The New House Of Pain
PHOENIX, Arizona -- With tonight's 8-3 loss to the Diamondbacks at the BOB, the Cubs are now 12-21 in Arizona since the D'backs entered the league in 1998 (and 25-35 overall against them, so this sort of losing isn't confined to the desert).
This includes last year, when Arizona was terrible; the Cubs lost two of three in 2004 and matched that for 2005 with a dispirited effort tonight.
I had a hunch about Ryan Dempster today. No, it wasn't that he was going to give up seven runs, it was that he was going to have a good start. That'll teach me to believe in my own hunches.
Seriously, Dempster wasn't as bad as the pitching line. No, listen. He struck out seven and was ahead of most hitters, and was spotting his slider really well in the first couple of innings. It was his inability to get the last out that cost the Cubs this game.
First inning: first two batters are easy outs. Then he walked Luis Gonzalez on four pitches. This wasn't a terrible idea, as Gonzo has been hot and came into the game 8-for-16 lifetime against Dempster.
Troy Glaus hit a fly ball to right that Jeromy Burnitz... well, Burnitz just misplayed it into a run-scoring triple. Yes, I said triple. The slow-footed Glaus had only seven triples in nearly 3000 career at-bats before today.
Third inning: After two singles, Dempster struck out Glaus and got Shawn Green to ground to first -- but that advanced the runners to second and third, where Jose Cruz singled both of them in.
Fourth inning: Well, it got ugly. Again the first two men made out. Then, Dempster's third walk was followed by three straight hits, whereupon Dusty mercifully yanked him. Maybe "mercifully" is the wrong word, because Glendon Rusch's second pitch was slammed for a 400-foot double off the CF wall, scoring two more runs.
That's all seven runs in the first four innings scoring after two were out, and worse, five of the seven scored after two out and no one on base.
My friend Phil always says you have to "close the deal", and he's right. I don't know if it's lack of concentration, lack of ability or both, but the Cubs seemed totally flat tonight, in both pitching and hitting. Even Michael Barrett's three-run homer off Brian Bruney, which gave the significant Cub-fan minority in the crowd of 26,789 (smallest of the series) its only chance to cheer, and which my friend John said might lead to more damage off what he called a terrible bullpen, didn't do much besides put false hope in our minds.
The two guys sitting in front of me, Cub fans, vehemently disagreed with both of Dusty Baker's pinch-hitting choices tonight and I cannot say I disagree, even though Jose Macias doubled right after Barrett's homer. When Neifi Perez was sent up with a runner on in the 8th, in a spot crying out for Jason Dubois (where a homer could have made it 7-5), you could see the disgust. They left soon after.
John mentioned to me that Chris Capuano, a lefty, will be starting for the Brewers on Friday. Thus, if Dusty holds true to what he told us at the Fan Fest in Mesa a week ago Monday, Dubois should start in LF. We shall see.
Did anything good happen today? Sure! I found my same free, on-street parking space, got out quickly, and tried to turn on the D'backs radio postgame show. For some reason my car radio took over, and wouldn't let me tune another station nor turn it off. This lasted about five minutes till I finally got it to switch to KTAR, the D'backs flagship, and I was home much more quickly than last night.
Oh, you mean did anything good happen to the Cubs? Sure! The bullpen was good again today, even with LaTroy Hawkins allowing a meaningless homer to Glaus; Hawkins, Rusch, Jon Leicester, Michael Wuertz and Cliff Bartosh combined to throw 4.1 innings, allowing three hits and just the one run.
Wuertz again was impressive, settling down after a walk and a hit to get an inning-ending double play. I still think the Cubs may have their closer solution right in-house with #43. Not that they'll listen to me, but I'm going to keep saying it.
A few notes: Before the game I climbed the 164 stairs up to Section 300, Row 33, Seat 5, the worst seat in the house, among the ones the D'backs sell for $1 (yes, you can get in for a dollar). Here's the view from that seat:

As usual, click on photo to open full-size in a new browser window
It's a lot farther from the field than it looks, and it's really hot up there, and I suspect that doesn't change when the roof is open (which it was tonight), because the top rows of seats aren't open to the air -- they're underneath the roof panels.
Finally, I was introduced to a charming young fellow named Harry tonight -- the (about) 12-year-old son of a friend of John's, from Washington, DC, visiting on spring break, and a Cubs fan.
Not only that, he kept meticulous score, even asking me to keep him up when he got up (twice) to get food.
Kind of reminded me of me at that age, actually.
And so, my Arizona sojourn ends, not the way I'd have liked it to, of course. Three games do not make a season, and despite the two losses I still have faith in this ballclub. I'll fly home Thursday, and shall return to Wrigley Field, hope in hand, on Friday.
0 recs |
7 comments
Comments
Baker's logic
He panders far too much to his veterans, almost as if he is still a Union shop steward. Right now I cannot recall the 3B the Cubs had in '03 but it finally took Hendry to waive him (to the Marlins eventually) to take him off the lineup card. Pinch hitting Dubois in the 9th on 4/5 and last night in the 7th was a natural, yet Baker decided he had a 23-man available roster in both games.
As for Dempster he has not demonstrated that he is a starting pitcher, getting two outs is the psychology of a reliever. Tomorrow Wood pitches and I hope he does well. Further bringing Prior off the DL will not retire Dempster's experiment but I believe that we will have to weather him through April. Not closing innings does not bode well for a potential closer either.
To me it is obvious that Guzman is the 5th starter in waiting. As for Wuertz this was his consecutive day outing and that is important.
As was stated the Cubs this year will go as far as their starting pitching will carry them.
by BobsConsulo on Apr 7, 2005 9:27 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The play in the RF corner
Then Thom Brennaman asked Mark Grace, "So, you said earlier in the series that Burnitz was an upgrade in right field. It always seemed to me that, whatever Sosa's problems going to his right, he always fielded balls to his left better. Does Sosa have a chance at that ball?"
Grace: "He has a better chance of getting hit by a meteorite."
Subtle, Mark. Subtle.
by zambranofan on Apr 7, 2005 10:15 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Al, you're being too kind
If Dempster had a decent track record, I'd give him the benefit of the doubt, because every pitcher has a bad night. The problem is that Dempster has been pitching like this for years.
by dvdmgsr on Apr 7, 2005 10:47 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I know, I know...
The offense did score 23 runs. Yes, I know the Diamondbacks pitching staff isn't very good.
Let's get a couple of turns through the rotation before we make changes. I'd go to Rusch before Guzman.
by Al on Apr 7, 2005 5:18 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
negative energy, man
I'm pretty sure that one start - certainly not the FIRST start - does not necessarily indicate how a guy will pitch all year. And even if WE think that Dempster is not the optimum 5th starter, we should all KNOW that Dusty's not going to give up on him this early.
I thought that Rusch would've had a lock on that starting spot after the great year he gave us last year, but I can completely understand Dusty's reasoning of needing him MORE in the pen. Rusch's flexibility is such a huge bonus for us, that he's probably one of the most valuable pitchers on the injury-prone staff. Hell, he could probably CLOSE if it was deemed necessary. He has the composure (see: Cajones) and would proabably take it in stride.
About that triple to right - I only saw a replay of it, but it seemed to me that the double off the center field wall in the 4th was more catchable than the triple to right. I keep hearing peopple talk about Patterson being so good in center, but frankly, he hasn't impressed me. I sure hope he does so soon - he HAS to play well for the Cubs to be where we all want them to be.
Just my 2 cents.
.
by BCurt10 on Apr 7, 2005 5:36 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
In fairness
wait, what?
by Jason Rieger on Apr 7, 2005 6:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It would indeed...
Judging from his "look at my baseball card" comment, apparently Dempster thinks you're doing a good job if you keep your ERA below 10.
And I agree with Al. When the Cubs decide to go with someone else, Rusch should be the first choice.
by dvdmgsr on Apr 8, 2005 10:54 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















