Tribune Company Sold, Cubs Next
So.
Tribune Company's sale to Sam Zell is a done deal, and at least one of you yesterday wondered why I didn't mention it myself, didn't make a front page post, let it go unmentioned.
Why did I do this? Because nothing happened to the Chicago Cubs yesterday. We all knew this deal was coming, and the Cubs have been on the market since last April. We did learn that Zell intends to complete the sale of the team by Opening Day; that's a pretty tight time frame, especially considering that MLB approval is needed. Implicit here is the possibility, since the time frame IS so tight, that a backdoor deal is already done, or close to being done. That might not be good news for us as fans, since that implies that insider John Canning and his group are the frontrunners. I went on record two months ago as saying I was not in favor of Canning's group, and would rather see Don Levin, owner of the AHL's Chicago Wolves, buy the Cubs.
This will all play out over the next couple of months, and if and when I learn more, I'll post it. Though Zell was quoted as saying, in the Tribune link above, that major changes were to be afoot in the Tribune Co. itself, I would not expect any such changes for the Cubs -- not immediately, and maybe not even after a sale. A good comparison would be to the sale of the Boston Red Sox, which occurred either late in 2001 or early in 2002. When they were sold, virtually everyone working for the Red Sox remained in place. Only GM Dan Duquette -- who was under fire and not well-liked -- was let go. What new ownership did, instead, was increase staffing, and that's what the Cubs need, because they are either 29th or 30th (depending on how many people the Marlins are employing this week) in year-round, fulltime staffing among major league teams. Plus, any new owner would be a fool to replace the marketing department, which has been among the most successful anywhere in professional sports.
About Zell, I'm more concerned that he's hired a guy, Randy Michaels, to run Tribune's broadcast operations who once created a radio format called "Power Pig" and who briefly renamed a Chicago radio station "Hell"; he's often had his radio people go on the air with direct attacks on competitors (according to that Feder article, Michaels had a contest in Chicago in which his station "offered prizes to listeners who could repeat the phrase "B96 sucks" as many times as possible in less than 10 seconds."). What this means to the future of WGN radio and TV -- who knows, but that's not the way they've been run in the past.
And as for the Cubs, the next order of business is to see if more offense can be added, not to see who's going to be running things, since the latter isn't changing, at least for now.
70 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
So you did make a post!
Seriously, I don't expect any changes in the Cubs' organization in the near term from Jim Hendry on down on the baseball side, and from Mark McGuire (?) on down on the business side. I mentioned Crane Kenney in my post yesterday because although he is fulfilling the duties of the vacant team president role, he is an upstairs TribCo suit. Those are the kind of guys that new TrbiCo ownership are going to scrutinize first and are most vulnerable to near-term replacement.
But if Zell really thinks the team will be sold in three months, there's not much point making any changes in personnel, unless it's necessary to grease the wheels for deals (like renaming) that help the new TribCo but not the future owner of the Cubs.
I doubt you'll see Kenney replaced, either.
Whomever is the new owner
It took the removal of Andy McFail, to a large degree, to get these kind of wheels FINALLY in motion.
I hope the new owners will be on board with the sentiments of the fans.
by TheEman on Dec 21, 2007 9:06 AM CST up reply actions
Agree
Even if the club is sold by opening day (which I doubt, unless something has been brewing under the table) nothing will happen to any Cub personal in 08. As I have stated before, Hendry is the one on the hot seat and with the money they have spent in his tenure, it will take winning at least one playoff series to give him a decent chance of coming back.
Agreed on Hendry.
Again, I figure Zell realizes that Kenney knows how the Cubs work, and he's likely to leave him in charge of the Cubs until they're sold.
I agree Al
Once the new owner is official, the first thing they will do is hire a team President. Chances are the prospective buyers already have that person identified. The majority of the time, a president wants to put his stamp on the team and he may do that quickly, or take time to evaluate what is already here. I wouldn't think anything major happens until the end of 08.
Agreed.
That said, you're right, whoever comes in will likely already have their person chosen. Who that will be, is anyone's guess.
McDonough may have had
like that comment...
It's Chicago, something is ALWAYS brewing under the table. And I wouldn't be surprised to see Daley with his hand in there extracting the wort.
Sad to say and I sure hope I'm wrong, it's gonna be Canning and his cronies coming in, to the utter delight of Bud Light and his entourage (e.g. Reinsdorf).
My rebuttal is two words: DON LEVIN!
Unfortunately as I understand, Don wasn't on the list of potential owners that were allowed to peruse the Cubs' books.
by blackhawk24 on Dec 21, 2007 10:08 AM CST up reply actions
I wouldn't assume...
Not the removal...
by TheEman on Dec 21, 2007 9:06 AM CST reply actions
Removal/resignation
I think Fitzsimons got tired of the losing.
by Shanghai Badger on Dec 21, 2007 9:11 AM CST up reply actions
Losing?
HA HA!
But he didn't have his nose bloodied either!
Again, I hope, with every fiber in my tattered clothes, that Zell selects the absolutely best possible new ownership group for the BENEFIT OF THE FANS. There is no reason why the team cannot be profitable, while still being "in the hunt" every single year.
by TheEman on Dec 21, 2007 9:30 AM CST up reply actions
Agreed on your last point, 100%.
Zell
Yes, that's what I was saying
I like the sentiment of the second point, but as someone's already replied, Zell's a businessman. He's not concerned about finding a fan's owner.
by Shanghai Badger on Dec 21, 2007 9:57 AM CST up reply actions
Zell
Expect lots of layoffs at the Trib.
The sooner he sells the Cubs the better.
What Zell hates as much
Naming rights in the mix too...
Based on transactions at other ballparks around the country, such rights could be "extraordinarily valuable," he said.
Yes, here...
How can Zell sell
Zell is trying to squeeze maximum $$ from the sale of the Cubs, and by threatening to sell Wrigley separately and/or naming rights, he's forcing up the price of the package.
He's all about the bottom line.
Right now Zell is trying to get cash...
So...
What's next? You gonna tell us you remember seeing your dad march with Dr. King?
There will be no "sweetheart deal."
Not saying that couldn't also be bad, but I doubt he'll sell the Cubs just to remain chummy. He needs cash.
You can be assured
This may mean some sparks fly between MLB and Zell, and this is going to be fun to watch.
Zell doesn't necessarily want...
I would imagine
Let me crack open my piggy bank then
Cubs still in on Brian Roberts
http://mlbfleecefactor.com/2007/12/21/friday-rumors-and-grumblings-roberts-joba-more/
Bruce Levine Speculates...
Wow.
lieber!
ok im kidding
Cuban has
by TheEman on Dec 21, 2007 1:17 PM CST reply actions
Ayup.
What's up, Buster?
In today's column he talks about how teams should just say No to PED-using players. Interesting idea but doubtful of it happening. But what makes this column comment-worthy is all the quick bits and links added on. He touches on some of the same news that Al and others here already have, but also many more topics in the baseball news today.
Take a gander if you've got some time to kill - I like the one about Santa Claus asking Omar Minaya if the Mets are going to get another starting pitcher. Here's the link - don't let the Insider part scare you - this one's a freebie.
What's important to the Cubs
As such, it appears that Zell has no other motive in selling the Cubs than making money. He could care less about the Cubs fans feelings. Money talks. And cash talks loudest. While he may give some access to the good old boys, I'm convinced that at the end of the day, the buyer with the most cash on the table will be the winner.
This from a recent article
Since Canning is a venture capitalist, he lives and dies by debt financing. In a way, he's just like Zell. This may limit his ability to offer a sweet deal with a lot of cash upfront. And remember, Canning isn't a devout Cub fan who has an urgency to own the club. On the other hand Cuban would seem to be a better fit for the sale due to his cash position. He's more likely to be flexible in the buyout terms, perhaps even integrating his entertainment industry background with Zell's declining empire.
The fly in the ointment is Selig and the good old boys. Imagine Zell receiving a better offer from someone other than Canning. He goes to Selig and tells him and Bud insists it's in the best interest of baseball that Canning's bid be accepted. That could very well be the scenario come March 15, 2008.
That's what I want to know.
Actually...
If I had a dollar
I know you're anti-Cuban (I'm pretty neutral Cuban) but you do realize, Al, that if Cuban buys the team, he's likely to be on this site giving you interviews and doing Q and A's?
Good to know that Al can't be bought with access!
by Josh Timmers on Dec 21, 2007 5:15 PM CST up reply actions
I think Al does indeed realize that -
by lostinthevines on Dec 21, 2007 5:22 PM CST up reply actions
That said -
by lostinthevines on Dec 21, 2007 5:23 PM CST up reply actions
Be careful what you wish for lost
I'd rather have.....
Thus, Don Levin.
COLANGELO!!!
by lostinthevines on Dec 21, 2007 7:53 PM CST up reply actions
He'd be fine with me.
Not only that
I hope it happens then
I'm a Cuban supporter now!
by Josh Timmers on Dec 21, 2007 5:52 PM CST up reply actions
And with Cuban as owner
Canning is right and
I would think someone would only pay top dollar if they would be free to maximize revenues as they see fit, not locked into deals pre-arranged before the sale of the team.
Who cares what the name of the park is?
And why wouldn't Zell keep the park? It's as much if not more of an ATM as the franchise that plays there. Sell the team, ergo relieving yourself of the liability, and keep the true asset - 1060 West Addison.
I can't say how I know but...
I can assure you that nothing is brewing with John Canning's group at this time. I know this to be 100% true. As a matter of fact, Canning is discouraged with the current state of affairs regarding the sale of the Cubs. Not to say that something won't get done but it isn't done now and looks less likely than it did six months ago.
That is all that I can say so take it for what it is worth coming from an anonymous poster on a Cubs fan blog :-)
I actually
by Josh Timmers on Dec 21, 2007 5:17 PM CST up reply actions
If Zell sells naming rights
IMHO, naming rights are fine... just don't mess with the damn marquee.
Mess with the marquee,
by lostinthevines on Dec 21, 2007 7:55 PM CST up reply actions
Word
by lostinthevines on Dec 22, 2007 5:25 PM CST up reply actions
I'd imagine it could work something like this:
"XYZ Presents" or
"XYZ Welcomes You To"
I don't see why they have to actually call it "XYZ Park at Wrigley Field." How lame is that already? I'm sick of seeing that all over sports venues.
It is lame.
Further, since I (and thousands of others) go in through the bleacher entrance in the outfield, we rarely if ever even see the marquee at Clark & Addison. Any sign there is lost on us.
Everyone forgets that Zell is still a
Zell doesn't want to sell his piece of the White Sox, is my guess, just because of a short-term flip of the Cubs. He hates paying taxes and why take a minority discount for selling your White Sox stake when you are about to get a huge price for selling 100% of the Cubs and Wrigley Field (and maybe squeezing some naming rights out of the deal too)?
I am sure MLB will give Zell a short-term waiver for ownership of the Cubs during this transition period, but Zell has made it clear that he LIKES the way he owns his piece of the Sox--he has NO ROLE in management. Zell wants no role in the Cubs and he made that clear from day one--he wants a fast deal but he also wants top dollar.
There is no doubt that Zell is working more than one buyer (Zell hasn't gotten where he is by going down a single path). Canning may have the inside track with MLB, but Zell will have more than one bidder to make sure this moves fast AND fair and closes this spring. Paying down debt quickly is his #1 goal.
I think
He's got a waiver from Bud to own both teams for a while. He's going to try to sell quickly, but I think Wall Street will have a far greater push to sell than Bud will.
by Josh Timmers on Dec 22, 2007 2:45 AM CST up reply actions
Check my last sentence,,,
I agree. The math is these deals is pretty simple. The debt is a time bomb.
Well
Style matters, people! Make it work! :-)
by Josh Timmers on Dec 22, 2007 4:30 PM CST up reply actions
OT -
No More Deals?
I don't see any reason to think so.
I have 1 good source
A real, live shortstop?
All-Overpaid Team
http://mlbfleecefactor.com/2007/12/23/the-all-overpaid-team/

by 


















