Ding, Dong
As reported in this diary, Corey Patterson is now a Baltimore Oriole.
Here's the official press release from the Orioles.
The Cubs receive Nate Spears, a 20-year-old SS who played last year in the Carolina League, and Carlos Perez, a 23-year-old lefthanded starting pitcher who was in the South Atlantic League in 2005.
It's over.
And it's sad, really: that someone with the athletic gifts -- the "tools" we always heard about, but rarely saw -- of Corey Patterson, simply didn't have the head, or the heart, to make it as a major league player.
Good luck to him. Seriously. I don't wish him ill.
I'm just glad he's not a Cub any more.
0 recs |
165 comments
Comments
agreed
by mike on Jan 9, 2006 2:49 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
those
blah.
by tomas21 on Jan 9, 2006 2:50 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
But...
Further, no mention was made of any money the Cubs are paying; so whatever Corey makes in 2006, it's all Baltimore's responsibility.
by Al on Jan 9, 2006 2:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
agreed, mr. al
I'm not crazy about this deal, but it's far too early to write it off completely, IMO.
by dustyisdonnie on Jan 9, 2006 3:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Patterson
Kasey
by kaseyi on Jan 9, 2006 2:50 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Is that all?
I don't care that it frees up 2.5 million. There is no salary cap. It doesn't automatically translate into acquring someone because there is room on the payroll.
I'm not upset about losing Patterson I am just upset that there seems to be a lack of a plan. What kind of roster is being put together? High slugging? No. High OBP? No. This reeks of Tribco cutting costs.
(reposted from the diary section)
by SonnyJ9 on Jan 9, 2006 2:54 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
You can't use up a roster spot for that...
by Al on Jan 9, 2006 2:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually Al..
by mannytrillo on Jan 9, 2006 4:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
fragile, like Chad Fox-fragile?
by dustyisdonnie on Jan 9, 2006 4:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree...
It's just silly. It cuts down the bench options. There really isn't enough work for 12 pitchers, particularly in April with multiple off days.
by Al on Jan 9, 2006 5:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Can't say I agree...
by mannytrillo on Jan 9, 2006 7:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No, it wouldn't be Macias....
by Al on Jan 9, 2006 7:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
roster
by Seamer on Jan 9, 2006 11:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Corey had to go
by JFCubFan on Jan 9, 2006 3:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Cutting costs???????????
Cutting Costs????????
I've stayed away from the Patterson debate because I honestly didn't know what to think about it.
On the one hand, he may have been able to add something to the team in 2006, even if it were in a bench role...
...but...
on the other hand, the relationship between Corey and the organization, the coaches, and the fans had gotten to the point that I saw absolutely no way he could be successful in a Cubs uniform.
However...
One thing I can definitely say is that the Cubs trading Patterson wasn NOT about saving money...it was about getting rid of Corey Patterson.
by Santos L Halper on Jan 9, 2006 3:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Corey
As I said in my diary, if Patterson was to be dealt, I'm glad that basically it was trading potential for potential. Landing mediocre major leaguers is not worth it. I would have rather he stuck around and try to figure things out here. I'm not sure what Perez and Spears will bring and I'm looking forward to seeing Baseball America's opinion on the trade, however a quick glance at BA's top ten O's prospects does not show either of these kids being in their top ten nor does it list either of them in the "best tools" section:
http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/features/05top10s/orioles.html
If Patterson fails in Baltimore, look for him to become the next Jose Cruz, a former top propsect with great tools, bouncing from team to team as a fourth outfielder.
DmL
by dmlichte on Jan 9, 2006 2:56 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Good luck Corey
At least we'll always have his 17th inning homer in Milwaukee to sweep the Brewers in May 2003.
by gauchodirk on Jan 9, 2006 2:59 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Confirmation
Steve Stone will be on WSCR at 3:00 CST to discuss the trade.
DmL
by dmlichte on Jan 9, 2006 3:01 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Help out some Orioles fans...
by Al on Jan 9, 2006 3:11 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Trade
by cubsfan2883 on Jan 9, 2006 3:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
While this deal...............
Hendry was unable to create an environment of value in Patterson, and recognizing Corey could not remain with the club, he accepted the best of the anemic offers available.
by tville on Jan 9, 2006 3:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Best of Available Offers? Are You Kidding?
If the Cubs were really pragnatic, they would float Derrek Lee for Miguel Tejada, straight up. Lee is good, but there's no way he replicates last year, because at age 29 it's way outside his expected production. He's not Albert Pujols in the long term, aftr all -- he's a .275/.350/.490 guy which, while good, is not as irreplaceable as the same numbers at shortstop.
Chuck
by chasfh on Jan 10, 2006 8:05 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Get this
by jfkjunior2004 on Jan 10, 2006 8:52 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i agree
problem is, lee couldn't get you tejada -- because everyone else knows what i just said.
by gaius marius on Jan 10, 2006 10:16 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Corner infielders
by greggie44 on Jan 10, 2006 11:50 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The White Sux............
by tville on Jan 10, 2006 2:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Do you have.............
If not, then I think you've overstated your position.
Further down in this post there is mention of Ryan Drese as part of a supposed deal with the Nats. If true, it was a mistake not to snap him up, but unless there's something of substance to these rumors, I find it hard to understand how/why this was a "crappy-assed" trade.
by tville on Jan 10, 2006 11:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That Wasn't My Point.
My point was supposed to be that they waited too long before they decided Corey wasn't going to be what they thought he would be when they drafted him -- which was something Cubs management would have seen at any number of points in 2004, had they'd been bothered to pull their heads our of their asses.
They waited until all the value drained from him because they decided they absolutely had to dump him -- not unlike Juan Cruz, Kyle Farnsworth and Sammy Sosa.
That's why I'm saying: now's the time to trade Derrek Lee. He is never going to be more valuable in trade than he is right now, because you will replace his projected level of performance far more easily at 1B than at SS with Tejada.
Of course, the Cubs won't do so -- not only because they believe Lee will replicate his 2005 (I'll go on record right now as saying he will not come very close to doing so), but because they will have a minor riot on their hands with their fans. You can say what you want about the Tribune, but they're no dummies. They understand what fans want to see, because it's the business they're in, and if what they do in response to that helps the ballclub win -- well, more power to them.
Chuck
by chasfh on Jan 11, 2006 1:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hold on now
by gauchodirk on Jan 9, 2006 3:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly.......
by Trumac on Jan 9, 2006 3:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Grissom...
by Al on Jan 9, 2006 4:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Doesn't matter.....
by Trumac on Jan 10, 2006 8:06 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You cannot...
Comparison: If the White Sox lost Jermaine Dye to injury, then Timo Perez would have to play RF for a time. Would that be good for them? No, it surely would not.
by Al on Jan 10, 2006 8:56 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
There are a few...
by Imtrejo on Jan 10, 2006 9:28 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe not injury prone, but.....
by Trumac on Jan 10, 2006 10:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Timo Perez is better.......
by Trumac on Jan 10, 2006 10:01 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
On what planet...
Wow, White Sox fans would think you are nuts.
by Al on Jan 10, 2006 10:21 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
if the cubs haven't
it goes along way toward explaining why they haven't won anything recently.
this is just a false statement, imo. you absolutely can and should expect one of your star players to get knocked out on opening day. you can't have their equivalent on the bench, but you sure as hell can have a viable alternative.
i agree that even good teams do not always have the perfect alternative waiting on the bench. but virtually all of them can replace at least two good position players with major-league-caliber substitutes.
i think the cubs did a good job with mabry in this respect, and hairston should be someone's starting second baseman. it's better now than when they had macias running out there. patterson, fwiw, would be just as awful coming off the bench -- so glad he's not our problem anymore.
by gaius marius on Jan 10, 2006 10:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Neifi...
I still cringe at the thought that he will be the starting 2B. Todd Walker is a far better option, even if his defense is worse, and I think that is more perception than reality.
Perhaps I wasn't clear. While you shouldn't expect injury, yes, you should prepare for it, because it is part of the game. Walker, for example, went down in game #5 last year, and Nomar was gone after 15 games. And while the Cubs might have been able to weather the loss of one of those, losing two was virtually impossible to handle, as losing your starting DP combination would likely be for just about any team.
by Al on Jan 10, 2006 10:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree Neifi is...
by Imtrejo on Jan 10, 2006 10:50 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i would even contest that much
can he step in when your shortstop goes down for three months and sustain some level of productive offense? not hardly.
if aramis goes out, mabry can step in and hit 270/330/450. neifi can't. big difference.
and this team nonetheless seems intent to play him every day. and across the bag from a kid who has never really played in the majors.... who's playing in front of a kid with a grand total of 140 big-league at-bats.... gonna be a lean year, imo.
by gaius marius on Jan 10, 2006 11:25 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
When you trade garbage...
by ccd on Jan 9, 2006 7:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
exactly
by gaius marius on Jan 10, 2006 10:28 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
players
by Ienpw on Jan 9, 2006 3:26 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
who pays for who's plane tickets?
by mike bornemann on Jan 9, 2006 3:29 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I dunno if I am allowed to quote something...
Q: Joe from Long Beach, CA asks:
Happy New Year, Will! How does Nate Spears project? His numbers look a bit better than Brian Roberts' early minor league totals...any chance he develops the same power that Roberts did in 2005?
A:
Will Lingo: Happy New Year to you too, Joe. That's an interesting comparison between Spears and Roberts. I went back and looked at our report on Roberts when he was No. 10 on the Orioles list before the 2001 season, and here's what it says: "His tools aren't overwhelming, but the package is greater than the sum of its parts." That's a lot like what we say about Nate Spears now, though Roberts' tools back then probably graded a shade ahead of Spears' across the board. The Orioles prospect list is also stouter now than it was then. But if you're asking me to guess, then no, I don't think Spears will develop power and I think he'll be a utility guy.
If I am not allowed to post it, Al simply delete it.
by Ienpw on Jan 9, 2006 3:35 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
A real shame
at his AMAZING Opening Day in New York in 2003
and his tragic injury in June of that year incured while
DESPERATELY trying to beat out an infield hit in a game
in which the Cubs had I think 2 baserunners through
7. However what finally tore it for me was when
he refused to see a sports psychologist or play
in Winter League. If he had done either than I would
have given him credit for trying and realizing there
was a problem. I still think he has a lot of talent
and wish him well
by jessica on Jan 9, 2006 3:45 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Bye Bye K-orey
by awesomedawson on Jan 9, 2006 3:48 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Wrong about something
by Carlos on Jan 9, 2006 4:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Except for...
That's not enough.
by Al on Jan 9, 2006 4:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
2005
by Carlos on Jan 9, 2006 5:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Fair
by awesomedawson on Jan 9, 2006 4:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
at any rate...
by dustyisdonnie on Jan 9, 2006 5:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's one of the best sayings in
by Carlos on Jan 9, 2006 5:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually...
Here is the study:
http://www.all-baseball.com/cubreporter/archives/018087.html
This myth that Baker doesn't like his players to walk is just another inaccurate myth brought up against him.
by mannytrillo on Jan 9, 2006 7:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The bonds factor
by CA Cub Fan on Jan 9, 2006 7:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If you actually looked at the link...
by mannytrillo on Jan 9, 2006 8:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
well, maybe he should talk a better game, then
At any rate, I'm not all that convinced that the numbers show a significant difference; even if they do, Dusty does have some input into the roster construction and utilization patterns of his teams, and the fact that the Cubs have not walked under his tenure implies that the decision-making process in that regard (of which he is a significant part) does NOT favor players who walk.
Besides, if the guy says that he prefers guys who put the ball into play over the take-and-rake crowd, who am I to not believe him? Nobody on this board knows the sum total of how he instructs his hitters, and I'm wont to believe that if the cat says he doesn't like walks, he isn't going to encourage his hitters to take them.
That's the way it is with the other 'myths' that I apparently bring up when giving the guy a hard time, too. I don't know what makes players develop in some organizations and not in others, but I see little young talent coming out of the Cubs system and developing on this team while listening to Dusty whine about not having enough veterans on his team, and I have to believe that there's something going on. If Dusty is bothered by his negative rep in the player development category, the guy should at least not say things that further it.
Folks can run all the numbers that they want -- and, yeah, numbers occasionally impress me -- but Dusty knows a lot more about baseball than I do, so if he says he doesn't like the walk, I'm going to believe him.
by dustyisdonnie on Jan 9, 2006 10:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
When did he say...
by mannytrillo on Jan 10, 2006 4:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
in the first three paragraphs of his article
by dustyisdonnie on Jan 11, 2006 2:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Didn't Pierzynski steal first last post season?
by EbbyCalvinNukeLaLoosh on Jan 9, 2006 7:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Dusty made him a bum, just like LaTroy
Dusty did the same thing with LaTroy, taking a guy who had proven he was not a closer in MN and forcing him into that role over and over again.
Creating situations where your players will repeatedly fail ruins them. And this is a guy that's supposed to be a "players' manager?"
by jsmckay on Jan 9, 2006 11:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Facts, please
Dusty forced Patterson to be a leadoff hitter and that's why Patterson was no good? Patterson, other than a half season in 2003, has never been good. No matter where he's batted, he has shown no patience and an inability to master the strike zone.
It really does no good to spout opinions as if they are fact without offering facts to back them up. It's counterproductive to spout off opinions that you can't support with facts.
by DSZ on Jan 10, 2006 9:05 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
lighten up francis
Dusty did not have to make Latroy the closer. He could have, as was hendry's intention, had Dempster there, Wood's injury notwithstanding. It would've been smarter to have a temporary fill-in 5th starter called up until your starter came back than to make your closer, who hasn't had much success as a starter, be the starter, and have your set-up man, who hasn't had any success as a closer, INCLUDING THE SEASON BEFORE ON YOUR TEAM, be your closer.
Let's try to be firendly here, that was a rude response by you.
by tomas21 on Jan 10, 2006 9:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Are you serious?
As there is nothing I can add to that beyond pointing out the plain hypocricy, I will move on.
My frustration reflected in my previous post is one that I feel frequently while reading these pages - negative pronouncements not backed up in fact. My perception may be skewed. I'm on my lunch break now and don't have the time to do an analysis of all of the postings on this site.
Nonetheless, the poster I responded to initially has a long history of bashing Dusty Baker with anecdotes and/or pronouncements given without evidence. This case was one of the latter.
If LaTroy Hawkins was not brought in by Jim Hendry with the possibility that he would be a closer, there was no reason for the clause to be in Hawkins' contract offering more money based on saves. As for your unsupported assertion that Jim Hendry would have preferred Dempster closing to Hawkins, I'd love to see a quote by Hendry to that effect.
As for your assertion that "it is a fact that corey's play deteriorated quite a bit after dusty forced him into a lead-off role," which you offered with no proof, I suggest you look here: http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/splits?statsId=6400&type=batting&year=2005
Scroll down to where it breaks down Patterson's season by spot in the batting order and you will see that his OPS was better when leading off than anywhere else in the order except third and 7th. Should you take from that that you think Patterson was better suited to bat 7th, that is a reasonable argument that you can actually support. But, given Patterson's speed and the lack of anyone else who would make more sense to bat leadoff, I would disagree.
by DSZ on Jan 10, 2006 12:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Let's get the lead-off thing straight.
Patterson's blood is on Baker's hands, to be sure.
We recall when suddenly Korey stepped up and said he wanted to be the lead-off guy. Most of us were pleased with his attitude, but concerned about his ability to deliver.
Instead of acknowledging Korey's enthusiasm and then making him EARN THE RIGHT to be a lead-off guy, Baker simply accepted Patterson's assertion and sat him on the top-of-the-order throne.
Wouldn't it have made more sense at the time for Baker to explain to Korey that he would be CONSIDERED for elevation in the order when.........
A) He takes some pitches
B) He cuts down his swing
C) He reduces his strike zone
D) He looks to put the ball in play
E) He takes some MORE pitches
F) He tries to take the ball to LF
G) He cuts down his swing
H) He tries to use his speed via bunting
I) He exercises some patience at the plate
........and on and on and on.
But no - that didn't happen. Instead "the players manager" allowed himself to be played by the player. Baker gave Korey the job with no solid baseball foundation for doing so, and the Cubs suffered for another miserable month or so while Patterson continued the downward deathspiral to a trade for a PTBNL......
Baker was a total ass in this entire situation yet only Korey hears the boo birds. Sorry, but Johnny B. deserves much of the credit for the ruin of Mr. Patterson in Chicago.
by tville on Jan 10, 2006 11:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
this is why
players like dusty. not because he's any good, but because he leaves them do whatever. he's the master enabler -- the outback steakhouse of major league managers. whatever tendency you have, constructive of destructive, it will be given free rein to dominate you as a ballplayer and a person.
that ain't leadership, and it helped destroy patterson. it's also why z's anger management problem will only grow worse, why walker's mouth is never shut, why sammy's boombox was first allowed to blast all day and then why it was smashed without consequence.
by gaius marius on Jan 10, 2006 11:31 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The flaw of Dusty....
by Imtrejo on Jan 10, 2006 11:55 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i
He is a poor in-game tactician, i think anyone who has watched the Cubs or Giants would agree to that.
I think, for all his accolades as a great manager of players, he is only a great manager of players in the right situation. That is, when he has a roster full of already fundamentally sound players without any major malcontents. He seems to have zero coaching ability (as attested by his quotes about not talking to players about baserunning until they make a gaffe), and he doesn't seem to be able to keep a clubhouse together if there are problems.
by tomas21 on Jan 10, 2006 2:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think so...
by sparkles721 on Jan 10, 2006 4:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
to be honest
not only will his anger management become an issue if someone doesn't teach him how to keep from flying apart on the mound.
i've also rarely seen a pitcher who relied so much on his stuff and so little on precise location. z's gameplan is often to throw it down the middle. his movement is incredible, so he gets away with it. but that won't last.
if he gets hurt -- which is just a matter of time, playing for pitcher-killer baker -- and his stuff doesn't come back, he will get tagged. we kinda get a preview of that every now and again, when dusty's used him too hard and his movement goes away. remember june of last year?
that may not mean "trade him now" -- but if you want to sell high, players rarely get higher than zambrano is now.
by gaius marius on Jan 10, 2006 7:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Z is 24 years old...
There are some pitchers who can handle this sort of workload. Z appears to me to be the kind of pitcher who can.
Another full year ought to tell for sure.
by Al on Jan 10, 2006 8:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i hope so -- but
i'd be ready for it. baker is a murderer.
by gaius marius on Jan 11, 2006 9:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Neither one of those injuries...
I don't think that Baker's use or misuse of Z had anything to do with those things, and his arm seems sound.
We shall see.
by Al on Jan 11, 2006 9:35 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
don't make me laugh, al
i suppose you think prior's problem in 2004 -- after a year in which he was mercilessly beat to pieces in the playoff run -- was his achilles? hardy har har.
most teams try to mute the injury status of their young players when they can. the cubs are no different than anyone else.
and this thing with baker has a long history. billy swift never recovered from 232 innings in baker's first year as manager. john burkett spent part of 1994 disabled after throwing the same number of innings for that team.
some guys can take it. livan, for example, is a freak of nature in that way. but there are very few. the odds of z being one of them seems to me pretty remote, given the way these aches and pains are already showing up.
by gaius marius on Jan 11, 2006 9:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Prior...
Again, this is like the Dempster argument you and I have had.
I think Z can handle it. You don't.
Only time will tell.
by Al on Jan 11, 2006 10:26 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
prior's health
pretty clearly he isn't. the kid's had spats of elbow pain in 2004 and 2005, has never had a cause diagnosed and has consequently never been treated.
i wrote last march:
"the cubs have never really discovered what's wrong in there. larry rothschild can say things like "This is something he may have to learn to deal with regularly", and "... it shouldn't be a problem. Medication will calm it down" -- but he knows as much as you or i what is really going on mechanically in there, which is nothing. and how long do you imagine the cubs can or should trot the 25-y/o franchise pitcher out to the mound with consistent elbow pain -- pain debilitating enough to double his walk rate and raise his ERA by more than a run even after two months off -- of an indeterminate origin?"
rothschild was quoted in the sun-times.
has anything changed since then -- except the marking of another year in which prior felt pain in that elbow? and moreover faded in the last two months?
by gaius marius on Jan 11, 2006 10:46 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Lots has changed...
And Z did have two unrelated pitching injuries. The internet thing was later said that it could've been because he swung the bat hard and extra BP. The toe injury was because he hurt it while running the bases in that game against the Red Sox.
Z is a horse.
by sparkles721 on Jan 11, 2006 1:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree....
He was 1-2 in September, but threw 28 innings in five starts, struck out 34 and had a 3.45 ERA, below his season ERA of 3.67.
You quote yourself and ESPN from a year ago, gaius. Let's see what happens THIS spring before you back up and keep going to what happened a year ago.
by Al on Jan 11, 2006 1:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
it'll be too late
being honest with ourselves about what's going on with the kid -- undiagnosed, untreated elbow pain in two consecutive years -- is a starting point from which to constructively criticize the cubs plan for 2006.
threw 28 innings in five starts
that doesn't concern you? you saw him pitch. he was not himself.
by gaius marius on Jan 11, 2006 4:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I will reserve judgment...
by Al on Jan 11, 2006 4:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
wadr
on this team, given what we're discussing, it's unconscionable not to have at least one if not two more starters. a team with one frontline starter looking at a bullpen career, another with the arm pain were talking about and a third showing signs of overuse and repetitive stress CANNOT sit tight on a back end of maddux, williams and rusch. they have no hedge against the probabilities we're discussing here. the cubs NEED to add pitching NOW in order to be competitive. by the time you get the confirmation you're seeking, al, the season will be by the boards. again.
passivity can be useful, but not when it's uncoupled from a pragmatic analysis of likelihoods. when so, it's just rationalizing intellectual laziness.
by gaius marius on Jan 12, 2006 9:06 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ahhh!
I won't believe Prior has arm pain until he says he does. Z is overused I agree with that. Is it hurting him? Not from what I see.
by sparkles721 on Jan 12, 2006 11:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
hope you're right, spark
that said, even if i'm right, it may not happen this year.
by gaius marius on Jan 11, 2006 4:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
How are those signs?
What may not happen? Z's injury? I'm getting a little confused, but if it is about a Z injury, I think he won't get injured anytime soon.
by sparkles721 on Jan 11, 2006 5:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
if he's
given some kind of guidance, it surely would. but guidance apparently isn't in dusty's master plan. fortysomething moises alou regressed into a petulant child under baker. sosa was little better. wood (when he's pitching) wears every close call on his sleeve like he'd never been squeezed, kicking the mound and mouthing off. if 2005 was better than 2004, it was because the 2004 club was probably the most uncomposed team in any professional sport i've ever watched.
i hope he has a strong family influence to set him right. without that, he's got little better chance than paris hilton to keep it together while playing for baker.
by gaius marius on Jan 11, 2006 9:24 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh gosh...
I remember June very well. He freaked me out. I was so worried about him. That day he pitched in Milwaukee was horrible. That day I believe he said he was using too much velocity instead of a lower velocity to get more movement and better control. That was probably his worst start ever. But his next start he was awesome.
I disagree with the anger management thing. He was a lot better last year about it. Sure, he is emotional and off the top of my head the days that affected him were opening day and the game he pitched against the Mets, but that day he got pulled for a sore back. Other than that though, I love Z's energy. When Z makes a critical pitch and pumps his fist in the air, it makes me laugh every single time. He may roll his eyes sometimes, but he calms down, breathes, holds the ball, and then throws a good pitch.
As everyone on this blog already knows, I love Z. If he ever gets traded, I would be extremely angry. I think I need to translate your post into Spanish and send it to Z. He is so competitive he would just love to show he is going to get even better. And he will.
by sparkles721 on Jan 10, 2006 8:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
sorry spark
sometimes i forget. ;)
by gaius marius on Jan 11, 2006 10:48 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's ok...
by sparkles721 on Jan 11, 2006 1:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This is one time...
And by the way stop scaring children...
by Imtrejo on Jan 10, 2006 9:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's to bad Corey didn't work out...
However, I think that this is really the best we could get for him considering, unless it was a package deal with other players on the move as well.
It would have been great seeing Corey succeed in a cubbie uniform but certain circumstances beyond anyone control did not allow for that to happen. I wish Corey the best of luck unless it's a game 7 world series, Cubs/Orioles, and Corey is at the plate, other then that, best of luck.
by DTJchris on Jan 9, 2006 3:51 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Korey
by pmenadue on Jan 9, 2006 11:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Addition by Subtraction
by brianp88 on Jan 9, 2006 3:56 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Sophmore slump?
by SonnyJ9 on Jan 9, 2006 4:04 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
i agree
by mike bornemann on Jan 9, 2006 4:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
by Zachary on Jan 9, 2006 4:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This is best for Corey
by cubfan4life on Jan 9, 2006 4:08 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Why not great?
by Carlos on Jan 9, 2006 4:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Great=Proof
by FauxChuck on Jan 9, 2006 4:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't expect this to happen...
by Al on Jan 9, 2006 4:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Great? No.
by cubfan4life on Jan 9, 2006 4:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
A quick note...
Thus, the roster stands at 39; there's an open spot. Don't expect it to remain empty for too long.
by Al on Jan 9, 2006 4:29 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I was...
As long as the Cubs didn't have to eat one penny of Patterson's contract, I could care less who we got. He had to be moved and he batted .215 last year. What more should we expect from another over touted position prospect from the Cubs system. He goes along with Hill, Choi, Dubois and others now.
by mannytrillo on Jan 9, 2006 4:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
In all fairness
by saluki05 on Jan 10, 2006 11:58 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why is Lenny Harris available ?
by jessica on Jan 9, 2006 5:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I always felt bad for Corey
by EbbyCalvinNukeLaLoosh on Jan 9, 2006 4:37 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
It is sad...
Thank you Corey for making that awesome catch and turning it into a double play in order to save one of Z's shutouts. It made both me and Z very happy.
by sparkles721 on Jan 9, 2006 4:51 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
David Eckstein?
If he turns into another David Eckstein, I'll be very happy. Eckstein ain't great, but I think we'd have all traded Patterson for him.
by Josh77 on Jan 9, 2006 5:23 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Sounds encouraging
Let's include him in the package for Zito.
by slide on Jan 9, 2006 5:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I am going to miss...
by Imtrejo on Jan 9, 2006 5:56 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Corey
by Perkins on Jan 9, 2006 6:21 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I was at the game
by mike bornemann on Jan 9, 2006 9:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, me too
by Perkins on Jan 10, 2006 3:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Looks like Corey...
From the Foxsports.com article:
"He also hopes to provide speed at the top of the lineup, perhaps in the No. 2 spot ahead of Melvin Mora and Miguel Tejada.
'I'm a guy who can get on base, and if I can steal bases and get into scoring position, that would really help the team,' Patterson said."
He can get on base?? Since when? I wish I could help Corey.
by sparkles721 on Jan 9, 2006 6:34 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah Right!
by jtiet on Jan 9, 2006 9:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, yeah...
I need to give Corey more credit. He CAN get on base! :)
by sparkles721 on Jan 9, 2006 9:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Somebody had to....
by Imtrejo on Jan 10, 2006 1:36 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Corey needed a change of scenery
While I agree that he needed to be traded I don't like our return. I would like to think we could have done better than this. What would the harm have been in letting him go through spring training to see if his value goes up. I'm sure this type of trade would have still been available even if he had a bad spring. Heck, for what we got we could have simply released him before the season.
Now that he is gone I would like the Cubs to acquire another outfielder to serve as the # 4 as insurance in case Murton or Jones don't pan out. I would rather Mabry be a pinch hitter and Grissom play in Iowa. Even though Hairston can play the outfield I would rather consider him our starting second baseman. I say this because I am assuming Walker will be the next to go and I do not want Neifi starting.
by AZ Saluki on Jan 9, 2006 6:41 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Furcal to have knee surgery
by LT on Jan 9, 2006 6:49 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
We'll see about that, Al
Personally, I predict a breakout in Baltimore.
by dvdmgsr on Jan 9, 2006 7:05 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I couldn't disagree more...
by Al on Jan 9, 2006 7:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not a chance...
by Kinky Reggae on Jan 9, 2006 9:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think he could flourish in Baltimore
is not a team in chaos , it has a screwed
up owner who is hurting the team but
I think the new manager & Mazzone could
improve the team. There is no way they
are likely to compete but this should be
GOOD for Corey. He will certainly be under
pressure but nothing like being booed
relelentlessly at Wrigley. I think both
he AND LaTroy will have good seasons
by jessica on Jan 9, 2006 10:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Could be...
And maybe they can make Tejada happier.
by sparkles721 on Jan 9, 2006 10:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
We'll see about that.
Now, you have a point about Baltimore, an organization that is even more dysfunctional than the Cubs. But at least, in recent years, they've had some young position players break out.
by dvdmgsr on Jan 10, 2006 8:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
one less boo to launch
by mrcubsfan on Jan 9, 2006 7:34 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Never partied late?
by Al on Jan 9, 2006 7:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Help me here
by pmenadue on Jan 9, 2006 11:30 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I couldn't make
My heart was so broken I had to give a co-worker a hug.
by priorpwnz on Jan 10, 2006 1:06 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
LOL!
by sparkles721 on Jan 10, 2006 4:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
as
by priorpwnz on Jan 11, 2006 1:10 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sure!
by sparkles721 on Jan 11, 2006 1:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
you
by priorpwnz on Jan 11, 2006 5:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No I don't...
by sparkles721 on Jan 11, 2006 6:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
uh huh
by priorpwnz on Jan 12, 2006 12:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Trying?
by sparkles721 on Jan 12, 2006 11:36 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
oh you
by priorpwnz on Jan 12, 2006 12:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I know I'm kind...
by sparkles721 on Jan 12, 2006 12:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
sigh
by priorpwnz on Jan 12, 2006 1:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I know...
by sparkles721 on Jan 12, 2006 1:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
sigh
by priorpwnz on Jan 12, 2006 11:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i feel
by tomas21 on Jan 11, 2006 6:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Good call Tomas
by greggie44 on Jan 11, 2006 6:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't worry...
by sparkles721 on Jan 11, 2006 6:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
ironically
by priorpwnz on Jan 12, 2006 12:39 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
my frustration
Starting with giving Kerry Wood an enormous extension about ten minutes after his first solid season/playoffs. The with the trades of some of our scapegoats, such as Sosa/Latroy/Corey, he trades them when their value is at the lowest in their entire career. And if that wasn't enough, they make it publically known that they want to trade tehm and that they can't live with them anymore. He did manage to get a useful part for Latroy, in fairness.
But I think just about everyone here knew that Sosa wasn't going to work for us BEFORE the 2004 season, and same with Corey BEFORE the 2005 season. They still had trade value at that point. He waited until the player had completely ruined themselves under the Dusty regime to dump them. Especially when its our player, you should have enough insight into them to get rid of them while they have some value. its basic business philosophy.
I like the bullpen signings of this year, but its the same thing. we now have one of the most expensive bullpens in baseball, and nobody has really had more than a season of success.
Hendry has made some good moves since 2003 (i still think the nomar signing was good, especially since murton came with it), but his moves seem like they are made more by a high school-aged fantasy baseball manager than a professional GM.
But he can win me back. If he went and got Lugo without giving up anyone i like i'd be excited again.
by tomas21 on Jan 10, 2006 9:15 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
amen to all that
by gaius marius on Jan 10, 2006 10:33 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
But you are right that Patterson would have brought far more a year ago, or even in midseason last year. So would Bobby Brownlie, and others.
by Al on Jan 10, 2006 10:39 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i agree
I know he's been going through some personal struggles, and maybe that's to blame, but he seems to have lost some of the great timing he showed before.
by tomas21 on Jan 10, 2006 2:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought I might provide a Spears scouting report
Drafted 134th Overall (5th Rd), 2003 Draft, HS, Port Charlotte, FL
Bats L/Throws R 20 yrs old 5'11", 155-160 lbs
Spears does not have a lot of power, but he coaches all say he knows how to play the game. He has evidenced good plate discipline, Spears has a line drive swing where he is able to put balls into the gaps. There are comparisons to David Eckstein, in the O's system he is playing 2B, some report he should play SS too although he's projected to play second long term. Spears possesses speed, projected earliest call up is 2007.
by Ivy Walls on Jan 10, 2006 9:41 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
A question was asked...
by cubfan4life on Jan 10, 2006 1:40 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Do we really need to see him do well
by cubbybear on Jan 10, 2006 8:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Has the Cubs...
by cubfan4life on Jan 10, 2006 9:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
25 years?
Mark Grace, Rafael Palmeiro, Joe Carter are three pretty damn good ones. I can name a lot of others with long careers--Dunston, Girardi, Glanville, Eric Hinske, Dave Martinez. I still think Choi can hit.
Of course, both the failures and the successes of the the farm system in the mid to late 80's are pretty irrelevant to the ability of the current regime to produce positional talent. And I wouldn't defend their record on this recently. It's just that none in 25 years is pretty clearly false.
by Josh77 on Jan 11, 2006 3:02 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Jon Garland
by priorpwnz on Jan 11, 2006 3:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Josh...
And of course, the Cub farm system has produced Wood, Prior and Zambrano, too.
by Al on Jan 11, 2006 4:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
oh
by priorpwnz on Jan 11, 2006 8:10 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What I should have said...
by cubfan4life on Jan 11, 2006 8:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Good point on pitchers
by greggie44 on Jan 11, 2006 11:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Instead of 25 years...
by Imtrejo on Jan 11, 2006 9:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry for being...
by cubfan4life on Jan 11, 2006 8:23 AM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 

















