his way out of that by saying it was "Magic Floss", which is what it said on the bag, but I wasn't having any of it), he talked his way into having one of those.
I asked him whether he was cold, or just wanted the chocolate. Got an honest answer, too: it was for the chocolate, of course!
Meanwhile, the crowd was awakened, however briefly, by Joe Crede's home run that was the White Sox' first hit off Paul Byrd.
I've seen Byrd throw against the Cubs before, since he spent the bulk of his career in the NL with the Mets, Phillies and Braves (and not very well, either -- 1-3 in 10 games with a 9.64 ERA), but I didn't remember him with the old-fashioned, Milt Pappas-style windup, with his arms flailing down to his knees, then up over his head.
This seemed to have the White Sox off-balance for most of Byrd's six innings, and he might have stayed in longer (he threw only 73 pitches), except that his seventy-third pitch hit Aaron Rowand to lead off the seventh, and apparently Mike Scioscia decided that he'd trust his bullpen.
That was a smart move, and it's one of the things that has brought the Angels this far -- they have an excellent bullpen. Scot Shields got out of the inning with a fielder's choice, and then something happened that, when the history of this series is written, may turn out to be the key play of the entire series.
A. J. Pierzynski, who has to be one of the slowest players in the game, and who has stolen six bases in his career in nineteen attempts (and no SB since 2003), took off for second base, and was thrown out easily by Bengie Molina.
During the post-game press conference we listened to on the radio driving home, Guillen confirmed what Mark and I (and all the fans sitting around us) thought: that someone, likely Pierzynski, missed a sign. That had to be a blown hit-and-run, though Guillen also suggested that Pierzynski might have been "trying to make something happen" and just went on his own.
Not too smart, if that was the case.
The White Sox made some noise in the 8th inning too, with a pair of singles, and with Paul Konerko up, the crowd came alive for what would turn out to be the last time. Konerko slapped a couple of sharp foul balls and then hit a lazy fly ball to Steve Finley in CF.
I was shocked to see what happened next. People started leaving the ballpark. I couldn't believe it. A one-run playoff game, that actually was moving along fairly quickly -- it was barely past 9:30 at the time -- and you're leaving? There were large blocks of empty seats in the upper deck for the 9th inning.
Speaking of which, I was surprised to see Jose Contreras sent out to start the 9th; props to Contreras, who threw another nice game. After the Angels made it 3-0 in the third, Contreras retired 11 in a row until Darin Erstad's single in the seventh. When Bengie Molina singled in the 9th, on Contreras' 102nd pitch of the day (see, I told you guys last week -- Contreras seems to turn into a pumpkin right around 100 pitches), Neal Cotts came in and kept the White Sox in the game. Contreras left to a standing ovation, including applause from Mark & me -- he did a terrific job.
It wasn't enough, because the guy known as K-Rod from his great 2002 postseason, Francisco Rodriguez (and think about it -- he's a World Series hero, and one of the game's top closers for three full seasons, and he just turned 23) -- came in to finish it off, and the White Sox played right into his hands. After Chone (and how on EARTH can you figure a way to pronounce that name "Shawn"?) Figgins booted Carl Everett's leadoff grounder, Rodriguez got two easy outs and then up came Crede... who not long ago hit an extra-inning, game-winning homer against the Indians.
Rodriguez is known as K-Rod because, well, he strikes out a lot of guys (322 in 243 career innings), and he throws 97-MPH fastballs.
And Crede is a dead fastball hitter.
And Rodriguez wouldn't give him one. He kept bending off 81-MPH breaking balls; nearly had Crede struck out on a 1-2 splitter, and then got him on the 2-2 pitch. Gutty pitching, actually.
The White Sox, thus, have lost four in a row to the Angels, dating back to a three-game sweep the Angels put on them in early September at the Cell, and with it they also lost their home-field advantage in the series.
Finally, I should note: I didn't hear one "Cubs suck" comment, and only a scattered anti-Cub piece of clothing spotted around the park.
Credit to the Sox fans. That's the way it should be -- they were passionate for their team, and into the series.
48 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
as to AJ's SB attempt
Great report, Al! I'm so jealous! I've never been to a playoff or world series game.
by Scott @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Oct 12, 2005 8:48 AM CDT reply actions
That is, of course...
Quiet
I noticed that. I get the impression that Chisox fans are worried their team is made of glass.
Pierzynski
And as far as the Sox go, for a team that proclaims to play small-ball, they sure hit a lot of home runs, and their lack of bunting skills last night made them look a lot like a certain team on the other side of town.
Matt
You hit the nail on the head...
If Konerko doesn't hit, they may have a lot of trouble scoring runs.
I think..
The fact is that their pitching is amazing, but their offense is streaky. They just went through a hot streak, so I guess it is very probable that they go through a slump now.
I don't think they are really a small-ball team much because of the homers. But they should be worried about Scott Podsednik because right now he can't hit, get on base, bunt, or steal because of his health.
Where is...
Doesn't he usually come on here and talk about teh White Sox after every playoff game?? I wonder why he did not come by and visit this blog last night or today yet. Hmmm??????
by mannytrillo on Oct 12, 2005 12:08 PM CDT reply actions
Thanks for the concern.
Were you one of the guys who's attacked me for posting about the Sox here?
Well, it seems to me that Cub fans should retire that tired old line about Cub fans not being concerned or caring at all about the Sox. The voluminous posts about the Sox prove that Cub fans do indeed have interest in the Sox.
And for those who've said that my posts here are examples of why they hate Sox fans, I suggest that you take a moment to see the examples of the vile things some Cub fans spew...
And finally, I have absolutely no reason to be ashamed of anything I've posted or said in advance of the Sox vs. Angels ALCS.
The Angels are a very good team. If the Sox lose, I won't be happy about it, but neither will I be ashamed.
Now, keep talking about White Sox baseball!
Well...
DmL
that's the thing I noticed too
I do think the Sox win tonight. Although I wouldn't mind seeing Buehrle get pounded. A couple of Vladdy 3-run bombs would be nice!
Dude... c'mon
They won 99 games. No Cubs team since 1935 (or was it 1932) (someone will correct me if wrong) has done that.
They didnt bunt well last night. No one has ever said their offense is great. It's the pitching that is great on that team.
We can argue and/or debate the merits of the White Sox and reasonable minds can disagree... but to watch the Sox lose their first game in the past, what 9 or something, and then declare that they are a bad team?!
If the White Sox are a "bad team", what the hell are the Cubs? Or the Red Sox? Or the Royals?
Who exactly do you think is a "good team"??
by NLBallClub on Oct 12, 2005 4:02 PM CDT up reply actions
Please re-read my post
And game 1 reinforced the point that they are bad.
If you don't agree, then tell me why they are good and don't point to # of games won as an indicator of their offense.
Re-read
The White Sox are a good team. Primarily due to their pitching. The offense was in the lower half of the American league in runs and almost every offensive category (they did lead the league in sacrifices).
The White Sox are certainly not the 1927 Yankees. But I stand by my comment that they are a good team. Only 4 teams are left, and they are all good teams.
by NLBallClub on Oct 12, 2005 5:26 PM CDT up reply actions
of course
The 162 game season separates the men from the boys. It's the ultimate test to see who is the best team.
I think Sox fans are really nervous because the offense is bad and they don't have confidence in coming from behind. Pitching carried them and to give up early runs is deflating.
and
Well...
details Al
That cannot happen, EVER.
Would ABC allow their Democratic Covnention coverage to be run by CBS?
Couldn't Reinsdorf...
by mannytrillo on Oct 12, 2005 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions
That's not really comparable, is it?
I don't think this is such a big deal, really.
no, it's not a big deal
If I walked up to get my beer at the '03 NLCS and some jamoke was wearing a Sox or Brewer or Cardinal hat, I'd have a problem with it.
The comparison was "attention to detail" and it is something to be addressed prior to those situations taking place. Obviously it wasn't on the Sox management group.
Frankly..
Were I at an LCS game following my team, I wouldn't even CARE what the beer vendor was wearing (unless the vendor was Jessica Simpson, in which case she should be wearing a smile and little else).
What I WOULD care about is the SCORE!
Sheesh.
we already addressed
Because you weren't offended, doesn't mean it was right or handled properly. The world doesn't revolve around you and your view on life.
Just to make it clear...
Agree with Socialbob
DmL
Also agree
This issue is simple -- they only get issued one uniform, and I just assume that the contractor (probably rightly) doesn't think it's worth the expense for extra duds.
That is not right...
Well Sparkles...
by NLBallClub on Oct 12, 2005 5:27 PM CDT up reply actions
Yup..
I think that if you are really a fan of baseball and you're team, you shouldn't leave. Unless like I said, you have something important to do. I also said it was everyone's choice, and I was simply stating mine and my opinion.
to play Devil's Advocate
Actually...
don't go
I was just playing--there IS a reason to leave that ballpark early.
I know..
I would go to The Cell, but obviously not by myself. But nobody in my family likes baseball, it is hard to go to Wrigley, and even tougher to go anywhere else let alone The Cell.
That is why I'm jealous of Mark because Al takes him to a lot of games. My parents don't like baseball, although my mom actually learned that St.Louis' color is red and that they are a bird. I felt very proud of her. And one of my dad's friends used to watch the Cubs all the time but he died, and my dad learned some baseball from him.
The Cell is not dangerous.
I am not going to get into a Wrigley vs. The Cell argument, 'cos I've been to both and I've NEVER been harmed or threatened around either park. However, if you believe that Wrigleyville has less crime or safer than around The Cell, then I seriously doubt that you've honestly looked at things. That's simply not true.
Of course, if you're a reader of the Chicago Tribune, then of course you'd be led to believe that you should be in fear around The Cell.
Must be fun...
http://www.chicagocrime.org/map/
No murders in the Wrigley area in the last 100 days. No so for Violent crime lower in district 9 (Comiskey) than Belmont 19 (Wrigley). Total number of crimes is lower, too.
The web is a great resource. Use it. So much more accurate than making stuff up.
Lies, damned lies and statistics...
At least, I have found it just as safe as walking around Wrigleyville after night games. I have been to many, many night games at the Cell and have never, ever had a problem there.
Draw a 1 mile circle...
Now, you want to say that, due to heavy police and security patrol, on event dates, your risks are similar at both parks? Fine. I might be willing to accept that.
But don't pull crap out of your ass and say that the crime rates in both areas are the same.
The facts, and nothing but the facts...
So, here are the facts of crime 1/4 mile around each park, from 7/8-9/15:
TOTAL CRIMES:
Wrigley 166, The Cell 53
BATTERY:
Wrigley 23, The Cell 12
ROBBERY:
Wrigley 8, The Cell 2
CRIMINAL SEXUAL ASSAULT:
Wrigley 1, The Cell 0
ASSAULT:
Wrigley 8, The Cell 0
WEAPONS VIOLATIONS:
Wrigley 1, The Cell 0
SEX OFFENSE:
Wrigley 3, The Cell 0
"But don't pull crap out of your ass and say that the crime rates in both areas are the same."
You're right. It's not even close, the area directly around Wrigley is much more dangerous.
If you'd like to compile the actual crime rates for 1 mile, here's where you can get the stats, rather than out of your ...
Proof again...
by mannytrillo on Oct 12, 2005 10:48 PM CDT up reply actions
forgot one
Wrigley 0, cellular 1
by mike bornemann @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Oct 12, 2005 10:50 PM CDT up reply actions
Gosh...
Just kidding Al, I love your site and would never stop posting. Keep posting everyone just keep it nice.
by sparkles721 on Oct 12, 2005 10:55 PM CDT up reply actions
1 mile
29 crimes at Wrigley, 5 batteries.
26 crimes at Comiskey. 4 Batteries, 3 assualts.
So, 5 of 29 at Wrigley involve personal harm.
7 of 26 at Comiskey.
You site or mine, Comiskey has more violent crime.
Maybe next time you won't give me a barrel with fish and a gun.
No, your argument has too many holes...
How does your pulling stats for areas (one mile away) where almost no one attending a game at The Cell would venture proof that Comiskey has more violent crime?
So, maybe you could directly answer me this, if you venture a 1/4 mile or less from each ballpark, which one has more violent crime?
But even if you answer that, Al, who is a die-hard Cub fan disagrees with your premise.
If you honestly believe that going to The Cell is dangerous, then continue on in your ignorance. I'm done with this.
Best wishes to you.
Ch Ch Ch Changes
Key phrase - THE AREA AROUND THE CELL.
Now, you say, "If you honestly believe that going to The Cell is dangerous..."
I never said that going to the Joan was more or less dangerous. I was disputing your neighborhood point.
As to the 1/4 mile range, you should note that a 1/4 mile perimeter from the Joan is comprised of about 40% parking lots. This is rather untrue of Wrigley. The total population within 1/4 mile of Wrigley is higher than at 35th and Shields. Also, with the higher number of night-oriented businesses, one would expect crime across the street from Wrigely on a potential 365 days per year. Not so at the Joan. Who's gonna be in the South Lot in November?
Thank you...
In my 41 years of attending games at The Cell, I've NEVER been the victim of a crime NOR have I seen one. Have crimes occurred? Sure, no doubt. But when people make these silly arguments about how it's dangerous to go to a game at The Cell they're just usually talking about fear, unreasonable fear IMHO.
I generally park outside a friends home at 37th and Normal. The area is frankly very, very nice.
Sometimes if I don't want to bother my friends, I park between 26-29th Street and Princeton, just outside the locals only parking ban. That's quite a walk. I've done it with my now 4 year old daughter. It's actually nice. People sitting on their porches say hello.
My daughter and I attended the 9/14/04 Marlins game at The Cell. We parked at 29th and Princeton. On the way home we met this gentleman. I even have photographic evidence. Note the guy's Cub's hat.
My point is NOT that Wrigley is so dangerous that I wouldn't go. It's not. But both ballparks are in metropolitan areas. If you are reasonably cautious you will probably NEVER encounter trouble attending games at either park. To suggest that The Cell is dangerous is ludicrous.
man, sparkles....
I feel for ya.
by priorpwnz on Oct 12, 2005 6:34 PM CDT reply actions

by 


















