Open Thread: 2006 World Series, Game 5
Many seem convinced that the Cardinals are about to be crowned World Champions.
Just a hunch on my part, nothing more: the series is going back to Detroit tomorrow.
Before we discuss tonight's game, I found some interesting Larry Rothschild remarks about Mark Prior in this article:
So the collision with Giles DID cause future problems? Maybe there are some effects from the line drive off the elbow, too, that they haven't talked about before.
Gameday: Tigers at Cardinals, 7 pm CT. (Cardinals lead series 3-1) TV: Fox
It appears the weather may clear by game time, though it'll still be nasty conditions for baseball.
Discuss amongst yourselves.
120 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
"laxity"
So was the article talking about him being Lax and neglectful or his shoulder having Ligamentous Laxity?
Good article on Rothschild
The Cubs knew that they would not have Wood or Miller available for at least the first 3 months? If they didn't know this then I am not sure what they were looking at.
Basically, the only "un-planned outage" was Prior in my opinion, and even that's being generous to the Cubs' planning.
So if we had Z, Madux and Prior, then we were planning to use Williams and Rusch from the git-go, heavily.
Anyway, that's all behind us...
What disturbs me is the less than enthusiastic support for Hill. Make the team? Excuse me? He has to fight for a roster spot with who? Maybe we are going to sign 4 veteran starters? make the team?
Is Rich Hill a guy with a miserable personality or is he the other type who coaches generally hate, i.e., does he have a brain and think for himself?
Maybe I am reading too much here, but I thought he earned a spot in the rotation for 2007 after his try-out at the MLB level in 2006? If Spring training 2007 somehow counts more then I think this organization is hopeless...Bring Dusty back, make him the hitting coach for 2007, or make him Larry's assistant pitching guy.
by DudeVf1 on Oct 27, 2006 3:53 PM CDT reply actions
Nothing but speculation...
Reply
Is Rich Hill a guy with a miserable personality or is he the other type who coaches generally hate, i.e., does he have a brain and think for himself?
Probably. Rich is known as a bit of know-it-all. Rothschild probably doesn't like that.
by VS on Oct 27, 2006 4:05 PM CDT up reply actions
Larry doesn't like
by BlueMike on Oct 27, 2006 4:51 PM CDT up reply actions
Adults and Children
But, of course, this rant is based only on speculation.
by ExNorthsider on Oct 27, 2006 4:55 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm not
Al strikes again...
by Matt Allison on Oct 27, 2006 11:13 PM CDT up reply actions
He also
by jazzman56 on Oct 28, 2006 12:12 AM CDT up reply actions
I did say...
Oh, well. Some people just can't pass up any chance they get to slam me.
Wasn't
Picking teams to win in a certain number of games is a losing proposition in any event. BUt, if you do it, you should not have a problem with being reminded.
I did get a kick out of all the posts that said the NLCS didn't matter because the Tigers would sweep, etc, etc.
Now that the Cardinlas have won, that has morphed into: The Cardinals only won 83 games, they didn't deserve to win, we beat them during the regular season, Eckstein sucks, etc.
Time to get over it. St. Louis won, and it wasn't close. They are the champs. Only losers use excuses and try to rationalize.
by jazzman56 on Oct 30, 2006 12:41 PM CST up reply actions
But I can hope ...
I really want to see Kenny Rogers again before the season's over, so Al, I hope you're right!
by Littlerock Rynofan on Oct 27, 2006 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions
It seems to me
I thought the juxtaposition of the slip and misplay in the outfield by the Tigers last night with the one by Curt Flood the LAST time the Cardinals and TIgers played in the WS was brilliant.
I recently read an article about how that slip by Flood ultimately led to Flood's being traded to the Phillies, which led to Flood suing baseball over the reserve clause, which led to Free Agency.
So, you could make the argument that not only did that slip cost the Cardinals a championship, but it was the most significant play in baseball history.
by jazzman56 on Oct 27, 2006 6:45 PM CDT up reply actions
Matsuzaka Update
Daisuke Matsuzaka, the 26-year-old right-hander represented by agent Scott Boras, may not be their first choice, sources said. The Cubs will make a blind bid just for the rights to sign Matsuzaka, but they apparently are more intrigued by free agent right-hander Hiroki Kuroda of Hiroshima. The 31-year-old Kuroda could be targeted as a No. 3 or 4 pitcher in the Cubs rotation, after going 13-6 in 26 games last year. He's 91-81 lifetime in Japan with a 3.70 ERA.
Typical.
You want typical.......
by PriorandAramisfan23 on Oct 27, 2006 4:46 PM CDT up reply actions
Well
What a play!
I don't care if the Cards.....
by PriorandAramisfan23 on Oct 27, 2006 8:05 PM CDT reply actions
and I mean good ones......
by PriorandAramisfan23 on Oct 27, 2006 8:08 PM CDT up reply actions
I HATE
Man oh man
Why?
No
When the Cardinals, Red Sox and Angels did their FA musical chairs swap of SS, the buzz at the time was that the Cardinals got the short end of the stick. Eckstein had just had a down year (injuries) in 2004 and the conventional wisdom was that he was in decline.
So much for conventional wisdom.
by jazzman56 on Oct 27, 2006 11:31 PM CDT up reply actions
Right
Eckstein was a free agent after the 2004 season. Pierre came to the Cubs in a trade before the 2006 season.
I know. Air said Eckstein was the kind of player we lack. I said we have Pierre, who is basically the same player.
When the Cardinals, Red Sox and Angels did their FA musical chairs swap of SS, the buzz at the time was that the Cardinals got the short end of the stick. Eckstein had just had a down year (injuries) in 2004 and the conventional wisdom was that he was in decline.
So much for conventional wisdom.
He is in decline. He had a rebound year last season, but this season he continued his decline (81 OPS+, same as Pierre). The guy had a great series and deserves the MVP, but that doesn't mean he has turned his career around.
Oh
by jazzman56 on Oct 28, 2006 12:02 AM CDT up reply actions
Disagree
No, Eckstein is more like a Freel (and hopefully Theriot) that just gets under the other team's skin, brings everything they have to each game, and gets those around them to do the same.
Pierre is not that type of guy. Hardworking, yes. But, honestly, I think we should try to keep Pierre for next year unless we can land a Wells or Jones for CF. I think he will be more comfortable with another year. Unfortunately, he will want more than a 1 or 2 year deal.
To make this post short
I truly wish
Oh, we already do. He'd fit right in.
by gravedigger on Oct 27, 2006 11:25 PM CDT up reply actions
Just out of curiosity
Let me save you from looking it up.
Answer is six. (BTW, Eckstein's career OPS is .710)
Those six are:
Furcal, Rollins, Renteria, Drew, Ramirez, Reyes.
But, wait...those last three are rookies, so we really don't know what their "career" OPS will be after they have been in the league a few years.
So, you have to say Eckstein is amongst the top four, at least in terms of OPS.
The Cubs tried...and failed, to obtain Furcal. So, there is your assignment...go try to pry Rollins from the Phillies, Renteria from the Braves or one of the rookies from their respective teams. Good luck.
by jazzman56 on Oct 28, 2006 12:08 AM CDT up reply actions
You're proving my point
He's essentially Ricky Gutierrez. I don't remember Gutierrez being the glue to the Cubs team. But he wasn't all that scrappy.
by gravedigger on Oct 28, 2006 12:43 AM CDT up reply actions
By the way
2006:
EQA: .251 (21st among all SS)
WARP1: 2.5
VORP: 9.2
They point out that that 9.2 VORP is 217th in MLB.
By the way, check them out, as they have some great Ecktacular posts over there tonight.
by gravedigger on Oct 28, 2006 12:47 AM CDT up reply actions
Sure, Mr. Stats
He IS one piece of a championship puzzle that obviously requires more, but his intangibles benefit those around him. Sure his statistics do not say he is the top SS, but again, he is a winner.
I'm not exactly Mr. Stats
I don't mean to be snarky. Its just that it is hard for me to buy into the 'intangibles' argument.
No offense
For as much as I like DLee, he is a pretty quiet guy. ARam is too. I think Barrett tries. There were no guys on the last couple teams to spur the others on to greater things. In '03, Prior and Wood did it.
Whether we can measure them or not, there are those things out there that make a winner. Unfortunately, I think our men at the top have a bad eye for finding those things. Hopefully, Uncle Lou can...for all our sakes.
I agree with you..
I know the stat people hate things that can't be measured in a spreadsheet. But they exist. If they didn't, the Cardinals wouldn't have won.
bullroar.
the Cards have a vet team that had been there before, and they used that to their advantage. Detroit looked like a deer caught in the headlights. And while that might have been expected due to their youth, Leyland had a horrible series- a "maybe it's time to retire" kinda series.
by Matt Allison on Oct 28, 2006 8:14 AM CDT up reply actions
Well, I think that
Look, the Yankees supposedly have the most fractious clubhouse around, yet they make it to the post season every year. It's because their management spends money and acquires good players.
David Eckstein's intangibles would have meant nothing if any of the central division clubs bothered trying to put together a decent club this year.
THAT SAID - I do believe that leadership can provide direction for a team with talent. But I don't equate being small and scrappy with being a team leader. Maybe Eckstein is, but that's not what you typically hear. You hear that he's tiny and gritty. Whatever that means.
Here's two more guys that have "won"
Please
Curtis had a grand total of 6 ABs in his one and only WS appearance.
Sprague went 1-15 in one World Series and only had 2 ABs in the other.
Eckstein was 9-29 in his 1st World Series and won the MVP award in his second.
This is no comparison to be drawn here.
by jazzman56 on Oct 28, 2006 2:16 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm talking about the season
The only thing we can hope for....
by PriorandAramisfan23 on Oct 27, 2006 8:26 PM CDT reply actions
The only comment
WHERE THE HECK IS GLOBAL WARMING WHEN YOU NEED IT??
by jazzman56 on Oct 27, 2006 8:54 PM CDT reply actions
Whoa
Cherish it, Tim, it is unlikely to happen again anytime soon.
First the White Sox
God must really hate us Cub fans.
They do!
I hate the Cardinals. What is wrong with Jeff Weaver? Isn't he supposed to be a bad pitcher? He did not have a good season, but maybe he got hot towards the end.
Isn't that the pits...
Looking on the bright side, maybe back-to-back championships by the Sox and Cards will motivate J.H. to do something more than spend payroll on Neifi Perez, Glendon Rusch, John Mabry and Jacque Jones this offseason. Don't get me wrong, Jones played better than expected this year, but we could have done a lot better in right field.
In fact, if I remember correctly, Pat Gillick wanted Mark Prior and some change for Bobby Abreu last offseason. Hmmm...
by Mark H @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Oct 27, 2006 11:41 PM CDT up reply actions
Ugh. Buck just said it
That's even worse.
I'm no
But, I would think you guys would have gotten over it by now. This is 10th time the Cardinals have been in the WS since the last time the Cubs were in one. And, if the Cardinals go on to win, it will be their 9th Championship since the last time the Cubs won one.
If this so-called rivalry were a boxing match, they would have stopped it already.
by jazzman56 on Oct 27, 2006 9:49 PM CDT up reply actions
It takes me...
The Cardinals have won a lot, but that just makes me more jealous. They haven't won in my lifetime, and I wanted it to stay that way. Guess not. Oh well, I'll live.
by sparkles721 on Oct 27, 2006 10:09 PM CDT up reply actions
How can you not admire
What's not to like about that?
by jazzman56 on Oct 27, 2006 9:51 PM CDT up reply actions
Those are wonderful cliches...
But I also hate him because he HAS had a good series and has helped kill the Tigers' chances.
And he plays for the Cardinals.
by gravedigger on Oct 27, 2006 10:02 PM CDT up reply actions
Here's another cliche
by jazzman56 on Oct 27, 2006 10:10 PM CDT up reply actions
Well
by gravedigger on Oct 27, 2006 10:14 PM CDT up reply actions
Don't know
Well, now the little dude has two World Series rings.
by jazzman56 on Oct 27, 2006 10:33 PM CDT up reply actions
Here's one stat
But gaucho...
by gravedigger on Oct 27, 2006 11:20 PM CDT up reply actions
I know!
Drivin' off in that little yellow Corvette.
by Littlerock Rynofan on Oct 27, 2006 10:46 PM CDT up reply actions
Lamest. World. Series.
EVEN if you hate the Cardinals...
It will be good for the Cardinals to win this thing. Agree with a comment above regarding the White Sox and now Cardinals (probably) winning it- hopefully will give Hendry an even more sense of urgency. Yes the Cards will rub it in again and again, but if this Cardinal team can win the WS, it does give me more hope than I had for the Cubs to make some noise in 2007, provided they make some reasonable moves this offseason.
by LuisSalazar on Oct 27, 2006 10:19 PM CDT up reply actions
I've not enjoyed it
You both may be right, however, about Hendry, although I think the fact that his job is on the line may be all the impetus he needs to go out and make the right moves. Assuming he's capable.
by gravedigger on Oct 27, 2006 10:23 PM CDT up reply actions
I enjoyed it!
Detroit's pitchers were reminding me of the Cubs in 2003/2004 when they had a streak of lame fielding plays on pretty easy balls.
St. Louis is a great baseball city and to me it's great for baseball when a city with great fans gest to celebrate. Maybe we can do it in 2007? I hope so!
Also, that's awesome that a rookie closed those games out!
by DudeVf1 on Oct 28, 2006 1:05 AM CDT up reply actions
Cards
Nice to know
Did this series set any kind of record for errors per game?
Good job
Not only that...
by sparkles721 on Oct 27, 2006 10:37 PM CDT up reply actions
Its the Neifi factor.....
by PriorandAramisfan23 on Oct 27, 2006 10:34 PM CDT reply actions
Ha! Actually it's the DFA factor
Wilson, Weaver, Vizcaino.....
by LuisSalazar on Oct 27, 2006 10:37 PM CDT up reply actions
Me too.
by sparkles721 on Oct 27, 2006 10:39 PM CDT up reply actions
Kudos to you
by jazzman56 on Oct 27, 2006 10:42 PM CDT up reply actions
I bash
Thanks.
I'm jealous that I don't get the chance to say 'I don't care about anything else because my team just won the World Series.'
Hendry!!!!! Keep working because I'm dying for a championship!
I think I need to change my answer in your poll from today. I need to stop caring so much.
by sparkles721 on Oct 27, 2006 10:52 PM CDT up reply actions
Spring Training
Now the off-season begins and the rumors, speculation and wishful thinking that goes with it. In a lot of ways, the 2007 season starts tomorrow!
by jazzman56 on Oct 27, 2006 11:11 PM CDT up reply actions
Well Sparkles
By our team...
I HATE TONY LARUSSA AND ALBERT PUJOLS AND ADAM WAINRIGHT AND JEFF WEAVER AND ALL OF THOSE PEACHY CARDINAL FANS!!!!
WTF???
I can just see this off-season going to the gallows... Aram ain't comin back, Big-Z hurt, and a bunch of mediocre signings...
why do the baseball gods hate Cubs fans so much? The White Sox and now the Cardinals?
Of course!
by sparkles721 on Oct 27, 2006 10:55 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm not sick about the Cards winning......
by PriorandAramisfan23 on Oct 27, 2006 10:50 PM CDT reply actions
This is why you don't tank a season
Right
I also believe (as someone else mentioned) that the way they were humiliated by the Red Sox in 2004 and the heartbreak of 2005 made them really determined this year. The guys who were performed so poorly in 2004...Edmunds, Rolen, etc, were clutch this time around.
by jazzman56 on Oct 27, 2006 11:18 PM CDT up reply actions
WRONG !!!
The Cubs are an island of futility.
I was going back thinking about that time the Cubs were at .500 at the break and won the title
That's right, it's never happened.
Cub fans might want to wait until the Cubs actually win a title before comparing them to anyone, much less the Cards who have the second most titles in history.
Hey, but I might win the lottery.
Be realistic.
Sometimes I wonder...
You never have a single good thing to say about them.
Al
I refuse to compare this organization to any other until they actually do something on the field.
The romantic days of beer, ivy and sunshine and "wait till next year" ended for me a while back.
I want results.
Sorry I don't meet up to what your standards of a Cub fan should be.
And by the way, pick something out of that post that's up for argument.
I have no "standards"...
Bitching and complaining -- what fun is that?
Do it if you like, but don't be surprised if I don't respond. It gets tiresome.
Why would
This is a spot to leave opinions on the Cubs.
When the Cubs give me something not to "bitch and complain" about, let me know.
The "everything is beautiful" mindset of Cub fans is also "tiresome", but if they want to live in la-la land, that is their choice.
And by the way Al
by Peoria Matt on Oct 29, 2006 10:58 AM CST up reply actions
What does this organization.....
by PriorandAramisfan23 on Oct 28, 2006 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions
although i hate the cards
by LilLPLancer23 on Oct 27, 2006 11:47 PM CDT reply actions
The good news is..
The bad news is the winter (offseason) from hell is beginning.
by southernilcubfan on Oct 28, 2006 12:17 AM CDT reply actions
It's freezing over, baby!
(Now if that happens I'll have an operation if needed to be converted to a Cardinals fan.)
by DudeVf1 on Oct 28, 2006 1:11 AM CDT up reply actions
I DO NOT!!!
Make him his own player... or compare him to someone else. But NOT David Eckstein!!!
Why the Cards victory is good for the Cubs
peoria matt
I don't think...
As I have said before, isn't it sad that we, the fans, have to embarrass and do all this things to get the front office to do their jobs? We shouldn't have to do that.
by sparkles721 on Oct 28, 2006 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions
good call
Good points, CubsBall,
by Peoria Matt on Oct 30, 2006 12:12 AM CST up reply actions
Agreed...
Will they do it? We do not yet know. But on October 30, with not a single free agent signed yet, it is too early to give up on next year.
Sale of the Cubs
I'm guessing the reason they want to win next year is to up the going price.
The Cubs will have a new owner by 2008.
Eckstein's worth
In those, David Eckstein looks like a much better player.
You guys inspired me to do a post about this on my blog, so if you want to see my full take on it, here ya go: http://midwestsportsfan.blogspot.com/2006/10/leadoff-hitters.html

by 



















