Homework
Mark is off school this week for his spring break.
Not wanting him to get out of the habit of doing homework, I gave him an assignment last night.
Since I had to go to sleep to get up for work and thus would not be able to see most of last night's game, I asked him to stay up and watch the game, then email me a game summary that I could post as this morning's game post.
Thus, I present Mark's game summary of the Cubs' 2-1 loss to the Dodgers, exactly as he wrote it. I think he nailed it, from what I've read about the game.
Just a few other notes from me:
- The stolen base by Aramis Ramirez was his 10th career steal, and his first since August 29, 2003.
- Had the Cubs won the game, they would have been .500 lifetime vs. Dodgers since the Dodger franchise was created in Brooklyn in 1890 (now 1002-1004). So, even with a win tonight, they'll have to wait till LA's visit to Wrigley Field in September to even-up.
- Silly note from last night in the major leagues: for the first time ever, seven Venezuelan pitchers started on the same day: Tony Armas Jr., Nationals (W), Gustavo Chacin, Blue Jays(W), Carlos Silva, Twins (L), Kelvim Escobar, Angels (W - faced Silva), Carlos Zambrano, Cubs (ND), Victor Zambrano, Mets (L), Felix Hernandez, Mariners (L) -- a record of 3-3, with one no-decision.
Meanwhile, the vaunted Cardinals lost big to the Pirates 12-3, despite Albert Pujols' 10th home run of the season. That tied Mark McGwire's 1998 Cardinals team record for HR in April. The major league record for HR in April is 13.
In today's Tribune, Dusty Baker calls on the Cubs to sign Greg Maddux to an extension:
Finally, WGN had a really, really bad night for TV production values. Whoever was in charge of checking their graphics did an absolutely terrible job. First, the umpire graphic misspelled John Hirschbeck's name as "Hershbeck". This really isn't excusable; the folks who do this stuff have reams of information in front of them, and really ought to get something like this right. But what was even worse was this: on each player stat graphic, it said "LAST SEASON" next to the current season's stats.
Obviously, this was a template made when the season started because at that point, they were using last season's numbers. Someone should have checked to have this changed.
As someone who works in the business, I wouldn't have allowed stuff like that on the air.
46 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
And if you stayed all the way through ...
Now I'm all for calling the Cards a bunch of girls (no offense to the lovely women who post here), but that just added to WGN's production failures of the night.
by nextyearcub on Apr 19, 2006 9:13 AM CDT reply actions
Arne Harris(sp?) retired right,
by Will71081 @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Apr 19, 2006 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions
Arnie...
The guy who writes/checks graphics might have been a sub or someone from LA.
by stadiumguru on Apr 19, 2006 10:36 AM CDT up reply actions
Regardless...
And if that person didn't, why are they working in that part of the business?
I agree
by stadiumguru on Apr 19, 2006 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions
None taken!
Baseball Tonight's having trouble, too
For example, it would say:
W: Maddux (0-0)
L: Tomko (0-0)
S: Dempster (0)
Not okay, guys.
by Tom @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Apr 19, 2006 9:25 AM CDT reply actions
Maybe Al can comment on this ...
A few years ago, you might have been able to make somewhat of a living doing graphics in the production truck as someone just starting out in the business, hoping to move on up in responsibility. Not that you made good money for a long time doing this, but at least you made an acceptable wage for a while while they tested your mettle.
Nowadays, in the interest of controlling costs, you pay a part-time person $6 an hour to do this, or worse, get an unpaid intern to do it, with the thought that no one is really paying too close attention to things like the spelling of umpires' names and the use of last season's stats as late as April 19.
Ultimately, you get what you pay for.
Am I close, Al?
Nice job Mark but you forgot to point out 5 BB by
Speaking of Barrett, I can't remember the last time he tagged someone out at home. He seems very skittish on these types of plays.
Too many walks for Z
Lofton...
I find it weird
by cubbiejulie on Apr 19, 2006 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions
Agreed
by Kinky Reggae on Apr 19, 2006 10:40 AM CDT up reply actions
Absolutely
by jazzman56 on Apr 19, 2006 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions
About last night...
- On the Lofton steal Barrett really had no chance. Lofton had gone back to 1st the pitch b4 that, and Brenly was just talking about how sometimes a runner will do that to fake out the pitcher then go on the first move the next pitch. That's EXACTLY what happened, as Lofton took off as soon as Ohman lifted his leg and it wasn't even close. The throw from Barret wasn't perfect, but it was strong.
- The REAL issue was Lofton being on at all. Ohman had him down 0-2 (I think) and threw 3 straight breaking balls. No reason to do this. Lofton has never had any pop and he sure wouldn't have gotten one out last night.
- Ohman was in there b/c he faced 4 straight Lefties/Switch-hitters. He was doing fine till the Lofton walk. Drew is a good hitter, and Ohman set himself up for failure there.
- Neifi is one helluva fielder. Seeing how smooth he is in the field amplifies that Cedeno has some work to do. I think Ronnie will be good, he just needs lots and lots of reps. Hopefully he's taking xtra every day and picking Neifi's brain.
by BCurt10 on Apr 19, 2006 10:01 AM CDT reply actions
agree
by mike bornemann @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Apr 19, 2006 10:14 AM CDT up reply actions
Barrett
Actually, from what I saw a good throw gets Lofton there. He's not nearly as fast as he used to be. Barrett's throw bounced between the mound and second.
At this point, I just consider Barrett to be a poor man's Piazza. Not going to throw guys out or block every ball in the dirt. He seems reluctant to block the plate also. You just have to hope he drives in more runs than he gives up.
I agree that Ohman's real mistake was walking Lofton w/ 2 outs to begin with. Make the old man hit!
Agree about Perez. Can't figure out all the hate that goes his way from some fans.
by salparadise23 on Apr 19, 2006 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions
Neifi & Barrett
Neifi, I think, is a very valuable member of the team. He is a leader on the field, is extemely good w/ the leather, plays hard all the time, and can occasionally get hot at the plate. I would be shocked if Neifi doesn't end up coaching or managing when his playing days are over. You'll see him at the mound during every visit by the manager/pitching-coach and, as mentioned by others, can be usefull to calm a pitcher down.
Of course, all this comes w/ the given that he needs to be used as a back-up/utility guy, and even then he should be batting 8th. If he is not mis-used (I know, fat chance) then he is tremendously valuable.
by BCurt10 on Apr 19, 2006 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions
Lofton...
by jolietconvict on Apr 19, 2006 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions
it figures
by dholl @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Apr 19, 2006 10:28 AM CDT reply actions
OT but cool
Carry on without me and have a great day all!!
Contract talk will ANNOY Maddux
on a new contract for Maddux is EXACTLY the kind
of distraction he hates. Right up there with last year's
comment on retirement, Now every reporter will come
up and ask about NEXT year. He only wants to think
about THIS year. You can look at my diary post re
what I think of Maddux re-signing but he truly hates
this kind of thing being discussed in the media
and it is VERY unlikely he would negotiate until
the end of the season. He needs to see where the
Cubs are going because that WILL be the deciding
factor ( and lengh of contract). In the meantime
enjoy his pitching THIS year and things will work
themselves out
by jessica on Apr 19, 2006 10:52 AM CDT reply actions
At the game...
Speaking of the bullpen, I was impressed with Eyre, but unimpressed with Howry and Ohman.
Overall, we beat ourselves by walking too many batters - Zambrano was all over the place, but as Al put it, he did appear more "settled" down, even if he worked extremely fast.
How come there has been no mention of Neifi's stellar defensive play in the 9th? Too bad he could not get the ball out of the IF, or hit his way out of a paper sack for that matter.
My question was, why did Dusty not have Neifi bunt with no one out and runners on 1st and 3rd? Mabry was coming up, and that could have put 2 in scoring position. Also, would have made for a nice squeeze play, although we know what Dusty thinks of those.
Lots of Cubs fans at Chavez Ravine though as usual, unfortunately I had to sit next to the big hispanic guy who thought he was funny by making South Side and White Sux references while also giving play by play out loud like the White Sux announcers. He LOUD! You can SHUT your mouth, YES!
Bunting...
Any thoughts?
by evillecubman on Apr 19, 2006 12:10 PM CDT up reply actions
Heir apparent
by shop girl on Apr 19, 2006 11:16 AM CDT reply actions
The Delayed Steal
In Barret's defense, pardon the pun,
barrett
seems like one of the "fundamental" things that doesn't get addressed when dusty is the manager.
i can't blame the bullpen for this game--not when aramis had a sosa-esque at bat with a man on third and one out in a tie game. man between the k in that outbat without ever taking a ball and standing there watching his long double the other day, i had to make sure i wasn't watching sammy in 2003 or 4.
you don't really think that
and take a look at bp's 2005 profile, which, in commenting on how much barrett has improved, suggested "it may be that he is one of those players who benefited from getting the good, mentoring half of Dusty Baker."
you are, of course, free to do what you like, but the more you watch the game without your anti-dusty blinders, the happier you will be and the less you will come across as your bcb nemesis' twin.
by DSZ on Apr 19, 2006 1:59 PM CDT up reply actions
Bad Ohman
Nonetheless, I must agree that Lofton stole the base on Ohman, not Barrett. Not discussed so far, though, is that Lofton may very well have scored from first on Drew's hit into the corner, had he not stolen. I thought that it was very possible.
He most...
by jolietconvict on Apr 19, 2006 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions
OT - Tim Hudson
Of course he did
OT - Chris Carpenter
Can anybody figure out why I bothered to post that here? ;)
lol
Atta kid.
by BCurt10 on Apr 19, 2006 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions
It didn't work
Cardinals 4, Pirates 0. Final.
Beware of the walk
But the bottom line is that the Cubs are last in the NL in walks. And the offense is going to sputter if they don't figure out the working the pitch counts thing. Even worse, about half of their walks were at bats where even the least patient hitter would have drawn a pass. Such as the Sunday night game vs. the Cardinals where Hancock and Izzy couldn't find the plate.
Last night was a big loss. The Cubs never seem to win the games you think are a slam dunk. I think they'll be lucky to return to Wrigley Field at 9-8 and a 4-5 road trip.
by cubz1963 on Apr 19, 2006 2:03 PM CDT reply actions
I just watched the reply of the SB...
- Lofton started the steal before Ohman came home. Ohman must have had some sort of "tell" in his motion that tipped Lofton off that he was going home with the pitch. He should have been picked off if Ohman had been paying attention
- The pitch was off-speed and inside, far from the ideal fast, outside pitch a catcher prefers when trying to throw a basestealer out
- A more accurate throw would not have gotten Lofton - Barrett's throw (which was rushed) did bounce a couple feet in front of 2nd base. However, Lofton was just getting to the bag when Barrett's throw skipped in the dirt. This means an accurate throw would have been late.
- Lofton never should have been on in the 1st place - Ohman's pitches to him missed the strike zone by a wide margin after he had him in an 0-2 hole. I'd much rather give Lofton something hittable with no one on than give J.D. Drew something hittable with Lofton on 1st (or 2nd).
- The game wininng single would have been a double if it didn't end the game - Drew laced a pitch Ohman left over the middle of the plate into the LF corner for an easy, stand up double... its just that the game was over once he set his foot on 1st. Without a strong RF arm, Lofton probably scores easily from 1st on that "single."
by Shawn Domagal-Goldman on Apr 19, 2006 4:19 PM CDT reply actions
bakers call to the pen
by dalehenderson on Apr 19, 2006 6:15 PM CDT reply actions
dont compare
"On the other hand, it must be noted that pitchers of that era were expected to complete their games; in consequence, they paced themselves throughout the game and seldom threw as many hard pitches in the early and middle innings as today's pitchers. There was also little danger of home runs being hit and a pitcher could frequently simply throw the pitch down the center of the plate and let the batter hit the ball in play. These circumstances enabled the better pitchers of the day to put up astronomical totals (by modern standards) of complete games and innings pitched and of games won."
-wikipedia

by 


















