Why Defense Matters
Here are the primary reasons why the Cubs lost 7-5 to the Pirates this afternoon.
Third inning; after the first two hitters made easy (well, at least easy after a dropped third strike resulted in a throw-out at first) outs, the Pirates' Chris Duffy beat out an infield hit.
Then he took off to steal second, and Henry Blanco threw him out.
Well, he WOULD have thrown him out if Mr. Looks-Like-A-Major-Leaguer-But-Really-Isn't Freddie Bynum didn't drop the throw.
This would have ended the inning - or maybe it would have ended earlier if Sean Marshall hadn't messed up trying to cover first base on Duffy's hit in the first place; instead, Jon and I looked at the pitch count and Marshall had to throw twelve more pitches and allowed a run after a Xavier Nady single.
In the next inning, after a walk and another single, Aramis Ramirez fielded a ground ball at third and started a 5-4-3 double play.
Or, at least he would have if Freddie ("I'm Wearing A Major League Uniform, Isn't It Cool?") Bynum hadn't dropped the throw. They credited the out at 2nd. Had the DP been completed, Humberto Cota's fly ball to center would have ended the inning, and maybe Marshall (who threw twenty-five more pitches after that, and 69 for his four innings) might have been able to stay in the game rather than allow five runs in four innings and get lifted for Carlos Marmol.
That's what good defense can do for you -- the Cubs probably should have won this game 5-1 or 5-2, instead of heading into the ninth inning in a tie game. It was exciting to have Marmol and Scott Moore both hit their first major league homers in the same game (security brought out team-signed balls to exchange for the actual HR balls with the bleacherites who caught them; Jon and I said as one, "Those balls aren't worth very much, unless there's a Greg Maddux signature on them!"), but ultimately, it was meaningless after Duffy (who had ZERO home runs this year coming into the game, and only one in nearly 400 career AB) homered a second time off Scott Eyre in the ninth -- this after Dusty Baker left Eyre in specifically to throw to him. Then Ryan Dempster put the reverse exclamation point on this game, coming in and allowing another home run to Nady. (In fact, both Baker and Jim Tracy made several mindless, useless mid-inning pitching changes, taking a game which had been fast-paced and making it last just under three hours at 2:58.)
See, this is the sort of thing Maddux was talking about the other day when he said he appreciated the defense behind him. The Cubs have been a putridly bad defensive team this year; we've talked about the bad outfield defense (no throwing arms, or inaccurate ones), the bad infield defense (every time Cedeno picks up the ball when there's a runner on third, you just KNOW he's going to throw it away), and there is absolutely NO way Bynum and Cedeno should ever, EVER appear in the same game as a DP combination.
I have written about this several times before. That is the worst DP combination in the history of this franchise, and although at first -- given the 130-year history of the Cubs -- that seems like a harsh judgment, they are apparently willing to prove me right every time they pick up a baseball.
As I said, it should have been a nice, pick-me-up victory -- Marmol not only homered, but threw two good innings; Moore also doubled for his first major league hit, and the Cub pitching staff combined for eleven strikouts, not that strikeouts should be the be-all and end-all of getting outs.
And that ruined an otherwise gorgeous early-fall afternoon on which I made a reacquaintance with another guy named Mike (he's from Indiana, and used to sit with me often back in the 90's), who happened to show up today. I had forgotten about how much we enjoyed analyzing situations back in the days when the bleachers were nearly as empty as they were today; he told me he'd just returned from one of Jay Buckley's baseball bus tours, which I have never taken but I understand they're quite well-run and you get to see a lot of baseball in different cities (Mike said he saw that Tigers-Yankees game which was won by Craig Monroe's HR, and the game in Boston where Alex Rios batted a ball over the fence for a HR). He said he's going to join us more often next year.
At which time we hope massive changes will have been made. The announced crowd of 27,105 again seemed about half that many in the ballpark, a few more in the bleachers today due to the nice weather. I'd suspect that next week, when the Dodgers -- and likely Maddux next Thursday -- will be the opponent, the attendance may bounce up a bit. The Dodgers have always been a popular opponent; they're in a playoff race and in addition to Maddux, they have several other popular ex-Cubs on their club. If the weather is decent, I'd expect larger crowds, particularly if Maddux does indeed wind up throwing on Thursday. This is no indicator for 2007's attendance patterns; it's simply a reflection on the OTHER team's popularity.
Finally, I want to say a word today about someone I've known for several years, longtime bleacher season ticket holder George Wiseman. Earlier this year he was diagnosed with mouth cancer, and has undergone several painful surgeries and rounds of chemotherapy and radiation. Today, he came back to the bleachers for the first time since all this began, and though he can't talk (his mouth is still quite swollen), he carries around a notepad, writes notes, and I had a nice conversation with him. Though he said (well, wrote) that things are rough at times, he's intending to make it through, and come back next year to see better things. Wish he'd have seen a win today. And so, in thinking about complaining again about this team's management and play, think about George, and know that adversity comes in many forms. We're all pulling for him to come through.
93 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Oh Jeez
By the way, thanks for all the good writing. It does make this mess of a season better.
by NO100 on Sep 7, 2006 4:51 PM CDT reply actions
Thanks from me, too
Your writing is excellent, the tone is right-on, and your passion, knowledge and common sense come through perfectly. It's a great site, and I really appreciate your commitment.
Best Regards,
exnorthsider
Cedeno, Blanco, Bynum &
Obvious loss when those names all show up in the box score...
What don't you like about Blanco?
I just don't think that he should be lumped in with the rest of those guys who are failing at the job they were given to do.
by NO100 on Sep 7, 2006 5:06 PM CDT up reply actions
that he's not barrett.
That's true
by NO100 on Sep 7, 2006 5:12 PM CDT up reply actions
Agreed ...
The Cedeno-Bynum curse does seem to be wearing off onto other team mates; Blanco, although sharp with the bat today, seemed sluggish behind the plate. Maybe it's all those pitchers.
Hoka hey!
by Littlerock Rynofan on Sep 7, 2006 6:53 PM CDT up reply actions
Blanco is an asset
Blanco......
by PriorandAramisfan23 on Sep 8, 2006 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions
IMO...
If there is any thought within the front office that this team does not need new leadership and a total reevaluation, hopefully MacPhail, McDonaugh and the folks at Tribune Tower look upon Wrigley Field and see that things need to change.
DmL
have to be getting killed in
What is there
7 pitchers in 9 innings...
classic Hendry ball, too
Those are Hendry decisions, not Dusty.
The Cubs haven't won and will never win under Tribune ownership.
by Pa on Sep 8, 2006 1:55 AM CDT up reply actions
When
100 losses is in the bag.
by Johnny Callison was a Cub on Sep 7, 2006 6:47 PM CDT reply actions
At the rate this club is losing,
But it is not the quantity of losses that disturbs me, it is the quality, or rather lack of quality play and the depressing ways this group of players (I hestitate to call them a team) find to lose that bugs the living piss out of me.
We all know Baker is history, now all we can hope for is that Hendry's contract gets bought out and he gets the boot too for these so-called MLB players that he put in Cubs uniforms.
100
Me too
I just wish Andy would come down from his Ivory Tower, fire Hendry, and take over permanently as GM.
by BlueBooHoo on Sep 8, 2006 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions
The 1981 team...
You say they need to be shamed into doing something, and I agree. What would you suggest doing NOW, with three weeks remaining in the season? At this point, wait the three more weeks, and THEN if nothing happens, you'll be justified in your criticism.
1981
Mike Tyson
1981 was a very bad year
If history does repeat itself, the next manager after Baker will be a wild-eyed firebrand like Elia before we get a solid one like Frey for our championship campaign in 2010.
Elia
"Right downtown, and PRINT IT!"
1981 was a very, very bad year
by BlueBooHoo on Sep 8, 2006 3:03 PM CDT up reply actions
McFail needs to be shamed
Hendry, on the other hand, is different. This is his livelihood. While we may bitch and complain and truly care about this team, I don't think that the quality of life for anyone on this list is dependent on the Cubs winning or losing. Hendry's is. If the team can't win, his earning potential is affected, maybe not this year or for the next 2, but what about his next job? If anyone thinks that Hendry is not motivated to win and to win now, you're wallowing in self pity to try to make it look more dismal than it is.
To paraphrase a famous quote, "You're never as good or as bad as you think you are."
by NO100 on Sep 8, 2006 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions
Neifi
As far as empty seats
As far as the MacPhail's, McDonaugh's and Trib people of the world go, I kind of hope the latter send MacPhail packing.
Boom Boom
I'm not sure why Dusty took Marmol out after he looked so good for 2 innings, except that Dusty isn't happy until his mismanaged the game into a loss.
This is a truly pitiful season one of the worst I can remember.
Dusty
He also needs to change pitchers
by secdelahc on Sep 8, 2006 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions
McPhail and Hendry
by BlueBooHoo on Sep 7, 2006 10:36 PM CDT reply actions
Just think how bad the Cubs would be
Amazingly, this could be a lot worse, cause some geniuses thought Choi, Bobby Hill, and Brendon Harris were really good, and that Brian Giles would save us w/ his 12 home runs for a cool $12-15 million a year...
Pat Burrell's the biggest trade we can reasonably hope for. :(
Pat Burrell???
For one, I don't think that Prior's trade value is nearly as low as many on this site think. I don't care that most GM's think he's washed up. There still are 29 other GM's out there and all it takes for a trade market to appear for Prior is 2 of those guys to think that a) Prior is a very talented pitcher and b) to blame the Cubs org for his injuries. That last sentence is not a stretch.
Second, thier young pitching, for the most part, has increased their value. Marmol, Marshall, and Hill being at the top of the lsit. Ryu getting pounded early in the season had no effect. Guzman loooked very sharp at times. The Cubs can't hold on to all these guys and will have to trade them at some point.
Third, Jones and Barrett value went up over the season because of thier play.
It looks bleak right now, I know, but it's not that bad. Don't forget that the Cubs will have the biggest single addition to thier team in all of baseball for 2007. The Cubs will have Derrick Lee for a full season. I'm not trying to make Dusty excuses here, but this team would not be sniffing the worst record in all of baseball if he weren't injured.
by NO100 on Sep 8, 2006 9:25 AM CDT up reply actions
who's possible then?
Honestly, I don't know
Andrew Jones maybe
Carl Crawford maybe
Manny Ramirez maybe
All I know for sure is that there will be players that come available 2 months from now that we wouldn't have even considered. Also, the Cubs this year, as opposed to last year, have chips of value that they can bargain with.
Pat Burrell will not be the best available or the best the Cubs can hope for.
by NO100 on Sep 8, 2006 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions
So let me get this straight
by BlueBooHoo on Sep 8, 2006 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions
Actually...
Marmol, Marshall, Mateo, Ryu all have value; of course, they don't have as much as a Liriano or McCarthy. None of them would have any interest or bring anything of real value by themselves. Package them WITH someone, then, maybe you've got something.
Yes trade some prospects
I've read your posts and I know that you are very negative on the Cubs. Just because Cubs pitchers aren't Liriano or McCarthy (though I would say that Hill is very close to McCarthy) doesn't mean they don't have value. As Al wrote, packaging them can bring back something good.
The thing is that you or me don't know what anyone can get for these guys because we don't know the extenuating circumstances. There very well may be 2 GM's out of 29 that have Prior in high regard. You don't know that. I don't know that.
3 years ago we would have never thought that we could get Lee for Choi. Last year, we wouldn't have thought Prior for Tejada. Things will happen that we don't know right now. It's not that bleak.
by NO100 on Sep 8, 2006 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions
I'm invincible
by BlueBooHoo on Sep 8, 2006 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions
Perhaps, but
It takes 2 to trade.
Yes it takes 2 to trade
by NO100 on Sep 8, 2006 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions
Giles
I'm still glad the Cubs didn't sign him. The Padres had to because they gave up an All Star via trade to get him.
Right
So let's see...
Tell me how this equates to hitting 25 HR this year if he had Wrigley Field as his home park. Show your work.
It seems that nobody can ever admit
by LT on Sep 8, 2006 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions
You're saying he'll
This has nothing to do with baseball...
Dear George,
It's either Bynum
Trading Walker & Maddux, along with Izturis' injury, may guarantee 100 losses. The alternatives are just awful or not near ready.
But Cedeno won't sit
Bynum's glory days may be over though, if the dugout reaction shots of the Dude after Freddie's various F-ups yesterday are any indication.
This spells out
Good luck to your friend George, puts this season in perspective.
by Johnny Callison was a Cub on Sep 8, 2006 6:29 AM CDT reply actions
A positive
While Moore probably isn't ready yet, it is good for him to get a taste of success at the big league level. It was especially good to see Moore show some power to left center, a good sign for the lefty power hitter.
Hopefully the Cubs won't be foolish enough to see Moore's success and think Ramirez is expendable. Moore probably needs another full season in the minors, and even then could play the corner outfield spots and the corner infield spots to get some at-bats, as opposed to being an everyday player right away.
Empty seats ...
Paul Sullivan has twice now written something similar what he wrote in the paper today: "There were several thousand no-shows again as Cubs fans continue to eat their tickets" twice this week. That is just bad reporting if there are really > 5,000 and more than 10,000 like Al suggests.
"Several thousand"...
Each of the last three games appeared to be attended by about half the announced tickets-sold count.
Burnitz' quote:
[[[[[Manager Dusty Baker is taking most of the heat for the Cubs' downfall. Burnitz said it's just something that comes with the territory.
"Managers always take more heat than they deserve," Burnitz said. "That's how it works. On bad teams the manager is in trouble.
"In any sport, in any real-world thing, everything at the highest level involves pressure and certain positions of accountability. Managers are accountable, and they get fired when they don't do good."]]]]]
by DudeVf1 on Sep 8, 2006 9:34 AM CDT reply actions
I assume..
It is flat out embarassing
Meanwhile, Ronny Cedeno is just plain awful, albeit with physical talent. No way can he be back next year, not even as a utility infielder given his wretched defense.
by BlueBooHoo on Sep 8, 2006 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions
numbers
Bynam has played in 55 games, of which 13 were Cubs' wins (.286)
Theriot has played in 35 games of which, 13 were Cubs' wins (.371)
by ExNorthsider on Sep 8, 2006 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions
It's just a
How in the world can Dusty think that Bynum deserves playing time? The guy is a joke. It's really sad that the young players who show promise aren't being played every day. I don't get it and would really love to hear an explanation from management why they aren't being played.
George, I wish you the best and hope when you go to the games next year you get to see a much improved Cubs team.
100 losses--unlikely
If they do reach that embarrassing no. it would almost assure Dusty's dismissal.
Reading Paul Sullivan recently it seems a likely outcome anyway. But will be interesting how it's spun. It's not really a "firing'' since it will simply be a contract is not renewed--they'll be letting him go, after paying 16 M/4.
It's parting of ways, management dec. but not a firing. Firing woulda been before contrat expiration.
by writerinwrigley on Sep 8, 2006 10:38 AM CDT reply actions
It is exactly that...
About 100 losses: the Cubs would have to go 6-16 to lose 100. I grant you, that is possible, though just when this team looks its worst, they wind up on a mini-winning streak of 3 or 4 games.
100
I don't think...
The magic
Remember the dead cat Pounce?
What would have saved this season?
I have no clue. I think we were doomed no matter what.
Oops
lol
Well
I say we open 2007 by roasting the goat on a spit in center field.
Pig
I didn't say
At first, I thought you were calling me a pig. I was about to throw down. Right here. Right now.
I'm stupid
And what's the point of roasting an animal on a spit, if we're not going to eat it? Seems like a waste to me.
No thanks.
I don't know about
Dusty managed horribly and the players did not step up when Lee got hurt.
by Johnny Callison was a Cub on Sep 8, 2006 11:25 AM CDT reply actions
What?
Are you high? If our pitching depth was adequate, we wouldn't have spent the entires season trolling AAA when Wood and Prior (predictably) went down.
Well...
The people who always say "Play the kids!" certainly got their wish this year.
It's just too bad most of the "kids" suck. :)
by salparadise23 on Sep 8, 2006 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions
and they tend to be the one's
It's not ironic at all
I already know what the Neifis of the world can't do. At least we are relatively certain that Theriot is vastly superior to him. And Marshall and Marmol have a possible future better than Rusch. And Murton wasn't a fluke. And Hill could become a quality starter.
Perhaps some would prefer to see veterans continue to play poorly. I'd much rather see what our prospects might do for us in the future.
Thank you.
by Johnny Callison was a Cub on Sep 8, 2006 11:39 AM CDT reply actions
Whew
Carry on.

by 


















