Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook

Homework

Mark is off school this week for his spring break.

Not wanting him to get out of the habit of doing homework, I gave him an assignment last night.

Since I had to go to sleep to get up for work and thus would not be able to see most of last night's game, I asked him to stay up and watch the game, then email me a game summary that I could post as this morning's game post.

Thus, I present Mark's game summary of the Cubs' 2-1 loss to the Dodgers, exactly as he wrote it. I think he nailed it, from what I've read about the game.

Good Game.  Zambrano was doing good his only downside was that he wasn't very efficient {too many pitches.}  The cubs are great ecspecially their bullpen and bench.  But in this game they had a couple good chances to score even though they missed.  Lowe had a great game just one bad inning. Hopefully they will win {im starting this in the ninth inning score is 1-1.} Weird thing is that i was looking at other games' scores and their scores seemed a lot higher than this game.  A lot of people say its too early to judge but the way the cubs are playing they look pretty good.  Cubs also have a much speedier team between lee and pierre, who bothe have over 4 SB's are great.  Too bad they lost and its all michael barrett's fault for not throwing out lofton just kidding!
He says he's kidding... but seriously, Kenny Lofton is going to be 39 years old next month. A competent major league defensive catcher ought to be able to throw him out, especially in the ninth inning of a tie game.

Just a few other notes from me:

  • The stolen base by Aramis Ramirez was his 10th career steal, and his first since August 29, 2003.
  • Had the Cubs won the game, they would have been .500 lifetime vs. Dodgers since the Dodger franchise was created in Brooklyn in 1890 (now 1002-1004). So, even with a win tonight, they'll have to wait till LA's visit to Wrigley Field in September to even-up.
  • Silly note from last night in the major leagues: for the first time ever, seven Venezuelan pitchers started on the same day: Tony Armas Jr., Nationals (W), Gustavo Chacin, Blue Jays(W), Carlos Silva, Twins (L), Kelvim Escobar, Angels (W - faced Silva), Carlos Zambrano, Cubs (ND), Victor Zambrano, Mets (L), Felix Hernandez, Mariners (L) -- a record of 3-3, with one no-decision.
Speaking of Z, he appears to be settling down a bit, allowing only one run -- though the five walks he allowed are a bit unsettling. His next start will be next Monday against the Marlins at Wrigley Field; that'll be a good chance for him to finally nail down that first win of the year.

Meanwhile, the vaunted Cardinals lost big to the Pirates 12-3, despite Albert Pujols' 10th home run of the season. That tied Mark McGwire's 1998 Cardinals team record for HR in April. The major league record for HR in April is 13.

In today's Tribune, Dusty Baker calls on the Cubs to sign Greg Maddux to an extension:

"At this point it's hard to imagine him not pitching forever," Baker said. "Who knows? Roger [Clemens] was [43] and had excellence, so who's to say?" With Maddux's sizzling start, is it a no-brainer the Cubs will be discussing a contract extension at the end of the season? "Or maybe before [the end]," Baker replied. "Who knows? It's kind of how he feels."
If Maddux wants to pitch next year, it ought to be in a Cub uniform. Period.

Finally, WGN had a really, really bad night for TV production values. Whoever was in charge of checking their graphics did an absolutely terrible job. First, the umpire graphic misspelled John Hirschbeck's name as "Hershbeck". This really isn't excusable; the folks who do this stuff have reams of information in front of them, and really ought to get something like this right. But what was even worse was this: on each player stat graphic, it said "LAST SEASON" next to the current season's stats.

Obviously, this was a template made when the season started because at that point, they were using last season's numbers. Someone should have checked to have this changed.

As someone who works in the business, I wouldn't have allowed stuff like that on the air.

Comment 46 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

And if you stayed all the way through ...
The game, for WGN's next telecast, it had "Chicago Cubs vs. St. Louise Cardinals" with the pitching matchups.

Now I'm all for calling the Cards a bunch of girls (no offense to the lovely women who post here), but that just added to WGN's production failures of the night.

Poppppppppped it up...

by nextyearcub on Apr 19, 2006 9:13 AM CDT reply actions  

Arne Harris(sp?) retired right,
I never remember his crew having any trouble under his direction.
"You know what God told the cubs. Don't do anything until I get back!" Pete Rose

by Will71081 @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Apr 19, 2006 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Arnie...
...passed away the evening before the final game of the 2001 season.
The guy who writes/checks graphics might have been a sub or someone from LA.

by stadiumguru on Apr 19, 2006 10:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

Regardless...
... all of the things mentioned here should have been known by ANYONE who knows either baseball or television.

And if that person didn't, why are they working in that part of the business?

by Al Yellon on Apr 19, 2006 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree
I am involved in video production and misspelled graphics are not good, especially when you are reading of a script

by stadiumguru on Apr 19, 2006 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

i saw it too
st. louise, that is ...
HaHa! Na, you're all right! -- Flexo

by kjk on Apr 19, 2006 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

None taken!
I advocate employing Arnold as a guest singer and calling them a bunch of girly men... as I have previously mentioned my distaste for Pujols impeccably groomed facial hair.
she

by Sarah Hope on Apr 19, 2006 9:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

Baseball Tonight's having trouble, too
I haven't seen it the last few nights, but even as late as this weekend, in every score summary, all the pitchers' records were 0-0.
For example, it would say:
W: Maddux (0-0)
L: Tomko (0-0)
S: Dempster (0)

Not okay, guys.

"Respect the game above all else." - Ryne Sandberg, July 31, 2005, Cooperstown, NY

by Tom @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Apr 19, 2006 9:25 AM CDT reply actions  

Maybe Al can comment on this ...
But I think it's related to an ongoing issue with American business to push costs down as far as possible to maximize profits, i.e., paychecks and bonuses for the guys (and I do mean guys) at the top.

A few years ago, you might have been able to make somewhat of a living doing graphics in the production truck as someone just starting out in the business, hoping to move on up in responsibility.  Not that you made good money for a long time doing this, but at least you made an acceptable wage for a while while they tested your mettle.

Nowadays, in the interest of controlling costs, you pay a part-time person $6 an hour to do this, or worse, get an unpaid intern to do it, with the thought that no one is really paying too close attention to things like the spelling of umpires' names and the use of last season's stats as late as April 19.

Ultimately, you get what you pay for.

Am I close, Al?

by chasfh on Apr 20, 2006 8:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

Nice job Mark but you forgot to point out 5 BB by
Zambrano although they did not hurt him.  Way too many walks for him.

Speaking of Barrett, I can't remember the last time he tagged someone out at home.  He seems very skittish on these types of plays.

by SonnyJ9 on Apr 19, 2006 9:27 AM CDT reply actions  

Too many walks for Z
The walks didn't kill the team but if he isn't walking so many people he'll use fewer pitches and maybe go another inning in that game.  That might have negated the need to use Ohman in that situation, and possibly allowing us to get the win.  I also don't think it would have been a bad idea for Dusty to let Eyre or Howry throw more than one inning considering that they haven't been used much lately and an off day coming up tomorrow.  I'd like to think that in a close or tie game our best pitchers could be used for more than three outs.  I know we've got 7 in the pen now but some are clearly better than others.  That game was winnable and I don't think Ohman pitching in the 9th gives us the best shot at winning it.

by pageian on Apr 19, 2006 9:45 AM CDT reply actions  

Lofton...
...stole 22 bases and was only caught 3 times last year.  He can still steal on plenty of catchers.  He would've scored on Drew's hit no matter what.  The 9th innning is squarely on the shoulders of Will Ohman.

by jolietconvict on Apr 19, 2006 9:58 AM CDT reply actions  

I find it weird
to see Lofton batting 2nd these days. I'd love to know what skin care products he uses, if any. He still looks like he could be 25.
"Aw, how could he lose the ball in the sun, he's from Mexico!"--Harry Caray

by cubbiejulie on Apr 19, 2006 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed
Ohman and Dusty for reserving Williamson and/or Dempster who have way better in these situations.  Par for the course with Dusty...putting in a guy with a 23._ _ era instead of ANYONE else.
Anyone can have a bad century...

by Kinky Reggae on Apr 19, 2006 10:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Absolutely
The key to the whole inning is walking Lofton to begin with.  Santo said as much before it happened.  He said walking Lofton in that spot was like giving up a double.  And when Ball Four crossed the plate, Ron gave one of his patented long sighs.

by jazzman56 on Apr 19, 2006 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

About last night...
  • On the Lofton steal Barrett really had no chance.  Lofton had gone back to 1st the pitch b4 that, and Brenly was just talking about how sometimes a runner will do that to fake out the pitcher then go on the first move the next pitch.  That's EXACTLY what happened, as Lofton took off as soon as Ohman lifted his leg and it wasn't even close.  The throw from Barret wasn't perfect, but it was strong.
  • The REAL issue was Lofton being on at all.  Ohman had him down 0-2 (I think) and threw 3 straight breaking balls.  No reason to do this.  Lofton has never had any pop and he sure wouldn't have gotten one out last night.
  • Ohman was in there b/c he faced 4 straight Lefties/Switch-hitters.  He was doing fine till the Lofton walk.  Drew is a good hitter, and Ohman set himself up for failure there.
  • Neifi is one helluva fielder.  Seeing how smooth he is in the field amplifies that Cedeno has some work to do.  I think Ronnie will be good, he just needs lots and lots of reps.  Hopefully he's taking xtra every day and picking Neifi's brain.
"At the end of the day, don't tell me how rough the waters are... just get the ship into port." - Stoney

by BCurt10 on Apr 19, 2006 10:01 AM CDT reply actions  

agree
i was listening to the game last night, but the first thing pat said was that lofton stole the base on ohman, not barrett.

by mike bornemann @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Apr 19, 2006 10:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

Barrett

Actually, from what I saw a good throw gets Lofton there.  He's not nearly as fast as he used to be.  Barrett's throw bounced between the mound and second.

At this point, I just consider Barrett to be a poor man's Piazza.  Not going to throw guys out or block every ball in the dirt.  He seems reluctant to block the plate also.  You just have to hope he drives in more runs than he gives up.

I agree that Ohman's real mistake was walking Lofton w/ 2 outs to begin with.  Make the old man hit!

Agree about Perez.  Can't figure out all the hate that goes his way from some fans.

by salparadise23 on Apr 19, 2006 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

Neifi & Barrett
I am baffled by Barret's covering of home.  It's like no-one ever told him to block the plate.  Maybe he got ran over by his sister in a family softball game and has psychological issues.

Neifi, I think, is a very valuable member of the team.  He is a leader on the field, is extemely good w/ the leather, plays hard all the time, and can occasionally get hot at the plate.  I would be shocked if Neifi doesn't end up coaching or managing when his playing days are over.  You'll see him at the mound during every visit by the manager/pitching-coach and, as mentioned by others, can be usefull to calm a pitcher down.

Of course, all this comes w/ the given that he needs to be used as a back-up/utility guy, and even then he should be batting 8th.  If he is not mis-used (I know, fat chance) then he is tremendously valuable.

"At the end of the day, don't tell me how rough the waters are... just get the ship into port." - Stoney

by BCurt10 on Apr 19, 2006 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Lofton...
...is still an excellent base-stealer (22/25 last year).

by jolietconvict on Apr 19, 2006 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

it figures
that dusty would think maddux can pitch forever. that's the way he pitched prior, wood, nenn, and every other pitcher whose arm fell off under his watch.

by dholl @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Apr 19, 2006 10:28 AM CDT reply actions  

OT but cool
I'm off for the rest of the day to go watch Dontrelle Willis pitch.  I've never seen him in real life.  Just wanted to tell people who might care! Haha!

Carry on without me and have a great day all!!

she

by Sarah Hope on Apr 19, 2006 10:37 AM CDT reply actions  

Contract talk will ANNOY Maddux
I am sure Dusty meant well but speculating
on a new contract for Maddux is EXACTLY the kind
of distraction he hates. Right up there with last year's
comment on retirement, Now every reporter will come
up and ask about NEXT year. He only wants to think
about THIS year. You can look at my diary post re
what I think of Maddux re-signing but he truly hates
this kind of thing being discussed in the media
and it is VERY unlikely he would negotiate until
the end of the season. He needs to see where the
Cubs are going because that WILL be the deciding
factor ( and lengh of contract). In the meantime
enjoy his pitching THIS year and things will work
themselves out

by jessica on Apr 19, 2006 10:52 AM CDT reply actions  

At the game...
I was at the game last night, and we looked hapless at the plate - give the credit to Lowe and Saito, as they looked very good. Why do we not jump on some of these Japanese guys for the bullpen?

Speaking of the bullpen, I was impressed with Eyre, but unimpressed with Howry and Ohman.

Overall, we beat ourselves by walking too many batters - Zambrano was all over the place, but as Al put it, he did appear more "settled" down, even if he worked extremely fast.

How come there has been no mention of Neifi's stellar defensive play in the 9th? Too bad he could not get the ball out of the IF, or hit his way out of a paper sack for that matter.

My question was, why did Dusty not have Neifi bunt with no one out and runners on 1st and 3rd? Mabry was coming up, and that could have put 2 in scoring position. Also, would have made for a nice squeeze play, although we know what Dusty thinks of those.

Lots of Cubs fans at Chavez Ravine though as usual, unfortunately I had to sit next to the big hispanic guy who thought he was funny by making South Side and White Sux references while also giving play by play out loud like the White Sux announcers. He LOUD! You can SHUT your mouth, YES!

by airweino on Apr 19, 2006 11:14 AM CDT reply actions  

Bunting...
How hard is it to bunt against a sinker ball pitcher?  Seems like with the lack of hits and low run production last night, we might have been able to capitolize on our speed by bunting.

Any thoughts?

Languishing in Card Country.

by evillecubman on Apr 19, 2006 12:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Heir apparent
It looks like BCB is safe at least for one more generation. Great post by Mark!

by shop girl on Apr 19, 2006 11:16 AM CDT reply actions  

The Delayed Steal
Hey Al remember talking about this last week?  Once again they had a chance for it last night with Pierre and Lee on the corners.  With the way Lowe was throwing it was worth a try.  Even if the Dodgers don't fall for it and the catcher holds the ball you have at least taken away the DP.  I really think Pierre is the perfect player to try it with.  Who knows that may have been the key to the whole game.  Cubs score one more in the 7th and then Dempster comes in to pitch the ninth.  I sure would like to see them try it this season.
Madog93. There is only one good season of the year -- BASEBALL SEASON!

by madog93 on Apr 19, 2006 11:30 AM CDT reply actions  

In Barret's defense, pardon the pun,
I've seen him take hard hits by runners to the plate. He does have poor accuracy when throwing on steals, but more disturbing to me is how he has a tendency to drop the ball on plays to home.

by teacher tom on Apr 19, 2006 11:32 AM CDT reply actions  

barrett
not only USUALLY drops the throw to home, but he sets up three feet in front of home plate, so that IF he caught the ball he'd have to spin around to make the tag. he'll never tage anyone out at home unless wendell kim is coaching third for the other team. its so frustrating to watch.

seems like one of the "fundamental" things that doesn't get addressed when dusty is the manager.

i can't blame the bullpen for this game--not when aramis had a sosa-esque at bat with a man on third and one out in a tie game. man between the k in that outbat without ever taking a ball and standing there watching his long double the other day, i had to make sure i wasn't watching sammy in 2003 or 4.

by tomas21 on Apr 19, 2006 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

you don't really think that
barret is that bad do you?  the idea that any major league player "usually" drops the ball is just silly.  but not nearly as silly as any criticism of barrett that doesn't acknowledge that the converted third baseman has grown considerably as a defensive catcher over the past few years and i challenge you to find an informed observer who would disagree. in fact, it's been years since barrett was a bad catcher.  baseball prospectus, as one of many examples of those who would disagree with you, said in its 1999 profile that, given the recent switch to the catching position, "his solid defense there is quite impressive."

and take a look at bp's 2005 profile, which, in commenting on how much barrett has improved, suggested "it may be that he is one of those players who benefited from getting the good, mentoring half of Dusty Baker."

you are, of course, free to do what you like, but the more you watch the game without your anti-dusty blinders, the happier you will be and the less you will come across as your bcb nemesis' twin.  

All will be fixed in 2006

by DSZ on Apr 19, 2006 1:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

Bad Ohman
I commented to my wife when the Cubs brought Ohman in to pitch the ninth that this was the Dodgers' chance.  I then drew her attention to his 23.63 ERA.  She asked "That's bad, isn't it?" to which I responded "No, an ERA of 5.00 is bad.  23.63 is God awful."

Nonetheless, I must agree that Lofton stole the base on Ohman, not Barrett.  Not discussed so far, though, is that Lofton may very well have scored from first on Drew's hit into the corner, had he not stolen.  I thought that it was very possible.

by Lance on Apr 19, 2006 11:59 AM CDT reply actions  

He most...
...definitely would've scored.  The hit was well into the corner and Lofton would've been running on contact due to there being two outs.

by jolietconvict on Apr 19, 2006 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

OT - Tim Hudson
Tim Hudson is perfect through five innings vs the Mets at Shea Stadium this afternoon.
One day, the dream will come true.

by brianp88 on Apr 19, 2006 1:13 PM CDT reply actions  

Not any more...
... Castro singled in the last of the sixth.

by Al Yellon on Apr 19, 2006 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Of course he did
it was the first hitter he faced after my post.  I should know better.
One day, the dream will come true.

by brianp88 on Apr 19, 2006 1:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

OT - Chris Carpenter
is on his way to a complete game shut-out victory against the Pirates this afternoon.

Can anybody figure out why I bothered to post that here? ;)

One day, the dream will come true.

by brianp88 on Apr 19, 2006 1:23 PM CDT reply actions  

lol
Hoping to apply the same JINX you did to Hudson??

Atta kid.

"At the end of the day, don't tell me how rough the waters are... just get the ship into port." - Stoney

by BCurt10 on Apr 19, 2006 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Can't say
I didn't try...
One day, the dream will come true.

by brianp88 on Apr 19, 2006 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

It didn't work
Carpenter 8 scoreless, 2 hit, innings, and an uneventual ninth from Izzy.

Cardinals 4, Pirates 0.  Final.

by Lance on Apr 19, 2006 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Carpenter
keeps rolling along.  Gotta tip your hat to the guy.  He's been fantastic.  Glavine and Hudson are going at it pretty good today too.  Seems like a good day for pitchers.  
One day, the dream will come true.

by brianp88 on Apr 19, 2006 2:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Beware of the walk
There is a lot of optimism out there about the Cubs, and I'll agree the team speed and early bullpen work are encouraging.

But the bottom line is that the Cubs are last in the NL in walks. And the offense is going to sputter if they don't figure out the working the pitch counts thing. Even worse, about half of their walks were at bats where even the least patient hitter would have drawn a pass. Such as the Sunday night game vs. the Cardinals where Hancock and Izzy couldn't find the plate.

Last night was a big loss. The Cubs never seem to win the games you think are a slam dunk. I think they'll be lucky to return to Wrigley Field at 9-8 and a 4-5 road trip.

by cubz1963 on Apr 19, 2006 2:03 PM CDT reply actions  

I just watched the reply of the SB...
and the game winning run was NOT Barrett's fault.
  1. Lofton started the steal before Ohman came home. Ohman must have had some sort of "tell" in his motion that tipped Lofton off that he was going home with the pitch. He should have been picked off if Ohman had been paying attention
  2. The pitch was off-speed and inside, far from the ideal fast, outside pitch a catcher prefers when trying to throw a basestealer out
  3. A more accurate throw would not have gotten Lofton - Barrett's throw (which was rushed) did bounce a couple feet in front of 2nd base. However, Lofton was just getting to the bag when Barrett's throw skipped in the dirt. This means an accurate throw would have been late.
  4. Lofton never should have been on in the 1st place - Ohman's pitches to him missed the strike zone by a wide margin after he had him in an 0-2 hole. I'd much rather give Lofton something hittable with no one on than give J.D. Drew something hittable with Lofton on 1st (or 2nd).
  5. The game wininng single would have been a double if it didn't end the game - Drew laced a pitch Ohman left over the middle of the plate into the LF corner for an easy, stand up double... its just that the game was over once he set his foot on 1st. Without a strong RF arm, Lofton probably scores easily from 1st on that "single."
I'm not saying Barrett is god's gift to catching and i agree with Al that we shouldn't let near-39 year olds be stealing 2nd base in the 9th inning of a tie game. However, this particular stolen base was not due to Barrett's D. On the contrary, i think Barrett played admirably in the field last night, throwing out Bill Meuller by a wide margin (the ball was waiting for him) in the 2nd, making a couple nice stops when the Dodgers were threatening in the 8th, and deeking fellow catcher Navarro in that same 8th inning jam on the inning-ending strikeout pitch. (Barrett set up outside and high SLOOOWWLY and got Navarro looking there when the pitch was a filthy low, inside slider. Navarro's swing missed by a lot.)
The Cubs better shine 'fore twenty-oh-nine!

by Shawn Domagal-Goldman on Apr 19, 2006 4:19 PM CDT reply actions  

bakers call to the pen
I agree! anyone other than 0hman. what was he thinking (1-1). are not games in april just as important as games in sept.   But I can't blame dusty for pitching arms. wood's arm just isn't dependable for a starter and cy young had 749 complete games, how many 120 pitch games did he have? Finally, I'd start 39 year old Loften in a heart beat. Not that Barret needs backing but "thomas 21" would have barret getting run over on ever play at the plate.

by dalehenderson on Apr 19, 2006 6:15 PM CDT reply actions  

dont compare
Cy Young to modern pitchers -

"On the other hand, it must be noted that pitchers of that era were expected to complete their games; in consequence, they paced themselves throughout the game and seldom threw as many hard pitches in the early and middle innings as today's pitchers. There was also little danger of home runs being hit and a pitcher could frequently simply throw the pitch down the center of the plate and let the batter hit the ball in play. These circumstances enabled the better pitchers of the day to put up astronomical totals (by modern standards) of complete games and innings pitched and of games won."

-wikipedia

by cephyn on Apr 20, 2006 5:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bleed Cubbie Blue, the Chicago Cubs blog for the SB Nation, created on February 9, 2005 by Al Yellon

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Jazz Up Your Recs!
Img_0001_small
Value of Various Plate Approaches
284_small
Cubs' Fantasy Camp 2012 as seen by a Player's Wife
P7200073_small
Randy Hundley Fantasy Camp 2012

Recent FanPosts

Small
Arguably OT: Aussie Baseball Finals Go To Decisive Game Three
Small
New Cubs draft strategy player development
Jeffnewwork_small
What I Expect From The Cubs In 2012
Wrigley_scoreboard_small
What To Do With Alfonso Soriano
Small
A quick update from the 2012 concessions orientation
Caray_small
Is there any FA left worth going after?
Marvin_the_martian_small
Thoughts On Gerardo Concepcion: Trust The Scouts
Star_small
What if Hendry were still our GM instead of TheoJed?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Nice article about Ernie Banks
Yankees Hire Jim Hendry
Dale Sveum Meets Early Arrivals At Camp Buss

Recent FanShots

The Rickettsification of Wrigleyville has begun!
Marlins' Cespedes Offer 6 years, under $40M (MLBTR Link)
BCB Fantasy Baseball 2012
Former Cubs Blogger Interviewed on The Score
Cubs vs. Rangers In Las Vegas Tickets On Sale Monday 2/13
Hoyer driving to Spring Training with his dog
Hoyer-Soriano likely a Cub to start 2012, Garza extension talk a possibility
Law's Top 100 prospects
Ranking the Farm Systems
WGN Releases Season Schedule

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
How many games will the Cubs win in 2012?

  325 votes | Results

It Is Only...

It Is Only...

Cubs By The Numbers

Cubs By The Numbers is a history of the ballclub by uniform number, but the biographies help trace the history of our beloved team in a new way. For everyone who's a Cubs fan, anyone who ever wore the uniform is like family. Cubs By The Numbers reintroduces readers to some of their long-lost ancestors, even ones they think they already know.

Click here to order your copy, available now!

Recent Stories in Ticket Exchanges


Managing Editor

Alyellontoppscard_small Al Yellon

Front Page Contributors

Primary_fc_small Josh Timmers

Marvin_the_martian_small Shawn Domagal-Goldman

Other Contributors

Dsc_0139_small David Sameshima

Toonmike_small Mike Bojanowski