Hooray!
Our long national nightmare is over. -- Gerald R. Ford, on taking the Presidential oath of office, August 9, 1974.
OK, so last night's 8-1 Cub win over the Giants, snapping the 8-game losing streak, didn't quite have the impact of a Presidential resignation.
But it sure felt good, didn't it?
I'm going to keep this post fairly short, as there's a relatively quick turnaround to today's afternoon game. That could be a real positive thing, too, if the Cubs can win this afternoon -- that'd be two wins in less than 24 hours, and a chance to have that long plane ride back from California feeling good.
Eight runs. That is as many runs as the Cubs had scored in their previous four games. In fact, it's as many runs as they'd scored in their previous SIX games, because the two before the four mentioned were both shutouts.
Carlos Zambrano threw a very, very nice game for the second straight outing, and finally -- 33 games and eight starts into the season -- got his first win. I fell asleep again -- even though I didn't have to get up for work today, I have a hard time staying up late -- but did manage to see the called third strike he slipped past Barry Bonds in the fifth inning. (I also woke up right when the last out was being registered, so I could go to sleep knowing they'd won, and turn the TV off. This is NOT the first time this has happened.)
Not having the time or inclination to look this up, anyone know how many called third strikes Bonds has seen in the last few years? It can't be many -- since 2003 he's only struck out 115 times total, or about what Jacque Jones does every year.
Speaking of Jones -- hmmm. He homered and doubled and drove in four runs and if you look at his stat line this morning -- 25-for-93, four doubles, 6 HR, 15 RBI, 5 BB, 21 strikeouts -- those numbers are almost precisely Jones' career norms.
I'm not saying he's a good player -- he's not -- nor am I saying the Cubs should have spent $16 million on him -- they shouldn't; only saying that it appears they got exactly what they should have expected.
If Dusty Baker would just put a righthanded hitter out there during the times the Cubs face lefties, he'd become even more useful. Against righthanders (and the Cubs will be facing them throughout the San Diego and Washington series coming up, and also today with Jamey Wright), Jones is now hitting .320/.358/.613 -- that's All-Star level production. He is 1-for-18 vs. lefties with five strikeouts.
If WE know this, why is it that Dusty Baker doesn't know this?
If you didn't see the game, you missed hearing Juan Pierre being roundly booed on his first trip to the plate. Good. I hope the Cubs prevent Bonds from hitting ANY home runs during this series.
I guess the reason that Ryan Dempster was chosen to throw the 9th inning of an 8-1 blowout is because he had pitched only once in the previous nine days (Monday in San Diego). He threw only nine pitches, which means he should be fine if needed for a save situation today.
You feel pretty good this morning, right? Losing streaks always end. Eight-game streaks are no fun for anyone -- players, coaches, managers, or we the fans. It has been pointed out to me many times that teams that lose this many games in a row rarely, if ever, come back to make the playoffs.
I have responded, both privately and here, that there have been teams (notably, last year's Astros) that, while they never lost 8 in a row, did have tremendous losing for an extended period of time. Houston last year, for example, in their 15-30 start, had a seven-game losing streak and three separate six-game streaks.
Losing eight is just one more game. Statistically, yes, maybe teams that lose eight in a row don't make the playoffs.
But I shall repeat something here that my friend Dave, who has forgotten more baseball than I'll ever know, has said to me: "Just when you think you know everything about baseball, something happens that reminds you that you don't."
Words to live by. There are still 129 games remaining in this season. Keep the faith. There'll be an open game post sometime around lunchtime today.
164 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
We're back...
Now if only we can shut out Bonds one more game, and win it ofcourse, I think we'll be able to call this a successful series.
Finally we can resume playoff talk around here now
:-)
by peorianorthsidereport on May 11, 2006 9:12 AM CDT reply actions
Last night's win
Yeah, it felt GOOD.
by elscorcho0682 on May 11, 2006 9:14 AM CDT reply actions
It may have felt good
Thank god..
Baker named Worst manager Maxim mag.
So when do the Cubs read the writing on the wall and fire the Reverand Dusty B. Baker?
I defended DB for the last 2 1/2 years but I am at my wits end. His brand of managing isn't right with the current make up of this team. He looks like he's sleeping.
Enter Lou Pinella, just sitting here in Tampa looking for another sweet gig. Lou has managed a World Champion (Reds) not just taken a team there.
Lou's fire and passion would be a great fit for the Cubs and Chicago.
Would Hendry, Wood and Prior conspire to delay there coming back until after Baker is replaced? The case gets stronger the longer Wood and Prior don't come back. If they do come back and pitch well then DB gets and extention and we Cub fans live in the mess we have right now. I say fire DB now while we have a chance.
May 21.
Lou also managed
Then again, it's worth thinking about.
Orel for Pitching Coach.
by elscorcho0682 on May 11, 2006 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions
A needed change
Coddling and disciplinarians
I completely agree
There comes a point in time where the advice of a wise sage becomes the incoherent ramblings of a crazy man. Just sayin'.
by elscorcho0682 on May 11, 2006 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions
Al I don't
The reason the Cubs lost 8 straight...
You think a disclipinarian yelling at them is going to change that?
No
I agree with you...
I still don't see why you think getting a disciplinarian would get the team to start hitting.
Focus
Re
Baker just sits there. On the rare occasion he leaves the dugout, he might exchange a few words, but he never challenges them, and never uses the opportunity to try to spark his team. Unless, of course, it involves yelling at LaRussa. Maybe if we could just make all the umps into LaRussa clones, Baker would be more engaging. Of course, his ego would explode in the process.
Visit The Digital Gazette
Yes
by cubbiejulie on May 11, 2006 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions
I always
Either that or the "Dissing Your Dog: How to train your puppy with mockery and verbal humiliation"
Fussy eating habits..
"Oh, right, Margaret, you wanted prime rib. Here's the deal: The Palm wasn't taking reservations, and I didn't even try Morton's because I understand they have a new chef. So for now, let's just go with the Alpo, okay? I know it's not your first choice but keep in mind, you're a f--king dog! "
Bill James...
by jolietconvict on May 11, 2006 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions
argh, Bill James
by elscorcho0682 on May 11, 2006 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions
I remember that study...
I'll have to...
by jolietconvict on May 11, 2006 12:35 PM CDT up reply actions
and the results were?
A good example of a disciplinarian taking over...
Teams tend to go back and forth between players managers and disciplinarians.
Compared to Dusty
by cubbiejulie on May 11, 2006 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions
Heh heh
Mother T would be bustin' out the yardstick on every strikeout.
And I, for one, think a good dugout paddlin' is what this team needs.
by elscorcho0682 on May 11, 2006 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions
Actually, I did
by cubbiejulie on May 11, 2006 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions
Nice.
Simpsons reference? Anyone?
by elscorcho0682 on May 11, 2006 11:12 AM CDT up reply actions
No doubt about it
How about...
I think the disciplinarian effect DOES have a short-term effect.
You still need the players though, and I'm not sure if the Cubs have them or not.
Al, McKeon was known as a disciplinarian.
It is also the reason he wears out his welcome most places he manages. Reportedly, Marlins players could not stand him in 2004 and 2005. I heard similar stories about McKeon when he managed the Padres and Reds.
there's a school of management
i'm all for it. would love to see a crazy lou pinella in here.
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions
Agreed
Manuel replacing Bowa didn't work out so well at first, but now it doesn't look so bad. At least their little streak will help him keep his job a little longer.
Why is it, then...
<tongue firmly in cheek>
Also, I do not think the Cubs should ever be allowed to hire the former Tampa Bay manager until everyone here can spell his name right.
</tongue firmly in cheek>
It's
P I N I E L L A
The Dusty Years Jumped the Shark
NO LOU!!!!!!
Here is why I say no way to a guy like Lou. He would be our third straight "celebrity" manager. My biggest gripe with Baker, is whether he views himself as bigger than the team. With a guy like Baker, or Sweet Lou, as soon as things go sour you are stuck. Right now we are left to wonder whether Dusty really wants to manage the Cubs, or would rather be in SF or AZ or LA. Wouldn't there be the same questions with Lou, just change the team to NY? I want a manager who comes in and is committed to winning and winning with the Cubs, and views himself as part of the team/system.
My personal preference is towards the players manager type, but more important than that, I don't want a manager whose ego gets in the way of good managing. I am starting (reluctantly) to think that we might be seeing that with Dusty, and it wouldn't take long for the same thing to happen with Lou. I wish Girardi was available, but there are other guys like him out there that I would much rather have than Lou, keep him AWAY!
More no Lou!
If Baker goes, I want the Cubs to show some vision and give someone a chance who might be great. Chris Speier might be a good internal option who could be hired as a temporary guy as a "try-out". Please, NO LOU!!!!!!! Do we want him ditching us like he did Seattle?!?!?!?!
Another no Lou
by jc60625 on May 11, 2006 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions
no problem
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions
Ramirez
Agrred
by jc60625 on May 11, 2006 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions
Keep in mind..
No to Piniella
You want Piniella as the next Cub manager if you think Dusty Baker would be perfect if his players hated him. Most (although not all) of us think that Dusty's ability to get along with his players is his one strengths and not the only thing about him that we'd want to change.
Most Devil Rays fans thought less of Piniella by the time he left than we think of Dusty.
by Josh Timmers on May 11, 2006 12:10 PM CDT up reply actions
I don't want Pinella, either
by cubbiejulie on May 11, 2006 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions
that's very fair
i'm game.
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions
You're right Al
Lol
Sweet
by jolietconvict on May 11, 2006 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions
exactly
by mike bornemann @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on May 11, 2006 11:24 AM CDT up reply actions
If you don't look for the $20 dollar-bill
logic vs experience
however, there are limits to the power of rationality and possibility. in the end, what rules our lives is experience and probability -- and that's what i would advocate paying more attention to.
I'm not going to take any money out of the ATM because I know someone who found a 20-dollar bill on the ground once.
this is logically valid but probabilistically crazy.
so it hanging on for this team this year. the evidence strongly suggests that they're cooked.
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions
Sure but...
Let's say Prior, Wood, Miller and Lee come back, and let's say Guzman, Hill and (i dunno) Rusch aren't pitching for this team two months from now and Bynum isn't playing for it. How would you like our chances then?
What happens if the week after we sell off all of our tradeable parts Pujols hurts his back from the weight of carrying the Cardinals, Carpenters arm falls of, The Rocket finds some dignity and decides to retire and Berkman overslides second and breaks his leg on the left field wall at the juice box and we still end up losing the division because we gave up so early?
I'm tired of...
This isn't a spreadsheet we are rooting for.
It is a baseball team, filled with human beings who, believe it or not, don't always perform the way "probabilities" say they should. Neither do the other baseball teams against whom they compete.
Keep your nose in your stat sheets if you like. Doesn't sound like much fun to me.
Spreadsheet Team
You know what...
by jolietconvict on May 11, 2006 12:21 PM CDT up reply actions
Speaking for myself, at least
But writing this team off right now is just silly, and I honestly don't see why anyone without a shred of hope still bothers.
There's a phrase for people like that.
by elscorcho0682 on May 11, 2006 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions
i, for one, have plenty of hope
but why people would continue to waste time and resources on a lost cause is beyond me.
and why people in an age blessed by information would continue to live in willful ignorance of just what a deep, deep hole this club is in also mystifies me.
not wanting to believe they're in all probability out of it in may doesn't trump the reality of long experience.
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions
Fair enough
And the blessing of information is a curse in itself. For me (and this is me, personally), Adjusted ERAs, Win Shares, Runs Created, and all of that stuff may give me a better GM's eye, but I'm not a GM. I'm a fan. And those numbers and spreadsheets and calculators (for me) sucks all of the joy out of the game.
by elscorcho0682 on May 11, 2006 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions
perhaps i can ask
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 1:10 PM CDT up reply actions
No,
Do you need to analyze everything and reduce baseball to a grouping of numbers to enjoy it? Apparently. That's where we differ.
by elscorcho0682 on May 11, 2006 1:20 PM CDT up reply actions
lol
i submit that if i were you -- and yes, i am not :) -- i'd spend at least enough time examining why you like sport to get a cursory answer (though it is certainly a life's pursuit). you might be surprised at what you discover about yourself.
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions
I know exactly why...
I am not telling you what to do, Gaius. All I ask is that you not tell the rest of us how to follow and root for our favorite baseball team.
Do as you wish, but do not criticize others for their feelings. Frankly, those are none of your business.
again, all you seek
do you not see the dysfunction of that?
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions
Who said...
by jolietconvict on May 11, 2006 1:10 PM CDT up reply actions
exactly
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions
You know boys..
It's not what makes more sense. Because it shouldn't have to be a choice between the two. Why is it so inconceivable (shout out to the non-baseball thread) to have hope and plan for the future? I thought they went hand in hand.
What's more is that what is wrong with communing with fellow believers? Being a part of a greater collective heartbeat that is flowing and bleeding cubbie blue? John Donne said, "No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main." There's nothing wrong with optimism. There's nothing wrong with believing in the present and the future.
There's also a sweet simple pleasure in the things we do, not because they make sense, but because we simply want to. There's something magical about something you put your heart into and act deliberately and by choice - not by coercion of immediate necessity or what you may be told is the a rational ideal.
I personally believe that believing in something bigger than your understanding can explain is good for the soul. It helps you grow. But to give up - to refuse to grow - is to die.
And I'll get off my soapbox for the day so Jed can come and piss and moan.
i have no problem with optimism, sarah
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 1:29 PM CDT up reply actions
Oh no, friend.
Mature optimism is neither of those things. It is simply accepting setbacks with grace, and realizing that the circumstances are only what you make it.
You have the power to make the best out of the circumstances you are dealt. In no way does that imply that you give up. You can cloud this ability by maintaining a negative attitude, but why would you want to do that? It's fruitless. And you only bring others down in the process. And I know you are a better person than to want the worst for those around you.
Whether you feel it or not, your life - every life -touches other lives. Rich Mullins said, "Each of us warms the world or chills it inasmuch as we offer or withhold respect, hopitality, encouragement, etc. In that sense, we are all parts of each other's well-being or sickness - and we affect the climate that we all share"
Just keep in mind how you are affecting the climate your'e sharing with others and how there isn't much to be accomplished by a negative attitude.
we don't disagree
completely. but the first step has to be recognizing the circumstances.
i understand this year to be lost as far as winning something -- but i also understand this year now to be a great opportunity to make trades and play kids that will improve this club over the next few years. isn't that exactly making the best of these circumstances?
Whether you feel it or not, your life - every life -touches other lives.
would you please explain this to the poor souls here who feel that, whether or not they buy season tickets, it makes no difference to the cubs? :)
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 1:56 PM CDT up reply actions
Aside
You, Mr. Logic - of all people - should know that you simply can not foretell the future of this team this year. The games haven't been played, therefore, the outcome is still unknown. If you'd like to pay $1.99/minute to find out, go right ahead. And maybe we'll start considering your opinion on these matters as valid.
As far as buying season tickets, yes. Every contribution counts. But if you are eluding to the much-preached point that you should not give the team anymore money until they start following your demands, I will not. Refusal to participate as a fan and calling yourself a fan is mere hypcocrisy and is the most utterly ridiculous attempt at tough love that I have ever heard of. You are not a kidnapper, and the Cubs are not required to negotiate.
It's a friggin' game, Gaius.
i think the measure of your participation
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions
You said it wasn't in
Logic will tell you that, darling. :)
Re
This post encourages genuine discussion, and has the added benefit of being completely on-topic. It would be nice to see more.
Visit The Digital Gazette
No,
You don't know me, your opinion of me is different everyday. Just stop. You're just losing any credibility you have left here.
I would say that the majority of this blog enjoy my posts and interaction with other bloggers more than your constant attempts to outcast yourself from society and get back at mommy not loving you the right way.
Just let it go and keep your snyde remarks to yourself. Either that or just go away. I can't say anyone would notice or care.
Re
Why don't you just make a poll where everyone can tell you how popular you are so you can stop obsessing about it.
I'm always amused by the person who appoints himself spokesman for a group in order to bolster his own perspective and puff up his own standing, especially when it's a group as diverse as those who participate at BCB. I guess my proxy statement for your coronation got lost in the mail.
In case you haven't noticed, the only person's opinion around here that really counts is Al's. There's one of you in every crowd, Sarah. The question is never if, it's who's it gonna be.
Visit The Digital Gazette
Oh dear
If you have some repressed anger over not being popular in highschool or ever, fine. But don't unload on me.
I was simply saying that you might think that posts that are cheerful, that distract from the current misery, that entertain with humor and movie quote - you might think that those are inappropriate by your standards (which, again, no one cares about), but I would say that most people enjoy those more than your spewings that seemingly have no end in sight.
I'm asking you to let it go now because you are just digging yourself more of a hole. We already don't like you. Stop before we can't stand the sight of your posts so much that no one even bothers to respond.
and i'm tired of you
is this your new rote unthought dismissal of me? the Spreadsheet Epithet? lol.
the right spreadsheet will tell you a hell of a lot more about this club than you care to admit. not that you'll ever take the time to find out.
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions
hey now,
You know good and well that if you're tired of Al you can simply stop coming here.
Let's keep the gloves up fellas.
Bad analogy
All anyone's saying, Gaius, is that spreadsheets don't ever tell the whole story. Sure, they're good information tools, but games aren't played on paper, right?
(By the way, I think sabermetrics are just another way for a good ol' fashioned fan to ruin the fun of the game by relying exclusively on numbers to make a point.)
by elscorcho0682 on May 11, 2006 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions
i don't understand
so many people have delves so deeply into escapism as a way of life that they can't seem to find happiness in the real world. so ridiculous larks like this one get bandied about, where every longshot horse comes in and every lost cause is saved because we dare not accept that we are in fact limited in some ways. it doesn't comport with our preferred nietzschean dreamworld, in which we can all do anything by force of will alone.
life, however, isn't hollywood. it's better. but to realize it, you have first to embrace the reality.
al's pushing 50 and still professes a small child's conception of fantasy optimism -- maybe he's a lost cause too that no one should be devoting resources toward.
but there are a lot of twentysomethings here that should at least contemplate how destructive that sort of constant fantasy-immanentization can be in a real life.
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions
We've had this discussion already
As I said before, nobody is living in a dreamworld. I don't understand what is so horribly wrong about continuing to cheer for this team, while at the same time realizing (there's the keyphrase) that big things need to happen for this team to get on the right track.
You're getting agitated, you're getting negative, you're getting personal, you're getting downright nasty. For what? Don't you see how childish that is? You think your numbers can solve everything, and you're so wrapped up in it that you're forgetting that it's only a game, and that the rest of us aren't going to be damned for all eternity for turning on the radio every day and hoping to see the Cubs come out on top.
I'm done talking about this - we're obviously never going to see eye-to-eye.
by elscorcho0682 on May 11, 2006 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions
if i believed that
the thing is, if baseball were "just baseball", would we build half-billion dollar temples to it? would senators threaten to legislate it? would millions around the world obsess over it?
no.
the reason these things happen is that baseball -- rather, sport -- is theater. it's a reflection of the society that creates it, is infused with its morality and its wisdom, and stands as a testament to who we think of ourselves as being and wanting to be.
no less than when voltaire wrote candide or shaw wrote pygmalion, sport today tells us who we are and are becoming. and how we react to and interact with it is therefore a matter of the highest possible importance.
constantly seeking escape from its difficult realities and professing that one's actions relative to it are inconsequential and meaningless is both a profoundly disturbing thing and a very great insight.
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions
Just as a final thought
I'm also a theatre professional, and I often get into these debates about Shaw, Voltaire, etc, etc, as you mentioned. I see theatre and sports as two supremely different things - any connections you want to make are yours alone. I don't subscribe to that.
by elscorcho0682 on May 11, 2006 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions
i'd suggest
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions
I'd suggest
I'd suggest that when it comes down to being a fan of baseball and a student of theatre (and a religious person) I can benefit from all three separately.
by elscorcho0682 on May 11, 2006 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions
i don't think
let's take the classical period. we don't disagree i'm sure that both the olympic athletic tradition and the attic tragedy held roots in olympian religion. by the time of pericles, of course, they had diverged -- and later, in the secular individualism of the roman empire, even opposed one another.
that does not mean, however, that these institutions served opposing ends. while entertainment and escape ascended to dominance as they do in virtually all decayed societies, both sport and theater (along with literature) continued to produce tales which entered the popular lexicon as illustrative moral examples of what it meant to be (or not to be) a roman. the emperor commodus' unforgivable transgression into the colosseum, for example, or the staged recreations of great roman victories.
forward some further centuries, and the secular institutions of theater and sport simultaneously died with the ongoing collapse of roman civility, and their remains reabsorbed into religion via the nascent constantinian church.
forward again to the medieval period, and the church, having formalized the theater in the sacramental rites, gives birth with the re-emergence of individualism to liturgical passion plays. sport as such also reappeared at this same time in the rite of the provencal bullfight and chivalric contest.
and since the advent of modern secularism, they have diverged again -- but again continue to provide morality tales so less than theater -- from the black sox to bonds to the elevation of men like babe ruth and joe dimaggio to the status of a minor god, sport continues to provide a vehicle for defining ourselves.
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions
They don't
You can make your final comparison for any (ANY) facet in life. But what you're suggesting is that sports do and should hold some special significance that somehow should translate to how we look at the Cubs this season.
What I resent is that you're attempting to use academia and history to impose your holier-than-thou attitude upon those who choose not to give up on this season.
by elscorcho0682 on May 11, 2006 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions
That is PRECISELY why...
Baseball IS an escape, theater, a way, as Jack Brickhouse used to say:
"to let these two managers worry about your cares for you..."
(OK, I'm paraphrasing.)
Good lord, man. Quit quoting Voltaire here. I know exactly what "reality" is. The reality is, the Cubs are six and a half games out of first place, with a team with holes.
There are ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY NINE games remaining. If you don't hope at that point, well, I feel there's no hope for you. Do as you wish, as I've said, but you have NO right to criticize others for feeling the way they do.
the very fact
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions
You know what? I'm not done
You harp about the connection between theatre and real life, conveniently ignoring major facts, and then you ridicule people for exactly the opposite.
You are so wrong that it actually hurts.
by elscorcho0682 on May 11, 2006 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions
which major facts?
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions
Scroll up.
by elscorcho0682 on May 11, 2006 1:59 PM CDT up reply actions
sheesh
Yes it's much more fun to just make things up and wildly speculate. Facts are stoopid!
by jolietconvict on May 11, 2006 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions
Read what you're saying
Just get your head out of the dang statbook and away from the calculator and Microsoft Excel and enjoy the game, for Pete's sake.
Sheesh.
by elscorcho0682 on May 11, 2006 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions
Re
While I definitely lean toward the numbers side of baseball, I also understand those who watch baseball primarily for its esthetics. I get this because while I know very little about the game of hockey, I enjoy going to games just to watch the beauty of the movement. Unlike so many other sports, I don't know the strategy behind it. I don't even know more than the basic rules, and not even all of them. But I can tell when a play has been well-executed because it speaks to my perception of beauty, and in doing so, clearly demonstrates quality.
Let's all keep in mind that most people see things in one of these two ways, but that doesn't make one way right and the other wrong. For those interested in reading more about this, I highly recommend Robert Pirsig's Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance.
Visit The Digital Gazette
"They're Cooked"
This guy: http://cyberend.com/culture/images/gulliverstravels_glum_01.jpg
Just for one day Gaius, can't you write something positive? Anything? Maybe just one thing like "Putting Ronny Cedeno at lead-off actually worked for a day?"
lol
there's no reason at all that the cubs can't win the world series in 2008. but it's going to take some planning. i personally think it's better to get started than keep dreaming about things that's never going to happen because we don't want to admit how wrong we were.
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm not saying
In otherwords, say something positive every once in a while!
You look nice today Gaius. Have you lost weight?
how can you see me through the computer?
the thing is, brian, that coming around for my daily cub affirmation gets really old really quickly. in my view, a forum like this is made to recognize, analyze and solve problems -- and god knows this team has a few. :) spending a lot of effort circle-jerking about the things that are right doesn't make a lot of sense to me. i find a lot more enjoyment in the work of solving problems than in basking in mutual gratuity.
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions
We'll, I think I'm starting to get
What say you?
surely
which is one of the reasons why i find the lack of it so worth analyzing, i suspect. :)
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions
lol
They say you can catch more flies with honey rather than vinegar; in your case it would seem you have no interest in catching any flies in the first place. No biggie.
I'd be amused if you'd at least make your signature line "Eamus Catuli". You'd at least let people know that you are indeed rooting for the team -- and with a moniker like "Gaius Marius" I would think you'd enjoy invoking some Latin. ;)
Re
Of course, that's created some friction between myself and those who are wired to desire affirmation. Sound familiar?
Visit The Digital Gazette
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
by NC Cubs Fan on May 11, 2006 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions
It's...
by koramcub on May 11, 2006 9:29 AM CDT reply actions
this may
by Faith plus 1 on May 11, 2006 9:42 AM CDT reply actions
Jones.
Anyhow, this is usually Jones' best time of year - the first two months; so I say if we're stuck with him, let's use him only against righties and milk his best months for all he's worth. Then, like Al said, let's see if the Yankees or someone might want an OF who's batting better now than he'll finish the season. It beats three years and 16 million on a guy who'll finish at about .240 (perhaps less), if you know what I mean.
Congrats, Jacques, your bat helped bring the Cubs a much-needed victory. Now Dusty.....let's leave him down the order where he can be tolerated; don't get crazy again and start batting him cleanup, please.
I'm still hoping new blood is on the way, but I'll take this win because I was getting pretty miserable watching the games lately.
by The Jade Scorpion on May 11, 2006 9:51 AM CDT reply actions
Jones' Platoon Partner
Here are your options (with second and first also listed since they will be affected)
Option #1
RF Jones
2B Hairston
1b Walker
Option #2
RF Hairson
2b Perez
1b Walker
Option #3
RF Mabry
2b Perez
1b Walker
Option #4
RF Mabry
2b Hairston
1b Walker
Option #5
Rf Hairston
2b Walker
1b Mabry
Option #6
RF Hairston
2b Theriot
1b Walker
Option #7
RF Theriot
2b Hairston
1b Walker
.
.
.
Ok, so you get the point, there are a number of options here, but you are replacing an admittedly weak bat in Jones against lefties with a some pop with another weak bat against lefties with little or no pop.
While I admit that Jones shouldn't be playing against lefties, right now Dusty has no option.
If you were Dusty, what would you choose to do?
I think I'd try...
Option 2 might be useful against certain pitchers that Perez hits well.
I would
OR, I'd bring up Pie and let him start every day in right, then platoon Jones with Murton in left.
Murton's a good looking prospect, but he isn't exactly lighting the world on fire either at this point. Murton versus Lefties and Jacque versus righties would make a damn good platoon, all-star level production from the left fielder.
Dusty had the option
but you have to know by now
this same situation persisted with burnitz last year. burnie was horrid vs lhp, and yet led the team in ab vs lhp. players like restovich are all over the margins of baseball -- the cubs could have acquired and played his analogue at any point.
did they? no.
i'd expect no different for jones. he's their guy, hell or high water.
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 11:34 AM CDT up reply actions
Mabry
by ogsbucog on May 11, 2006 10:19 AM CDT reply actions
MABRY
couple more wins
by mike bornemann @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on May 11, 2006 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions
No comments on...
Naturally, with as bad as things have been over the past two weeks, you've got to wonder why it wasn't done four or five games ago...
You've got to love hindsight, second-guessing, and Monday-morning quarterbacks, yeah?
by Shawon O Meter on May 11, 2006 10:54 AM CDT reply actions
I mentioned
He sure proved me wrong. D'oh.
by elscorcho0682 on May 11, 2006 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions
suicide
i can't believe that his freefall hasn't been more commented on here. check the last 30 days stats: cedeno is 263/291/354.
dusty has essentially put neifi back at the top of the order -- the mortal fear of most of the people here.
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 11:39 AM CDT up reply actions
I liked Cedeno leading off
Paddlin'
by Sidd Finch @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on May 11, 2006 11:14 AM CDT reply actions
LOL
by cubbiejulie on May 11, 2006 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions
Bonus points
Can I name him?
by cubbiejulie on May 11, 2006 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions
Jasper!
by cubbiejulie on May 11, 2006 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions
We have a winner!
Comic Book guy also now has a name
by cubbiejulie on May 11, 2006 11:39 AM CDT up reply actions
I had a feeling that was true
Me too
by cubbiejulie on May 11, 2006 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions
Hmmm...
Sorry Al
I missed this thread too late
Is the "ringers" episode the same one where MLB is Big Brother? They have a satellite that's tracking Bart, and they all think he's crazy. Turns out he was right!
by elscorcho0682 on May 11, 2006 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions
Nope
"Are you standing up to get me to leave?"
by cubbiejulie on May 11, 2006 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions
Oh, of course
by elscorcho0682 on May 11, 2006 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions
"Why did Humpty Dumpty fall down?"
by cubbiejulie on May 11, 2006 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions
Heh
by elscorcho0682 on May 11, 2006 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions
Sorry
by cubbiejulie on May 11, 2006 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions
No worries!
by elscorcho0682 on May 11, 2006 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions
A very good one
Ah, wrong about the date
"Tis!" replied Aunt Helga!
LOL--love that one.
by cubbiejulie on May 11, 2006 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions
This episode...
Yep
"More friends! More allies!"
by cubbiejulie on May 11, 2006 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions
Time for Reform
I'm serious, this daily negativity is starting to become hazardous to my health. I mean, we can easily go down that Bashing route, but we might as well just put on a black and white jersey and cheer for that other team. At least we can all be happy that way.
Haha
"Non, please, and can we have a booth?"
by elscorcho0682 on May 11, 2006 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions
lol
by gaius marius on May 11, 2006 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions
You could have picked a better time
Am I missing something here? Why would you rather have Bynum hit than a pitcher?? He's struck out in over half his plate appearances. What the hell is Dusty thinking?
by pwhalen on May 11, 2006 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions

by 


















