"The Trade": Cubs up the ante.
Not sure if this has been posted in the 1,785,963 1/2 posts made on the subject.
The Cubs made the deal a little bit sweeter for the Orioles. Rumors are that the Cubs send Ronny Cedeno, Sean Gallagher, Donald Veal, and Jose Ceda. The Cubs get: you know who.
Link:
http://www.suntimes.com/sports/baseball/cubs/842384,CST-SPT-brian14.article
So is this a good deal?
Please note: if this has been posted or talked about somewhere else, or if this is old news, please don't flame me. If that's the case, Al, please delete this diary. Thanks guys.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Al Yellon, managing editor (unless it's a FanPost posted by Al). FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans.
168 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
On the surface it appears
I am hoping that the thought of Marquis and cash for Payton isn't added to this. Not that I am concerned with losing Marquis but adding Payton would force Lou's hand more against Pie or Fuld.
A different article [earlier this week] stated there's a lot of unrest in Cubs camp because of this. I simply want [some] resolution ASAP.
I'm no Payton fan
I don't think so
Ceda doesn't change the deal for me
But here's the thing. Our system is overrun with good, right-handed relief prospects. Kevin Hart, Billy Petrick, Alex Maestri, Rocky Roquet, Jeremy Papelbon--these are all right-handers with the potential to end up in our bullpen. And if not, relievers are one of the easiest things to pick up in the free agent market.
I'm a lot more concerned about giving up Gallagher (although I guess you've got to give up something) and Veal. Gallagher is a potential #3 starter, which doesn't sound like much until you realize Ted Lilly is a #3 starter. Those guys aren't easy to find or replace. I also think Gallagher has a very good chance of reaching that potential.
Veal is more of a boom or bust guy. He's a potential major league #2 starter, but he really took a step back last season and I'm starting to wonder if he'll make it. The one thing he's got going for him is a maturity and good attitude towards his struggles.
So if you'd trade Gallagher and Veal for Roberts, I don't see why you wouldn't trade Gallagher, Veal, Cedeno and Ceda for Roberts. Just don't incude Pie under any circumstances. I guess I'd do it. In the end, the 4 for 1 trade would probably be just Gallagher and Cendeno for Roberts.
by Josh Timmers on Mar 14, 2008 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah
Thanks for the catch. I simply forgot that Jeremy is the left-hander and Jonathan is the right hander.
Scratch Papelbon and write Mitch Atkins.
Still, the point stands. We've got a lot of right handed pitchers who could pitch in the bullpen. I didn't even include starters who could end up in the pen like Samardzija, Jake Renshaw, Chris Huseby, etc.
by Josh Timmers on Mar 14, 2008 7:51 PM CDT up reply actions
I'd do it in a heartbeat.
If that's all the Orioles want
They want more.
Much
I saw Ceda this spring and his delivery is garbage and like I said, reminds me of a young Novoa. I would include him in any deal.
Will he be the next Novoa or the next Lee Smith? He has the arm of both no doubt, but he's a "prospect". Like I said, I would include him in a deal for Roberts in a heartbeat. I came away far less impressed with Ceda than I should've.
He was bad.
Roberto Novoa bad.
I like the 6-2 swap...this is a championship move
for two bona fides? A real lead off hitter who can slot into the spot and move Theriot/DeRosa platoon into a strength---while bringing a good veteran back up in the OF?
This is a championship MOVE!
What are the values of the above....even if they all turn out to be MLB players, the Cubs would start out the season with a set starting pitching who are veterans....set bullpen who are veterans....and a regular lineup that has youth (Soto, Pie and Theriot) new blood in the Fukudome and versatility with DeRosa and Payton....
do it McPhail....
From Ken Rosenthal
He also quotes a scout as saying that the Cubs will never let Pie get 300 AB if he's struggling, so he'll probably have to go elsewhere to become a starter. I disagree with that.
that's odd.....
These aren't established players...
If I were McPhail, I would do the samething.
obviously not
by petrie on Mar 14, 2008 10:47 PM CDT up reply actions
Veal...
These "prospects"
It's a joke to even begin a discussion about it.
seems enough to me.........
its a joke
Here's the joke....it's on you
You keep believing that when you stir your fruit loops.
If one subscribes............
It's not even close
you are speaking
Robert's value is established...
What you have here, is a very cautious organization, with a very delibrate guy (McPhail) making the judgement on what they can settle for.
As I mentioned above, when you are dealing with prospects, you want to get the latest read from your top scouts, on what their latest evaluations would be.
I keep hearing from my source (and no I can't say who it is, but they are in a good position to have solid information) that the Cubs want Roberts badly. In his opinion, the only thing that prevents this deal is if the O's final asking price is out of hand. He doesn't expect that, because it would not make a lot of sense for the O's to hang on to Roberts with their rebuilding process well underway.
This could go until the end of ST, but the Cubs would like to get it done in time go give Roberts some time with his new mates in ST. I guess we'll see what happens.
Both wrong. Here's a joke:
He looks around the room to find his clothes are on the dresser, neatly folded, with a clean shirt on top. The bedroom is immaculate. On the bedside table is a note, which says, 'Darling, your breakfast is in the kitchen. I love you.'
Downstairs, he finds his favorite cereal, rashers, eggs, a tomato and hot tea laid out waiting for him, along with the morning paper - and his 15-year-old son, who is finishing his own breakfast.
'Tell me, son,' he asks, 'what happened last night?'
'Well, says the boy, 'you came home so blind drunk you didn't even know your own name. You nearly broke the door down, then you were sick in the hallway, then you knocked the furniture over and when Mum tried to calm you down, you thought she was the police, so you gave her a black eye.'
'Christ!' says the man. 'Then how come my clothes are all folded, the house is tidy and my breakfast is ready?'
'When Mum dragged you into the bedroom and tried to get your trousers off to put you into bed, you shouted at her, 'Get your filthy hands off me, you strumpet, I'm married!''
That's awesome gary
LOL!
It involved
Mmmmm......rashers
Wow
Vitters can't be offically traded yet, and I doubt the Cubs would trade him for a player like Roberts so soon. Soto is our starting catcher so he isn't going to be dealt. It's already been confirmed that Pie isn't gonna be traded for Roberts and I don't blame the Cubs for not wanting to trade him after all the work they put in with him over the last year or so. The Cubs also don't wanna trade Colvin right now, because they only had him one fullseason, and want to see more of him before their willing to trade him or not. So I can't see a possible way that the Cubs could really offer more or it costing the Cubs more then this. Actually most Cubs fans are freaking out about this offer on other boards and calling for Hendry's head if they do this deal. I know there probably overvaluing some of these prospects but it's a pretty high price to pay. But of course this is just another rumor, and no reason to get worked up about. If or when a trade actually happens then we can worry about if it was a good trade or a bad trade.
Dude
Paragraphs
Write something
thoughtful points
Personally, I don't care how good a relief pitcher prospect seems - he's still just a relief pitcher and I'll trade him for an everyday player every day.
yes, prospects
I'd like Roberts but if the Cubs have to give up Gallagher, Veal and Marshall.... no thanks. I think they could shop those prospects to other teams and do much better.
DmL
Ok DML
My opinion is, that the unless the deal involves Pie, I would do it.
That's how I feel about the Cubs prospects,
Well...
Prospects have value and unless you're talking about the Tampa Bay Rays, teams are willing to trade for them.
DmL
I think you're overvaluing
And I would trade these "prospects" for Roberts in a heartbeat.
So would the Cubs.
THat's my point.
This all depends on how...
I guess people should look at it like this; if the Cubs had Brian Roberts, would they be excited to be getting the above mentioned players in return? I think that is what the O's are trying to figure out, and is why they want to take in some of the minor league action to feel more comfortable with a decision.
The Orioles are rebuilding
and I think the Oriole scouts are still sorting through the Cubs system and trying to find those "worthy" prospects for Roberts.
Let's face it, these prospects aren't as great as Cubbie fans think, or Roberts would be a Cub. Again, Just My Opinion.
I think I agree
by Kinky Reggae on Mar 14, 2008 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions
I agree with you...
In the end, this deal will happen, simply because it is in the best interests of both clubs to meet in the middle and get the thing done.
Sun Times
Agree
I like Roberts, he would be a welcome addition, however he is not Chase Utley.
I do not mind, Marshall, Cedeno, and Gallagher in the package. I would not give into Ceda. Someone called him Nova, is he that bad? Ceda just turned 21, he probably has had bad mechanics since he was 13. I just don't think you give up on a guy who has been part of the Cubs for a year and a half. Hey I have never saw him throw, but guys throwing 98 don't come around often. My opinion.
I guess what it comes down to, I am personally worn out on this Roberts BS
by Johnny Callison was a Cub on Mar 14, 2008 8:01 AM CDT reply actions
Ceda is NOT worth it...
I'll forgive you if you win the World Series.
Do it in a second...
this trade
The fact remains
So who cares about the farm----when all the Cubs have been doing is trading and signing free agents.
...and sometimes, just sometimes
I know the following two examples were more of salary dumps than true rebuilding like the O's but it has to be repeated:
Jimbo turned Hee Seop Choi into Derrek Lee and Bobby Hill + scraps into Aramis Ramirez.
Exactly
Not pitchers
lol
Resident Internet tough guy here at BCB
Oh that lemon, it doesn't matter what you say, he'll always come back at you like it's 2:00AM on a Saturday night, he's tanked, and you just insulted his mother.
by IllinoisCubs on Mar 14, 2008 9:23 AM CDT up reply actions
lol
Do you really think I'm a tough guy?
I love baseball---cant we all just get along
Blasphemer!!!
Oh of course not
No one thinks of themselves as the mean curmudgeon jerk that causes people to avoid a post once they start posting in the thread.
I mean, why would you continue to post in the latter fashion unless you were just some troll?
You though, lemon, you know. You just know you are the class of Bleed Cubbie Blue. You never make it personal.
"If you actually believe that the Orioles are willing to part with Roberts for>>>>Veal, Gallagher, Ceda and Cedeno.
You keep believing that when you stir your fruit loops."
"Paragraphs
and ritalin."
"lol
Is this post a joke?"
You keep it classy.
by IllinoisCubs on Mar 14, 2008 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions
That's good stuff
He said curmudgeon...
by Damen Jackson on Mar 14, 2008 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions
I had a band one time
Seriously.
and we sucked bad
Welcome to BCB
Care to contribute something worthy
Oops
and again
and again.
you're not endearing yourself to a whole lot
by blackhawk24 on Mar 14, 2008 10:36 AM CDT up reply actions
LOL
LOL
How many more usernames you got TBag?
I'm having fun with this.
cringing, when I hear liberals say they like Obama
Tell these guys why you think the Cubs' offerings are not enough based on their projections, in your opinion.
Saying Pie, Colvin must be included is an obvious solution from the O's side but the Cubs would be overpaying.
I guess all I see is a lot of back-and-forth ripping w/o getting to the point(s).
by blackhawk24 on Mar 14, 2008 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions
Let's not bring politic's into this
Jeesus, don't want to bring politic's into this but you must be a republican.
Quote me, please.
while you wait
Who me???
Without calling you too many names, thank you.
ha what?
secondly, i know obviously that you think this is not what the orioles want. i hate to spell it out like a second grade teacher but,
WHY DO YOU THINK THIS IS NOT WHAT THE ORIOLES WANT, PLEASE BACK UP YOUR CONJECTURE WITH FACT.
thank you.
CONJECTURE????????
by Kinky Reggae on Mar 14, 2008 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions
Fact?
the problem is
otherwise you just look like a condescending troll.
I like anyone but George W.
Hahahaha...
by Damen Jackson on Mar 14, 2008 10:14 AM CDT up reply actions
Aren't you the same guy......
If so, I wouldn't call you a tough guy, more of a stand up guy!
But they're prospects, hence the name
I growned when Pinto and Nolasco were given up for Pierre (didn't think Mitre was all that anyway). Pierre is gone and neither of these 2 guys are lighting it up [yet], though Nolasco had a decent call-up in '06.
On the flip side who would have known that D-train while with Boise, short season A ball, would have been what he developed into when Lynch traded him as p/o the Clement/Alfonseca deal.
I take a line (OK, ripoff yet another) from one of my top 10 movies of all time, "...sometimes you just gotta say, 'what the fuck', make your move". Jimbo has to say that.
by blackhawk24 on Mar 14, 2008 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions
Who needs to produce players when you can buy them
Well said fuzzy
But the Orioles appear to be heading
You are talking about position players
Carlos Zambrano
Rich Hill
Carlos Marmol
Michael Wuertz
The are four guys who I'm sure any team would want in their pitching staff. Dontrelle Willis and Pinto were Cubs farmhands. And of course, injuries aside, Wood and Prior.
I'd be careful when giving up pitching prospects from this club. A little while ago people were eager to give up Rich Hill and Carlos Marmol for pretty much little value in return
I have to agree in that
Later they can sell off quality players to re-build. a la the O's this offseason. Right now, this is a nice upgrade and to gove up what appears to be a lot of prospects is what has to happen. It is widely known that MacPhail is trying to build a very deep farm system for the future so this is what it will take...
Do It.
by Kinky Reggae on Mar 14, 2008 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions
The reason I think this trade
There are no guarantees with these guys, but there never are with trades for prospects.
They're called prospects
I'm tired of beating my head against the wall.
What?
I won't delete this.
AL
Question 1---Does he frequent the bleachers?
You actually asked four questions.
The answer to "Question 1" is, "No comment."
Ha
Ha, DAMN---I really am curious
LMAO
"No comment"..........
Hmmm...........
plus, you know...
by drewishdrewid on Mar 14, 2008 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions
Roberts used to play SS
I wouldn't rule that possibility out...
Yeah -
Even then, I think DeRosa gets a lot more playing time than many are expecting.
Not really...
by BirdFanInPhilly on Mar 15, 2008 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions
I agree
Anonymity
I would like to know, though, what qualifies this person as being a "source"?
Inquiring minds wanna know...
If I told you I'd have to kill you.
You're Not "Deep Goat", Are You?
That question I can answer.
LMAO
If I might add a little more...
"The latest names that may go to Baltimore include pitcher Sean Gallagher, shortstop Ronny Cedeno and pitching prospect Donnie Veal. Outfielder Jay Payton may come back to Chicago, along with Roberts. But if Payton does, the Cubs might want to offset the dollars by sending the Orioles veteran pitcher Jason Marquis, who's won more games than Barry Zito over the past few years but makes $6 million a year (a tad more than Payton) and has frustrated the Cubs with his inconsistency."
and...wait for it:
"One Orioles-connected person said, "The Cubs don't appear to have too much,'' suggesting a deal still was no certainty, but most folks around baseball still think there's probably going to be a trade involving Roberts at some point. Even if there isn't one, there is already a lot to love about these Cubs."
by Damen Jackson on Mar 14, 2008 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions
I GOT IT
For those keeping score at home...
by blackhawk24 on Mar 14, 2008 10:28 AM CDT up reply actions
Any details?
From what I understand...
Unless Deep Goat is Jim Hendry
Everyone knows talks are ongoing, but I don't think Jim would talk in great detail with many people until a deal is done.
by Hugest Canadian Cubs Fan on Mar 14, 2008 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions
Al
by puckishcubsfan on Mar 14, 2008 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions
I Recall Having A Conversation About 6 Weeks...
What are the ratings for Gallagher, Veal and Ceda?
I thought Gallagher had a #3/#4 ceiling, and that he could now be a #5.
I thought I read that Veal had #1/#2 potential, but he was likely a few years from that.
I know Ceda is a big guy, and can throw 99, but his control has a lot left to be desired.
Case in point - if the numbers are high (say 8,9) but the letter is low (say D) or if the number is lower (say 6,7), isn't it worth it? Doesn't it come down to probabilities/statistics?
From what I've read
Gallagher's ceiling is generally considered to be limited, but you're right - you could probably get decent results out of him now in the NL Central. He's not the type of pitcher I'd throw into the AL East, though.
Ceda has a ton of potential as a reliever, but not as a starter and is a bit aways away.
In my view, a team like the Cubs can buy low-ceiling guys as free agents fairly easily. It's the high ceiling prospects that want to keep. So, I'd rather not give up Veal, but I don't blink giving up Ceda or Gallagher.
I want this trade to happen
PS Even if, no when we get roberts, I think batting soriano second is the height of stupidity. Theriot is great in the two hole with his ability to bunt, push the ball, and not strike out. The lineup will go roberts, theriot, soriano, lee, ramirez, fukudome, soto, pie. Im dont think you can find a better one in the NL
Also, I would say the Cubs are below average at producing position players and above average at producing pitchers. Not horrible or great at either.
Geting Roberts...
I've made my points before, so I don't feel the need to re-iterate.
What has changed since the week of the General Managers meetings in December for me is the following (confirmed by Piniella): we need to balance the lineup.
Your proposed lineup is close to what I would do... namely that Theriot is higher in the order where I originally had him. I would:
(1) Keep Pie and Theriot away from eachother in the lineup
(2) Break up Soriano-Ramirez-Lee
(3) Utilize the three-lefties (or switch hitter) to balance the lineup.
(4) Not going to the extent of baseballmusing's thought of batting the pitcher 8th.
With this, I had Soriano leading off. Starting with a righty makes it easier to use your lefties.
Roberts and Fukudome fit nicely batting 2/5, respectively. I had a problem, though, with keeping Pie and Theriot broken up.
Then, I went to Theriot batting second, with Roberts first. The problem then becomes finding a spot for Fukudome (I would not bat him 4th) and Soriano. Still, I think that three righties in a row here is not avoidable, and ok.
So, I'd go with: Roberts, Theriot, Lee, Ramirez, Fukudome, Soriano, Soto, Pie.
My money is on this lineup:
Soriano
Lee
Ramirez
Fukudome
Soto
Theriot
Pie
Pitcher
If Your Name Was Jose...
;-)
Time shall tell, but
I Roberts is acquired...
This will all shake out in the next 2-3 weeks, and I wouldn't take too seriously what Piniella does with the lineup in that time period.
Not Quite
Very, very nice...
One stud starter (who happened go to the Emerald City) in combo with the big fish in this trade would have made the Cubs NL favorites and competitive with AL powerhouses.
by blackhawk24 on Mar 14, 2008 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions
There's Always...
What may be prohibitive is the $20M in salary we go up in 2009 with existing contracts. Shed Marquis, and 15% of those committed dollars is shed...
Not to mention, Wood, Eyre and Howry contracts expire.
Stop the INSANITY!
Do we need to hand over the keys to Iowa and Daytona?
"it's nothing personnel."
Viewpoint
I'm suspicious of this deal. Gallagher is a promising starting pitching prospect. However, Veal's stock has signficantly downturned. Ceda is an intriguing prospect but it's too soon to tell whether he is a flash in the pan or the real thing. His weight and control are both issues in my book. Cedeno? At this stage I can't believe he has much value. The guy has failed on multiple ocassions and is dumber than a hockey puck when it comes to baseball IQ.
Overall assessment? I think Baltimore would want to do better than this.
No kidding
There are more than 100 posts here.
THIS MUST END!
Colvin/Pie/Veal/Gallagher/Marshall/Murton/Ceda/Patterson/Soto
for
Roberts and Cal Ripken Jr. (circa 1991)
I like it...
So its essentially Gallagher and Cedeno for Roberts.
If they can do this w/o Pie or Colvin, go for it.
tough call
Our bullpen is stacked as is, so Ceda is not all that important.
Veal , Gally, Ceda, even if just one of them pans out to be preety good the cubs still got a decent deal. So i dont mind this trade that much, altohough i would like sherill in the deal.
Terrible deal.
by Snake Plissken on Mar 14, 2008 11:53 AM CDT reply actions
I can't wrap my head around this topic anymore.

And this thread has been amusing to read but, much like the Roberts trade itself, it goes in circles so many times that it winds up devouring itself.
Loud, sustained applause!
and exactly what that TV will look like
But for this diary with over 100 posts, most of it I like.
If we do this
But come on look at our infield defense would be with lee, ramirez, roberts, and soto behind the plate. and then our outfield defense is already sick with pie, soriano, fukudome.
I also think derosa played shortstop in the minors. I may be wrong though. its worth a shot though
Personally, I'd be willing
DeRo or Roberts
My prediction is that if the Roberts trade (in whatever form "Deep Goat" and lemonpie find acceptable) happens DeRo and Roberts will start, most likely with DeRo at short, and the lineup will look something like this:
Roberts
Soriano
Fukudome
DLee
ARam
DeRo
Soto
Pie
Personally I'd like to see Soriano lower, 5th would be ideal but apparently they'll want someone to "protect" him ("protection" is a myth, more or less) and DeRo isn't anyones idea of "protection".
There, I'm finished. I'll go get my flame suit.
Every time I finally cave and read another
Just to repeat...
What appeared in the Sun-Times this morning, which started this whole thread, is 100% nonsense. Not happening.
FWIW, It Ain't Dead Just Yet...
The Rangers countered with wanting young pitching.
Hendry likely said, "Well, we'll get back in touch with you when we find out what young arms are left after we deal with the O's for Roberts"...
:-)
Is it just me?
Thats part of the reason Id like to see this happen, it just seems like a natural fit.
I guess I dont have much of a point, but its just why I would like to see this trade so badly despite the fact that it isnt entirely necessary.
He Fits A Lot Of Needs...
If the glove fits...
Here, here!
Everything people like about Ryan Theriot, Roberts has in spades.

by 





















