Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

A statistical analysis of our playoff hopes

Diclaimer: This post is not only long, it is intentionally optimistic. I'm doing everything i can to the numbers to see how its possible for the Cubs to make the playoffs. That said, you should still feel free to fire away your critiques!

I decided to go into a statistical analysis of what the Cubs need to do in the 2nd half of the season to make the playoffs (or, more accurately, the remaining 75/162nds of the season). I made all these calculations based on data from ESPN's RPI rankings page, The Cubs' remaining schedule, and 2004 and 2005 win shares from The Harball Times.

Lets start by assuming the Cubs play just as they did in the first half of the year. On first approximation, that would mean a repeat of the first half record-wise. They have gone 43-44, a win rate of .494. If they continued to win games at this rate, they would win 37 more games for a final record of 80-82, a touch under .500 and well out of playoff contention.

However, win-loss records are a worse predictor of what a team will do the remainder of the season than their runs scored and runs against are. Based on the number of runs the Cubs have scored and have given up, they should win half of their remaining games (37.5 wins). Given that they've been a half game "unlucky" thus far, lets assume regression to the mean gives them the extra half win, giving them 38 "second-half" wins for a final record of 81-81, right at .500.

I wanted to go into a little more detail, since even the runs scored and runs against do not take into account that the Cubs have played through the toughest half of their schedule. Their strength of schedule (SOS, the cumulative win rate of all the teams played thus far, weighted by games played) is .504. The strength of the remainder of the schedule (the cumulative win rate of all teams left to play, weighted by games) is .493. We are left to figure out how many wins can the Cubs expect out of the easier schedule. Lets do this based on RPI. The Cubs current Relative Power Index (RPI) is .502. RPI is a weighted average of a team's win rate (25%), its opponents' win rate, i.e. a team's SOS (50%), and its opponents' opponents' win rate, i.e. a team's opponents' SOS (25%). If we assume that the Cubs' RPI will remain constant (the starting assumption), as will their opponents' SOS's (the lazy, i don't want to do any more work assumption), then we can calculate what the team's win rate the remainder of the season will be, based on the strength of their remaining schedule. You can even do this team-by-team, if you wish. The results are a prediction that the Cubs will go 4-10 against the Cardinals (blech!), and 36-24 against everyone else, piling up 40 more wins for a final record of 83-79, just above .500 and almost certainly out of the playoffs. If you repeat all of this using expected W-L records based on runs scored and allowed to calculate SOS, the results are similar: 39 more wins the rest of the season for a final record of 82-80.

Now, all this is based on what the Cubs did in the first half. I'm not going to make predictions of any changes in performance from individuals in the second half, but in the interests of looking for a best-case scenario, i will now see how much change we can expect from recent or near future additions to the roster. In other words, i will see what impacts a healthy roster and some major Jim Hendry acquisitions could have on the second "half" of the season...

First, lets assume we get a healthy second half from Kerry Wood, Mark Prior, Scott Williamson and Nomar Garciaparra, as well as a full second half from Jerome Williams. Next, lets assume that the players they are replacing are average bench players (on average, they basically are). Then, lets use win shares above bench (WSAB) to calculate the wins they will add to the club remainder of the season (an explanation of win shares is here). We'll do this based on this year's WSAB or on last year's WSAB, based on which is more appropriate (this is admittedly arbitrary, and i mostly use last year's for the sake of sample size and to avoid bad 1st half numbers that are the result of injury/soreness. If someone has career WSAB numbers, i'd be happy to recalculate things based on those). In order to account for having only 75 games left on the schedule, we'll prorate WSAB by number of starts/appearances. Then, we subtract the WSAB earned in the first half from what we can expect in the second half, and we'll get the expected improvement in the Cubs' record from adding these guys to the roster, in units of win shares. Got all that? If not, follow along with the following example for adding Kerry Wood to the roster:

In the first half, Kerry earned 0 WSAB, so any win shares he earns in the second half are gravy. Based on last year's win shares, Kerry Wood earned 2 WSAB. He did that in 22 starts, a rate of 0.09 WSABs/start. If he gets 15 starts the rest of the year (75 games/5 games per start=15 starts), then we can expect about (2/22)*(15)=1.36 WSAB from Kerry the rest of the way. Subtract the 0 WSAB Kerry earned in the 1st half, and our record should improve by 1.36 win shares in the second half. In order to convert win shares to wins, you divide by 3, so the Cubs can expect about .45 more wins the rest of the year due to having a healthy Wood.

The remainder of the additional win shares resulting from additions that have already happened or we can count on happening in the near future are as follows...

Prior: 1 extra win share (Note: Prior had enough starts for me to feel comfortable using this year's WSAB data, as he had 12 starts, just short of the 17 we'd expect).
Garciaparra: 3.36 extra win shares (this large number is partly due to Nomar's WSAB rate last year, and partly due to the -2 WSAB he "earned" in his early season slump. Also note i used 58 games for Nomar, assuming an August 1 return date).
J. Williams: 1.5 win shares (Note: I again used this year's win shares for Williams, as he seems to have fixed the weight issues he has had in the past so i felt this year's numbers would be best).
S. Williamson: 1.36 extra win shares (Note: i used 19 appearances the rest of the year, assuming an August 1 return date and an appearance every 3rd day).

The total for all these changes is an additional 8.58 win shares. Before you get too excited, remember you have to divide by 3 to convert win shares to wins. This means we can expect about another 2.86 (call it 3) wins for the Cubs in the second half. If you add this to the most optimistic projections above, that leaves us with a final record of 86-76. That's a solid season, but i'm not sure if it gets us a playoff spot.

I'm thinking we would need over 90 wins to get to the postseason. That means we would need to add another 5 wins, or 15 WSABs to our roster. Lets look at WSABs for players in the first half, and consider adding two OF bats and a reliever. Lets go all out and assume what is in my opinion the best case scenario - that we add a power OF bat, a leadoff OF bat, and a setup man. Specifically, if we add Adam Dunn, Matt Lawton, and Mike Gonzalez (i told you this was best-case), that would give us an additional 15 win shares, or 5 more wins. That would bring the season record to 91-71, probably good enough for a playoff spot.

It looks like we can make the plaoffs. However, in order to get there, the Cubs will have to stay healthy, and Hendry will have to make a couple major moves.

Of course, if we just do better than 4-10 against the Cardinals, then we woudn't need all the fancy win share math to show how we can make the playoffs. Reversing that and going 10-4 against them would leave us with 89 wins instead of 83, and at that point we'd be close to a playoff spot without any major moves.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.

Comment 20 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

My replies may be slow...
I've got a couple busy days ahead of me, as i am off to Utica, NY this weekend to prepare for my wedding on July 23rd. So if my replies are slow, i apologize... There are more important things to me than baseball, even if they are few in number.
The Cubs will thrive in twenty-oh-five!

by Shawn Domagal-Goldman on Jul 13, 2005 10:48 PM CDT reply actions  

Not a lot to say
Just that this is a brilliant post. Can I use it somewhere else? Of course I'll give you full recognition for typing it.

Kudos.

According to the Chicago Tribune: "The Oakland A's are 32-0 when they have scored more runs than their opponents.

by Carlos on Jul 14, 2005 12:13 AM CDT reply actions  

Absolutely!
Feel free to re-post this wherever... I would also ask that you give a link back to this post, to ensure this site gets the traffic its earned.
The Cubs will thrive in twenty-oh-five!

by Shawn Domagal-Goldman on Jul 14, 2005 6:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

whew!
man, you really do your homework! awesome!
a good team can't be beat!

by WrigleyCat on Jul 14, 2005 8:25 AM CDT reply actions  

or maybe...
i'm doing this instead of doing my homework!
The Cubs will thrive in twenty-oh-five!

by Shawn Domagal-Goldman on Jul 14, 2005 8:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

And what's wrong with that?...
... seriously, thanks for the detailed analysis.

The bottom line is this: I think the wild card can be had with 90 wins.

That would mean the Cubs have to go 47-28 to take it.

That's a VERY good two months. Does this team have it within them? I think they do, IF:

  • Wood & Prior become WOOD & PRIOR!
  • The lineup keeps taking walks as they did in Florida;
  • Jim Hendry makes a bold move or three.

by Al Yellon on Jul 14, 2005 9:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

or IF...
they beat down the redbirds! Those 14 games will make or break our season...
The Cubs will thrive in twenty-oh-five!

by Shawn Domagal-Goldman on Jul 14, 2005 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

That was really good
Any analysis of player aquisition needs to be tempered with the WS argument. Getting 15 WS is not easy in the last 2 months of the season unless it is a MAJOR aquisition. This also assumes that Nomar will come back healthy. The third part is that we have had below average SS and LF in the first half. If Dusty wakes up and does
A) Leave Hairston and Walker at the top

B) Play Murton and Cedeno regularly

C)Manage his bullpen better

this team is already better than the first half even withoput additions.

by victor @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Jul 14, 2005 12:42 PM CDT reply actions  

Another thing to keep in mind...
is that the more Hendry waits to make an trade, the less it will impact the club. Adam Dunn earned 15 win shares above benchmark in the first half of the season. At that rate, he'll earn another 13 win shares the rest of the way (i forgot to prorate the winshares for trades). If we wait until August 1st, that number becomes 10 win shares.

Ivychat keeps pointing out that Hendry needs to make a deal sooner rather than later. It depends on how the market acts over the next few weeks, but if the Cubs are serious about making the playoffs this year, they need to make a deal very soon, or else it will be difficult to bring in the kind of talent we need to get over the top.

The Cubs will thrive in twenty-oh-five!

by Shawn Domagal-Goldman on Jul 14, 2005 4:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

That should read...
Adam Dunn, Matt Lawton, and Mike Gonzalez combined to earn 15 win shares above average in the first half. If Adam Dunn did this alone, he would be untradable, even when playing for as inept a front office as they have in Cincy.
The Cubs will thrive in twenty-oh-five!

by Shawn Domagal-Goldman on Jul 14, 2005 4:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

We've also had below average play...
from our centerfielder, Corey Patterson. Corey earned win shares, but considering the playing time he was given, he produced less than the average bench replacement, to the score of 3 win shares below average. That's a lot! That means that having Corey in the lineup every day "earned" the Cubs an extra loss in their first 87 games, when Corey is compared to an average replacement. This means that we should have been theoretically able to sign someone for league minimum to play CF (or SS for that matter), and we would have won one more game than we did with Corey playing CF all those games. Shows you how much of a funk he was in. Hopefully, he'll get it together and make that game up in August/September.
The Cubs will thrive in twenty-oh-five!

by Shawn Domagal-Goldman on Jul 14, 2005 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

great job
Thanks for spending the time to analyze something like this that is so dear to our hearts.

By the way, to acquire the players listed, what would be your trade offers to get it done?

by socalbob on Jul 14, 2005 4:08 PM CDT reply actions  

I think its doable...
apparently, the Reds are enamored with Rich Hill's curveball. Personally, i think they should be committed for wanting Rich Hill. Hill's a fantastic pitcher, and i'm ecstatic that he's a part of our system, but the man has one weakness: the longball. If there's one weakness you don't want pitching for the Reds, its the propensity to give up dingers (just ask Eric Milton). That being said, if they want him, i'd give him up. A pitcher that would make more sense (but not one i've heard Cincy has any interest in) would be Sergio Mitre, and his ability to pitch ground balls and avoid the home run. I would also send them an OF replacement of their choice (Murton, Dubois, Greenberg, anyone but Pie), as well as another arm, perhaps Ryu. If Cincy is willing, i'd ask for Kearns as well as Dunn. That would make the deal Hill, Mitre, Ryu, and Dubois/Murton for Dunn and Kearns.

As far as Lawton and Gonzalez are concerned, i would send them a pitching prospect and CPat (who they are supposedly enamored with) for Lawton and Gonzalez. CPat can play CF for them, and if he fails, so what? Its not like the pennant's on the line in Steelertown. We have an overabundance of young starting pitching, and we'll have to trade some of them away in the offseason anyways. Might as well get a reliever and a leadoff man for whoever that is while we can. I would say Pinto and Patterson for Lawton and Gonzalez should get the job done, but perhaps we give up too much there.

The Cubs will thrive in twenty-oh-five!

by Shawn Domagal-Goldman on Jul 14, 2005 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know if I'd give up Murton
to get Kearns included.  I want to see what Murton could do, plus(barring trade), he's likely to be the only part of the Nomar trade around next season.
Embrace the Neifi!

by Whitebacon on Jul 14, 2005 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

I like both proposals
but I'm not a huge fan of Lawton, but realize he's a stop gap until Pie get to town.  And he would be an upgrade.  To me Gonzalez is the sleeper because that DUDE is AWESOME.  I'd love to have him face Edmonds and Walker in those 14 Cards games.

The Reds deal is rather interesting because would the Reds want to give the Cubs 2 of their top hitters for the next 7-8 years.  And do the Cubs want to face Murton, Mitre, Hill over that same period?  I would do this one in a hurry!

Our system is so pitching heavy, that we need deals like this to get the quality offensive talent necessary to win.

by socalbob on Jul 14, 2005 5:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

how's this?
so the line-up becomes:

Lawton CF
Nomar SS
D Lee 1B
Dunn RF
Ramirez 3B
Walker 2B
Kearns LF
Barrett C

Blanco, Neifi, Holly, Hairston, Burnitz, Macias

Prior, Z, Wood, Maddux, Williams

Ohman, Rem, Gonzalez, Rusch, Weurtz, Dempster

May need to add another RHP in the pen, but this give Dusty the chance to use Rem in his natural role agaisnt RHB.

I'll take my chances to get the Wild Card with this group!

by socalbob on Jul 14, 2005 5:13 PM CDT reply actions  

Flip Kearns and Dunn
and you'd have it. Burnitz (much to your chagrin)would (and should-he's earned it) probably stay in the lineup.   Gonzalez should be the 8th inning setup guy, lefthandedness be damned. That pen is lefty dominant, but that's why we trade.  

If we're going to go after both Dunn and Kearns, Lawton is extraneous, as he's really only a corner outfielder.  He hasn't seen any significant time in center since 1998 and only has 100ish games in center over in his nine full years in the bigs.  Burnitz would be a better option in center.

Like many have said here, we shouldn't expect Pie as a full timer until 2007. So we'd still need something there next year.  I'm not so certain that we need that drastic of an outfield overhaul this year anyway.  Hairston seems to be acquitting himself fine in the leadoff/CF spot.  We should focus on getting Dunn or Lawton for left, and should those deals fall apart, let Murton have the job.  

I would trade Murton to get Dunn, but if its a choice between Murton and Kearns, I'd keep Murton.  We could probably get Kearns for Mitre straight up if we said please.  

Embrace the Neifi!

by Whitebacon on Jul 14, 2005 5:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Flip them in their OF positions
not in the batting order.
Embrace the Neifi!

by Whitebacon on Jul 14, 2005 5:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

agree
I based it on Dunn's cannon arm, not to say Kearns possesses a squirt gun.  I don't think either is a stellar outfielder from my viewing.

And I based the lineup on completing both trades.  Burntiz is the question mark as the lineup would need the lead-off hitter in Lawton.  It would be nice to have some choices for a change.

by socalbob on Jul 14, 2005 5:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Kearns is
the more adept right-fielder (better range and all that), and (I'm pretty sure) he has a better arm.  He's spent his entire brief major league career in either right or center (and not all that much in center).  I know that Reds management is inept, but I'm pretty sure they'd get that one right.  IF we were to get him(and Dunn), I'd keep Hairston in center, keep him batting leadoff, keep Burnitz in right, because he's earned it based on his performance this year, and use Kearns as the right handed hitter off the bench that we so sorely lack right now. Let Murton finish out the year in AAA, and ride it out.  
Embrace the Neifi!

by Whitebacon on Jul 14, 2005 6:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Jazz Up Your Recs!
Img_0001_small
Value of Various Plate Approaches
284_small
Cubs' Fantasy Camp 2012 as seen by a Player's Wife
P7200073_small
Randy Hundley Fantasy Camp 2012

Recent FanPosts

Small
Arguably OT: Aussie Baseball Finals Go To Decisive Game Three
Small
New Cubs draft strategy player development
Jeffnewwork_small
What I Expect From The Cubs In 2012
Wrigley_scoreboard_small
What To Do With Alfonso Soriano
Small
A quick update from the 2012 concessions orientation
Caray_small
Is there any FA left worth going after?
Marvin_the_martian_small
Thoughts On Gerardo Concepcion: Trust The Scouts
Star_small
What if Hendry were still our GM instead of TheoJed?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Nice article about Ernie Banks
Yankees Hire Jim Hendry
Dale Sveum Meets Early Arrivals At Camp Buss

Recent FanShots

The Rickettsification of Wrigleyville has begun!
Marlins' Cespedes Offer 6 years, under $40M (MLBTR Link)
BCB Fantasy Baseball 2012
Former Cubs Blogger Interviewed on The Score
Cubs vs. Rangers In Las Vegas Tickets On Sale Monday 2/13
Hoyer driving to Spring Training with his dog
Hoyer-Soriano likely a Cub to start 2012, Garza extension talk a possibility
Law's Top 100 prospects
Ranking the Farm Systems
WGN Releases Season Schedule

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
How many games will the Cubs win in 2012?

  309 votes | Results

It Is Only...

It Is Only...

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Primary_fc_small Josh Timmers

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski