Official July 31 Trading Deadline Discussion Diary
Please use this diary for any and all discussions of trades, rumors, etc. today, with the deadline coming up at 3 pm CT, rather than post a million different threads and diaries.
Thanks. Have at it.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
534 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hopefully
My deal, Pie, Gallagher, Marshall and Jones for Griffey and Arroyo.
Murton and Cedeno for a reliever.
Go ahead. Rip it apart..
Why would the Reds want Jones?
Arroyo has a 2.60 ERA in July
Sean Marshall...
So tell me again how the Cubs benefit from this deal?
Arroyo was a solid starter
You only need...
The Cubs already have five pitchers better than Arroyo.
You need 4 starters
Seems your expectations are winning the Central.. This team will need lots of luck to win the NL.. They're a impact player away imo, and Griffey would make a huge impact.
Marquis has playoff experience too.
Arroyo's postseason experience: 10 games, two starts, 7.41 ERA.
So who's more useful in the postseason?
arroyo
Arroyo has been the same this year
seriously his numbers are EXACTLY the same
the idea that he's been horrible this year is lazy
by DartmouthCubsFan on Jul 31, 2007 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions
Unless Hendry is a liar
gm's lie about not trading guys
There you go again
One has nothing to do with the other. I can imagine the terrible burden it must be thinking that you're always right. The truth is, you ain't even close.
Yeah right
Excuse me for intruding
FYI, when he's wrong, he's wrong. When he's right, he's right. Unlike you who worship all that is Hendry.
think we could
no...
LOL
by lostinthevines on Jul 31, 2007 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions
but why
Ummm...
Harang is one of the best pitchers in the game, and you think they are going to basically give him to the Cubs? And be forced to take the Cubs' crap?
Come on...
by big_lowitzki on Jul 31, 2007 9:18 AM CDT up reply actions
My list of players worth bothering making an offer
And no, not all of these guys deserve a lot in return...
American League
- Toronto: nobody
- Baltimore: Chad Bradford
- Tampa: Other than Crawford, nobody
- Minnesota: Nathan, Cuddyer, Hunter (as a rental)
- White Sox: nobody
- Kansas City: Reggie Sanders (for a B- prospect only!)
- Oakland: nobody
- Texas: Young, maybe Wilson
- Florida: nobody
- Washington: nobody
- San Francisco: Messenger, if he was a RH then Roberts
Someone mentioned this
Interesting
He's already a better
As evidenced last night,
Gomes would be nice
by lostinthevines on Jul 31, 2007 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions
that is a good idea
I like
by NO100 on Jul 31, 2007 9:06 AM CDT up reply actions
I like it
by hawkeyenation on Jul 31, 2007 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions
Gomes
I am calling it now, and I may be wrong, but I have this gut feeling...
Conine will be a Cub by the end of the day. He's cheap, he's experienced, and he would give us a good bat off the bench and can fill in in the outfield and 1B if needed. With Ward on the DL,it makes sense to pick him up, and I think we would probably owe something like 500K.
Just a gut feeling for some reason. It's either a gut feeling or that 6-pack and tacos.
I hope not
by hawkeyenation on Jul 31, 2007 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions
Here's a thought provoking link:
I just hope the Brew Crew doesn't get Gagne.
Oooops!
Gagne
I mean, let's be honest, all he's ever had to intimidate someone were those goofy-looking glasses.
In all seriousness, he's got a decent cutter, and fastball that moves, but he ain't exactly lights-out anymore.
Will Jim Hendry Get Carl Crawford please
by Will71081 @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Jul 31, 2007 7:56 AM CDT reply actions
agreed
by mike @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Jul 31, 2007 8:39 AM CDT up reply actions
I'd do it too, I think.
im not sure
by mike @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Jul 31, 2007 9:36 AM CDT up reply actions
What?
His contract has club options through 2010.
by big_lowitzki on Jul 31, 2007 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions
That
There are not many but Crawford in CF for a while would make it worth the trade IMHO.
by Kinky Reggae on Jul 31, 2007 8:40 AM CDT up reply actions
If Crawford could play CF, he'd be doing so.
The one constant is that Crawford stays anchored in LF. If he could play CF, he'd be doing so - the Rays' best OF would be Delmon-Crawford-Gomes. Instead, they've moved their 2B to CF and left Crawford in LF.
by ClosingTime on Jul 31, 2007 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions
CC is a DRAY
by juicegriffin on Jul 31, 2007 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions
Damn
I wish, but I don't see it happening.
I won't
by cubbyblue137 on Jul 31, 2007 8:27 AM CDT reply actions
Agreed
Murton
Just who
And fyi, Murtons career numbers are: .292/.362/.439/.801
Tell me how that is bad, tell me again how those numbers indicate that Murton just isn't that good. In fact his numbers are very similar to Conines career numbers.
Sounds to me like you just don't like Murton. The problem isn't that some of us guys here like Murton for "whatever reason", the problem is that some have given up on him or have never liked him despite the evidence that shows he is/could be a descent player.
Baseball isn't played by numbers!!!!!!
Hilarious
I know the next conclusion you'll jump to is that I believe Conine can rake, yet another comment I've never said, but I'll leave you to do as you choose. Can Murton equate Conine's numbers? Perhaps Conine's as a 40-year old or however old he is.
If Murton were such a viable OF option, people would be beating down Hendry's door for him. Hint...that isn't happening...and for a reason.
Murton
by Matt Allison on Jul 31, 2007 1:29 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah.
I hate the idea of giving up too much for too
Lol.
Yeah
Just like the Brewers, this team has the potential to slow down and I think a nice addition can change that fate.
Last night was ugly!
Who
by cubbyblue137 on Jul 31, 2007 8:35 AM CDT up reply actions
We have got
Marshall (if we get a starter in return)
Jones
Murton
Cedeno
Veal
EPat
Gallagher
Cherry
Petrick
Eyre (not likely!)
Fontenot (if the right deal)
We have guys to deal, we just need to get the right fit in return. Isn't that what Hendry is supposed to be good at?
by Kinky Reggae on Jul 31, 2007 8:38 AM CDT up reply actions
Hey!
</sarcasm>
Nice!
by BillHoldenFan on Jul 31, 2007 8:44 AM CDT up reply actions
Sounds like a deal to me!
Cmon though, some of these guys are expendable and there are teams out there who have expendable parts too.
BASEBALL SWAPMEET ANYONE???
by Kinky Reggae on Jul 31, 2007 8:49 AM CDT up reply actions
Hill not marshall
I Agree with Hill not Marshall
I also like the fact that Hill (could) bring more in a trade because his value might be a little higher than Marshall's in others' eyes.
by BJ Simpson on Jul 31, 2007 9:25 AM CDT up reply actions
Neither Hill nor Marshall
by cervantes05 on Jul 31, 2007 12:42 PM CDT up reply actions
Last night was a buzz saw
I wish they'd do something, but lets take it day by day, get a "W" tonight, and let Jim do what he thinks is best for the ballclub...
Good luck tonight Jason,
With Love...
A Cubs Fan...
by BillHoldenFan on Jul 31, 2007 8:36 AM CDT up reply actions
Hopefully
by jazzypete on Jul 31, 2007 8:35 AM CDT reply actions
No Trades...no (major) trades
Those who ignore history
Why would you ever, ever, EVER count on a healthy Kerry Wood?
If Hendry sees a pressing need in the bullpen, and is counting on Wood to fill it, then that is certainly a huge mistake.
by SuperContext on Jul 31, 2007 9:11 AM CDT up reply actions
but if we don't have a pressing need
Agreed.
And if not...
And Billy Petrick.
I just hope
If he's activated Thursday...
Need to make mental note..
- Find Wood Jersey
- Buy tickets
- Get 6 y/o son
- Start talking about night game versus braves in 2003 and 1998 games.
I agree there is no pressing need
I think my annoyance comes from Hendry's attempts to mollify those who think the Cubs should make a move by saying, in effect, "but really, we don't need to make a deal, because its as if we're trading for Kerry Wood!"
That, I don't buy. Might Wood's return help the team? Yes. But he doesn't address the area where the Cubs could most use a trade (the outfield), and he isn't a guy who is guaranteed to come in and perform and improve the pen. In fact, I read the decision to stand pat with Wood as a concession that the bullpen is fine as is, and if Wood works out, it will be even better.
by SuperContext on Jul 31, 2007 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions
forget wood,
by buckmulligan on Jul 31, 2007 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions
wow
Took a home town discount to stay with the cubs.
Put aside ego to become a RP instead of a SP.
Holds charity events to raise money for DLee foundation.
I think he's going to be another veteren great clubhouse guy who's been in the postseason before.
I would wish him the best, even if he wasn't a cub.
hey, i'm not wishing bad on the guy.
by buckmulligan on Jul 31, 2007 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions
I don't think anyone believes he is a stud
Just as much as Wood has been injured
His chance is coming soon, and I personally can't wait. He truly is a great Cub.
by HoffPowahhh on Jul 31, 2007 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions
did anyone see
by holycow07 on Jul 31, 2007 8:46 AM CDT reply actions
Yes, but don't believe anything this time of year
by cervantes05 on Jul 31, 2007 12:47 PM CDT up reply actions
I don't blame him.
by Matt Allison on Jul 31, 2007 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions
Jack Wilson
You must be joking.
Ugh. Forget it. No thanks.
Nevermind anyway
But in any event, Wilson is owed something like $7 million in 2008 and $8 million in 2009. Unless Pittsburgh eats all of that, Wilson isn't an option.
The rumor was that
Or
I don't recall
I subscribe to the theory that winning cures problems with the talent you have in place, but adding mid-season clubhouse problems can be fatal.
Well
The point is, the league is filled with front-runners and some guys that are competitive get tired of getting their heads kicked in year after year. Wilson more than likely fits that description.
I do remember Lofton being a PITA
Wilson is owed what a poster above states is 8M this and 9M next and is delivering a whopping .249 average, 4HR, 26 RBI and a stellar .301 OBP. Who (Theriot, Fontenot, Cedeno) cannot duplicate this cheaper?
LOL
I'm not going to get carried away on Wilson as it was an off-the-top suggestion, especially after seeing his salary numbers, but I don't think there is a question he would serve as a much better backup SS than Cedeno does. Even if Wilson sniffs the field once a week, he is a far superior overall player than Cedeno, which is really my point.
Heck, round up just about any other utility infielder and I'd rather have him on the field in any situation rather than Cedeno. Wilson was just the poster boy for this particular commentary.
Wilson...
And you want to throw that money at him to be a backup SS? That's just crazy.
Money
WOW
It's simple.
Come on man
Secondly, I missed the part where I said that I "liked" Jack Wilson. Is Jack Wilson a better player, particularly as a backup SS, than Cedeno? Without question. You've missed the point entirely.
As for Murton, he's brutal. Plain and simple. How anyone can argue otherwise is beyond me. The "he's a .300 hitter" logic is laughable. But this isn't a stats-based argument in the first place. Watch him play, put down the Shandler books, and you'll probably make an amazing revelation. Murton just isn't very good.
So, without making a further personal "observation" about you, I'm pretty comfortable in knowing and seeing good/bad, right/wrong, black/white...etc.
Okay, we get it.
Us?
Because you've used...
Unbelievable
The BlueMike comparison doesn't fly here. He reveled in rankling the masses. While I'm still in full agreement that neither Murton nor Cedeno belong in Chicago, and will continue to believe that until proven otherwise, my comments are simply my opinions.
Perhaps you don't like them, I don't really care. But as I said, I'm not standing on the table forcing you to listen to them. For you to lay into me as you did, in a discussion that you weren't even part of, is quite simply, ignorant and wrong.
I won't even comment on your line about women. That suggestion is even worse and belongs in a thread with BlueMike.
I don't spend a ton of time here
Look back at what you typed, seriously. When asked how you could possibly believe Wilson is good, you say that you're more qualified at watching baseball than the other poster, and then you just make a couple of patronizing comments.
It's not your opinions that's the problem, it's your ridiculous attitude. Cwyers is absolutely in the right to call you out on it.
Garbage
You've obviously only skimmed the entire thread as it was the other that first mentioned my ability to recognize baseball talent. But I'm not going to waste any more of my time on this silly message board sqaubble. It's meaningless.
You'll be back for more...
"But I'm not going to waste any more of my time on this silly message board sqaubble. It's meaningless."
I think we all have different views of what is talent and what is not. Just because one played college ball, does not mean that they know what talent looks like. Same way if hendry was on BCB we would probably disagree with him too.
AND
We'd have arguments against his skills too!
This argument seems pointless...Murton has been weak, Cedeno too. If they can bring what the team needs trade em. Period.
by Kinky Reggae on Jul 31, 2007 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions
OK...
Cedeno is not my first choice as our backup SS, but Wilson is hitting .249 with a .640 OPS. Not sure I'd want him either.
Finally
So why get Wilson? Simple, he's better than Cedeno. Do the Cubs "need" Wilson? Probably not. But they do need a backup middle infielder and anyone that is better than Cedeno should be looked at.
I realize that Cedeno is still a polar figure. There are those that believe his youth gives him time to improve while others believe that his lack of instincts expose him as marginal at best. I fall into the second camp even if it is easy to point out to his heinous pinch hitting appearance last night as the most recent example.
Do the Cubs have other needs that are more pressing? Of course. A RH hitting RF not named Matt Murton for one. But the Cubs would be better off with a better backup MI as well.
Some of you guys, not you 10 14 23 26, need to relax a little bit. You're acting like I suggested the Cubs add rev. Jim Jones to the clubhouse to serve cocktails.
f**k stats
Why?
Jack Wilson = Neifi Perez = Cesar Izturis
by big_lowitzki on Jul 31, 2007 9:22 AM CDT up reply actions
Update
by cubbyblue137 on Jul 31, 2007 9:25 AM CDT up reply actions
Easy equation
Can Eyre
by cubbyblue137 on Jul 31, 2007 8:53 AM CDT reply actions
I love it how people are jumping on the
The added benefit of keeping him and not
Wow
ok then prove me wrong...
If a picture is worth a thousand words
by IllinoisCubs on Jul 31, 2007 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions
when murton first came up,
by buckmulligan on Jul 31, 2007 10:03 AM CDT up reply actions
I think...
I'm not arguing that Murton should be playing every day, only that he seems to be ill-suited to being a bench player and/or playing twice a week.
i agree.
for now, i'm for cloning derosa. make it happen jim.
by buckmulligan on Jul 31, 2007 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions
When guys first come up
With Murton, his best projected numbers came very early in his major league AB's and IMO, it had a lot to do with there not being an indepth scouting report on him. As he got more big league AB's, the found out he struggles to turn on the fastballs from the middle of the plate in, and his numbers went down a bit. In his effort to adjust to this, he has really gone backwards, because it has forced him to turn on that pitch, which means committing to his swing earlier. When you do this, you also become more vulnerable to breaking balls on the outside edge.
Murton has an inside/out type of swing, and most of these guys need the ball out over the plate, where they can drive it to the opposite field. When he is going good, he drives the ball well to right center, but when they bust him with hard stuff towards the inner half, he struggles.
To date, he has had a hard time making the adjustment, and in trying to do so, he has become more anxious at the plate. I think he can be a servicable major league hitter (.280-.290 with 15 homers) if he played a full season, but he will not be a run producer.
Adjustments?
Murton's line in the second half of the year last year: .319/.390/.522
This was after he had been in the league for a year, meaning that teams, by then, had plenty of time to make adjustments. The "pitchers making adjustments" argument simply does not hold up.
Murton had the best OPS in the NL among left-fielders over the second half of the season last year.
by big_lowitzki on Jul 31, 2007 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions
That's right - adjustments
Like I said, I think he can be a servicable major league hitter (similar to a right handed Todd Walker), but he will not be a run producer.
2005 - AB - 140 - avg - .321 HR - 7 SLG - .521
2006 - AB - 455 - avg - .297 HR - 13 SLG - .365
2007 - AB - 123 - avg - .244 HR - 1 SLG - .326
To me, this sure looks like someone that has had their flaws exposed, and has yet to make an adjustment.
im still not buying it
If he is here
like the current RF production?
by DartmouthCubsFan on Jul 31, 2007 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions
What are you recommending?
That Murton...
He just might get it
Wrong
.365 was his OBP. .444 isn't stunning, but it isn't terrible either.
And he got better as the went on, meaning that he was able to make adjustments to the pitchers' adjustments.
by big_lowitzki on Jul 31, 2007 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions
My gut feel is that Dye
by NO100 on Jul 31, 2007 9:13 AM CDT reply actions
I heard on talk radio
by Scott @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Jul 31, 2007 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions
If that was said on "The Score"
If the Hanley Ramirez for Josh Beckett deal is any indication, the RS don't give up thier top prospects too easily. Dye is probably not a guy one would sign long term, nor is his value anywhere near Beckett's.
We shall see what happens. One advantage that Boston has is that they have more than a few really good arms to deal.
by NO100 on Jul 31, 2007 10:26 AM CDT up reply actions
Not The Score
They were talking to someone in the Boston media (don't know who because I got in in the middle of the conversation) about KG to the Celtics and this guy kinda threw in about the Red Sox getting Dye, resting Ortiz for a while to get healthy, and then ultimately benching Drew. He didn't give any indication of who the Red Sox would send.
Probably not worth much, just passing it along.
by Scott @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Jul 31, 2007 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions
Thanks for the tidbit
by NO100 on Jul 31, 2007 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions
right handed bat
by Cubs fan on Jul 31, 2007 9:26 AM CDT reply actions
Reportedly, Jack Wilson
by cubbyblue137 on Jul 31, 2007 9:52 AM CDT reply actions
Good.
Wow, the Tigers.
Al....
1 year ago today i went into throw and i experienced one of the coolest things i have ever seen at a sporting event.
It was the trade deadline and i believe we had a night game. So i arrived at the field at around 2 to get ready and all that great stuff. When i walked into the clubhouse i was in absolute shock. All the players were watching ESPN News, to see who was traded to who, and if anyone from the Cubs was/is being traded. I stuck around in the clubhouse until about 2:55 at which point i needed to get out to the cage, and by this time Maddux had not shown up, but he still was a Cub (at 2:55, trade deadline ended at 3). I was sitting out in the cage with JJ, Pierre and Clines, when Blanco walks out (around 3:15pm) and said Maddux was just traded. Basically all four of us were shocked, including the Clines. We figured that since nothing happened by 2:55, that he was gonna stay on the Cubs. (Maddux arrived at 3pm)
We wrapped up our session in the cage and headed back into the clubhouse. When we arrived in the club house is when i experienced the coolest moment in sports for me. Every single player was sitting at their locker staring at Maddux cleaning out his locker. The clubhouse was quite and somewhat in awe of Maddux and most of them realized they would never share the same clubhouse with such a great baseball player.
Everyone was saying their goodbyes and giving him hugs and having him sign a few baseballs and whatever else he could. he was very professional about it and very classy. i simply walked up to him and said hey Greg it was great to meet you and hangout with you for a few months good luck with the rest of your career. He smiled and said thanks it was nice to meet you.
Just thought i would share my story in light of it being trade-deadline day! Enjoy!
that is cool.
by buckmulligan on Jul 31, 2007 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions
Very cool story indeed.
Class act.
overall thoughts on Hendry
What is the payback. FA respect that a player (marginal) will be afforded the chance to leave if it is appropriate.
Thanks for the story but I hated that day
but this is of course a sad day for me. I remember thinking it
was "safe" after the deadline passed with no word ,only to see the crawl run on the screen at 3.05. I know Hendry did it out of respect for Maddux but it was a tough.
Luckily I got to see Maddux pitch in LA that Sept and it was
a great game. He shut down the Reds, had two great fielding plays and executed a perfect suicide squeeze.
I am very glad he got to play for a contending team last year.
by jessica on Jul 31, 2007 5:21 PM CDT up reply actions
Carlos Silva?
http://blogs.chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports_hardball/2007/07/another-name-fo.html
Me either.
Since then he's been mediocre-to-bad. Depending on what the Cubs had to give up, might be worth it, but otherwise this seems sort of pointless.
eh??????
Cards got Pinto.
by cubbyblue137 on Jul 31, 2007 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions
Apparently, yes.
I'm guessing he goes into their rotation. Yawn.
Yawn if you like...
This is the type of move that always scares me...
by SouthernCub on Jul 31, 2007 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions
Dave Duncan's magic...
well, you won't have to be wary much longer
by buckmulligan on Jul 31, 2007 10:49 AM CDT up reply actions
Yes
by cubbyblue137 on Jul 31, 2007 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions
He's not actually offensive...
Bruce Miles says NO to Silva
They are now discussing Garland.
That would be a huge addition to the rotation and worthy of giving up Hill or Marshall plus couple quality prospects (Epatt, etc.).
i'd be interested in garland.
by buckmulligan on Jul 31, 2007 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions
Garland
by big_lowitzki on Jul 31, 2007 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions
im not interested if
What about Griffey?
by writerinwrigley on Jul 31, 2007 10:55 AM CDT reply actions
If Griffey becomes a Cub
I beg to differ
by NO100 on Jul 31, 2007 11:00 AM CDT up reply actions
why, just luck?
think he could still play a bit of center?
by buckmulligan on Jul 31, 2007 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions
The difference is
Griffey will be pricey, both in dollars and players. Much more risk involved in getting him.
We've made our mess with Wood and Prior. Anything we get back at this point is gravy.
Update
by cubbyblue137 on Jul 31, 2007 10:59 AM CDT reply actions
People like you
by santoswoodenlegs on Jul 31, 2007 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions
ive said this before
by cubsluver22 on Jul 31, 2007 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions
Yeah Any player can get hurt
Prior to this year Griffey has played, on average 89 games a year over the last 5 years. That's awful for a guy with his salary. And generally speaking, potential for injury goes up as the player gets older.
This is not a "never take a chance on anything" situation. It's cost benefit analysis. Griffey is a huge risk that will be costly.
Oh boy...
by santoswoodenlegs on Jul 31, 2007 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions
Yes
And when we got him...
by santoswoodenlegs on Jul 31, 2007 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions
No, I like Nomar
I don't boo a guy becasue I don't like his signing.
So as I understand it...
by santoswoodenlegs on Jul 31, 2007 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions
nomar cost a lot?
brendan harris
justin jones
Harris is the only one that made it to the majors and he did it with a team other than the Twins
Nomar cost very little and landed us Murton
by DartmouthCubsFan on Jul 31, 2007 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions
yeah murton
Good point, but
Not a knock, mind you... As said, getting the best value is going to GET you to the playoffs... but winning them usually takes more than that. We have a good blend of stars and team players now, but adding another "A" player wouldn't hurt.
With all that said, doubtful he ends up a Cub, regardless, since it might just tinker with a good thing.
by cervantes05 on Jul 31, 2007 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions
misc.
Johnny Gomes
Oh no!
by santoswoodenlegs on Jul 31, 2007 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions
you must mean Pie...
by Kinky Reggae on Jul 31, 2007 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions
I didn't mean anyone..
by santoswoodenlegs on Jul 31, 2007 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions
We certainly can give up
by Kinky Reggae on Jul 31, 2007 12:31 PM CDT up reply actions
Gomes is about right...
The questions would be whether the D-Rays reasonable in their trade requests?
by SouthernCub on Jul 31, 2007 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions
I think we could probably get Gomes...
What about
No
If we are going to complain about Wood and Prior being injured he is the same as them except he doesn't rely on his arm to earn money, he relies on his legs, which are constantly bad.
Plus, he's on the DL so you can't trade for him.
by hawkeyenation on Jul 31, 2007 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions
Agreed...
A side note though: Baldelli can certainly be traded for right now. He'd just have to be a player to be named later.
by SouthernCub on Jul 31, 2007 11:42 AM CDT up reply actions
Thanks
by hawkeyenation on Jul 31, 2007 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions
2 sets of numbers...
30 63 16 1 2 28 24 37 2 .308 .333 .241
R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB OBP SLG AVG
24 48 11 0 11 28 13 58 4 .330 .508 .265
Which player do you want?
by santoswoodenlegs on Jul 31, 2007 11:42 AM CDT reply actions
both...
by BillHoldenFan on Jul 31, 2007 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions
neither...
by BillHoldenFan on Jul 31, 2007 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions
Well good news and bad news...
by santoswoodenlegs on Jul 31, 2007 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions
I'd take both of them as catcher...
Sorry to break it to you...
The second is Gomes.
by santoswoodenlegs on Jul 31, 2007 11:51 AM CDT up reply actions
Here is the caveat...
Gomes is 27, has only played in 287 ML games and has never had more than 385 AB in any of the 3 seasons where hes played with any regularity. He may/should get better.
by santoswoodenlegs on Jul 31, 2007 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions
Oh, and check out...
Yeah, I'd take Gomes over Jones.
Last year Gomes had this line
385 53 83 21 20 59 166 61 116 .325 .431 .216
Sure, this year I would like Gomes over Jones. But be careful what you wish for. If we had Gomes last year everyone would want to DFA him
If we had Gomes last year...
by santoswoodenlegs on Jul 31, 2007 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions
4286 career at bats
.780 caree OPS
.241 2007 avg
.641 2007 OPS
Rock on!
by santoswoodenlegs on Jul 31, 2007 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions
Jacques career numbers
I would like to have Gomes this year, he is performing better than Jones. I'd glady switch one for the other.
All I'm saying is Gomes isn't a stud. Gomes does have more potential and Jones is probably in decline, but Gomes isn't great and he certainly hasn't proven himself.
That's tough though
by hawkeyenation on Jul 31, 2007 12:42 PM CDT up reply actions
Yes but last year...
- 348 AB, 21 HR, .282/.372/.534
- 181 AB, 11 HR, .265/.330/.508
Basically, you're arguing that Jones' norm (which may or may not be his norm anymore) is better than Gomes' worst-case scenario.
by SouthernCub on Jul 31, 2007 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions
Your words, not mine.
by santoswoodenlegs on Jul 31, 2007 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions
exactly
But again, doing a deal for Gomes would make too much sense.
by hawkeyenation on Jul 31, 2007 12:47 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm glad you're listening
"I would like to have Gomes this year, he is performing better than Jones. I'd glady switch one for the other."
All I'm saying is he is not a proven player. He is worth taking a chance on, but I wouldn't want to give too much up for him.
Cubs interested in Eric Gagne!
The Journal News' Peter Abraham believes the Red Sox and the Cubs are the favorites, with the Red Sox offering David Murphy and Kason Gabbard. If Boston moves Gabbard, it means Jon Lester would get to stick around as the team's fifth starter.
I have a funny feeling.....
Or it is a big move that would definitely sure this bullpen up. Make Demp a starter???? Need a righty?? Better than Marquis!!!!
by louslovechild on Jul 31, 2007 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions
Pie for Laird, Gagne, and prospect?
If Gagne is acquired, and wood comes back, along with howry/demp/marmol, the pen would look really good.
by cubbyblue137 on Jul 31, 2007 11:58 AM CDT reply actions
Fantasy Land
by IllinoisCubs on Jul 31, 2007 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions
um....
by hawkeyenation on Jul 31, 2007 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions
Me?
by cubbyblue137 on Jul 31, 2007 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions
NO!
If Pie lands you Griffey, maybe you do it. But to get another bullpen arm (even a good one like Gagne, but one who has injury history) as a rental? Forget it.
What else do we have to trade?
by cubbyblue137 on Jul 31, 2007 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions
So what...
by santoswoodenlegs on Jul 31, 2007 12:10 PM CDT up reply actions
and yet
by hawkeyenation on Jul 31, 2007 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions
bad market
IT IS!
by Kinky Reggae on Jul 31, 2007 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions
I hear we're going to have to throw in
unfortunatley
Woo-Woo, Cendeno, or Santo?
by cervantes05 on Jul 31, 2007 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions
LOL
by lostinthevines on Jul 31, 2007 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions
FANTASY LAND
by BillHoldenFan on Jul 31, 2007 12:04 PM CDT reply actions
WHAT TIME IS THE ESPN THING ON?
by BillHoldenFan on Jul 31, 2007 12:05 PM CDT reply actions
12:30
by cubbyblue137 on Jul 31, 2007 12:06 PM CDT reply actions
Yeah we aren't getting Gagne...
I'm begining to believe the theory that the Cubs
Crap
id like gagne
Pretty boring!
Anything being discussed on local radio?
Honestly...
Baseball tonight
What are they reporting?
Currently Steve Phillips is talking...
Now they're talking about...
They just reported
i dont get your reasoning
Um...
reports.
Rosenthal says...
the espn special
Good year for a weak trade market
Boston for Gagne
did't they try papelbon in the rotation
Not exactly...
But they aren't going to consider moving him from the bullpen this year. Perhaps next year (if they retain Gagne), but certainly not this late in this season.
Somewhat
by IllinoisCubs on Jul 31, 2007 1:14 PM CDT up reply actions
As long
I think I'd rather have CJ Wilson than Gagne, if we are just raiding the Rangers.
Laird, Wilson and Wilkerson for Murton, Cedeno, Pawalek and Soto. How bout that?
by jazzypete on Jul 31, 2007 1:09 PM CDT reply actions
Don't bogart that joint, my friend -
by lostinthevines on Jul 31, 2007 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions
What does this mean?
Its the universal mechanics.....
by PriorandAramisfan23 on Jul 31, 2007 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions
I had typed the line from the song
by lostinthevines on Jul 31, 2007 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions
Mine was
by Kinky Reggae on Jul 31, 2007 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions
mets offering
If they pull that off...
Which would make it really funny if they didn't make the playoffs.
Best Deadline Headline
"BRAVED DANGLING WICKMAN"
Would this be some new diet exercise for him ? The Braves are
DESPERATE for a good closer so who would be MORE desperate to take Wickman off their hands?
by jessica on Jul 31, 2007 1:26 PM CDT reply actions
Keep the updates coming from
The short version:
Steve Phillips for a chicken salad sandwich
I love chicken salad
by lostinthevines on Jul 31, 2007 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions
ACTUAL ESPN TRADE RUMOR!
all the reports i am getting
Me, too -
by lostinthevines on Jul 31, 2007 1:50 PM CDT up reply actions
dye to redsox
This means
C'mon Jim! Cedeno plus a prospect that's not one of the top 5-7.
by NO100 on Jul 31, 2007 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions
Trader Jim
I could go along with that
by NO100 on Jul 31, 2007 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions
Dye
if all reports are true
As long as
We're not getting Griffey or Dunn. The ownership situation pretty much prevents that.
by Josh Timmers on Jul 31, 2007 1:53 PM CDT up reply actions
Not quite...
Well
I just meant we aren't getting a big name, and two Reds were the first that came to mind.
by Josh Timmers on Jul 31, 2007 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions
espn
Rosenthal
Problem is that he doesn't have the megaphone that is ESPN. Hopefully he'll go to ESPN soon or, even better, the new MLB channel.
by Josh Timmers on Jul 31, 2007 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions
Remember, everyone...
Also...
SWEET!
Thanks, Al!
by lostinthevines on Jul 31, 2007 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions
no kidding
Where'd you get that?
by lostinthevines on Jul 31, 2007 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions
I guess
by Josh Timmers on Jul 31, 2007 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions
wait
by IllinoisCubs on Jul 31, 2007 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions
*** SIDEBAR ***
Is there a list where
by LilLPLancer23 on Jul 31, 2007 1:55 PM CDT reply actions
Wikipedia article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball_transactions
by ExNorthsider on Jul 31, 2007 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions
I don't know where...
Team puts player on waiver. If player clears waivers (i.e., no one claims player in the allotted time), then that player is free to be traded. If a team claims the player, then there is a 72-hour window in which the two teams can negotiate a trade. Or the original team can revoke the waivers, and are stuck with the player for the rest of the year.
Waiver claims are ordered from the worst team in the league to the best team, so bad teams have the first crack at all of the waiver players.
You really can't...
braves improved offer for arroyo
Williams
by ExNorthsider on Jul 31, 2007 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions
Dye nets some decent draft picks...
Iguchi, Mackowiak for prospects -
by lostinthevines on Jul 31, 2007 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions
I don't understand arbitration
by NO100 on Jul 31, 2007 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah, but Dye isn't going...
If I could figure out how to relate confusion
by lostinthevines on Jul 31, 2007 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions
Kenny's priced himself
Dye will be gone by 3
Short of that, I could see Dye being a Cub.
by NO100 on Jul 31, 2007 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions
Bill Stoneman doesn't have the
Then Dye will be a Cub
by NO100 on Jul 31, 2007 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions
Trading between the Cubs and Sox
price must have dropped as reported by
If not Marmol then who or what? Cherry or Petrick and another mid level prospect?
I would do this deal.
I think that anybody...
What about
by lostinthevines on Jul 31, 2007 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions
Torii Hunter to the Cubs for Mark Prior, Jaque...
OK, sorry I just had to do one. See ya again next July 31st!
NO SOUP FOR YOU
by lostinthevines on Jul 31, 2007 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions
BTW I would do that deal
by lostinthevines on Jul 31, 2007 2:09 PM CDT up reply actions
Mark Prior?
Baseball Tonight...
This may be
They did it, though!
ESPN probably has
Ensburg/Mackoviak
Bolster their bench.
Because Sledge and Kouzmanoff are horrid...
But they have added...
Wait, you mean that...
According to the Hendry-Baker Theory,
Don't forget -
by lostinthevines on Jul 31, 2007 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions
Oh, absolutely.
Once we acquire Laird we'll be all set
by lostinthevines on Jul 31, 2007 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions
If that happens,
It would look like a volleyball game
by lostinthevines on Jul 31, 2007 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions
Now SD needs
new idea
The Reds are kinda like Tampa Bay
NSBB...
From BP's Kevin Goldstein...
jetmax (Naperville, IL): How active do you think the Cubs are right now? Lou seems content with what he has but I don't think Hendry is that comfortable.
Trade Deadline Team: They're defnitely active, but I'm not sure anything is close. They might add a veteran bat like Payton or Conine before the afternoon is out, but that's about it.
Hendry needs to make his annual deal
BBTN/Sportscenter...
does BBTN/SC have the rundown on the right
I've seen a demo of the Character Generator...
BBTN/Sportscenter
30 Minutes to go!!
Dye??
Conine?
Nothing?
Lets get Dye...
by BillHoldenFan on Jul 31, 2007 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions
He's got to do SOMETHING,
You can not be content with Cedeno/Murton as RH bats off the bench and Eyre/Ohman as LH pitchers in the bullpen.
He's a smart guy;
by lostinthevines on Jul 31, 2007 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions
Yep
You'd think
by NO100 on Jul 31, 2007 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions
I really hope
Too bad
by ExNorthsider on Jul 31, 2007 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions
LOL
I hate
I can't see
Am sure
but how long
that's not really
I'll bet Boston can trump Cherry & Cedeno.
We will know for sure by 4 or so
by NO100 on Jul 31, 2007 2:52 PM CDT up reply actions
*** SIDEBAR ***
Lets Trade Jaque
by BillHoldenFan on Jul 31, 2007 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions
15 Minutes from Disappointment
That's not a bad deal for them...
by Damen Jackson on Jul 31, 2007 2:49 PM CDT up reply actions
Come on
by cubbyblue137 on Jul 31, 2007 2:46 PM CDT reply actions
Lost faith in what?
Lost faith
by cubbyblue137 on Jul 31, 2007 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions
You couldn't trade
by santoswoodenlegs on Jul 31, 2007 2:56 PM CDT up reply actions
The gloves would definitely be worth more on Ebay
Opening bid - 0.01$
Lets get this deadline over
I love this idea
by BillHoldenFan on Jul 31, 2007 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions
Recap of all trades
by BillHoldenFan on Jul 31, 2007 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions
JIMBO!!!
Perhaps we're seeing
Zero...
You know why everyone wants to see Glavines 300th?
by LilLPLancer23 on Jul 31, 2007 2:51 PM CDT reply actions
I am sorry to say..
by santoswoodenlegs on Jul 31, 2007 2:53 PM CDT reply actions
The Mets, Dodgers
This is disappointing...
Dan
with 5 min 2 go
As Al said earlier
by NO100 on Jul 31, 2007 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions
I want...
Five Minutes to Deal!!
Remember Nomar!
if dye isnt traded
How long after the deadline passed
I was thinking it was at least 20-30 minutest afterwards.
Don't
This team,
Strong enough to win the division, not strong enough to win it all. Still crossing my fingers for a late DYE trade.
Well
I Went to that Game on the deadline
I remember running into people on the street saying that the Cubs just picked up Nomar and that it was on the ESPN.
by BJ Simpson on Jul 31, 2007 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions
Whoops
by BJ Simpson on Jul 31, 2007 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions
not sure
by cubbieblue86 on Jul 31, 2007 3:06 PM CDT up reply actions
Yanks
I have a female friend
by NO100 on Jul 31, 2007 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions
LOL!
by Tangled Up In Blue on Jul 31, 2007 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions
That would ...
hehehe ...
by Littlerock Rynofan on Jul 31, 2007 3:06 PM CDT up reply actions
Dang!
The only way I want him back in Chicago
by Me and Lou WS 07 on Jul 31, 2007 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions
Funny
Which of us were them?
by lostinthevines on Jul 31, 2007 3:06 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah we need a 100+ mph hurler
by lostinthevines on Jul 31, 2007 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions
and low IQ
Kyle + Lakeview = bad news.
by ClosingTime on Jul 31, 2007 3:06 PM CDT up reply actions
NESN is reporting...
mlbtraderumors.com says the same
by lostinthevines on Jul 31, 2007 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions
Okay ...
I still think we need RF and SP for the long haul through (!) October.
--t.
by Littlerock Rynofan on Jul 31, 2007 3:05 PM CDT reply actions
If nothing
I was hoping Cedeno and Phillips for the last couple hours of my life back and a cardboard cutout of Lou to take Phillips place but time has rejected my offer.
by cubbyblue137 on Jul 31, 2007 3:06 PM CDT reply actions
Just shows that
These guys have little value..
For a team that is one game out of first place
The Cubs are going to be just fine..
by BillHoldenFan on Jul 31, 2007 3:09 PM CDT reply actions
1 game out
We need some one in RF who knows what there doing. Hell i would take Burnitz over floyd and murton!!
by jfkjunior2004 on Jul 31, 2007 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions
Same here...
That, as well as the possibility of forcing a .235 hitter into RF day in and day out for a couple of prospects, really makes this okay.
The only trades I would have liked would have been for Torii Hunter or Gagne. Even Marte from Pittsburgh. Other than that, I would have been, "Who and why?"
Agreed
by BillHoldenFan on Jul 31, 2007 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions
Marte...
"Damaso Marte" is Spanish for "Will Ohman". Glad they didn't do that.
To a certain extent, but...
4 for 46, 20 K's and 6 walks.
Some fans
LA, NY and ATL are all better than the Cubs..
no way
the point is, every nl team is flawed, and i think the cubs are the least flawed of the bunch.
Be thankful
Really?
Rant Over.
by cubbyblue137 on Jul 31, 2007 3:24 PM CDT up reply actions
ha
haha, and you say wheres our power, where the hell is LA's power? nomar has the worst ops among 3b in the MLB. Pierre, no-power-furcal, if you are going to tell me that Russ Martin's 25 and Jeff Kents 30 homer pop are scarier than DLee, Aramis and Soriano then i dont know what sport you are watching.
My problem is
by cubbyblue137 on Jul 31, 2007 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions
yeah i agree
Maybe it's
But I guess since it "ain't broke" whe should just let Hendry tell us everything will be fine and that he made the best two trades at the deadline--getting Wood back, and this "trade you don't make" that is apparently the best trade.
by jazzypete on Jul 31, 2007 3:18 PM CDT up reply actions
See what waiting for the three-run homer...
Fine
But they replaced Barrett and his stick with nothing, and Floyd hasn't had the power they thought he would. Some of that is made up for the improved defense at catcher, but no amount of good defense is going to make up for the 30-40 home runs from those two guys you thought you were going to get.
The fact is the Cubs are 19th in baseball in runs scored, 22nd in home runs, and 20th in OPS. This team is below average on offense--it would have to have 2005 white sox-type pitching to win the series. You know Zambrano will do that, is there anyone else on the staff you feel confident will shut another contending team down? Lily and Marshall have been great, and the other two have been good at times, but when you are behind all the other contending teams offensively, you really have to have a stacked rotation, and I'm not sure the Cubs staff will pitch as well all year as they did in the first half.
Maybe I'm wrong, but with a weak NL, an impending sale to an owner with an unknown payroll, and LOTS of backloaded contracts that could hamper the team in the future, I would like to have seen SOMETHING done to address the glaring weakness on this team, even if it means overpaying a bit to get the team to the world series.
by jazzypete on Jul 31, 2007 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions
One player...
We would have to bring Torii, Dye and Eckstein in to get those rankings up. How many prospects would you be willing to move to get all of those...Then we would have had to got rid of, or send down Pagan, Fontenot and a reliever...
The point is we got the team we got. The only glaring weakness was LH power and LH relief.
Like everyone else. Enter supply/demand.
Good point
LH relief was a need, but the real need was a power RF, whether right or left handed. There isn't much RH power on this team, but they have the most trouble with LH starters, so I think Dye would have been a perfect fit.
And I would move whetever prospects necessary if I thought it would get us a world series.
by jazzypete on Jul 31, 2007 3:48 PM CDT up reply actions
I would do the same thing with prospects,
I can understand the LH relief, I am a big fan of adding Marte.
Dye, to me, wasn't worth impacting the playing time of DeRosa, Fontenot and still doesn't solve our CF issue, to me a more pressing concern.
So you would have been a big fan of getting Dunn, then?
Yes
I think Fontenot did a great job, but, as expected, the advanced scouting has caught up with him, and he has a .460 OPS in july. I'm not to worried about finding at bats for him.
Put Dye in right 4-5 days a week, with Floyd picking up the other days. Derosa is at second most days, and I think you have a much better lineup.
by jazzypete on Jul 31, 2007 4:48 PM CDT up reply actions
Ugh.
That's what, in the end, this is about. What can we get for what we want to get rid of...And that's why the rumors are more abundant than the facts.
Loud Sustained Applause
by cubbyblue137 on Jul 31, 2007 3:19 PM CDT up reply actions
Funny how 6 games over equals
Big market franchises like the Yankees, Mets, Dodgers and Red Sox aren't content w/ 6 games over..
Amen
by cubbyblue137 on Jul 31, 2007 3:25 PM CDT up reply actions
Totally agreed
by ExNorthsider on Jul 31, 2007 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions
I tend to agree if....
I like the everyday lineup and the bench.
im not at all saying
All of the contending teams improved...
by BillHoldenFan on Jul 31, 2007 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions
"Most"
by BillHoldenFan on Jul 31, 2007 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions
I was reading
by cubbieblue86 on Jul 31, 2007 3:16 PM CDT up reply actions
I know,
by BillHoldenFan on Jul 31, 2007 3:20 PM CDT up reply actions
I think I'll pass judgement...
We don't know how Gagne, after not pitching in a Yankee series, will respond.
We don't know how Jermaine Dye would have been in this locker room.
We don't know how we would have fit sixteen catchers into our lineup...
Isn't Dye
by jazzypete on Jul 31, 2007 3:19 PM CDT up reply actions
Point is...
Blame me for not wanting to tinker right now. I would know more if the trade deadline was August 30th instead of today.
No decent deals today eh?
Thought Cubs would do SOMETHING even if smallish..guess could still come until Cub website or someone says "no deals for Cubs''...
by writerinwrigley on Jul 31, 2007 3:22 PM CDT reply actions
omg
half ass cub fans?
abra ka dabra
by not adding garbage
I agree
by cubbyblue137 on Jul 31, 2007 3:41 PM CDT up reply actions
Not to defend the whiners
I don't see how some of you people aren't embarrassed to death that you don't have the literacy skills of a second grader.
by Josh Timmers on Jul 31, 2007 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions
or that you actually care....
blah blah blah...
sorry we weren't all born to be writters...
by BillHoldenFan on Jul 31, 2007 3:41 PM CDT up reply actions
writers...
by BillHoldenFan on Jul 31, 2007 3:42 PM CDT up reply actions
Correction
I will never give up my quest to uplift the quality of the written word in this country, even if it's one person at a time.
Is Zell exerting ...
Aren't trades still avaliable after today ... isn't it a waiver thing, now? I'm not at all up on the rules from here on out.
--t.
by Littlerock Rynofan on Jul 31, 2007 3:26 PM CDT reply actions
Damn man...
Braves are loading for bear too.
Seems all the contenders are, except us.
Well, we did get Kendall. Oh man, I have gotta do this...
Sung to the tune of Arrested Development's Mr. Wendal
Here, have a shinguard,
in fact no brotherman here, have two
Two shinguards means nothing for me,
but it means a big deal to you
Be strong, serve Cubs only,
know that if you do, beautiful Wrigley awaits
That's the poem I wrote for the first time
I saw a man with no average, no ribbies, no HR's.
Mr. Kendall, that's his name,
A's traded him cause they thought he was a no-one
Never thought twice about his lack of homeruns,
until I had the chance to really get to see one
Now that I know him, to give him playing time isn't charity
He gets a weekly hit, I buy him some cleats
And to think Cubs spend all that money on big prospects,
still most of them can't even compete
Go ahead, Mr. Kendall
hey hey hey hey-a-a-a yeah
Go ahead, Mr. Kendall
hey hey hey hey-a-a-a yeah
Yeaaaahhhh Mr. Kendall
Mr. Kendall has freedom,
a freedom that you and I think is dumb
Free to be without the worries of a high batting average
or driving in too many runs
His only worries are wild pitches
and an occasional harassment by the baserunner and a stolen base
Washed up we call him,
but I just saw him get his first hit since May
Cubs fans, are we really fans, yes or no?
Who are we to judge?
When dozens of players could be easily traded
we took the man who is the opposite of Pudge
Mr. Kendall has tried to warn us about our ways
but we don't hear him talk
Is it thanks to him we've got this far,
and we goin' far, cause on him we walk (and steal)
Mr. Kendall, a catcher, a human in flesh,
but no passed-ball
I feed you dignity to catch with pride,
realize that you'll be hitting .250 in the fall
Mr. Kendall, yeah yeah yeah, Lord, Mr. Kendall
Go ahead, Mr. Kendall
hey hey hey hey-a-a-a yeah
Go ahead, Mr. Kendall
hey hey hey hey-a-a-a yeah
Yeaaaahhhh Mr. Kendall
Ensberg and Mackowiak are good pickups?
Alternate universes and quantum physics and stuff
Ensberg is a very solid player. An all-star in 05, and I think he finished in the top 5 in MVP voting that season. Not sure what his dropoff in numbers is all about this year, including his power outage (kinda like one of our guys), but he provides a good bit of depth and options for the Padres, something which they did need. I don't anticipate his numbers staying down. I don't figure he will replace Kouz at third base, but he gives them a solid fill-in, and can play first as well if needed. They bring him back to his own backyard where he lives, and gets him out of Houston, and he provides a big bat off the bench. More importantly, the Astros are paying his salary. So the question is, in what universe, alternating or direct, is that not a good move?
Mackowiak, on the other hand, doesn't have the pop that Ensberg does, but has an attractive amount of versatility. He provides a reliable left-handed stick when needed. These aren't guys who are going to be everyday starters, but let's face it, if you are going to be a contender, you had better have some depth off the bench.
Are they better now than they were? Time will tell. Do they have more depth and versatility? Absolutely.
Prior to trades: Limited bench depth and options.
After pickups: Options offensively and defensively.
Good pickups. My opinion, yours may vary. :)
Augh!
GO CUBS!!!
Florida Cubbie
Well I guess Hendry...
by santoswoodenlegs on Jul 31, 2007 3:35 PM CDT reply actions
Improvement
Improvement is having 5 starters in your rotation without having to call up someone new from the the minors every other week.
Improvement is having a team that struggled early show drastic improvement over the last two months.
This team has some holes, and could use some tweaks, but as it is, this is a MUCH better team than last year.
I know this isn't news to anyone, but the Cards won last year. Wildcard teams have been winning the WS. Get to the playoffs and get hot.
Having a different RF or a LH reliever isn't the magic piece that gets us there. Lou, starting pitching and the guys we can count on like Lee, ARam, DeRosa and Soriano are. We'll be there. Hendry did the right thing. Nothing
And I would submit...
by santoswoodenlegs on Jul 31, 2007 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm done with you
You seem like the kind of person who is never pleased. You seem to know everything yet are content with nothing.
Have you seen what this team has done? Do you understand the turnaround that has happened?
Open your eyes and rejoice in a pennant race.
Go Cubs....I believe
I believe too.
by BillHoldenFan on Jul 31, 2007 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions
His username should
by LT on Jul 31, 2007 3:48 PM CDT up reply actions
I'll be rooting like crazy...
I agree that there were no "blockbuster" deals to be made with what was available. I won't go so far as to say that leaving this roster as it is will be enough. Since I know everything, Hendry will get an arm for the bullpen, and since I'm content with nothing, I already hate whoever it is. Oh, and the sequel to the Simpsons Movie will also be very bad.
by santoswoodenlegs on Jul 31, 2007 4:27 PM CDT up reply actions
omg
I wasn't talking Tex or Gagne.
So, Griffey gets hurt. What are summer rentals good for ... other than a steamy romance?
--t.
by Littlerock Rynofan on Jul 31, 2007 3:45 PM CDT up reply actions
Okay...so it appears that the Cubs stood pat...
1.) The most pressing need that the Cubs have right now is that #5 spot in the batting order. For the most part, Cliff has hit well when he's been healthy, and he's also played a better right field than what I expected. He hasn't played a great right field, but it has been average. However, really since the series with the Giants, I've seen lapses in the offense that have been troubling. Though I completely realize that power bats -preferrably left-handed- are extremely hard to come by, I was hoping that the Cubbies would be able to pull of some kind of a deal before the deadline. Don't tell anybody, but I have a sort of soft spot in my heart for Griffey, Jr. in a Cubs uniform (I know all of the downside to that, including health and money, but just bare with me). I also know all of the reasons that a Griffey deal wouldn't happen, but, hey, can't blame me for wishing...
2.) Left-handed relief pitching help in the bullpen. Ohman and Eyre aren't getting it done consistently. They're not even getting it done consistently on a "situational" basis. Though Scott has been pitching better of late, I still feel my toenails begin to curl whenever he comes into a ballgame. There were very few "southpaw" relievers available heading into the deadline, but I was hoping that JH would be able to pull something off. Say, Damaso Marte from Pittsburgh. Before anyone blasts me for that comment, here are his stats this season: 43 G, 32.2 IP, 1.38 ERA,
35 K, and 0.95 WHIP. Against lefty hitters? 15.1 IP, 0.80 BAA (batting average against), 20 K, 0.65 WHIP. The best part about that deal would've been that he's cheap. Even if he reverted to the Damaso Marte from the last couple of years, he'd still only get paid $2M next season. I'll take that over Ohman.
3.)Jason Marquis is beginning to scare me, and I mean he's starting to scare me a lot. Maybe he'll get straightened out beginning tonight, but, if not, almost any kind of insurance plan would've made me feel a little better. It's not every year that the Cubs gear up for a playoff run, and I just don't want anything -like most here- to get in the way of October baseball on the North Side. There were basically no available starting pitchers worth anything, and any mediocre SP that were available had a lot of interest from around baseball. I didn't expect anything to happen in this area, but there's nothing wrong with wishing...
Okay, I'm sorry about the incredibly long post, but I figured I'd throw out some stuff...
In the mean time...GO CUBS!!!
by Mark H @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Jul 31, 2007 3:41 PM CDT reply actions
Right on.
Torii Hunter.
Damaso Marte.
Eric Gagne.
Everyone is overpriced.
Yeah, everybody was overpriced...
by Mark H @ Bleed Cubbie Blue on Jul 31, 2007 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions
Matt Morris to the Pirates?
by cubbyblue137 on Jul 31, 2007 3:57 PM CDT reply actions
Yep
by carmenfanzone on Jul 31, 2007 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions
that might mean....
by carmenfanzone on Jul 31, 2007 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions
Aug 31 Next
So, we will see.
by NO100 on Jul 31, 2007 4:06 PM CDT reply actions
I am a little stunned
with all this trade hype, I haven't thought of
I thought mariotti did a great job in his column
As per his usual,
Mariotto
I always know I am on the right path when it is a divergent one from Jay the Joke.
You mean Mariotti wrote a critical column?
He consistently writes critical columns without much real analysis. What did he propose?
Seems like Mariotti
by Tangled Up In Blue on Jul 31, 2007 5:33 PM CDT up reply actions
Strange Pirates move
Surely thought SF would sell off something talk about a team goin nowhere...
At least Milw didn't do anything drastic and neither did StL our main foes
by writerinwrigley on Jul 31, 2007 4:39 PM CDT reply actions
Yeah, that is weird for the Bucs...
They did have a glut of centerfielders with McLouth, Duffy, and Davis....all young, all cheap. And Van Benschoten, one of their young propects they brought up, has been horrid (0-5 9.76). I think Zach Duke has been injured and has almost as bad.
But they're going nowhere, so it is a strange deal.
by carmenfanzone on Jul 31, 2007 4:54 PM CDT up reply actions
Did you actually want anyone who was traded?
Matt Morris, Marte, Morgan Ensberg, Bentemint?.
Also I don't get that the most of the other contenders improved
Braves yes but they still have major staring pitcher issues. Red
Sox definately and amazing that they had so much to give. Brewers nothing unless you seriously count Linebrink. Mets well Castillo was good but only needed due to injury. Phils fixed another injury hole and got a bad starter. Dodgers nothing unless you really think Proctor helps Padres picking up a lot of spare parts for not much. D'backs nothing, Rockies nothing. Cardinals nothing.
Sorry if this all gone over but I don't have that much time during the day and I miss posts
There was nothing signicant out there for the Cubs to get so we will have to live with what we have.
by jessica on Jul 31, 2007 4:50 PM CDT reply actions
This is defintely the case...
Nothing was out there. It wasn't like there was a Randy Johnson to the Astros sort of year.
It was more of a Heathcliff Slocumb for Jason Veritek and Derek Lowe kind of year.
Five years from now, track where Salty, Elvis Andrus and Kason Gabbard will be compared to what Tex and Gagne did this year for their new clubs.
Cards nothing
by IllinoisCubs on Jul 31, 2007 4:59 PM CDT up reply actions
Yabbut
Assuming that Dye is taking the free agency path (That seems a big assumption at this point, I know) there would have been nothing but upside from Williams' perspective. Had they not won in 2005, it would be different, but they did. So what if the Cubs win it? The Sox already got there. Get the best deal you can and move on.
by NO100 on Jul 31, 2007 8:13 PM CDT up reply actions
Matt Morris as PTNL ??
Not surprisingly, this deal doesn't make much sense for the Bucs. So, is it possible that Morris will be the PTNL in the Izturis trade?
That said
This one is puzzling.
thanks
http://espn.go.com/mlb/s/transanctionsprimer.html
trying to make sense of the pirate's personnel decisions promises to be a fruitless exercise. this one just makes my head hurt.
by circuitclout on Jul 31, 2007 5:24 PM CDT up reply actions
SF...
Littlefield's getting all kinds of heat in Pirates forums. They had a glut of CF's, so that makes sense, but for all his comments about payroll and making many personnel decisions based on that, why do you go out and get a $9mill washed up pitcher? It's not like they're in a pennant chase or anything.
by carmenfanzone on Aug 1, 2007 7:52 AM CDT up reply actions
Next best trade headline
Kind of says it all re trade market. Still like the image of
a dangling Wickman. Look out below
by jessica on Jul 31, 2007 5:15 PM CDT reply actions
REDS!
Norris?
Look!
This is the EXACT same team that we started the year with minus a couple guys and plus a couple minor leaguers, yet this team is VASTLY better. Why? It's because they are a team. They have grown together and they are winning. There is no since making a trade just to make a bunch of bored fans feel better and risk getting a Fred McGriff that has the possibility of destroying the chemistry and fire on this team.
This is your Cubs. Love them, root for them and quit whining just to hear yourself whine.
Loud, sustained applause!
In October,...
Sure, the team is winning but if you think this is a well-rounded team you're delusional. For example, help was needed in the #5 spot in the lineup and nothing was done.
Sure, any trade would've cost us some prospects, but that's the price to pay if you think you can win now. By not trading, management is telling us that their motto is "we've improved; so, at worst, wait 'till next year". Other teams take another approach. Think, did the Red Sox get Gagné for nothing?
I hope I'm wrong, but with the Braves bullpen very much improved as well as the Padres having a deeper bench, we may beat the weakened Sheeet-less and panicky Brewers, and the aging Mets, but that's about it!
Now, as consolation I offer the story of a team that fared much worse at the trade deadline: The Yankees, a team that needed to improve their bullpen, traded a reliever (Proctor) for an infielder that they didn't need (Betemit) and didn't add one arm to their depleted relief corps. Meanwhile, someone at ESPN dared to say that Betemit would be a possible replacement for A-Rod next year if and when A-Rod leaves. I just hope the guy was joking. So, think how lucky we are that on July 31, Jim Hendry wasn't Brian Cashman.
You miss the point.
ANYONE is too expensive and NO trade is worth making. Try posting a name, and you'll get a CHORUS of shouting down about what's wrong with the person. Honestly, shy of getting Albert Pujols for one lone, .200 batting, single-A prospect, you will hear howls of how one trade - one single trade for the strecth run - has single-handedly, ENTIRELY depleted the whole of the farm system and mortgaged decades of the Cubs' future.
Seriously, the idea of GIVING something to GET something is dead with many people, Jim Hendry included. It's either something for nothing, or don't bother. The only fair trade is one where the Cubs get a superstar in exchange for a bag of bats.
Looking at the acquisitions of many teams in the running, this reminds me a lot more of the Astros getting Randy Johnson or Carlos Beltran while the Cubs got middle relief. The ridiculous overconfidence, even outright arrogance with which many Cubs fans - even at BCB - are now carrying themselves because the Cubs are no longer several games out is going to come back to bite them. It's going to hurt - as you said -- A LOT -- if this team falls just short of either the playoffs or winning a playoff series and we all look back to the trade deadline when Hendry decided he already had the absolute perfect team assembled to win the World Series, and that there was nobody in all of Major League Baseball worth the price to acquire for the stretch run.
If Hendry is indeed going to pass on any major moves - yet another broken Hendry promise (remember how he SWORE that if the Cubs were ever in the running at the trade deadline, he'd make a big splash because the goal was winning the World Series?) - then it's going to come back and haunt this city again.
I think the problem is that folks here want to break the streak, but not if it involves risk. I mean, if the Cubs happen to ever stumble into a championship by doing nothing costly, then great! But if improving the team for the strecth run might risk losing some minor leaguer we've all been told is good.....well, let's not all get crazy over the chance to win a World Series title. I mean, there are no 100% guarantees that anyone added would automatically mean Championship, and without a 100% guarantee, well, let's not get crazy. We've waited this long, we can wait a few more years for the youth to take us to the next level at some point.
Me, I'm hoping for Griffey on a Waiver trade. But I will be damn mad if Hendry's approach to the stretch run was to take a nap and light a candle in church. Sure looks like it so far.
Mark my words, several teams got better, but Hendry just assumes the Cubs will be red hot without fail for the rest of the year. You know, that same Cubs team that was under .500 for the majority of the season.
Doing nothing was a bad move, and will cost the Cubs in the long run. Just more proof that Hendry is NOT serious about winning a World Series - folks like him and some of the aforementioned Cub fans want guarantees before they ever make a trade. No risk, no reward, as far as I'm concerned. Getting some help for the stretch run would have been huge, and a locker room and fan boondoggle for momentum.
Alas, unless Hendry still has a trade up his sleeve, it looks like fear will again win the day.
But hey, who needs the new tires? The car hasn't broken down, and there's no guarantee that the new tires will never, ever blowout. So why give away money for new tires? Just keep driving.........
"Life is just one crushing defeat after another until you just wish Flanders was dead."
by The Jade Scorpion on Aug 1, 2007 4:40 PM CDT up reply actions
Standing ovation!
Maybe management's song is "Money for nothing".
by Fraggin Judge on Aug 3, 2007 1:00 AM CDT up reply actions

by 




















