Cubs Blog Army Summit Meeting
CHICAGO (AP) -- Colorado Rockies pitcher Jason Jennings set a major league record today by throwing only 46 pitches in a complete game victory against the Chicago Cubs at Wrigley Field. Jennings was helped in this remarkable feat by the fact that every single Cubs hitter swung at the first pitch he threw.
That's absurd, of course, but the Cubs' offense is getting a bit absurd these days. Twelve different Cub hitters DID swing at the first pitch today, including the first two to look at Rockies reliever Jay Witasick. Nine other hitters took a called first strike. It wasn't until Brian Fuentes came in to pitch in the ninth inning that four of the five hitters he faced actually looked at the first pitch they saw.
How on Earth is this offense ever going to get untracked until and unless they... repeat after me, everyone:
Not only that, Jason Jennings came into the game leading the NL in walks with 37, and the Cubs STILL didn't try to get on base this way. Meanwhile, Cub pitchers issued five free passes, even though only one of them scored.
Why is it that Dusty Baker and Gary Matthews and the rest of the coaching staff simply refuse to acknowledge that on-base percentage IS the name of the game today? For all Baker's supposed people skills, sometimes it takes baseball skills to win ballgames and his stubborn insistence that everyone go up to the plate hacking away at everything they see is, quite simply, costing the club wins.
This ruined an otherwise pleasant day, weatherwise (sunny, with puffy clouds, with nice temperatures in the upper 60's), and otherwise -- as today, Byron Clarke of The Cubdom, Scott Lange of The Northside Lounge and I convened the First Unofficial Cubs Blog Army Summit Meeting.
Scott came in with his dad (and they'll both join me again tomorrow), and Scott, Byron and I had a photo taken which Scott promised to e-mail me this evening (and which I'll post either later tonight or tomorrow). Until today, Scott was undefeated in his trips to Wrigley Field, 4-0 -- so I guess we could blame him, but instead, I'm going to blame the Cub offense. Frankly, Carlos Zambrano, despite throwing very well (three earned runs in five innings, and the 110-pitch count surprised my friend Craig, also in for a visit from Kansas City, because it didn't seem as if he had thrown that many pitches), should have won this game. When the Rockies took a 1-0 lead in the top of the third -- after one of those darned walks, Dusty! -- I said to Craig, "One run won't win this game."
The Cubs made me truth-tellers in the bottom of the inning, with a nice three-hit, one-run rally. But that was it for Cub scoring, as they played like they were impatiently looking at their watches at an airport security line the rest of the day. Scott pointed out to me that not only was everyone swinging at first pitches, but there were no fewer than eight ground balls hit right to Todd Helton at first base for easy outs (five unassisted putouts, two 3-1's, and one where Helton stepped on the base and then caught Aramis Ramirez in a rundown for a tag double play).
This sort of offense, my friends, is not going to win many games, especially if this is all you can muster against a guy who came in with a game-time ERA (7.05 -- get it?).
Too little too late, the Cubs scored a run in the bottom of the ninth, but even that wasn't what I would consider "offense". Corey Patterson singled and was forced out. Michael Barrett was hit by a pitch, both runners moved up on a ground ball to deep shortstop, and then Fuentes wild-pitched the run home. Big whoop.
If this season is still to be salvaged -- and it IS way too early to give up, only 45 games in -- some changes must be made, and I'm not even suggesting trades, although some of those may come.
I'm suggesting a sea change in the way Cubs hitters approach their times at bat. Work the count. Make the opposition starters throw a ton of pitches, because if you can get deep into most clubs' bullpens, you are going to score some runs (note to Dusty: see what other teams do off the Cubs' bullpen!).
Tomorrow, Scott and I will reconvene the CBA summit, day two, and Mark Prior will be attempting to even the series. It goes without saying that it's an absolute must for the Cubs to win the three remaining games on this homestand.
Keep the faith, all.
UPDATE [2005-5-26 20:50:31 by Al]: Forgot to mention this earlier. While we were waiting in line to get into the bleachers before the gates opened, two very large men were harassing some of the security people and the gate chief. It was clear that they were very drunk -- amazing at 11 am on a Thursday.
A security supervisor came over and explained that they should go away, have some coffee and sober up and come back in an hour, because they would not be allowed in at gate time, 11:20.
Good for them, I say. Well done.
0 recs |
42
comments
Comments
Apparently, Dusty and Matthews...
By the way, Gary Gilette had a great article on how plate discipline is one of the most underrated tools in the game when analyzing prospects. You can find it over on ESPN's insider page.
by shawndgoldman on May 26, 2005 5:31 PM CDT 0 recs
It's weird
I had hoped that Kerry Wood would really step up as a leader this year, but he's been occupied with his own problems, Greg Maddux has never been one to take charge, Nomah is out, and Todd Walker hasn't really been the team leader I always thought he would be. Damn, I wish we had kept Eric Karros around, if for nothing else than as a clubhouse leader.
When a team just seems to be drifting aimlessly, it's hard to blame anyone other than the manager.
by cubbiejulie on
May 26, 2005 9:26 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I have no idea if this makes sense at all...
by shawndgoldman on
May 26, 2005 9:58 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Just don't like them
by jimhickman on May 26, 2005 5:31 PM CDT 0 recs
I agree. Better to watch a team from the mid 70's
NOTE TO CUBS: The #1 solution for underachieving teams...fire the manager. Take a lesson from Steinbrenner and the Red Sox.
by jsmckay on
May 27, 2005 6:03 AM CDT
up
0 recs
New Players
by Boilerfan on May 26, 2005 5:41 PM CDT 0 recs
Becoming a hitter
Being a smart hitter means swinging at hittable pitches, fouling off tough pitches that would be strikes and not swinging at balls. It is not easy, but it can be learned. The players just have to want to listen to the hitting coach, and the hitting coach has to give some useful advice.
What is odd is as I recall, Sarge Matthews was a guy who believed in taking a walk. He had a .410 OBP in 1984 and a career mark of .364. One has to wonder it the Matthews agrees with Baker's hack at all costs attitude.
by Ross on
May 26, 2005 11:17 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Not only that...
by Al on
May 27, 2005 3:17 AM CDT
up
0 recs
The hack at all costs approach...
NOTE TO DUSTY:...DUH.
by jsmckay on
May 27, 2005 6:06 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Ay, yi, yi
As an aside, I just now happened to flip over to the Orioles game while Sammy was up. First pitch I saw, he popped it up ....
by 08Cubs on May 26, 2005 7:06 PM CDT 0 recs
Walks?
Now it looks as if he's not even qualified to be a mananger.
Walks give you a man on base without a hit, if the next guy hits a homer, a triple, or even a double, that runner scores. IT'S A RUN! Not something the Cubs have seen much of lately, and apparently this is the reason. They swung at alot of pitches today, first pitch groundouts was all I saw today, that's not how you get a run.
by Miss Fantastick on May 26, 2005 8:12 PM CDT 0 recs
You're absolutely right.
by Al on
May 26, 2005 8:49 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Clogging...
'During spring training, Cubs manager Dusty Baker derided walks as "overrated unless you can run" and said that walks tend to "clog up the bases for guys who can run."'
<Big sigh....>
by gharp on
May 26, 2005 9:24 PM CDT
up
0 recs
That's it
by gjdow on
May 26, 2005 11:13 PM CDT
up
0 recs
pack it in
Say what you will about the Sox. I don't think offensively they are much better than the Cubs. But they do things to win. Not only that they have a much better bullpen.
In one of of the papers today, they mentioned how the Cards are beating up on the bad teams. This is not something the Cubs are doing.
by sanman on May 26, 2005 8:23 PM CDT 0 recs
We make EVERY pitcher look like Cy Young
Worst of all, we squander good starts by our guys.
I bet Zambrono can't wait to join Clemment as an ex-Cub with a team that will show him a little run-support.
by jsmckay on
May 27, 2005 6:11 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I think...
The bottom line, IMO, is that this may be the most undisciplined baseball team I've ever seen. The Sox series was a tremendous contrast. I'm not talking about making baserunning errors and fielding mistakes, I'm talking about overall baseball play. This team swings for the fences with the wind blowing in at a gale. This team swings looks at a minimum of pitches. They seemingly refuse to work the count. Their situational hitting is absolutely horrid. We have heard about the White Sox and smart ball which may or may not be appropriate, but the Cubs, right now, are playing dumb ball.
To me, this all comes from the top. The manager dictates what happens, and what really stands out is Dusty's mantra that the Cubs need to be aggressive at the plate. Is it a surprise that they've seen the fewest pitches per plate appearances? As I said during the offseason, while Matthews and Clines changed titles, the result was no real change and I believe that I've been proved correct. I have not been one to blame Hendry, but look at the holes that this team had last year. Hendry filled none of them.
The Cubs should refund the money of everyone who paid to see the abomination that took place today at Wrigley.
DmL
by dmlichte on May 26, 2005 9:03 PM CDT 0 recs
Dan...
You're absolutely right about the ballclub. It's NOT just the walks or lack thereof, or the solo homers, or the baserunning gaffes -- it's a complete lack of fundamental baseball.
The funny thing is, the 2003 Cubs under Baker DID play this brand of baseball. But last year and this, it seemed to turn totally around under the same manager and (essentially) the same coaching staff. That's hard to explain or reconcile.
But it's very clear that it has to change. Beyond the losing, today (and many other days this year), the Cubs haven't even been a fun team to watch.
by Al on
May 26, 2005 9:08 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Well...
Anyhow, a few interesting things via the media over the past few hours.
First, Gene Clines was interviewed on WSCR tonight. The one item of note that he raised was that Aramis Ramirez has had back problems for a little while now and, because of that, has had to alter his swing. We have seen the result. Clines insists that Aramis is getting better and the backpain is going away. I hope that I'm not the only one here who feels that the Cubs would have been better off DLing Aramis throughout this all.
Also of interest was Clines going on and on about "modern day ballplayers..." Clines was asked a few times about Patterson, and Clines kept going on about modern day ballplayers and so forth. I'm left wondering a few things. First, perhaps the Cubs just don't have the right mix of attitudes. Secondly, perhaps guys like Clines and Baker are too caught up in how they think that it should be and can't relate to the players. You've got to know how to connect to be able to figure out how to teach the individuals.
The Trib's story about today's game discusses Baker's total frustration with the Cubs unwillingness to take pitches with Jennings on the mound. Well, actions speak lounder than words and if Baker really wants to make a point, perhaps he needs to sit some of those players who refuse to take pitches. If it would make a point, perhaps we need to see some regulars sitting for guys with really crappy averages, just to let them know that when they play bad baseball, there is going to be a consequence.
DmL
by dmlichte on
May 26, 2005 11:01 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Odd...
Isn't that supposed to be Baker's strength? Relating to his players?
And if he can't do that... then he ought to go.
by Al on
May 27, 2005 3:13 AM CDT
up
0 recs
And another thing...
Since when do players go to the plate doing what THEY want to do?
Don't they still have signs? Don't they still have strategy?
It's not very apparent these days.
by Butchoh31 on
May 27, 2005 8:24 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I'm not sure
I'm not sure if this is the case with Baker or not. More of an issue that I've seen with him is his unwillingless to place any limits and his desire to have his players love him. This has led to a manager who lets the inmates run the asylum.
DmL
by dmlichte on
May 27, 2005 9:32 AM CDT
up
0 recs
At the same time...
Sure, there might be a problem with the "modern day ballplayer", but it's not like the 2005 Cubs are playing in the 1947 National League.
by dvdmgsr on
May 27, 2005 9:45 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Agreed...
DmL
by dmlichte on
May 27, 2005 10:04 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I share your feelings, Dan.
Well, I'm coming to town tomorrow, and narcissist that I am, I'm hoping this makes a difference! :)
by dfrancon on
May 26, 2005 11:11 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Even Len & Bren
by JohnM on
May 27, 2005 10:23 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I'll be at the game Friday
by cubbiejulie on May 26, 2005 9:28 PM CDT 0 recs
If you're going to be in the bleachers...
by Al on
May 27, 2005 3:17 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Al, I think...
I already know I won't be there, I've got a distance barrier of about 1300 miles stopping me.
by Miss Fantastick on May 26, 2005 9:41 PM CDT 0 recs
Meeting for the Summit?
I'm flying from Dallas to Chicago early tomorrow a.m. so as to see all of this weekend's glorious games, which I believe will leave the Cubs 3 for their last 3. Yes, I'm an optimist. Is there really a summit happening tomorrow? I'd love to meet up for a brew!
by dfrancon on May 26, 2005 11:12 PM CDT 0 recs
As I said above...
by Al on
May 27, 2005 3:18 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Aw, sadly, I don't have bleacher tickets.
by dfrancon on
May 27, 2005 11:11 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Anybody going to Monday's Game in LA
by Ross on May 26, 2005 11:20 PM CDT 0 recs
Chavez
by perseman on
May 27, 2005 7:09 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Winning might cure all
Maybe they need a collective referral to ARod's therapist. And I'm not really joking. The players looked defeated before the game was over; I know the fans felt that way.
I'm hoping for Prior to continue to step up when he needs to tomorrow, but, quite honestly, I'm much more concerned with him (and Z) making it through this season and staying healthy. I don't think this team competes without yet another overhaul, and the next overhaul needs to include management.
by Serena on May 27, 2005 1:31 AM CDT 0 recs
The offense on Thursday...
The Cubs lost to the Reds 5-4, but the key is the following PBP from the first inning:
CUBS 1ST: Patterson doubled to right; Stynes out on a sacrifice bunt (pitcher to first) [Patterson to third]; Sosa lined to shortstop; McGriff walked; Alou struck out; 0 R, 1 H, 0 E, 2 LOB. Reds 0, Cubs 0.
Read that carefully -- and I remember how ridiculous it appeared at the time. Patterson led off the bottom of the first with a double -- and the next hitter laid down a sacrifice bunt.
IN THE FIRST INNING!
It was almost as if Don Baylor, the manager at the time, who we all derided for bunting at the drop of a hat, was begging to be fired. A week after this ridiculous stunt, the Cubs obliged him.
I wonder if Baker is doing the same thing.
by Al on May 27, 2005 3:27 AM CDT 0 recs
Dusty Musty Go
by perseman on
May 27, 2005 7:13 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Cory
by jimhickman on May 27, 2005 7:16 AM CDT 0 recs
Cory
When a baseball player listens to his agent more than his coach, the jig is up.
by Butchoh31 on
May 27, 2005 8:29 AM CDT
up
0 recs
In case anyone had any doubt...
They are 27th in walk rate, and worst in the National League.
by dvdmgsr on May 27, 2005 9:20 AM CDT 0 recs
Kenny Lofton and Randall Simon
I also missing watching Patterson in a skybox during the 03 postseason. He appeared to really miss playing in important games, and I read it as a sign he would come back hungry. Now he seems to put all his energy into self-adulation. How long until he fires up some salsa music?
by JCM on May 27, 2005 9:54 AM CDT 0 recs
















