Cubs For Sale?
Many of you have wondered when I'd weigh in on the possibility of Tribune Co. selling the Cubs, since there have been literally dozens of different rumors over the last few weeks and months about such a sale, during the ongoing drama of whether Tribco is going to be broken up, sold whole, or taken private, among many possibilities.
Why am I doing this now? you may ask. Part of it is because of articles in this morning's Tribune and Sun-Times detailing efforts by local groups to buy the team IF they are put up for sale, which appears to be an open question at this time.
Before I tell you more, a little story. In 1981 I was working part-time at WXRT as a stringer for Bruce Wolf, who was then the fulltime sportscaster for that station (you longtime 'XRT listeners will no doubt remember his "Athletes' Feats" segments on Terri Hemmert's morning show). I got wind of a group, very similar to the groups desiring to buy the Cubs now, that was about to make an offer, and I interviewed the investment banker representing that group.
Those people never had a chance once the team was actually put on the market by the Wrigleys; the sweetheart relationship that the Wrigleys and WGN radio and TV had had for more than thirty years trumped any chance that any "outside" buyer would have had.
Things are more complicated today, obviously, with the Cubs part of a corporate structure. Here's the most interesting part of that Tribune article:
Jim Anixter, the scion of a wealthy Chicago-area family, said he also approached Tribune Co. about buying the Cubs and has been rebuffed.
Anixter, president of A-Z Industries in Northbrook, has drafted a letter he intends to send to Eli Broad and Ron Burkle, the Los Angeles billionaires who have said they are interested in acquiring Tribune Co.
Anixter, 62, said his message is simple: "If you are successful in buying Tribune, we'd like you to spin off the Cubs to us."
That's a possibility, I suppose, but my feeling is that if Broad and Burkle do buy the entire company -- which they want primarily to restore the LA Times to LA-area ownership -- they'd keep the Cubs as a trophy property, perhaps installing a local, Chicago-area person as team president and CEO.
That'd be fine with me. There are those who have said I am a shill or an "employee" of Tribune Co. and that somehow, my "position" (whatever that is) would be threatened with a team sale. That's ridiculous, but some people have trouble with the truth. If the team is sold -- great. If it's not, and current management is willing to do what it takes to put a winner on the field -- that's great too.
Finally, one of the groups rumored to buy the team is headed, or fronted, by Playboy founder Hugh Hefner's daughter Christie, leading to certain types of inevitable junior-high jokes. That's all well and good, but actually, Christie Hefner is a savvy businesswoman who took her dad's floundering business and turned it around in short order. If her group did buy the team, and she were installed as managing general partner (something MLB would probably love, as there are very few women involved in baseball management), I think it'd be a positive development for the city and the team. Remember, you don't have to have billions to buy a sports franchise -- you only have to have the ability to raise multi-millions of dollars. Jerry Reinsdorf isn't the majority owner of the White Sox -- he's only the managing general partner of a syndicate involving thirteen different men (whose names you can see at the top of that linked page, and many of whom are the same people who are in the ownership group of the Chicago Bulls -- link opens .pdf file, scroll to page 7).
We await developments.
0 recs |
39 comments
Comments
Hey, Al,
As I've said before, I don't think anyone with a skill level above paper delivery guy should be working for a massive media conglomerate for what you say they pay you, but, to each his own.
by TR on Nov 17, 2006 9:32 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
What is it that you don't understand...
FWIW, they told me they're not doing the column any more. No big whoop.
by Al on Nov 17, 2006 9:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Off topic
by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Nov 17, 2006 9:42 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
It would be nice.....
by PriorandAramisfan23 on Nov 17, 2006 9:47 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Christie Hefner
by BlueMike on Nov 17, 2006 10:10 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Her politics...
The group she's associated with also has as a principal, her husband, William Marovitz, who has a long association with Chicago politics and business.
But I'd bet if that group did buy the Cubs, Christie would become the managing general partner, due to her name and visibility.
by Al on Nov 17, 2006 10:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Her politics, and her line of business
Full disclosure: I don't cheer "mens' magazines" overall influence on women in our society, but admire the business acumen Playboy's management has shown over the last decade in a certain way. If you think your retail or communications business was adversely affected by Internet competition, hooo boy!
(Not trying to tick anyone off, here.)
by zambranofan on Nov 17, 2006 11:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
by BlueMike on Nov 17, 2006 2:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
WXRT
As a fan of XRT back in the day (though not any more), I'm pretty sure it was Bob Verdi, not Bruce Wolf who did Athlete's Feats on XRT. Wasn't Wolf on the Loop back then?
John
by John916 on Nov 17, 2006 9:49 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
You don't go back far enough.
In fact, I was working for Bruce when he left 'XRT to get his first TV job, and applied for the fulltime position. XRT management hired Verdi because they wanted the "name" guy. Oh, well.
by Al on Nov 17, 2006 9:52 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
When exactly...
I seem to remember that it was in the mid-80's that he worked with Brandmeier at the Loop.
Thanks.
by cubsgirl2 on Nov 17, 2006 11:39 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Here...
by Al on Nov 17, 2006 12:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
$60 from the Evanston Review
But then. I'm a WGA member, so take everything I say with a militant grain of salt.
by TR on Nov 17, 2006 9:50 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
It does nothing of the sort.
I'm a union member too, as you well know. My writing is a completely separate thing from my TV business livelihood.
by Al on Nov 17, 2006 9:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sorry, but that's absurd, TR.
Al was not getting paid $60 to replace even a contributing reporter like John Kass, let alone a major newspaper reporter.
by jcub on Nov 17, 2006 4:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The quoted
While I'm sure major league baseball would like a woman owner (although the last one wasn't so great), I'm not sure Christie Hefner is what they're looking for. While you and I might be able to get past the junior-high jokes, I'm not sure the other 29 owners can. And there would be a certain resistance to her simply because of the industry in which she and her father made their money. I mean, it's okay if you made your fortune foreclosing on family farms wiped out by the Depression like Carl Pohlad did, but taking pictures of women's naughty parts is right out in some quarters.
What would really be interesting would be if David Geffen won the war to buy the Tribune over Broad and Burkle. Then we'd have the first openly gay owner of a baseball team and it would be interesting to see how baseball reacted to that. Unfortunately, Geffen would almost certainly sell the Cubs immediately--unlike Broad and Burkle, he's shown no interest in owning a sports franchise. I say unfortunately because his track record at Asylum Records, Geffen Records and DreamWorks indicates that he wouldn't run the franchise on the cheap. (Although it might be a case of another Gene Autry, who tried to run a ballclub like a movie studio to limited success.)
I'm about the only person who agrees with you that Broad and Burkle would keep the Cubs.
by Josh77 on Nov 17, 2006 10:23 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I'll have to disagree
if it came up that she had a chance to buy the team it would almost have to be approved, wouldn't want MLB to look like a Boy's Club after all, and once in it would either go really well, or really poorly, but I dout that it would be from problems with other owners
by flyball on Nov 17, 2006 10:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's
Well, they drove Marge Schott out of the game when she was the only woman owner and they weren't worried about appearing sexist.
Not that they didn't have a good reason to drive Marge out of the game, but many people in MLB will consider the nature of her business to be a good reason.
by Josh77 on Nov 17, 2006 11:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Patrick Ryan's group is the real top choice
They will be backed by Private Equity and a closed club of serious high net worth North Shore individuals, alot like Reinsdorf pulled off with the Bulls and Sox.
The biggest play will then be for the Cubs to work with the city to redevelop distressed and brown field land closer to Edens/JFK corridor,
(I personally think the junction triangle where old industrial land could be made available under an aggressive TIF), and where emminent domain now can be used for redevelopment. That will be interesting....)
The Cubs could rebuild Wrigley in a retro style while remaking the sky box and club box's for big money revenue, own the parking and other revenue generating aspects and then tear down and sell the Wrigley Field property for a major yuppie development.
This would be BIG BUCKS....BIG BIG BUCKS....
by Ivy Walls on Nov 17, 2006 10:38 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
A few comments
2)Part of what makes Wrigley what it is is the fact that it is in a neighborhood. While you could develop a neighborhood around the park like the Cardinals and Athletics. I have a feeling it wouldn't feel right.
- If they did choose to sell the land they could go the route that the Detroit Tigers are rumored to be going and one of the soccer clubs in England is going. The idea that both of those groups had was to tear down most of the stands and build condos and what ever else and then leave the field as a common park.
- Forgive my ignorance, but I am not entirely sure I know what area you are talking about when you say the "junction triangle."
by mike on Nov 17, 2006 12:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
there is no feeling in big money plays
Why would anyone with millions or billions in net worth want to buy a ballclub. Ego, they all have ego...money.
Wrigley Field is a great place, it is part of my youth when my father some 40 + years ago grabbed my hand someplace north of Waveland off of Clark and we walked aggressively through the street venders, cars and chaos to enter it for the first time, I rode buses down with him to go to Bear games where we sat in the old temporary bleachers and where I saw Sayers score 6 TD's in the rain and also saw him get hurt twice.
I watched many a Cub game from '68 to '73 and then I came back and watched Denier and Sandbury lead the Cubs to a game of the WS, I was there for both playoff games.
On and on, I even got to sit among the rarifieds on the dugout first row seats and entertain clients.
So don't give me the sentimental journey. Wrigley is great nostagia place but as far as money goes it has topped itself out.
When the Cubs are sold it will invite substantial changes, one being a new ball park and probably a new location close to public transportation (O'Hare line) and JFK.
The neighborhood will survive and possibly thrive, it does in the off season.
That is reality, I am just glad I was able to bring my children to the game, my son a Brewers fan at 7 dressed in regalia all Brew Crew and screaming for his team was first told by an old crotchety Cub fan to sit and shut up when I said he can cheer for his team, he turned to me in a Cub shirt and cap that I didn't do a good job raising my son, and I said neither did your father...
with that there was a beer tossed unfortunately my wife and neighboring fan got the wet, where by the ushers told the spirited fan to leave.
Wrigley is special and I am certain this summer now healthy and making a living again we will return and find a few tickets before a Gino's celebration.
But I suspect that by 2010 they will be breaking ground if the Cubs are sold.
by Ivy Walls on Nov 17, 2006 1:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
alright
by mike on Nov 17, 2006 2:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Boo.....
by PriorandAramisfan23 on Nov 17, 2006 3:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not too into soccer
by mike on Nov 17, 2006 6:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That is actually a great idea...for when they
The apartment/condo/park idea would preserve the field as "sacred ground," so to speak.
I lived in that neighborhood for three years. Trust me, on game days when you are not going to the game, you dread the crowds/mayhem...especially on weekend games.
As I told my buddies, who groaned when I moved west, "you get tired of coming home from work on Friday nights to someone peeing on your front lawn."
That neighborhood is growing like mad right now, and would be fine without the Field, much like Rogers Park or Albany Park are growing and expanding without a major attraction (other than transportation).
by jcub on Nov 17, 2006 4:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't
I agree with AL below that a wealthier buyer could buy out some of the rooftops, but I could see the area turn more into a Fenway like atmosphere with the stadium taking over parts of the stree on gameday to allow for more room.
by flyball on Nov 17, 2006 4:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
parts of the park are protected,
by mike on Nov 17, 2006 6:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
junction triangle is my description
Another interesting area is around Division and the JFK where the Metra has a station along with the CTA come close allowing for both suburban train customers from the north and northwest and CTA passengers along with the expressway.
That might be even a more interesting area close to a new area for nightlife development and easy access to the downtown and near north.
by Ivy Walls on Nov 17, 2006 1:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Much as you may think this...
Tribune Co. thought they might build a new stadium when they first bought the team, but quickly found this out. Any local buyer would realize the same thing.
There could be improvements made to WF such as more skyboxes, and perhaps even a Jumbotron (it could be put across the street in partnership with some of the rooftops -- or watch for a wealthy buyer offer to buy out all the rooftop owners).
But I don't see Wrigley Field gone. The new owners of the Red Sox, once gung-ho to replace Fenway Park, realized the value of Fenway to the franchise.
by Al on Nov 17, 2006 2:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
really Al?
by wicubfan on Nov 17, 2006 3:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It did, but...
I'd suspect any local owner would feel exactly the same way, particularly if they grew up a Cubs fan.
by Al on Nov 17, 2006 4:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Knowing the Anixters...
by Schwa on Nov 17, 2006 12:57 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
This is
by sue369 on Nov 17, 2006 2:10 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I would be very curious
by mike b on Nov 17, 2006 4:27 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Both things...
It was said in the last ten years that building a new ballpark would be the panacea for losing teams everywhere.
Try telling that to the folks in Pittsburgh, or Milwaukee.
Yes, the Tigers won. And they filled their ballpark. The new park was not a factor in them winning or not.
Wrigley Field is unique, and the following the Cubs have is unique in its way. There's room for both -- the wonderful old ballpark, updated to the 21st Century, AND a winning team within.
by Al on Nov 17, 2006 4:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
missed the point
if they promoted PNC and Miller as drunken beer gardens with a neighborhood to match, they would probably increase some business, but it would say more about their fanbase if they didn't, they aren't rewarding crap.
by mike b on Nov 17, 2006 5:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would follow them anywhere.
I'm sure a new park would take some people time to adjust, but if that drives all the bad people away that give us 'true blue' fans a bad reputation I'm not going to complain.
by sparkles721 on Nov 17, 2006 4:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Totally agree
by wicubfan on Nov 18, 2006 8:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















