An Interview With "Stiles Points"
Rick from the Ohio-based blog Stiles Points emailed me several Cub-related questions over the weekend; you can read my replies to them here.
He also asked me how I feel about what seems to be the inevitable, Barry Bonds hitting his 756th career HR. Just in case you wanted to start a firestorm today.
0 recs |
34 comments
Comments
It should be noted...
I'd like to believe he wasn't trying to spike Morneau. I'm just not sure I can.
by cwyers on
May 29, 2007 9:05 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
If Barroid does hit 756 at Wrigley...
by Reverend Jim Ignatowski on
May 29, 2007 9:16 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
P.S. : It would be even better...
by Reverend Jim Ignatowski on
May 29, 2007 9:19 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I suggested that...
Great idea. Dead silence. It'd speak volumes, especially since ESPN is likely to be there.
by Al on
May 29, 2007 9:25 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I never claimed to be original.......
by Reverend Jim Ignatowski on
May 29, 2007 9:56 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I would clap.
by sparkles721 on
May 29, 2007 4:19 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Becareful
by cubfaninSTL on
May 29, 2007 10:41 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Here's a question for you Al.
Do you
a) take it and sell it thus funding Mark's college tuition and paying for your season tickets for a considerable amount of time.
b) throw it on to the field
c) somehow get down to the clubhouse and give the ball to bonds.
by mike on
May 29, 2007 9:27 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
That one's easy.
(And throw my throwback ball onto the field.)
by Al on
May 29, 2007 9:30 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No brainer...
I would add that I'd negotiate (ha-ha) with Barroid to try to sell it to him, but his price would be double or triple the market price----just to piss him off and prove, to his mind, I'm a racist along with the rest of the world.
by Reverend Jim Ignatowski on
May 29, 2007 9:54 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Or how about
by Will23 on
May 29, 2007 10:12 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think this says it all..
IIRC this was at the Ballpark in Arlington? I salute them for doing the work to send a message that will last as long as baseball.
by Will23 on
May 29, 2007 10:03 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Philadelphia
by Reverend Jim Ignatowski on
May 29, 2007 10:19 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Problems
The more I think about it the more I disagree that the bullpen is the Cubs' biggest problem. Here is why. The bullpen problem can be fixed via trades, shuffling players around, etc. HOWEVER the bigger problem as I see it is the STUPID mental mistakes the players keep making, thus putting the pen in untenable situations late in the game. This problem is NOT easily fixable and appears to be the main problem over the past couple years. Bad baserunning, misjudged fly balls, fail to advance runners, no hitting with RISP, the list goes on and on. This is why we are 5 below .500 and if anyone can suggest a solution to this problem, please comment here. Yes, we can fix the bullpen, but we ain't going to win even 80 games without playing fundamental baseball.
by ronsanto10 on
May 29, 2007 10:12 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Still..
That alone would put the team over .500 at 25-24.
While your point is taken -- yes, this team needs to play better fundamental baseball -- the reason they are losing games is because the bullpen keeps blowing leads. Fix that and you'll fix the problem.
by Al on
May 29, 2007 10:18 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
However...
Example 2: Sunday night in LA. OK, the pen blew it the 11th. With some clutch hitting, the Cubs should have won in 9.
Example 3: Yesterday against Marlins. OK, Eyre allowed 2 runs to put them in 5-0 hole. However a 3-run blast or an extra base hit by Lee or Ramirez in teh 9th would have made a lot of fans happy. Instead both strike out.
by ronsanto10 on
May 29, 2007 10:32 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Example 1.
I'll grant you, they have to play better fundamental baseball. But the primary fault is the bullpen's.
by Al on
May 29, 2007 10:43 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Example 1
by ronsanto10 on
May 29, 2007 11:01 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Lee didn't strike out in the 9th
by Orangeman94 on
May 29, 2007 11:12 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
u r right
by ronsanto10 on
May 29, 2007 11:15 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Cubs...
They actually hit better with RISP than they do otherwise. You could look it up.
by cwyers on
May 29, 2007 10:26 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
RISP
by ronsanto10 on
May 29, 2007 10:59 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And yet...
by santoswoodenlegs on
May 29, 2007 1:16 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Half-full, half-empty
On a day when the bullpen walks in the winning run or hits a batter to drive in the winning run or just gives up 5 runs in the bottom of the ninth the bullpen is the culprit.
On the other hand, when outfielders miss the cutoff man or throw to the wrong base or misjudge fly balls; when a catcher cannot get an out when the runner is hung-up between second and third or when infielders boot routine groundballs everyone points to a lack of fundamentals.
All of these situations are hallmarks of this team this year. As a player and coach for a long time, I can reliably state that fundamentals can be taught. After a while it becomes instinct. Before every pitch you have to know what you will do if the ball comes to you - where are you going to throw it? Which baserunner is slower/faster? How many outs are there? Does this hitter have power, does he pull the ball, will he bunt? Asking these questions keeps a player focused and in the game.
But now, step back and ask yourself - why are we even using the phrase "lack of fundamentals" to describe a major league team!?! Isn't that what the minor leagues are for? When a player signs a 9-figure contract, shouldn't it be expected that he will not misjudge fly balls? After playing almost 1000 games, shouldn't a catcher know how to get a hung-up runner out? What am I missing?
by MetsSuck on
May 29, 2007 10:51 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Fundamentals.
by ronsanto10 on
May 29, 2007 11:52 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Poor Team Preparation
Ramirez recently bitched about all the day games at Wrigley the Cubs have to play in comparison to other teams but I wonder if there is more to it than just that. For example, why did they schedule yesterday's game during the afternoon when they were coming off a West Coast trip the day before, presumably getting back home very late in the morning? Why not schedule the game at night and give those guys an extra hour of sleep or so?
I also wonder if the coaching staff adequately preps the players with scouting reports, film, etc. for that critical first game, especially early in the season when the teams haven't played yet.
I think there is more to these losses than the simplistic "the relief pitching sucks" theory that is very popular these days.
by JFCubFan on
May 29, 2007 12:16 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Other fundamentals missing.
- Throw strike 1.
- Get that first batter out in the inning.
4) JUST THROW STRIKES!
by Tekboy on
May 29, 2007 12:39 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Strike one
by MPH73 on
May 29, 2007 1:05 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed
Sadly, because of all the ups and downs with this team, mistakes are magnified. Just think how horrible this team would be if the starting pitching wasn't our strong point? Just think of getting into the bullpen in the 4th or 5th inning instead of the 7th or 8th? I shudder to think.
Soriano not getting to some fly balls, Barrett not throwing out ANYBODY, all the freaking walks. These things are killing us because we don't hit sac flies or can lay down a sac bunt. Extra runs are plated because we fail to hit the cutoff man, extending innings.
I usually feel HR's are overrated, UNLESS the team is built for them, like the Cubs. It was refreshing to see them score 7 runs against the Dodgers without the benefit of a HR. HR's take care of themselves, moving runners along and driving in that man at third consistently will make up for the bullpen, and if the bullpen could cut down on walks and throw strikes, they will make up for baserunning blunders.
I don't have any data in front of me, but I have a feeling that most of the 1 run losses were because of the bullpen. I don't remember too many times where we were losing and only scored enough runs to get within one. It seems we have taken late leads only to give the runs back.
by BigJohnAZ on
May 29, 2007 1:25 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I can't remember
I also think that the Cubs ERA went down about a run after he took over. Of course, for whatever reason, he was let go.
He would be a great coach to teach how to pitch at Wrigley. Again.
by Peoria Matt on
May 29, 2007 3:05 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That was 1996.
That was a big mistake. I'd very much be in favor of hiring Fergie again, if he'd be interested in returning.
See, Matt? You and I CAN agree on something! :)
by Al on
May 29, 2007 4:00 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You did
by sue369 on
May 29, 2007 3:38 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks, Sue!
by Al on
May 29, 2007 4:01 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not only that
by Rev Gunia on
May 29, 2007 6:26 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
















