Seeking New Jacque Jones Trade Ideas
... because he's not going to the White Sox. They just re-signed Scott Podsednik.
Where else could we peddle Jacque? Cleveland?
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
55 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Jones
- Does he have a good spring?
- Does some team that hopes to contend have an important outfielder go down to injury in the Spring or early in the year?
- How much will the Cubs be willing to eat of the Jones salary.
Or we could talk about unrealistic options like trading Jones straight up for Adam Dunn or Jason Bay or straight up for Johann Santana (yeah.. that's a good one)
The Cubs shouldn't have to eat
Teams
SF Giants
LA Dodgers (in case they're not sold on letting Loney/Nomar man 1B AND a corner OF spot)
SD Padres
Pittsburgh
St Louis
Atlanta (if they didnt like a Langerhans/Diaz combo in LF)
Washington
Baltimore
Minnesota (need to replace Shannon Stewart in LF and dont seem to have much confidence in Kubel)
Texas
those are the teams that "could" be interested in Jones. His salary is reasonable as is his 2 yrs remaining on his contract, the question is how much we'd be asking for him in return
given he's our only LH bat and we're trying to win right away i'm guessing there's not many matches. For those dreaming of picking up young SP like Zach Duke, etc... those guys dont get traded anymore for veteran OF's
If Jones would be moved he could likely only net a "prospect" in return, not a major league ready player
people are forgetting how valued SP is in this market, a middle of the road OF doesnt have the same value as a middle of the road SP so though they're even in relative production they dont carry the same price tag because pitching is in such short supply
since we seem to be using an all or nothing right now mentality to running this team i dont see how they're going to be able to move Jacque for something that can help right now, unless they're packaging him with a prospect or with a solid bullpen arm (like Eyre or Howry... not average bullpen arms like Ohman or terribly inconsistent ones like Novoa)
so i dont see us moving him
i'm not a big Jacque Jones supporter but it seems his value to us (given our intentions for next season) are more than his value on the open market (given our needs, specifically SP)
if Soriano can play CF, Jones in RF and Murton in LF makes for a solid offense
it would be a circus defensively... but its not like we're not used to that
its interesting though to see a team that wasnt a few moves away trying to act like they are...
by DartmouthCubsFan on Dec 1, 2006 2:04 PM CST reply actions
"it would be a circus defensively..."
by Santos L Halper on Dec 1, 2006 2:27 PM CST up reply actions
San Fran
LA probably puts Kemp in RF and Washington has Kearns.
Jones can play left as well
by DartmouthCubsFan on Dec 1, 2006 2:39 PM CST up reply actions
Unfortunately
This Diary..
Couldn't the Giants use an Outfielder?
BTW Latoya signed with the Rockies today.
by escapegoat on Dec 1, 2006 2:26 PM CST reply actions
thats my point
He has a lot of value to mid market teams or teams trying to hold places for youngsters to develop because of his contract length and size
but those teams certainly arent dealing away starting pitching because its the most valued commodity in the market and the only way you can get good quickly is to develop your own
so people are going to throw out great young pitching from the giants like Cain, Linecum, Sanchez, Lowry etc... but the Giants aren't going to deal that away
most teams arent
so Jones value is really more that of some lower level prospects
which would be GREAT to acquire, but that doesnt seem to be Hendry's motivation because he wants to win now to save his job
therefore Jones is more valuable to the Cubs than he is on the market because they're trying to win right now
so he has to be moved in a big package where we also give up bullpen to land a SP (and likely overpay)
OR he has to be dealt with the intent we can fill his production through FA and take in the lower level prospect with a big ceiling
by DartmouthCubsFan on Dec 1, 2006 2:58 PM CST up reply actions
i somewhat disagree
so you package izturis, jones, and some mid level arms (marmol & ryu, for example) and you get vizquel, morris & lowry in return.
the cubs could then opt to keep lowry or make him the centerpiece of a deal for westbrook or jennings.
its awfully optimistic, but i dont think its totally impossible.
Lowry
how is that a bad contract?
he's a young player who's a valuable cheap commodity that has a career ERA just above 4 and is 26
your idea is pretty ludicrous, the giants arent dealing TWO starting pitchers for jacque jones and cesar izturis and a flaming bag of poop
who would their rotation be if they traded those two guys?
Linecum, Sanchez, Cain, ???, ???
thats a combined less than 35 major league starts
why would a team like that want jacque jones and izturis if they cant be competitive with the pitching
c'mon...
by DartmouthCubsFan on Dec 1, 2006 5:14 PM CST up reply actions
misread
morris isnt a bad contract either though, he makes about 7 million, which in this environment isnt bad at all and he only has 1 yr on it... and he was an adequate back of the rotation guy
its not like he was killing them 10-15, 1.35 WHIP, over 200 innings
by DartmouthCubsFan on Dec 1, 2006 5:16 PM CST up reply actions
c'mon...
is your ivy league ego that fragile?
will you get mad if i point out that matt morris is guaranteed a minimum of $22 million over 2 years, not about 7 million for one year? you are right though, noah lowry's contract is very reasonable.
well played.
fragile ego?
i'm just tired of hearing these ridiculous rumors spouted around here where we give up nothing or things we dont need and get in return really good young players
things that are "awfully optimistic" but essentially make zero sense
its just annoying
and you were correct on morris, i thought it was 2 yrs 14 with a team option on the 3rd, it was 3 yrs 27 with no option
morris isnt an albatross contract though
by DartmouthCubsFan on Dec 1, 2006 7:44 PM CST up reply actions
They have
Speaking of the Giants..
Here's a guy I really wanted the Cubs to go after. He would've been a nice bat and I'd been ok with Jones cuz he'd be batting around 7th where Jones would actually be a good 7 hitter.
Oh well.
I know the Giants just signed Winn, but he can't be too happy with the signing of Roberts. The Giants told Winn he'd be their CF and now it looks like he'll be playing RF.
How about a deal of Jones and Cedeno (where Vizquel can maybe be a good influence on Ronny, who idolizes Omar) for Winn?
by escapegoat on Dec 1, 2006 3:26 PM CST up reply actions
reply
...They just re-signed Ray Durham."
false.
ray durham is playing center field for the cubs.
Giants also...
Giants appear close to shaping up their 2007 season:
LF Bonds? (possibly Burrell)
CF Roberts
RF Winn
3B Aurilla
SS Vizquel
2B Durham
1B empty
C Molina
by escapegoat on Dec 1, 2006 4:04 PM CST up reply actions
what is that suppoesed to mean
by LilLPLancer23 on Dec 1, 2006 5:13 PM CST up reply actions
ME?
If you're talking about Tomas, I am assuming he's being facetious and that someone on this very board has suggested Durham for CF?
by escapegoat on Dec 1, 2006 5:37 PM CST up reply actions
yeah
once mroe
by Faith plus 1 on Dec 1, 2006 7:13 PM CST up reply actions
Didn't he also
We might have to hold on to him
by nextyearcub on Dec 1, 2006 2:38 PM CST reply actions
Dont give up.....
by BillHoldenFan on Dec 1, 2006 2:45 PM CST reply actions
What I'd like to see
We give them Jones and Izturis in return for M. Young. Install Young at SS, let The Riot play 2B and move DeRosa to RF.
That will limit the power production from RF, but that's coupled with a power surge from SS over Izturis.
Anyhow, that's my two cents.
by Scott @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Dec 1, 2006 3:18 PM CST reply actions
maybe
for two guys that almost make up his salary and dont come near his production
can we stop with these ridiculous ideas??
by DartmouthCubsFan on Dec 1, 2006 3:28 PM CST up reply actions
Well
Secondly, Young is in a contract year, so they might want to trade him and get something for him while they can.
Texas is losing everyone right now, including 2 of their everyday OFs. Jones, as has been pointed out, is signed to a contract that is very reasonable compared to what similar output is getting this offseason. Plus, we give them Izturis to replace Young.
I don't think it's likely, but I don't think it's ridiculous, either.
by Scott @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Dec 1, 2006 3:42 PM CST up reply actions
Not realistic?
A couple issues...
Beyond those two, the pickings are slim. The best of the rest among left handed outfielder include Luis Gonzalez, Cliff Floyd, Steve Finley, Kenny Lofton, Matt Stairs, Todd Hollandsworth, Michael Tucker, and Bernie Williams.
Are there any outfielders among that group that could out-produce Jones? Keep in mind that Jones does bring 25-home run power to the lineup, which is a pretty nice thing to have. If you add some power at SS somehow, Kenny Lofton may be a short term fix in CF with Soriano in RF and Murton in LF. That's not a very productive outfield though.
The bottom line is that among the left handed free agents outfielders, Jones is probably equal to or better than any of them.
2) Jones is due about $10 million (a little more actually) over the next two years. Carlos Lee signed for $100 million and Soriano for $136 million while utility players that have no business being starters have been signed to 3-year $13 and $14 milllion deals while back-up catchers have been signed to multi-year, multi-million deals.
Jones is CHEAP. Any number of teams out there would take on his contract of just 2 years/$11 million and then laugh at teams like Houston and Chicago for signing these ridiculous contracts. Teams like the Royals and Pirates...small market teams would be thrilled to get a guy like Jones for 2-years and only $11 million in this market.
The idea that the Cubs would have to pay some of his salary is insane. The idea that he couldn't be traded is crazy. He's not going to bring much in return, but that's because he's not a very good player.
The same holds true for Ryan Dempster. He's due about the same money over the same 2 years and even small market teams would have interest in putting Dempster in their rotation as a number 3/4 starter and hope for the best. This is the market where you trade these guys, but unfortunately for the Cubs, they're so right handed I don't know how they trade Jones. They need to add a left-handed power bat to accompany Jones.
What they need to make this offense better than average is JD Drew or Barry Bonds, but apparently the world would come to disastrous end if that were to happen.
And for the record,
"some balance"
The bottom line is that among the left handed free agents outfielders, Jones is probably equal to or better than any of them.
I'm not so sure Jones is equal/better than the rest of the left handed OF's-that really depends on what you need.
As it stands now we have Soriano (35-40HR),DeRosa (8-15HR), Lee (35-40HR), Ramirez(30-35HR), Jones(20-25HR), Barrett(20-25HR), Murton(15-25HR), and Izturis. Looks like plenty of power.
Generally, with little exception, we have a lineup loaded with free-swingers, high K's, and suspect OBP at best- with Jones (albeit our only proven lefty) probably the worst of all. Each of the other regulars (with some question about Barrett) are all but guaranteed to be fixtures in the lineup the next few years. Thus, regardless if Jones is our token lefty or not, I do think it is time to move him now.....which would make renting Lofton in CF for a year an excellent compliment/'balancer'. I also think that given the rest of the lineup, the outfield does not have to be as productive as the 'traditional outfield'.
Jones was better than I had ever thought he'd be, and now is 'cheaper' than I certainly thought when we signed him. I'd guess he'd bring a little more than we think in a trade.
I'd love Drew.
The world doesn't end with Bonds but at the very least I doubt anyone on the Cubs coaching staff wants to hassle with him. At least Jones' legs will move him toward the balls hit to the OF.
by DudeVf1 on Dec 2, 2006 12:46 AM CST up reply actions
We'd need...
I just don't see a deal happening. We don't have enough left-handed bats in our lineup right now to lose JJones....plus, where do we find a replacement outfielder? And don't say Pie (who may or may not be ready....this is a win-now-or-very-soon team, so don't count too much on the young guys, beyond perhaps Murton)....
JJones stays, but probably moves to CF (where his weak arm doesn't hurt as much, and allowing Soriano to play a range-wise easier RF but use his strong arm). Murton stays in LF (perhaps in some sort of platoon if we sign Floyd as a left-handed bat).
On the other hand, if we can convert JJones into a quality SP (I'm thinking solid #3 or higher), then do it and take a risk on the Pie project and Floyd....
And...
Completely agree
At least he is not Burnitz...
Yankees needs a health backup for Matsui
- Nationals need another corner guy unless Escobar or Logan become fulltime (don't think Restovich counts).
- Braves and Padres have outfield issues as well with Langerhans and Sledge.
the yankees
by DartmouthCubsFan on Dec 1, 2006 3:29 PM CST up reply actions
While I don't believe for a moment that Jaque
Nats are looking
According to Ken Rosenthal....
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/6226820
by PriorandAramisfan23 on Dec 1, 2006 3:38 PM CST reply actions
somebody
interesting
i don't see why we have to trade jones. maybe they don't think soriano can play center after all, and they want to keep murton. i do not at all like trading jones for lugo in the lienup. that would make the soriano signing a lot worse, imo.
I'm all for dealing Jones
The best case scenario I can come up with other than imagining a trade that brings a left handed outfielder would be to deal Jones for pitching, essentially selling him high in a sellers market, and then signing JD Drew away from the Sox. Drew ends up being an upgrade over Jones, we get pitching back in the deal and the only thing it costs us (besides Jones) is money.
I agree!
by Macy on Dec 1, 2006 9:11 PM CST up reply actions
Jacque Jones is an asset
Trading him is an idiotic idea. Unless of course he can land something very good in return.
by BlueMike on Dec 1, 2006 9:41 PM CST reply actions
Isn't that obvious?
Trading just about anyone unless you can land something 'good' in return is idiotic (unless in cases of players who are cancers to the team or are draining you financially- Sosa for example). Trading Jones at this time is anything but idiotic for many reasons listed above. Being Lefty and 'cheap' does not and should not make Mr. Jones untouchable this offseason....complimenting the current lineup should take precedent here.
I don't agree.
Trade him if you can get something of value in return.
Al,
by Macy on Dec 2, 2006 1:50 PM CST up reply actions

by 


















