Bleed Cubbie Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: BTB's Final Preseason NCAA Hoops Bracket

Cubs For Sale?

Many of you have wondered when I'd weigh in on the possibility of Tribune Co. selling the Cubs, since there have been literally dozens of different rumors over the last few weeks and months about such a sale, during the ongoing drama of whether Tribco is going to be broken up, sold whole, or taken private, among many possibilities.

Why am I doing this now? you may ask. Part of it is because of articles in this morning's Tribune and Sun-Times detailing efforts by local groups to buy the team IF they are put up for sale, which appears to be an open question at this time.

Before I tell you more, a little story. In 1981 I was working part-time at WXRT as a stringer for Bruce Wolf, who was then the fulltime sportscaster for that station (you longtime 'XRT listeners will no doubt remember his "Athletes' Feats" segments on Terri Hemmert's morning show). I got wind of a group, very similar to the groups desiring to buy the Cubs now, that was about to make an offer, and I interviewed the investment banker representing that group.

Those people never had a chance once the team was actually put on the market by the Wrigleys; the sweetheart relationship that the Wrigleys and WGN radio and TV had had for more than thirty years trumped any chance that any "outside" buyer would have had.

Things are more complicated today, obviously, with the Cubs part of a corporate structure. Here's the most interesting part of that Tribune article:

A source close to Tribune said the company is focused on offers for the whole company and is concerned that putting the Cubs up for sale separately would distract management from bigger issues.

Jim Anixter, the scion of a wealthy Chicago-area family, said he also approached Tribune Co. about buying the Cubs and has been rebuffed.

Anixter, president of A-Z Industries in Northbrook, has drafted a letter he intends to send to Eli Broad and Ron Burkle, the Los Angeles billionaires who have said they are interested in acquiring Tribune Co.

Anixter, 62, said his message is simple: "If you are successful in buying Tribune, we'd like you to spin off the Cubs to us."

That's a possibility, I suppose, but my feeling is that if Broad and Burkle do buy the entire company -- which they want primarily to restore the LA Times to LA-area ownership -- they'd keep the Cubs as a trophy property, perhaps installing a local, Chicago-area person as team president and CEO.

That'd be fine with me. There are those who have said I am a shill or an "employee" of Tribune Co. and that somehow, my "position" (whatever that is) would be threatened with a team sale. That's ridiculous, but some people have trouble with the truth. If the team is sold -- great. If it's not, and current management is willing to do what it takes to put a winner on the field -- that's great too.

Finally, one of the groups rumored to buy the team is headed, or fronted, by Playboy founder Hugh Hefner's daughter Christie, leading to certain types of inevitable junior-high jokes. That's all well and good, but actually, Christie Hefner is a savvy businesswoman who took her dad's floundering business and turned it around in short order. If her group did buy the team, and she were installed as managing general partner (something MLB would probably love, as there are very few women involved in baseball management), I think it'd be a positive development for the city and the team. Remember, you don't have to have billions to buy a sports franchise -- you only have to have the ability to raise multi-millions of dollars. Jerry Reinsdorf isn't the majority owner of the White Sox -- he's only the managing general partner of a syndicate involving thirteen different men (whose names you can see at the top of that linked page, and many of whom are the same people who are in the ownership group of the Chicago Bulls -- link opens .pdf file, scroll to page 7).

We await developments.

0 recs  |  Comment 39 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Hey, Al,
Maybe if everytime you wrote about the Trib you didn't add that "certain people" think you're a shill for the company, nobody would bring it up.  Try it next time.

As I've said before, I don't think anyone with a skill level above paper delivery guy should be working for a massive media conglomerate for what you say they pay you, but, to each his own.

by TR on Nov 17, 2006 9:32 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

What is it that you don't understand...
... about getting paid $60 for a freelance article?

FWIW, they told me they're not doing the column any more. No big whoop.

by Al on Nov 17, 2006 9:37 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Off topic
but since I'm at work, no time to do a diary, this will have to suffice f/MSNBC:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15751099/

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Nov 17, 2006 9:42 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

It would be nice.....
if Hef's daughter bought the Cubs. Maybe then we could have bunnies singing the 7th inning stretch.
RAMIREZ!

by PriorandAramisfan23 on Nov 17, 2006 9:47 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Christie Hefner
I've met the President and CEO of Playboy Enterprises a few times via business.  She is a bright and tough as nails leader who has personally lead an extreme makeover of the company her father nearly ran into the ground.  She also is an acquired taste.  You either like her or you hate her.  No middle ground.  Huge, huge liberal activist which doesn't exactly endear her to everybody.
Rommel, you magnificent bastard, I READ YOUR BOOK !!!

by BlueMike on Nov 17, 2006 10:10 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Her politics...
... have nothing to do with her business acumen, which as you point out is considerable.

The group she's associated with also has as a principal, her husband, William Marovitz, who has a long association with Chicago politics and business.

But I'd bet if that group did buy the Cubs, Christie would become the managing general partner, due to her name and visibility.

by Al on Nov 17, 2006 10:19 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Her politics, and her line of business
may not be popular with Bud Selig and other owners.  I have a difficult time seeing Ms. Hefner as a public, managing owner of a MLB team for that reason.  It doesn't do much for baseball's image to say "We don't have enough female ownership.  I know, let's get the gal that sells the pictures of the hot babes and throws those great Super Bowl parties!"

Full disclosure: I don't cheer "mens' magazines" overall influence on women in our society, but admire the business acumen Playboy's management has shown over the last decade in a certain way.  If you think your retail or communications business was adversely affected by Internet competition, hooo boy!

(Not trying to tick anyone off, here.)

The call of the Cub fan, c. 1893: "one long, ravaged, derisive yell...a cyclonic whoop!"

by zambranofan on Nov 17, 2006 11:11 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed
Bud Selig and the fraternity of baseball owners would never go for this.  Never.  Bud is in charge of membership for that fraternity.
Rommel, you magnificent bastard, I READ YOUR BOOK !!!

by BlueMike on Nov 17, 2006 2:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

WXRT
Hey Al,

As a fan of XRT back in the day (though not any more), I'm pretty sure it was Bob Verdi, not Bruce Wolf who did Athlete's Feats on XRT.  Wasn't Wolf on the Loop back then?

John

by John916 on Nov 17, 2006 9:49 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

You don't go back far enough.
Wolf was the ORIGINATOR of Athlete's Feats back in the 1970's.

In fact, I was working for Bruce when he left 'XRT to get his first TV job, and applied for the fulltime position. XRT management hired Verdi because they wanted the "name" guy. Oh, well.

by Al on Nov 17, 2006 9:52 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

When exactly...
did Wolf work at Fox? My memory is a little faulty but didn't he do mornings on the Loop and also work for Fox at the same time?

I seem to remember that it was in the mid-80's that he worked with Brandmeier at the Loop.

Thanks.

by cubsgirl2 on Nov 17, 2006 11:39 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Here...
... is Wolf's current bio -- it shows him starting at WLUP in 1982, which is correct. Before that he did "Athlete's Feats" at WXRT for five or six years. I worked for him for a few months in 1981 there. Somewhere I have audio tapes that prove this.

by Al on Nov 17, 2006 12:52 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

$60 from the Evanston Review
or New Times might be understandable.  But I would think even the Reader would pay more for the 300 words (or however many it was) you'd write for the Tribune Company.  Accepting chump change from a union-busting company that could easily have payed you five, ten or twenty times what they did, sets a bad precedent for other writers who might depend on freelance jobs for their livlihood.  

But then. I'm a WGA member, so take everything I say with a militant grain of salt.

by TR on Nov 17, 2006 9:50 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

It does nothing of the sort.
They pay what they pay. If a freelance writer wants to make a living doing such things, absolutely, they can go elsewhere. It sets no precedents of any kind.

I'm a union member too, as you well know. My writing is a completely separate thing from my TV business livelihood.

by Al on Nov 17, 2006 9:53 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm sorry, but that's absurd, TR.
Vineline is a tiny publication with a relatively low readership.  Wouldn't you think that its owners would pay writers relative to the mag's revenues, rather than based on Tribune Corp's revenues.

Al was not getting paid $60 to replace even a contributing reporter like John Kass, let alone a major newspaper reporter.

"My uncle says you've got a screw loose." -- "Your uncle molests collies."

by jcub on Nov 17, 2006 4:01 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The quoted
article is probably correct:  Selling the Cubs while trying to sell the whole corporation would be just make a messy situation even messier.  

While I'm sure major league baseball would like a woman owner (although the last one wasn't so great), I'm not sure Christie Hefner is what they're looking for.  While you and I might be able to get past the junior-high jokes, I'm not sure the other 29 owners can.  And there would be a certain resistance to her simply because of the industry in which she and her father made their money.  I mean, it's okay if you made your fortune foreclosing on family farms wiped out by the Depression like Carl Pohlad did, but taking pictures of women's naughty parts is right out in some quarters.

What would really be interesting would be if David Geffen won the war to buy the Tribune over Broad and Burkle.  Then we'd have the first openly gay owner of a baseball team and it would be interesting to see how baseball reacted to that.  Unfortunately, Geffen would almost certainly sell the Cubs immediately--unlike Broad and Burkle, he's shown no interest in owning a sports franchise.  I say unfortunately because his track record at Asylum Records, Geffen Records and DreamWorks indicates that he wouldn't run the franchise on the cheap.  (Although it might be a case of another Gene Autry, who tried to run a ballclub like a movie studio to limited success.)

I'm about the only person who agrees with you that Broad and Burkle would keep the Cubs.

A little song, a little dance. A little seltzer down your pants

by Josh77 on Nov 17, 2006 10:23 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I'll have to disagree
about Ms. Hefner, for a few reasons.

if it came up that she had a chance to buy the team it would almost have to be approved, wouldn't want MLB to look like a Boy's Club after all, and once in it would either go really well, or really poorly, but I dout that it would be from problems with other owners

SINATRO!!!! Its music to my ears.

by flyball on Nov 17, 2006 10:47 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

That's
only one reason--that MLB owners would be afraid of appearing sexist if they didn't approve Christie Hefner.

Well, they drove Marge Schott out of the game when she was the only woman owner and they weren't worried about appearing sexist.

Not that they didn't have a good reason to drive Marge out of the game, but many people in MLB will consider the nature of her business to be a good reason.

A little song, a little dance. A little seltzer down your pants

by Josh77 on Nov 17, 2006 11:11 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Patrick Ryan's group is the real top choice
Pat Ryan, Chairman of AON along with Andrew MCKenna, both who are minority holders of the Chicago Bears is whom I have been told who have the most likely shot at forming a majority ownership group to buy the Chicago Cubs....

They will be backed by Private Equity and a closed club of serious high net worth North Shore individuals, alot like Reinsdorf pulled off with the Bulls and Sox.

The biggest play will then be for the Cubs to work with the city to redevelop distressed and brown field land closer to Edens/JFK corridor,

(I personally think the junction triangle where old industrial land could be made available under an aggressive TIF), and where emminent domain now can be used for redevelopment.  That will be interesting....)

The Cubs could rebuild Wrigley in a retro style while remaking the sky box and club box's for big money revenue, own the parking and other revenue generating aspects and then tear down and sell the Wrigley Field property for a major yuppie development.

This would be BIG BUCKS....BIG BIG BUCKS....

Bill Veeck planted Ivy during 'The Depression', and over time the Ivy Walls has become the most distinct symbol of Wrigley Field.

by Ivy Walls on Nov 17, 2006 10:38 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

A few comments
1) I'd be curious as to what exactly would happen to the area around Wrigley if the ballpark were to be torn down. Though the ballpark isn't entirely responsible for the increase in property values in that area, part of the appeal of living in that area is the close proximity to Wrigley.

2)Part of what makes Wrigley what it is is the fact that it is in a neighborhood. While you could develop a neighborhood around the park like the Cardinals and Athletics. I have a feeling it wouldn't feel right.

  1. If they did choose to sell the land they could go the route that the Detroit Tigers are rumored to be going and one of the soccer clubs in England is going. The idea that both of those groups had was to tear down most of the stands and build condos and what ever else and then leave the field as a common park.
  2. Forgive my ignorance, but I am not entirely sure I know what area you are talking about when you say the "junction triangle."
AC 00 00 00 - BELIEVE

by mike on Nov 17, 2006 12:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

there is no feeling in big money plays
Just a dose of reality that I wanted to give you on this area of mindset.

Why would anyone with millions or billions in net worth want to buy a ballclub. Ego, they all have ego...money.

Wrigley Field is a great place, it is part of my youth when my father some 40 + years ago grabbed my hand someplace north of Waveland off of Clark and we walked aggressively through the street venders, cars and chaos to enter it for the first time, I rode buses down with him to go to Bear games where we sat in the old temporary bleachers and where I saw Sayers score 6 TD's in the rain and also saw him get hurt twice.

I watched many a Cub game from '68 to '73 and then I came back and watched Denier and Sandbury lead the Cubs to a game of the WS, I was there for both playoff games.

On and on, I even got to sit among the rarifieds on the dugout first row seats and entertain clients.

So don't give me the sentimental journey. Wrigley is great nostagia place but as far as money goes it has topped itself out.

When the Cubs are sold it will invite substantial changes, one being a new ball park and probably a new location close to public transportation (O'Hare line) and JFK.

The neighborhood will survive and possibly thrive, it does in the off season.

That is reality, I am just glad I was able to bring my children to the game, my son a Brewers fan at 7 dressed in regalia all Brew Crew and screaming for his team was first told by an old crotchety Cub fan to  sit and shut up when I said he can cheer for his team, he turned to me in a Cub shirt and cap that I didn't do a good job raising my son, and I said neither did your father...

with that there was a beer tossed unfortunately my wife and neighboring fan got the wet, where by the ushers told the spirited fan to leave.

Wrigley is special and I am certain this summer now healthy and making a living again we will return and find a few tickets before a Gino's celebration.

But I suspect that by 2010 they will be breaking ground if the Cubs are sold.

Bill Veeck planted Ivy during 'The Depression', and over time the Ivy Walls has become the most distinct symbol of Wrigley Field.

by Ivy Walls on Nov 17, 2006 1:32 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

alright
thanks for answering my questions. I understand that ballparks don't last forever and I am just grateful that I have been able to go to Wrigley Field, Soldier Field, and Chicago Stadium. I understand that things change and that's just the way it is. Incidentally, if anyone is curious in seeing an example of what I was talking about earlier (stadium turned condos/public park)I found the site. My image of a baseball park project like this is somewhat different, but that's the basic idea. http://www.thestadium-highbury.com/stadium_main.htm
AC 00 00 00 - BELIEVE

by mike on Nov 17, 2006 2:17 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Boo.....
to Arsenal. Manchester United all the way.
RAMIREZ!

by PriorandAramisfan23 on Nov 17, 2006 3:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not too into soccer
but after the World Cup I started looking at Premier League teams and thanks to an article I read at ESPN.com about one of their guys doing the same thing I stumbled upon the Newcastle United. Needless to say my bad vibes have spread across the pond and they are having a rough year. I can't really do much beyond check results online so it's not really much.
AC 00 00 00 - BELIEVE

by mike on Nov 17, 2006 6:37 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

That is actually a great idea...for when they
decide Wrigley can't be renovated or updated any more (I don't believe we're far off from that point--with the concrete falling and lack of luxury suites, they are spending money that could be put toward a new stadium).

The apartment/condo/park idea would preserve the field as "sacred ground," so to speak.

I lived in that neighborhood for three years.  Trust me, on game days when you are not going to the game, you dread the crowds/mayhem...especially on weekend games.

As I told my buddies, who groaned when I moved west, "you get tired of coming home from work on Friday nights to someone peeing on your front lawn."

That neighborhood is growing like mad right now, and would be fine without the Field, much like Rogers Park or Albany Park are growing and expanding without a major attraction (other than transportation).

"My uncle says you've got a screw loose." -- "Your uncle molests collies."

by jcub on Nov 17, 2006 4:13 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't
know what they particular lists its on, but Wrigley is definitely protected with historic building status, just tearing it down is not an option without jumping through some hoops

I agree with AL below that a wealthier buyer could buy out some of the rooftops, but I could see the area turn more into a Fenway like atmosphere with the stadium taking over parts of the stree on gameday to allow for more room.

SINATRO!!!! Its music to my ears.

by flyball on Nov 17, 2006 4:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

parts of the park are protected,
but not all of it. IIRC the outfield wall and the lower level are. I could be wrong though.
AC 00 00 00 - BELIEVE

by mike on Nov 17, 2006 6:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

junction triangle is my description
of the area that forms a triangle when the JFK and Edens come together.....there is body of land there that is industrial and to a degree I am told brown field...also east of there near Elston there is available brown fields and distressed industrial/commerical properties

Another interesting area is around Division and the JFK where the Metra has a station along with the CTA come close allowing for both suburban train customers from the north and northwest and CTA passengers along with the expressway.

That might be even a more interesting area close to a new area for nightlife development and easy access to the downtown and near north.

Bill Veeck planted Ivy during 'The Depression', and over time the Ivy Walls has become the most distinct symbol of Wrigley Field.

by Ivy Walls on Nov 17, 2006 1:48 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Much as you may think this...
... the fact is, that much of what makes the Cubs what they are, and as attractive to potential buyers as they are, is Wrigley Field.

Tribune Co. thought they might build a new stadium when they first bought the team, but quickly found this out. Any local buyer would realize the same thing.

There could be improvements made to WF such as more skyboxes, and perhaps even a Jumbotron (it could be put across the street in partnership with some of the rooftops -- or watch for a wealthy buyer offer to buy out all the rooftop owners).

But I don't see Wrigley Field gone. The new owners of the Red Sox, once gung-ho to replace Fenway Park, realized the value of Fenway to the franchise.

by Al on Nov 17, 2006 2:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

really Al?
I'm not saying you are wrong, but when the Trib bought the Cubs in 1981 the Cubs were struggling to put 10,000 fannies in the park. I recall, as I'm sure you do, the upper deck rountinely being closed due to lack of attendence. I thought Wrigley's revival really came about after the 1984 playoff and the Trib's renovations.
The Wisconsin Badgers. The best 1 loss team in the country.

by wicubfan on Nov 17, 2006 3:45 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It did, but...
... the Tribune began doing things to Wrigley Field right away, and attendance DID start going up in '82 and '83. They also, after pronouncements they might move, made a point of saying that they knew what Wrigley Field meant to the Cubs.

I'd suspect any local owner would feel exactly the same way, particularly if they grew up a Cubs fan.

by Al on Nov 17, 2006 4:11 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Knowing the Anixters...
It would be great if they were involved in the purchase of the Cubs.  Passionate guys with a true love for the Cubs (basically the complete opposite of current Cub ownership).  But I guess anyone owning the Cubs other than the Trib is a step up at this point...

by Schwa on Nov 17, 2006 12:57 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

This is
totally off topic but Bo Schembechler died today. He had just finished taping a show for the big game tomorrow.
Please, please, please keep Orange guy!!!!!!

by sue369 on Nov 17, 2006 2:10 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I would be very curious
to see if a new stadium was built how much of the "fanbase" would follow the team to it.  take away wrigley (more important the bar scene around wrigley) and they are basically the devil rays. I am sure there would be a lot of "I can't support them after leaving Wrigley" noble rhetoric, as oppossed to the more honest "if i am going to root for a team based on just baseball and not the "experience" I'm going to root for the one that's not a disaster."  Would be a great opportunity to see who actually bleeds the true blue cubbie blue blood.

by mike b on Nov 17, 2006 4:27 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Both things...
... are a factor in making baseball, and any team, what it is.

It was said in the last ten years that building a new ballpark would be the panacea for losing teams everywhere.

Try telling that to the folks in Pittsburgh, or Milwaukee.

Yes, the Tigers won. And they filled their ballpark. The new park was not a factor in them winning or not.

Wrigley Field is unique, and the following the Cubs have is unique in its way. There's room for both -- the wonderful old ballpark, updated to the 21st Century, AND a winning team within.

by Al on Nov 17, 2006 4:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

missed the point
the question was if there would be room for a new park and cub baseball. there's always room for winning baseball, no matter where it is, that queston doesn't need to be asked.

if they promoted PNC and Miller as drunken beer gardens with a neighborhood to match, they would probably increase some business, but it would say more about their fanbase if they didn't, they aren't rewarding crap.

by mike b on Nov 17, 2006 5:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I would follow them anywhere.
I bleed true cubbie blue blood.  You want a sample so you can examine it? :)

I'm sure a new park would take some people time to adjust, but if that drives all the bad people away that give us 'true blue' fans a bad reputation I'm not going to complain.

by sparkles721 on Nov 17, 2006 4:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Totally agree
I'm on record as saying they should build a new park. And this time, don't put a statue of an announcer outside. Build in in an area that won't dictate how many night games you can play. Build it with wider concourses, no poles, and more bathrooms. Make it retro classic. And if people won't go, thats fine. That's more beer for us!
The Wisconsin Badgers. The best 1 loss team in the country.

by wicubfan on Nov 18, 2006 8:28 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon
Start posting about the Cubs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

66103_small
The Ordinary Wizarding Levels of Milton Bradley & the 2009 Chicago Cubs
Chicagocubs1914_small
OT: Big-Ten, Vista-Demolition, Bad-News-Bears, Anything-Goes-on-a-Weekend Game Thread
Jake_fox_small
Cubs Should Go After Rich Hill
Chicagocubs1914_small
Last Out to First Pitch – The 2009-10 Offseason IT'S HAPPENING!!!??? Contest
Small
More From the Cubs in Winter Ball

Recent FanPosts

Small
JT20 Dynasty League
Dscn2381_small
The Only CF That Fits for 2010
Small
Bradley For Millwood?
Fukudome_bleachers_small
The Top 10 Cubs Games of 2009
Sandberg94home_small
An argument for Mike Cameron
P272649reg_small
OT: How will the Big Ten wind up and who goes where?
Small
Should we trade him, or should we not?
Madduxflag_small
Starlin Castro Vitters etc LIVE Sat night

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Gomez to drink your Brew, Hardy to eat your Twinkie
BP interviews Sam Fuld. Great read!
Who was the best MLB player born on your birthday?

Recent FanShots

Marlon Byrd to the Cubs??
Rumorville
Should Cubs pursue another lefty Cardinals CF
Job Opening with the Cubs
Cubs trying hard to trade Bradley
Victor Zambrano's mother kidnapped in Venezuela
Cubs GM Jim Hendry says Milton Bradley may be back in 2010, and called the outfielder's '09 season a "major hiccup"
Bradley 3 Way-Trade????
This ought to end any MB for Wells talk...
The incongruity of our perceptions and probabilities

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

It Is Only...

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

SPONSORS

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges

Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: Cubs Convention 2010
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: General 2009 Ticket Exchange
Yelloncard_small
Ticket Exchanges: September 29-October 4 Homestand

Managing Editor

Yelloncard_small Al

Editorial Cartoonist

Toonmike_small toonmike

Contributors

Dsc_0139_small holy mackerel

100px-boisehawkscaplogo_small Josh77

Small shawndgoldman