Sweep!
As the dark clouds gathered over Wrigley Field this afternoon, I kept yelling out, "Swing!" at just about every batter, Cub or Rockie, from the 8th inning on.
Worked like a charm. About ten minutes after the last out, the skies opened up for the second afternoon in a row, but the rain held off for the important event of the day, the Cubs' sixth straight win, 6-4 over the Rockies, and they have their first consecutive series sweeps since April, 2004.
Remember those heady days? When the Cubs were supposed to be rushing head-on into a championship season?
Well, we all know what happened then. And it's far too early -- and with, of all people, Damian Miller hitting a three-run walkoff to give Milwaukee a sweep of Houston, the Cubs remain seven and a half games out of first place -- to think that way in 2007, especially since they still need one more win to get back to the .500 mark for the first time since May 10 (16-16).
But the Cubs are now 16-8 in their last 24 games and in the last six, have looked, really and truly, like a team clicking at last on all cylinders, a team that, when one guy has to sit out and rest an injured knee (Aramis Ramirez, just getting a day off, which gives him two full days to rest with the off day tomorrow) and others taking 0-fers (new hero Alfonso Soriano, not so heroic today), others step up.
Remember I said in this morning's recap how much I'm getting to like Mark DeRosa and his great approach to the game, how he gets the absolute most of his abilities, how he does anything and everything needed to win? He did it again today, starting at 3B for Aramis, playing good defense, and smacking a three-run homer and a double. There aren't too many teams today that have a "supersub", a guy who plays almost every day at several positions, but DeRosa could and should be that guy. 2B, 3B, RF -- who knows, maybe even SS? -- I like the way he plays the game, he is fast becoming one of my favorites.
Despite the sunshine that kissed most of the afternoon, most everyone knew the rain was coming which is why I was a little nervous at the nine walks that were issued today (five by Rockies pitchers, four by Cubs pitchers), slowing down the pace, although the eventual 2:42 game time wasn't that slow, it felt slow. And even when Billy Petrick, making his major league debut, gave up a two-run HR to Garrett Atkins in the 8th, cutting the lead to 6-4, you just had the feeling that the Cubs were going to win anyway. Suddenly, the vulnerable bullpen has done a lockdown job (at least since the memorable meltdown of Monday night). Today, it was Carlos Marmol's turn to get his first major league save, and he did it efficiently, 13 pitches (nine strikes). I have long felt that Marmol, if he can harness his control, could be a lights-out closer, as he consistently throws in the 94-95 MPH range. With this save, perhaps Lou will try him in that role while Ryan Dempster is on the DL.
I liked what I saw of Petrick -- big moose of a guy, just turned 23, 6-6, throws 94+, and made only one mistake, the HR to Atkins after a two-strike walk to Kaz Matsui, and that might have been thanks to plate umpire Dan Iassogna, whose strike zone was all over the place today; at least it was inconsistent for both teams.
Carlos Zambrano wasn't as good as he was in his last couple of starts, throwing only six innings and 107 pitches in the sticky, humid air; he did allow only two hits (and two walks) through five innings, bailing himself out of one of them with a slick 1-6-3 DP, and then got into trouble in the 6th, partly by his own inability to field Cory Sullivan's bunt quickly enough. A 27-pitch inning resulted in two runs on a pop-fly single, and that was it for Z; he was lifted for Jacque Jones, perhaps making his final appearance in a Cub uniform, if Jim Hendry can, at last, figure out some sort of deal for him on tomorrow's off-day. Jones bounced out meekly to first base.
And so, on Friday begins the biggest series the Cubs have played since September, 2004, and I don't think it's overhyping a June series against your division leader to say so. The Brewers are a good team. They're on a 90+ victory pace. I'd love to say the Cubs will sweep them, but that's a tough, tough thing to do to any team, even a struggling team like the White Sox, or a team like the Rockies that was playing well until they hit Toronto last weekend. The one factor that does give some hope that the Cubs can, at the very least, win the series (yes, I know, cutting a 7.5 game deficit to 6.5 isn't great, but there IS still half a season remaining) is that the Brewers are not a good road team (16-19, compared to 30-13 at Miller Park). The Cubs, until this week, hadn't been good at home, but now look like they actually know how to play to win at Wrigley Field.
Note: the Monday, July 16 game vs. the Giants has been changed to a 6:05 CT start, and will be carried on ESPN, good news for those of you outside Chicago, since that was to be a WCIU-only date.
Till tomorrow. Should be a terrific series this weekend. Enjoy the off day.
157 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Long time reader....first comment for AL
Your website is literally 5x more truthful and useful to me than anything on Cubs.com or espn etc etc
I will have many many more posts during the rest of this sites existance but I just wanted to get that off of my chest considering I have read this site for over two years. Well done my friend, well done.
by Beau Believes Esq on Jun 27, 2007 5:45 PM CDT reply actions
Thank you.
Its almost like the morning of opening day....
How in the world to your bring yourself to type these up after a long night in the bleachers? Is it the love or knowing that you have so many out there like me that look so forward to your recaps?
by Beau Believes Esq on Jun 27, 2007 5:57 PM CDT up reply actions
It's both, actually.
Glad you and your colleagues enjoy the site!
Marmol
One thing about Lou is that he expects the players to bring 100% every day. Apparently Marmol and some others are getting the message.
You can definitely...
Yet another reason I like DeRosa. He seems like Lou's type of player.
DeRosa has come a long way
The thing I like about DeRosa
He seems to have a real clue as to what he is doing, whether he is playing RF, 2B or 3B and he plays them all well. His bat will cool off eventually, but I like what he has shown.
One more thought on DeRosa
Six in a row baby!
Good:
Zambrano: 6 innings, 5 hits, 2 ER, 8 K's
Fontenot: 3 for 4, 2 runs, 1 RBI
Derosa: 7 for 16 with 7 RBI in last 4 games
Not as good:
Petrick: Got knocked around a bit. Welcome to the bigs kid!
Jacque Jones: 12 at bats since June 15? At this point do him a favor and just release him!
by Willgly on Jun 27, 2007 5:50 PM CDT reply actions
Petrick...
Agreed.
by Beau Believes Esq on Jun 27, 2007 6:02 PM CDT up reply actions
if petrick
Other than the pitch to Atkins
That is the difference between AA and the majors, though. He made a mistake to Atkins and Atkins made him pay. In the SL, he'd have probably gotten away with that pitch.
It's too bad, because his stat line will look like he pitched badly, but he didn't. But he has to learn not to make mistakes like that or he won't be able to stick here.
by Josh Timmers on Jun 27, 2007 6:09 PM CDT up reply actions
He did
by jazzypete on Jun 27, 2007 6:33 PM CDT up reply actions
Remember when Todd Wellenmeyer came up
You never know what you'll get out of a young player. Just gotta wait and see. Petrick's got a long way to go.
The off day is good....
Gallardo...
He led the minors in strikeouts last year at age 20.
He was leading the minors again this year at 21 before his callup.
He's not a huge velocity guy (topped out at 94 when I saw him), but the kid really knows how to pitch.
Good fastball, good curve, GREAT changeup. Didn't get rattled when he got in jams, either.
by NTNgod on Jun 27, 2007 6:16 PM CDT up reply actions
Gallardo vs. current Cubs
Fontentot was 0-5, 1BB, 1SO this year
Pagan was 0-6, 2SO
Hill was 0-3, 1SO
by NTNgod on Jun 28, 2007 12:32 AM CDT up reply actions
Road Schedule
Meanwhile we should see the other wild card teams playing amongst themselves which should prevent any runaway records.
we already
Take a deep breath
but we're worse at home so far.
Look
what?
i spent some time looking at the schedule and saw that we have a more favorable september than the brewers. i thought i would mention it. i'm just discussing baseball. what is it you think i am trying to justify?
See Subject Line
All in all a favorable road schedule remaining. We need to keep the Mo going on the road and now at home!
Go Cubs Go
Great sweep
I will be keeping track of the NBA draft on the day off.
nope
I'm not a
id rather see
Al--
As I had just returned from the best long weekend of my life in southeastern Montana and working as an interpreter-docent at Little Bighorn Nat'l Monument, sleep eventually got the best of me--but not until I was pretty sure of a Cubs' win.
And they did! It's now time to mow down Milwaukee! Sweep, sweep!
LRRF
by Littlerock Rynofan on Jun 27, 2007 6:07 PM CDT reply actions
6 in a row
Pretty sure of a Cubs' win?
I've been a Cubs' fan too long ...
by Littlerock Rynofan on Jun 27, 2007 8:07 PM CDT up reply actions
Given the bullpen's early record
The wild card picture
by Me and Lou WS 07 on Jun 27, 2007 6:13 PM CDT reply actions
Wild Card, Master Card, Visa Vard.....
The thing about the West teams, though
I'm hoping this isn't an aberration, that what we saw in the beginning of the year was a hangover from the "Dusty culture." I'm hoping that what we have seen the past six games (and to a lesser extent, the month of June in general), is Lou Piniella's presence and philosophy making itself shown on the field.
If that's the case, the Cubs will be in the mix come September. Whether they have enough to prevail is another question entirely.
by SuperContext on Jun 28, 2007 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions
Well....
That said, far too early to scoreboard or standings watch - much more important to keep our eye on our own game, and catch the ball, hit the ball, and win our own games.
Damn would another sweep feel good right now....
With the Cubs...
what a streak...
Go figure
Things are starting to fall into place. This team is better than one under .500. They've underscored their opponents by 31 runs as of today...
Winning streaks
It feels like Piniella is finally
7/16/07 game
Coincodence???.....
Gosh, it's so good to see some good fundamental baseball.
While I wouldn't be
nefi and dusty will b too busy to get bood
by ryan797 on Jun 27, 2007 8:51 PM CDT reply actions
didn't leyland say
Leyland, talking about Neifi
A: Well that's a good question because he played terrible. And what had happened was we got reports from our scouts, and I had known him from the past. We were kind of in a panic situation. We had lost Polly and we needed someone who could come in and play second, and play shortstop as well because Carlos needed some time off. And up to this point it looks like we made a mistake.
So Neifi's going to have to prove us wrong this spring because has not been a good acquisition up to this point.
But that was my fault, and the scouts. And I like said we had to have somebody. And I hope Neifi'll prove us wrong. I think he'll be much better than what he showed last year because he showed absolutely nothing when he came over.
In all honesty, this may be my favorite quote from any manager ever.
by ClosingTime on Jun 28, 2007 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions
Jim leyland is now my hero
by cubsirishkillme on Jun 28, 2007 11:31 AM CDT up reply actions
Where did you find this quote?
Neifi though
by NO100 on Jun 28, 2007 12:37 PM CDT up reply actions
Warning: AL Talk
11 games behind Boston, solidly in third place. Only three games separate Baltimore and Tampa Bay from New York.
3-7 in the last 10, 16-25 on the road. After this series, they play 10 games before the break against Oakland, Minnesota, and the Angels. Last place at the all star break? Quite possible.
8.5 away from the Wild Card... but only 5 away from topping the Fecal League!
Oh, and the savior the Rocket? 4 games, yet only 17.2 innings with a 5.09 ERA and 3 HR's.
Ballgame over! Yankees Lose! Theeeeeeee Yankees Lose!
DeRosa
Barrett
Technically, Lou didn't make the trade
by SuperContext on Jun 28, 2007 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions
No way
No way?
Yeah. Right.
Disagree
Good assessment
Super sub Derosa..
Henry Cotto
Al Spangler
But - that was all.
His fat ass sure couldn't run!
Henry Cotto was one of my favorite lesser known Cubs that caught on with the Yankees -
As was Miguel Cairo, who has had a very solid career.
by TheEman on Jun 28, 2007 12:00 AM CDT up reply actions
Was it Cotto
by SyneRandberg on Jun 28, 2007 7:43 AM CDT up reply actions
Man, that seems like yesterday.
by SyneRandberg on Jun 28, 2007 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions
It was raining so hard.
Sorry you got drenched!
Sweet Lou
Re: Sweet Lou
by deadcatbounce on Jun 27, 2007 10:41 PM CDT up reply actions
LOL
by deadcatbounce on Jun 28, 2007 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions
For those of you who have been harping
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/unfiltered/?p=426
Nate Silver...
Callups
No doubt Cedeno is on fire and all the things he was doing wrong early on seem to have been overcome. But again, who does he replace? If Izturis is moved, I'd think he'd be the first one up. If not, he might replace Izzy when he leaves after this year.
I understand Soto was just getting over an injury when Hill was called up so he wasn't available. And right now the mix of Hill and Bowen seem to have settled down the pitching staff. Perhaps Soto's sudden emergence as an offensive force still hasn't convinced management but barring a complete breakdown, I could see him starting next year.
Bottom line is that Lou seems very comfortable with his team right now until Hendry finds some was to dump the unholy three.
We've found chemistry with Hill and Bowen
I say, let Soto continue to develop this year, then figure him into the plans for '08.
If an injury in '07 forces his call-up... then he'll get his shot.
They might deal Izzy before the deadline
But, there's a dilemma here: does Cedeno need to play everyday in order to continue development and succeed? Or can he be part of a rotation? Plus, his defense is atrocious.
We've hit lightning in a bottle with Fontenot... and Theriot isn't going anywhwere.
i wouldn't mind seeing cedeno
by buckmulligan on Jun 28, 2007 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions
No thanks
One thing Silver is neglecting..
I don't think it was a very well thought out statement by Silver.
He's also
In fairness...
it does when you look at feilding %
He's only...
Wow
Some funny perspective:
FOUR YEARS WITHOUT A WINNING MONTH OF BASEBALL? WOW - we think we have it rough at times, but that is absolutely insane.
FOUR YEARS - absolutely incredible.
:)
Have you watched the Royals?
Bad Defense, poor pitching, and quiet bats - that's a bad combination.
by Ihatethecards on Jun 28, 2007 7:53 AM CDT up reply actions
This Cubs team recently
Blanco
by 26.2cubfan on Jun 28, 2007 12:02 AM CDT reply actions
They signed him to a 2 year deal
It was a bad signing...
he was signed
that should read
In case you don't know...
20 GAMES BELOW!!!
Had they not given away easily seven or eight this year, the team would be at the top or VERY close to the division lead.
So, to put this all in perspective, there is improvement in the record.
It will take a while to shake the loser mentality - but I hope they have gotten a nice start on it.
by TheEman on Jun 28, 2007 12:04 AM CDT reply actions
The trend is good
The Angels just got swept by KC at home
by sanantonecub on Jun 28, 2007 7:37 AM CDT up reply actions
I think we are stuck with Jones
According to the Minneapolis Star Tribune, the Twins are no longer interested in acquiring Jacque Jones because the Cubs are unwilling to pay a large percentage of his remaining contract.
The newspaper reports that the Twins and Cubs were working on a deal before the Marlins stepped in, but likely won't resume talks even though the trade to Florida fell through. Jones played for the Twins from 1999-2005 before leaving as a free agent.
====
I think we are going to be stuck with him if Zell doesn't want us to pay for him and if no other team wants to pay for him. Hell, certainly someone would want him..I mean after all we traded away Neifi Perez!!
I think
by jazzypete on Jun 28, 2007 9:10 AM CDT up reply actions
Mike and Mike
Mike and Buster Olney then got into discussion about how the NL only has something like 5 teams that are 3-4 games over .500 (Dodgers, Pads, DBacks, Mets and Brewers)and that the NL was relatively wide open, that the Cubs were poised to make a run...
FWIW
by HeyGundy on Jun 28, 2007 9:19 AM CDT reply actions
Mike &Mike
Yep
And they should have.
Olney
I'm trying to be polite. I think he's not very smart about baseball.
His "The Last Night of the Yankee Dynasty" struck me as one of the worst baseball books ever that wasn't a ghost-written autobiography. (OK, he's better than a ghost-writer.)
by Josh Timmers on Jun 28, 2007 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions
I think espn is feeding him exclusives
super sub
Soriano
then why does he have so few rbis?
by buckmulligan on Jun 28, 2007 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions
Not really
My guess is
by eamuscatuli1881 on Jun 28, 2007 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions
Not likely
That makes sense.
And if this...
lead off hitter
by cozmotaylor on Jun 28, 2007 10:33 AM CDT reply actions
If we sweep Milwaukee
If Jessica Alba accepted my dinner invitation
that would ALSO be intense.
by HeyGundy on Jun 28, 2007 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions
that would be more than intense
if you
by jazzypete on Jun 28, 2007 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm just looking for 2/3
Don't forget the W Sux are horrible and the Mile Highs just got sept by the Jays. Fortunately, we do play well against the Suds Heads. Should be very exciting!!!
Heading into Brewers series
The Cubs only play the Brew Crew six more times this year - a sweep puts us 4 1/2 back but we only pick up one game and go to 6 1/2 if we take two out of three. Normally two out of three is a good thing but it's not in this case. That having been said, let's go for nine in a row!
by mastrick on Jun 28, 2007 11:25 AM CDT reply actions
I still think
It will put us a game over .500 and it will mark continued solid play over the Brewers this year.
Too early in the year to say 2 out of 3 is not a good thing. I'll take 6.5 out at the break, notwithstanding 7 winnable games vs. Wash and Pitt before the break.
by HeyGundy on Jun 28, 2007 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions
Taking 2 out of 3...
by Rogue 52 on Jun 28, 2007 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions
Gallardo
But that's what he is. A prospect. Look at how Lincecum has struggled at times this season. It's rare that even a great pitching prospect steps into the rotation and dominates. He's going to have some rough patches.
I'd much rather face Gallardo than Ben Sheets, for example. But unfortunately, I think we're getting both.
by Josh Timmers on Jun 28, 2007 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions
Dunno..
IIRC
by eamuscatuli1881 on Jun 28, 2007 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions
Iowa Game Tonight..
I am planning to go for my first Iowa Cubs games tonight to Des Moines. What are the best seats for the game -
Here are the options I found online:
Ticket Type:
===
- General Admission
- Reserved Grand Stand
- Club Box
- Field Box
====- Best Seats
- Level 1 - Section C
- Level 1 - Section W
Thanks...
I just went wednesday
by scuba4 on Jun 28, 2007 1:14 PM CDT up reply actions
Iowa Cubs
by cozmotaylor on Jun 28, 2007 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions
Cubs trivia?
more Nate Silver
As far a defense that something hard to gauge most the games I have seen nobody lays out to stop a fast grounder up the middle or a fly ball in the outfield.
On the whole its unlikely that they will be brought up for good reason(except Soto). If they are then it means we are out of the race.
I still like Jones and I don't know that we would get anyone good for him. Why does everyone hate Jones I know he's batting like .222 but so is Theriot. Is it because we are weak on pitching , if so I understand but I don't think we can get Griffey from the Reds.
by scuba4 on Jun 28, 2007 1:08 PM CDT reply actions
Hmmm...let's see on JJones
He's done poor with RISP
Strikes out frequently.
He has a minu-minus arm.
Is the fastest on the team AFTER Pie, Pagan, Soriano, Theriot, Fontenot, Lee, Marquis, Marmol,and Itzturis.
But other than that, he's not bad.
by TheEman on Jun 28, 2007 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions
It should also be noted...
WTF IS THIS?
by TheEman on Jun 28, 2007 1:34 PM CDT reply actions
Soriano..
Pitching, as usual, will remain the key. As long as the starters don't implode I think we can compete in the weak division with a suspect pen.
I do like Marmol as closer but don't know if his time is now. I still may take a flyer on him on my fantasy team.
Nice to see a winner now and then after shelling out so many greenbacks to watch bad baseball. Go Cubs!
Part of the reason
Sure, you can talk fielding percentage and zone rating, but you can't really talk how many runs Soriano saved by making that throw. You can't determine how many less players attempted to go for the extra base because Soriano was in left.
He is turning into a good defensive left fielder and all one needs is thier own eyes to figure that out.
by NO100 on Jun 28, 2007 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions
Winning the first game...
I don't know about everyone else but if the Cubs take the first game. I believe the Brew Crew will begin feeling pressure. A pressure that IMHO will cause them to become unraveled.
With the Cubs taking game one in the Wrigley environment with the Cubs fans at their best and loudest. I see this Crew wilting.
The Cubs are playing really with nothing to lose right now.
I'm happy about the day off today for the Cubs. They can clear there head and rest. Then come in tomorrow and gun for the top spot.
Wishful thinking
Partially agree..
Hill is 1-1 vs. MIL this year
(W, 7IP, 1H, 1R, 1HR, 6SO, 0BB)
...and a not-so great one on April 24 at Wrigley.
(L, 6.2IP, 6H, 4R, 2HR, 5SO, 3BB)
by NTNgod on Jun 29, 2007 2:48 AM CDT up reply actions
To finish up on Hill...
(he had a couple of scoreless outings sandwiched in-between those two starts)
by NTNgod on Jun 29, 2007 2:51 AM CDT up reply actions

by 

















